What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is a person who is not a member of the military or other law enforcement agency. Civilians typically are not involved in military operations or military court cases, but they can be a key part of the legal system that defends people who have been accused of criminal activity. If you have been charged with a crime and are a civilian, it is important to get help from a criminal defense attorney who can protect your rights and work with you to resolve the case in your favor.

The word civilian originated from a French term meaning “common” or “ordinary.” In the early 19th century, it came to mean someone who was not military or engaged in warlike activities. It later came to refer to the common people, especially in reference to the legal code that governed nonmilitary life. Today, it is primarily used to denote nonmilitary persons.

In international humanitarian law, civilians are defined as “persons who do not take direct part in hostilities.” In addition to the general definition of civilians, the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions expanded the category to include members of national liberation movements. This distinction was introduced to better frame the grey area that exists between the more clearly defined categories of combatants and civilians.

For many returning service members, the transition to civilian life can be challenging. Moving less, navigating new school zones, and figuring out relationships with the friends and family who did not serve may be overwhelming at first. However, this change in lifestyle can be an exciting adventure that can help you build on your skills and see the world in a different light. Managing your finances, finding housing, and making the most of your new opportunities will require some adjustment, but there are resources available to help you make this change successfully.

The challenges facing civilians in armed conflict have never been more pressing. In an increasing number of places, state and non-state armed groups impede access to communities affected by conflict, limiting the ability of local and international organizations to monitor civilian harm and hold parties accountable for violations. Meanwhile, climate change and other environmental stresses are increasingly impacting livelihoods, displacement, governance capacity, and food and water security.

In the United States, civilians serve in key roles in the administration and guidance of, and the budgeting for, the military services and the national defense enterprise. These civilians are not merely a cultural, social, or political designation but also possess a unique set of experiences and expertise that can contribute to the national security debate and policymaking process. They have spent their careers learning how to balance a wide range of interests, deal with complex and shifting power dynamics, and lead large institutions and teams. These civilians can be invaluable in bringing the perspectives of all stakeholders to the table. This is why it’s crucial to recognize and support them. In doing so, we can ensure that civilians are not only a priority, but also an asset, to the military and to our nation’s security.

What is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

A citizen is a person who is granted full rights and responsibilities by a nation or political community. Citizenship typically comes with a duty to pay taxes, serve in the military and to obey the laws of the country to which one belongs. Different nations define citizenship differently and may grant full rights to all citizens or limit them to some groups. Citizenship can be gained through birth within a country, descent from a citizen parent, marriage to a citizen or naturalization.

Law is a body of rules created and enforced by social or governmental institutions to regulate behavior. It is usually defined as the set of principles, directives and procedures enforceable by a state in order to achieve certain public objectives such as maintaining order and protecting liberty and property. Law can be made through a legislative process, resulting in statutes; by the executive, through decrees and regulations; or established by judges through precedent in common law jurisdictions. Private individuals can also create legally binding contracts.

The term citizen replaces the terms subject and national in English, with citizen preferred because it implies allegiance to a people in which sovereign power is retained by the people and shared in common, rather than allegiance to a personal sovereign such as a monarch. The word subject reflects the earlier, feudal relationship between the monarch and his or her subjects; it is still used in British constitutional law and in some nationality legislation.

A person who is not a citizen of a nation is known as an alien. Aliens must comply with the laws of a country where they reside, but have fewer rights and responsibilities than citizens. For example, legal aliens must pay taxes but can not vote or hold government office.

The term citizen has several etymological roots, including “citizens of the world” and “citizens of the empire.” It is also related to a variety of legal concepts such as civil society, civil liberties, criminal justice, democracy, human rights and the rule of law. The law is often described as being an instrument of modernity, reflecting the impact on society and politics by developments such as the rise of industry and science, the spread of information and the development of international politics. In addition, the modern military and police force and bureaucracy impose restrictions on everyday life that earlier writers such as John Locke and Montesquieu could not have foreseen. See also law, philosophy of; censorship; and crime and punishment. These examples are automatically compiled from various online sources, and may not represent the opinion of Merriam-Webster or its editors.

What Are Human Rights and How Are They Enforced?

posted in: News | 0

human rights

Human rights are things that everybody deserves to be able to get by virtue of being a person. Generally, they’re a person’s basic entitlements to food, shelter and security in their daily lives. Unlike privileges, which can be taken away by someone else’s whims, human rights are legally and morally protected. However, people often don’t know exactly what human rights are or how they are enforceable. That can make them vulnerable to abuses such as wrongful termination, for example.

A good understanding of human rights is important to avoid such abuses. It also helps to recognise when you have been abused and what steps to take. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was drafted after World War II to give people a common understanding of what humans essentially deserve as human beings. The Declaration provides a framework for addressing the many issues and threats facing humankind today.

The Universal Declaration describes four defining features of human rights: equality, non-discrimination, participation and dignity. It states that all persons are equal in their human dignity and that they are free from discrimination in the enjoyment of their civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights. It further provides that every person and all peoples are entitled to the active and full participation in and contribution to society of all its members on the basis of their human dignity, without distinction of any kind.

It is these defining characteristics that help define the scope of human rights as a legal concept and as an ethical value. While some philosophers believe that human rights exist most basically in natural law, which is derived from different philosophical and religious grounds, others, including Rawls, prefer to describe them as a product of the politics of a given sphere (in his book The Law of Peoples). From this perspective, they are not merely an expression of a preexisting moral consensus but rather of the morally acceptable requirements of the system under which international human rights have emerged.

Another reason why it is difficult to rely on a metaphysical or theological basis for human rights is that billions of people do not subscribe to the religions that do have this faith. To base human rights on a theological belief would require persuading them of a particular theological view and that is likely to be even more challenging than trying to persuade them of the idea of human rights in general. In any case, legal enactment is a much more practical and reliable basis for human rights.

Immigrants and the US

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

The vast majority of immigrants surveyed say they came to the United States for economic opportunities, for better educational and job prospects for their children, or to improve their own living standards. Smaller but still sizeable shares cited other reasons such as wanting to join family members in the US or escaping unsafe or violent conditions in their home countries.

Regardless of their motivations, most migrants have a strong work ethic and are willing to work hard to make a life for themselves and their families. As a result, they contribute to their communities by filling jobs that native-born Americans are not interested in or unable to do, such as farmwork, domestic and industrial labor, or caring for elderly relatives. This helps to increase overall economic productivity.

Immigrants also bring unique skills, perspectives and ideas to the nation that can boost innovation, fuel industry and drive progress. For example, many agricultural innovations in the US have been attributed to the work of immigrants. This is especially true for specialty crops like horticulture and aquaculture, where workers have needed to develop the right combinations of genetics, pest control and cultivation methods.

In addition, immigration can help to bridge the gap between agricultural production and consumption, where there is often a shortage of labor. This is especially true for high-value crops like fruits and vegetables, which require specialized training that can take time to acquire. In addition, immigrants can be instrumental in improving food safety and reducing production costs through innovative practices, such as processing and packaging.

America is a nation of immigrants, and almost all Americans today either immigrated themselves or are descended from those who did so in the past. This is not just a cliche; it is a fundamental part of American history and our culture.

The current rate of net migration to the US – both legal and illegal – is modest in comparison to historical averages and other countries. And while some people who live in the United States have a negative view of immigration, others overwhelmingly say that it has been good for their community and the country.

In fact, most Americans agree that the US is a more diverse and tolerant nation because of its long history of welcoming newcomers from around the world. However, there is a growing divide over whether the benefits of immigration outweigh the negative effects. As a result, there is a lot of uncertainty about the future of immigration policy in the US. And this uncertainty has had real-world consequences for some immigrant families. Some parents have told us that they are limiting their family activities and vacations because of increased fears of deportation or other family repercussions. This can put financial strain on families, and may even lead to more isolation and reduced social interaction for the entire family. This can have lasting effects on the mental and physical health of children in those households. It is a critical issue that deserves careful consideration and thoughtful debate.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the removal, or expulsion, by an executive agency of a person who is not a citizen of a country. The word comes from a Latin phrase that means “to throw away.” It was sometimes used to mean exile, but it has since taken on a broader meaning. In the modern sense of the word, a person may be deported from the United States for breaking immigration laws or for committing other crimes.

The process for deportation varies depending on the type of crime and other factors. For example, the severity of a crime or whether it was committed while in a criminal gang can make someone deportable. The type of visa or status a non-citizen holds can also influence the likelihood that they will be removed from the country.

The government does not deport people without giving them a chance to fight the charge. Usually, non-citizens are placed into “removal proceedings” when ICE formally accuses them of being deportable. Immigration judges hold one or more hearings to decide whether a person should be deported. The process for removing a person from the United States can take years.

During an individual hearing, the immigration judge listens to arguments about why you should stay in the country. The immigration judge will also review any evidence presented, such as a report from a social worker or expert witness. If the judge orders you to be deported, the government will prepare your travel documents and arrange for your departure.

If you lose your hearing you can appeal the decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals. This is a separate process from appealing the judge’s original decision.

The exact timeline from the end of your hearing to your physical deportation depends on how close you are to a US border and your home country’s immigration law. For example, some countries allow for expedited removal for people who have been convicted of certain crimes.

Even though deportation can be a lengthy process, there are ways for you to avoid being deported. For example, if you have a good reason to leave the country, you can apply for voluntary departure. However, you should know that your chances of getting approved for this are very slim. The best way to avoid deportation is to get the help of a knowledgeable immigration lawyer. You can find legal services through a nonprofit organization or by contacting your local immigration court. They can help you understand your options and protect your rights throughout the removal process. These examples are programmatically compiled from various online sources to illustrate current usage of the word ‘deportation.’ Any opinions in these examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us feedback.

Transitioning From Military to Civilian Life

posted in: News | 0

civilian

When you transition out of military life, it can be a big shift to civilian life. From finding a new job to making new friends, it’s important to be patient during this time. It’s also important to understand what your civilian counterparts expect out of you and how to communicate effectively. This will help reduce frustration and help you adjust to your civilian lifestyle.

Civilian is defined as a person who does not belong to the armed forces or any organization engaged in belligerent activities, such as the police force or a member of a non-state armed group (a militia). The term has been applied more broadly to include persons not involved in an armed conflict, including journalists, medical personnel and religious workers. The distinction between civilian and combatants is one of the core principles of international humanitarian law, which establishes that “civilians are protected from attack” (GCIV Art. 3).

The protection of civilians must be an integral part of any strategy to prevent or mitigate the impact of armed conflict on the populations affected and on the overall stability of a region or country. The latest Secretary-General’s annual report on the protection of civilians is alarming: armed conflict has resulted in over 100 million people being displaced and is a major driver of acute malnutrition and food insecurity, highlighting how fragile the situation remains around the world.

It is a key challenge to better protect civilians by improving military approaches in places like Syria, Iraq and Yemen. Recent efforts by the US and its partners have reduced harm to civilians in these situations, but more work needs to be done in this area.

While the term “civilian” is widely used in many languages, there are different definitions and opinions about what it means to be a civilian. The most common definition is that a civilian is a person who is not a member of the armed forces or any organization that engages in belligerent activities, such as the law enforcement or the police force, or a member of a non-state or non-governmental armed group.

The question of whether a particular act amounts to direct participation in hostilities, which suspends civilian immunity from attack, is central to the understanding and application of the principle of proportionality in armed conflict. The ICRC has devoted considerable effort to clarifying the concept of direct participation in hostilities, particularly in connection with the modalities that govern the loss of such immunity. This process has produced a new set of standards to guide armed conflict planners and actors, as well as military lawyers, in their interpretation of the laws of war.

What Does it Mean to Be a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

Citizenship is a status of freedom with rights and responsibilities that differ from those enjoyed by noncitizens. Usually, citizenship is conferred on the basis of jus soli (birth within a territory), jus sanguinis (relationship to a citizen parent) or jus naturalis (acquisition through marriage to a citizen). Most countries have laws that require people to be citizens in order to participate fully in civic life, vote, pay taxes, receive health care and serve the nation in the military.

Citizens are expected to play a role in promoting their country’s goals and protecting their country’s assets. This includes promoting the nation’s culture, donating to charities and volunteering. They also have a responsibility to respect and follow the law of the land. They are also expected to help their fellow citizens in times of need.

A good citizen has the ability to make informed decisions. This means that they keep up with the news, read a variety of sources and are knowledgeable about current events. They also have an interest in the world around them and are not afraid to speak out on issues that are important to them.

Unlike some, a citizen isn’t blinded by their political affiliations or personal beliefs. In fact, they’re willing to listen to the opinions of others regardless of their views. They’re also able to analyze arguments and find the truth in them.

The best thing that anyone can do to be a good citizen is to learn as much as possible about their country’s history and government structure. It’s also important to keep up with current events and vote in elections whenever possible. Voting in local elections is especially important because these politicians often have a bigger impact on the day-to-day lives of citizens than those at the national level.

Another way to be a good citizen is to protect the nation’s natural resources. It’s not enough to simply recycle and take care of their own trash; a good citizen goes out of their way to conserve energy, water and other vital resources that their country relies on for survival. They also know that it is important to educate themselves and their children so that they can be informed about the world around them.

In a recent survey by Pew Research Center, about three-quarters of Americans described voting as very important to being a good citizen. Seven-in-ten said that paying taxes and always following the law were very important as well. Smaller shares of Americans said that it was very important to volunteer to help others, know the Pledge of Allegiance, be familiar with their country’s history and politics, and protest when government actions are deemed to be wrong. Not surprisingly, Republicans and Democratic leaners saw different things as being very important to being a good citizen. For example, Republican adults were twice as likely to say that knowing the Pledge of Allegiance was very important to being a good citizen than did Democrats.

What Are Human Rights?

posted in: News | 0

The idea behind human rights is that every person, regardless of their location or circumstances in life, deserves dignity. It’s a concept that allows people to speak up when they feel they are being treated unfairly or when they see something wrong with their society. Human rights also empowers them to be a part of changing things.

A human rights violation occurs when a state or a company violates a right that someone holds. The most common rights include the right to life, liberty and security of person. These rights are protected by provincial, territorial and federal laws. In some cases, these laws can be suspended or restricted under particular circumstances. For example, if you commit a crime that can be punished by the law, your right to freedom is temporarily suspended until the court decides whether or not to punish you for the crime.

People can also have their rights violated when a government fails to protect them from another group within society, such as when police fail to intervene during lynchings in the United States. Human rights violations can happen by both individuals and groups, but they can only be stopped if everyone stands up for their rights.

In order to prevent human rights abuses, the international community has created a series of international treaties and agreements to protect our basic freedoms. These include the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its two Optional Protocols and the International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

These documents allow people to bring forward their concerns about a government’s human rights record to the international community. These treaties have been ratified by many countries around the world, so they are legally binding.

The UDHR and the other international treaties and agreements have been made to ensure that all people are treated equally. They prohibit discrimination on the basis of race or ethnicity, colour, sex, gender, language, sexual orientation, religion or other opinion, national or social origin, property, disability, age or birth.

There are also rules for when military intervention is necessary. It must be done with the right intention, which means that there are reasonable grounds that non-military options have been exhausted and it must be a last resort. It should also be proportional, which means that the military action should be limited to the minimum force required to achieve the humanitarian goal.

In order to stand up for your human rights, you can try some of these tips: Write to your parliamentary representative and head of state, or contact local NGOs that are active in human rights activism. Explain why you think they are violating your rights and ask for their help to get those rights restored. You can also read about human rights violations in the news, watch documentaries on YouTube and read books about them. Educating yourself about your rights can help you to feel more confident when confronting those who have abused you or seeing injustice in your society.

Immigrants in the United States

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

About 3.4 percent of the world’s population—or 258 million people—are international migrants. The share of immigrants has been relatively stable over the past couple decades, though immigration rates have risen in many countries, most dramatically in Mexico and India. The vast majority of migrants—legal and unauthorized—are men, but the proportion of women in this group has also remained relatively steady over time. The median age of migrants is 29, and about a third are younger than 24. Most live in 20 major metropolitan areas—with New York, Los Angeles and Miami having the largest immigrant populations.

The vast majority of migrants are employed, and most work in construction, sales, health care, production and service industries. About three in ten immigrants say they are overqualified for their current jobs, a possible sign that they had to take a step back in their careers when they moved to the United States or have struggled to find work.

Most immigrants cite economic opportunities as the main reason they decided to leave their home countries, although smaller but still sizeable shares mention other factors such as a desire to improve the lives of their children, safety or security concerns, family reunification, retirement, escape from persecution or climate disasters, or simply a sense that the United States offers greater opportunity than their home country. Among those who are legal immigrants, most cite the opportunity to work in high-skilled fields or start their own businesses.

A growing number of Americans express mixed views about how immigrants should be treated, with a majority believing they strengthen the economy through their hard work and talent. Some people, however, say immigrants are a burden because they depress wages and cost services such as housing, education and health care. In the current political climate, extreme political partisanship and rhetoric can inflame anti-immigrant sentiments rooted in xenophobia, nativism and racism.

Despite their strong economic contributions, immigrants face challenges in the United States. Some are struggling to make ends meet or to pay for the care they need. Others are frightened of being deported, which can put a damper on their daily lives and make them less likely to interact with their neighbors. Still others fear discrimination or unfair treatment on the job, in their communities and even while seeking health care.

Some people argue that the United States could benefit enormously from a reform of its immigration system to be more responsive to broader economic conditions. Currently, Congress sets an annual limit on the number of permanent and temporary workers allowed into the country to meet labor demands, and that cap doesn’t fluctuate depending on the state of the economy. This limits the ability of employers to hire when they need to, putting downward pressure on wages and working conditions for both unauthorized and legal immigrant workers. This is true whether they are doing a job that requires highly skilled workers or unskilled labor. Immigrants also may have a difficult time navigating the complex bureaucracy of the healthcare system and are at heightened risk for untreated illnesses due to lack of insurance or access to health care.

Understanding the Process of Deportation

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the expulsion by executive agency of a noncitizen whose presence in a country is deemed unlawful or detrimental. It may be accompanied by other punishments, including fines or imprisonment.

People in the United States who are ordered to be deported can appeal their removal order or ask an Immigration Judge to reopen their case. Immigration Judges can reopen cases only if there was an error of law or new facts appear that impact the case.

Several factors determine how long a person has to spend in the United States before they can be deported. These include whether they entered the country without permission or overstayed their visa, criminal convictions, security risks and the length of time they spent in the United States, which varies depending on immigration status, if they came here with a visa or through a Visa Waiver Program, and any other grounds for removal.

When the government initiates a deportation case against a person, they serve them with a Notice to Appear. The person must then attend one or more hearings before an Immigration Judge to decide if they are eligible for relief from removal, which is the process of fighting their deportation. This includes proving that the charges against them in the Notice to Appear are false, or that they should not be removed because of their immigration status, past or present connections to their community and other reasons.

Many of the noncitizens deported from the United States are sent back to dangerous and unstable regions in their countries of origin, where they are at high risk of violence or other harms. A database from the Global Migration Project compiles reports of people who have been deported and faced abuse, torture, rape or even murder after their return.

There is a postcolonial power dynamic at play, with poor migrants sent back to former colonial territories, where they may have little support or protection. A lack of government resources and capacity can also make returns difficult. For example, when the U.S. government approaches an origin country’s embassy to request help in verifying identification and issuing travel documents as part of a deportation, that country can simply refuse or impose such a high bar for identity verification that it would be nearly impossible to comply with.

For these reasons, it is important for communities to have the right tools to support deportees after their return. Local efforts should include programs that foster supportive social networks and create a sense of belonging for families and individuals, and support mental health/healing and community building, particularly among children. These programs should also be designed to connect deported families with the social services they need and to connect them to organizers that can support their advocacy. In addition, cities and other local jurisdictions should end their 287(g) agreements with the federal immigration authorities and instead build strong partnerships with immigrant-serving organizations in their community. This would enable the city to better support immigrant detainees during their removal proceedings and after they are returned home.

What is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

A civilian is a person who is not a member of any military force. This person may have a job in the private sector or may be a student, doctor, or lawyer. Civilians may also work in government or volunteer with charities and organizations. In a legal context, the term is often used to refer to someone who has not been charged with a crime or who has not been arrested.

When you transition to civilian life from the military, it can be difficult to leave behind a tight-knit group of fellow service members. This crew became your family and it is normal to want to connect with them on a deeper level as you adjust to civilian life. It is important to try your best to find a community that fits you and makes you feel comfortable. This can be done through family, friends, and local veteran groups.

One of the biggest differences between military and civilian life is the strict rules that are adhered to in the military. This can include rigid schedules, a certain tone of voice, and strict responses to commands. Civilian life tends to be less structured and has more leniency in these areas.

If you are a civilian, it is important to know your rights as you navigate the legal system. You may be involved in a criminal case or may have been sued by a former employer. Having a strong defense is essential to ensuring that your legal case goes in your favor.

The word civilian is derived from the Latin “civilis”, which means “of the people.” The word became common in English during the Middle Ages, with the earliest use dating back to before 1425. The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) notes that the primary meaning of civilian is “not military.” The secondary definitions of civilian are a person not in the army, and also a lawyer or scholar who studies civil law.

In the context of international humanitarian law, the term civilian refers to individuals who do not participate in hostilities, as defined in Article 50 of Additional Protocol I. In practice, however, the distinction between combatants and civilians is not always straightforward during internal armed conflicts and members of armed opposition groups may be considered civilians. When they directly participate in hostilities, such civilians lose their protection from attack (API art. 6).

Civilians also do not have the same immunity from prosecution that military personnel enjoy under the laws of war. Therefore, if you are a civilian who is involved in a legal case, it is vital to consult with an attorney who understands the complexity of the military-civilian distinction and the unique challenges that civilians face when seeking justice. This legal professional can ensure that your rights as a civilian are protected throughout your trial. The stronger your defense is, the more likely your case is to end in a positive resolution that is beneficial for you and your family.

What is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

A citizen is a person who has the rights and responsibilities of a member of a nation or political community. Typically, citizenship is granted by the people of a nation through a written constitution and laws that follow it. Citizenship may be gained by birth, the nationality of parents, or through naturalization (the process of becoming a citizen). The duties and responsibilities of citizenship can vary from one place to another. For example, in the United States, citizens get to vote and hold government offices, but they are also required to pay taxes. Citizenship can be revoked for some criminal acts, such as fraud or terrorism.

Law is a system of rules that governs how people may live, work and interact with each other. It can be influenced by a written or unwritten constitution and the values encoded in it. The law shapes politics, economics, history and society in many ways.

The law has four main purposes: establishing standards, maintaining order, resolving disputes and protecting liberty and rights. It is important that citizens understand and respect the law because, without it, there can be no free society. It is a fundamental principle of civil society that everyone, regardless of wealth or status, is subject to the law.

People who do not have the rights and responsibilities of citizens are known as legal aliens. They may be allowed to stay in a country for extended periods of time, and may have protection from its courts. People who live in a country for a short period of time and are not citizens are typically called tourists.

Laws are a complex area that encompasses many different fields, such as law and economics, environmental science and law, and linguistics. For example, labor law is the study of the tripartite industrial relationship between workers, employers and trade unions; patent law deals with inventors’ rights to their inventions; and evidence law deals with which materials can be used in court cases. Moreover, law can be a changing field that is constantly evolving. For instance, scientific laws are usually based on theories that can be tested and proved through experimentation. These are different from laymen’s laws, which are based on beliefs and opinions that cannot be tested or proven. For example, a belief that apples fall down from trees due to the force of gravity is not a scientific law until an apple is dropped and the forces are measured.

The Importance of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

Human rights are not just a set of principles – they are an essential part of our moral and legal heritage. They are supported by almost every culture and civilised government on earth, as well as every major religion. They are the recognition that all humans have certain minimum requirements to live with dignity. This means that no one should be forced against their will to do anything; that women, children and the disabled deserve special protection; that freedom of speech and expression is a necessary foundation for the functioning of a democratic society; and that the right to life is a basic standard which cannot be denied.

The nineteenth and twentieth centuries saw continuing progress in the protection of these rights, including abolition of slavery, a greater provision for education and the extension of political rights. However, it was only after World War II that the international community recognised that nations could do what they liked within their own borders but that they had a responsibility to other countries and the international community not to abuse their power or ignore human rights violations.

Today, countries have ratified human rights treaties which make it illegal for them to violate other people’s basic freedoms and dignity. Many have laws that protect people from discrimination, and some, like Canada, have a system of complaint that allows individuals to take human rights cases directly to a national court. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, drafted by representatives with different legal and cultural backgrounds from around the world, has become the benchmark for these international commitments.

While these gains are real and substantial, the world still suffers from a number of serious human rights challenges. Millions of people struggle to survive on subsistence incomes, millions more are displaced by conflict or natural disasters, and millions still live under repressive rule by militias, armed groups or security forces. In many countries the press is not free, there are restrictions on religion, and dissenters can be punished, often permanently, for their views.

Despite the huge amounts of money spent on wars and development projects, there is much work to be done in order to make the world a better place. The key is to make more people aware of the existence and importance of human rights and to encourage them to demand that their governments respect and protect their fundamental freedoms. Civil society must also play a role, ensuring that businesses comply with anti-discrimination laws and that they promote equality, while the international community should monitor and call out the human rights violations of any nation that is not upholding its own obligations.

The Celebration of Immigrants

posted in: News | 0

People from around the world emigrate to the United States in search of a better life for themselves and their families. They contribute to our country’s culture and economy, often filling jobs that others do not want, such as working in agriculture, construction, or service industries. Despite the many challenges they face, most immigrants say that their lives are generally better here than in their countries of origin. This is particularly true for those who are likely undocumented, who are more likely to have serious concerns about their finances and well-being.

When they are able to work, most immigrants report that they earn at least enough money to pay for their basic needs and have good job prospects. They also say that their children’s education and future opportunities are better here than in their home country. However, they also face significant obstacles that can prevent them from fully realizing their dreams for themselves and their children. These include workplace and other forms of discrimination, difficulty making ends meet, and confusion and fears related to U.S. immigration laws and policies. These challenges are more common for some groups, such as those who live in lower-income households, Black and Hispanic immigrants, and those with limited English proficiency.

In the end, though, nearly all immigrants agree that their life in America is a good one. Three in four of those surveyed said they would choose to come to the U.S. again if they had the chance, and six in ten say they plan to stay.

The story of how these individuals and families have achieved their American dream is the focus of this year’s Carnegie Celebration of Immigrants, which highlights the contributions they make to our society and the nation’s economy. This year’s event is a partnership between Carnegie and The New Americans campaign, which partners with local community organizations to help them host naturalization workshops for people who have applied to become naturalized citizens. The campaign has held more than 2,500 workshops and clinics, which have helped more than 154,000 people complete their applications for citizenship.

For more information about the celebration, visit the Carnegie website.

This article was originally published on October 24, 2018, and has been updated for clarity and accuracy. The Carnegie Corporation’s Celebration of Immigrants is generously supported by The Ford Foundation and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. This is the first of a series of articles that will be published leading up to our November 16 ceremony to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the opening of Ellis Island.

Anna stands in front of the slammed door, chuckling. Her daughter Lucy is on the other side, yelling about band practice and her special t-shirt that hasn’t been washed yet.

For a moment, her eyes are clouded with emotion as she looks down at her child. She knows that she will never be able to give her daughter everything she wants. But she rests her purpose in doing whatever she can to give her daughter a chance to fulfill her own dreams and to prove to her that the sacrifices her parents made were not in vain.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

Deportation is the expulsion by executive agency of a foreign national from a country whose presence in that country is deemed unlawful or detrimental. It has had a variety of historical meanings including exile, banishment, and transportation of criminals to penal settlements. Today, deportation refers to the process by which the federal government removes a non-citizen from the United States based on their immigration status and criminal conviction history or other grounds. The removal process is overseen by an immigration judge and often ends with a decision to deport the non-citizen. Deportation is a very serious consequence because once someone is removed from the U.S., it will be very difficult (if not impossible) for them to return for many years or ever. For this reason, it is very important that if you are facing the prospect of deportation you seek help from a specialized attorney.

Most deportation cases are heard in a civil immigration court, rather than a criminal court. This means that the majority of individuals in deportation proceedings are not facing criminal charges, but instead have a case against them because of their lack of lawful immigration status or violations of other civil immigration laws like overstaying a visa or entering the U.S. without a proper visa or inspection. Criminal convictions can lead to deportation as well, but they are much less common than other reasons for deportation.

The deportation process begins when an immigration official issues a notice to the individual to attend a hearing with a judge. This is an opportunity for the individual to present evidence about their situation and their legal position. Typically, the judge will determine whether they should be deported based on the evidence presented at this hearing.

If the judge decides to deport an individual, they will have an opportunity to appeal the decision with the Board of Immigration Appeals or even the Federal Courts. If all appeals are exhausted and there is no other relief available, the person will be physically deported from the United States. The person may be able to leave on their own, but more commonly they will receive a “bag and baggage” letter from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) telling them when and where to show up for transport.

Deportation can be a devastating consequence for family members, especially if the deportee is a spouse or child of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. It is for this reason that most people in deportation proceedings work with an experienced immigration lawyer to prepare a strong defense to the government’s claims that they should be removed.

If you are in deportation proceedings, you have a right to a fair and full hearing with a knowledgeable attorney. Contact us to discuss your situation and learn more about how we can help you with the deportation process. We have offices in Denver, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. We represent clients all over the United States and internationally.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

A civilian is someone who is not in the military or otherwise taking part in hostilities. One ceases to be a civilian by joining the military, in which case they are subject to the laws of war, or by taking part in hostilities on their own initiative, in which case they become an illegal combatant. Civilians are protected by international humanitarian law, which requires that they not be attacked, and that their homes and places of refuge be respected and protected. In addition, civilians must not be used to shield military objectives or operations.

Civilians are also guaranteed a right to fair trial and due process in the event that they are captured during hostilities. However, this principle does not apply to members of armed groups who participate directly in hostilities, even though their participation does not disqualify them from prisoner-of-war status under national law. In practice, however, this distinction tends to be less straightforward in internal armed conflicts.

The civilian population has long been recognized as the primary victim of armed conflict and must therefore be protected at all times. As conflicts continue to erupt across the globe, finding better ways to protect civilians remains an urgent challenge. Civilian crises may be exacerbated by increasing levels of globalization, rising populations, and climate change, which threatens food security, water supplies, governance capacity, and human rights.

Although there is no one definition of a civilian, in the United States, people who are not members of the armed forces are called civilians. The term is often confused with non-military people, but the difference is that civilians are people who live and work outside of the armed forces. Military personnel, by contrast, are called soldiers or service members.

There are many aspects of civilian life that can be difficult to adjust to after transitioning out of the military. It is important to remember that these adjustments can be tough at times, but with patience and time they will become easier. Some of the most important changes include learning how to communicate with civilian friends and family, as well as finding ways to fit into established relationships that have been around for a longer period of time.

Civilians may be found at the highest level of policymaking, where they occupy certain roles in the administration and guidance of, and the budgeting for, military services and the defense enterprise. These positions may involve considerable responsibility and authority, as well as significant risks. Those with careers that prepare them for this sort of public work know a great deal about balancing diverse interests, political and social power, and the way in which government institutions are structured and resourced. This experience is valuable when it comes to advising the military on the best way to carry out its responsibilities and meet its challenges. But it is also necessary to recognize that senior military leaders have the right and duty to disagree with civilian policy guidance that they feel is unwise in their professional judgment.

The Importance of Being a Good Citizen

posted in: News | 0

A citizen is a person who is a legal member of a particular country or state, having the rights and obligations that come with it. In modern times, citizenship usually means the right to vote and to hold public office, as well as the obligation to defend the rights of fellow citizens. Citizenship can be acquired through birth within the territory of a nation, descent from a citizen parent, marriage to a citizen, or naturalization. Citizenship is one of the most important aspects of a democratic society and is often considered a fundamental human right, with the right to live free from oppressive regimes being an essential component.

The term citizen is related to the concept of community, with people interacting within a nation in many ways that benefit the entire community. For example, supporting local business and artisans helps stimulate the economy, while providing a sense of community connectedness and pride. In addition, buying locally grown produce and meats helps to reduce the carbon footprint of the food chain.

Another way to be a good citizen is by giving back to the community through volunteerism. By helping out with things like cleaning beaches, roads and parks, helping neighbors, and even offering up your time to serve on a jury, you are being a good citizen and contributing to the welfare of your community.

Generally, a good citizen is someone who participates in the political life of their nation. This includes being active in civic organizations, voting and taking part in debates, and getting to know their nation’s history, government structure and the issues it currently faces. It also involves becoming knowledgeable about politics and current events, reading various news sources, and studying political philosophy such as Rawls’ A Theory of Justice or Plato’s The Republic.

When asked to list traits of a good citizen, respondents to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center came up with a long list. However, the most common answer was voting, with more than eight-in-ten saying it is very important to be a good citizen by doing this. Other highly rated behaviors include paying taxes, obeying the law and playing an active role in the community.

While it may be easy to focus on just the positives of being a good citizen, the reality is that it is often challenging to do so, and there is a risk of falling into apathy. For this reason, it is crucial that individuals make an effort to keep their civic engagement high, no matter the current political climate. By doing so, they can ensure that their country and its people are being served to the best of their abilities.

The Concept of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

The concept of human rights empowers people to challenge abuse and corruption in society, whether it’s by the government or in their workplace. It says that everyone, regardless of who they are or what they do, deserves dignity and respect from society – and that, when they don’t get it, they can speak up.

The UDHR and the other international human rights treaties lay out a number of fundamental principles. They include the right to life, equality, freedom and security. They also say that the exercise of power must be subject to certain limits, and that no one should be arbitrarily deprived of their property or liberty.

Most people would agree that these basic principles are universal, and that they should be respected by every country in the world. There are, however, some important differences in how these principles are interpreted and applied by different countries. These differences are reflected in the range of questions and debates that surround human rights.

For example, while some countries may tolerate slavery within their borders, others do not. Female genital mutilation is a practice that some defend in the name of culture, while others regard it as a violation of human rights. There are also differences in how the death penalty is treated by different states; some have abolished it, while others still execute people.

But it’s important to remember that, despite these differences, the overall objective is the same: to ensure that everybody has their fundamental human rights protected. It’s also important to remember that no country in the world has a perfect record on human rights – even those considered to be liberal democracies like the UK and USA.

Nevertheless, there has been much progress, especially in the 19th and 20th centuries, with the abolition of slavery, the right to vote for women, the end of colonialism, the collapse of apartheid, and more. These changes have been brought about largely by pressure from the international community and, in many cases, from individuals who are willing to stand up against injustice.

There are still challenges to human rights protection, though. Some governments, political parties or candidates, social and economic players, and civil society actors, use the language of human rights without actually committing themselves to its objectives. This is often down to ignorance – not understanding what human rights standards call for – but it can also be down to intentional deception.

In any case, it is important to recognise that there are always going to be violations of human rights – because there are always people who don’t want to accept the principles of these documents. The best way to address this is through educating people, and encouraging them to speak up when they see their rights being violated. This can be done by pointing out that they have a right to do so, and providing them with information on where they can get support, either from the NGOs they can contact, or by writing to their parliamentary representatives or heads of state.

Immigrants and the United States

posted in: News | 0

A person who lives in a country other than their birthplace is an immigrant. International migration is a global phenomenon that affects nearly all nations. It occurs when people move across borders or between countries, either permanently or temporarily, usually for economic, social and family reasons. Migrants may cross an ocean or a desert, or travel over long distances on foot, boat, plane, train or automobile.

During the past century, immigration has played an important role in the history of the United States. Today, more than 45 million people in America are immigrants — a group that has grown rapidly over the years and now accounts for about 14% of the nation’s population.

This group of people are a vital part of our society, making contributions that benefit all Americans. As workers, business owners, students, taxpayers and neighbors, they are integral to our economy and culture. They are an essential part of the American story, and their experiences have much to teach us about our world and our future.

Some of the biggest challenges facing these people are high levels of workplace and other discrimination, financial struggles, and confusion and fears related to U.S. immigration laws and policies. These challenges are especially acute for lower-income households, Black and Hispanic immigrants, and those with limited English proficiency.

In their own words, the most prevalent reasons why immigrants say they moved to the United States are for better work and education opportunities and a good life for their children. A smaller share cites joining family members or fleeing unsafe or violent conditions.

While the number of unauthorized migrants has grown, most newcomers enter the country legally. For example, people who arrived under Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) have legal authorization to live and work in the country on a temporary basis. Other immigrants are admitted as refugees or asylum seekers, who have a well-founded fear of persecution in their home country.

The largest geographic clusters of immigrants are in large metropolitan areas, with two-thirds living in the top 20 destinations. Most of these are in California, Texas and Florida.

Many people from the same region or country migrate together, and their influx can have an impact on local housing markets, workforces and other factors. These trends make it essential to understand regional patterns in the United States and elsewhere when analyzing immigration trends.

The most popular countries of origin for newcomers are China, India, Mexico and the Philippines. The number of immigrants from these four countries has grown in recent decades, although immigration from Mexico has slowed since the Great Recession. People from these countries represent a larger share of the immigrant population than other origins. This is because these regions have relatively high unemployment rates and large numbers of people with college degrees who could be a valuable addition to the labor force. This can lead to competition for jobs among employers and a push for higher wages and benefits.

Understanding the Concept of Deportation

posted in: News | 0

Deportation is the expulsion by executive agency of an alien whose presence in a country is deemed unlawful or detrimental. Historically, it has also had a broader meaning of banishment and transportation to penal settlements. Regardless of its precise meaning, the concept is very real for many non-citizens in Chicago who are facing deportation proceedings (also known as removal proceedings). Deportation is a complicated and serious issue with significant implications for those involved. As such, it is strongly recommended that those who are facing deportation work with an experienced Chicago immigration lawyer who can help to guide them through the process.

When the federal government decides it is time to deport an immigrant, it initiates removal proceedings. These are a series of actions overseen by an immigration judge that can, and often do, result in the immigrant being ordered to leave the United States. Once an immigrant is deported, they may not be able to return for several years, or at all.

A variety of things can trigger the initiation of deportation proceedings, including breaking the terms of a visa or green card, committing certain criminal offenses, or otherwise violating immigration laws. In addition, the government can begin deportation proceedings if it determines that a person would pose a danger to national security or public safety.

Individuals in the midst of deportation proceedings are subject to short hearings that determine how their case should proceed. The first hearing is the Bond Redetermination Hearing, which allows individuals to request that they be released from custody on a bond. ICE, represented by a government attorney, must either agree that the individual is eligible for bond or dispute this claim by providing evidence that the individual is a flight risk or a danger to the community. If the individual is denied bond, they will be incarcerated until their case concludes.

During the course of a deportation proceeding, the immigration judge will review any evidence and make a decision on whether to order the person removed from the country. There are a number of grounds that can be used to justify removal, such as a conviction for an aggravated felony or a crime of moral turpitude. The most common grounds are however, based on conduct.

In order to protect their rights, it is important that people who are being considered for deportation attend all hearings and work with a dedicated and knowledgeable immigration lawyer. Non-citizens who are unable to afford an immigration attorney can still fight for their rights by filing a notice of appeal. Generally, an order of deportation will not take effect until the appeals period has ended and the immigration judge issues a final order of removal.

As the deportation system continues to evolve, it is crucial that non-citizens understand their rights and work with a knowledgeable immigration attorney. To learn more about how an experienced immigration attorney can help you, please contact us to schedule a consultation. We serve clients throughout the greater Chicago area, as well as across Illinois.

Re-Entering the Civilian Workforce After a War

posted in: News | 0

A civilian is a person who is not on active duty in a military, police, fire fighting or other belligerent organization. Civilians are not members of an armed force and are not participating in hostilities, although they may be affected by a conflict. In a democracy, civilians are the core of the political system, comprising all those who are not members of a militia or other armed force or party to an armed conflict (for example, military chaplains, journalists and diplomats). Civilians also include those not on the state payroll, such as unpaid volunteers and retirees.

Exceptional civilian actions in war involve life-changing decisions to flee, resist or build something new. But more commonly, civilians use ingenuity, energy, labour and social capital to survive through everyday acts that are endlessly repeated during a war, like avoiding dangerous people and places; subverting unfair systems; accommodating and negotiating with power; pretending loyalty and respect; queuing physically or digitally to get on aid distribution lists. The ingenuity, energy and social capital of civilians is essential to the survival of the people affected by a conflict and is why humanitarian organizations need their help.

There are many challenges that veterans face when re-entering civilian life. The biggest obstacle can be finding a community. When you leave the military, you are used to having a very structured and organized life where someone else manages your schedule and takes care of your physical and emotional health for you. In civilian life, you will have to take on more responsibility for your own well-being and will need to find new ways to develop a sense of community.

Another challenge is readjusting to the pace of civilian work. The work can seem tedious and monotonous, especially if you are accustomed to the fast-paced environment of the military. Keeping a strong network of military friends can be helpful during this time. In addition, it is important to try and stay connected with the military in some way, whether it is through an organization such as the VFW or by joining a support group.

The Army is committed to supporting its civilian workforce and providing growth opportunities for Soldiers and civilians alike. In fact, civilians have played a critical role in the success of the Army since its founding. The Army has the largest civilian workforce in DOD, supporting the nation and its soldiers in war and peace, and delivering vital services to our communities and the country.

What Does It Mean to Be a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

Citizenship is a legal status that recognizes one’s right to live in a particular nation, state or commonwealth. It also includes responsibilities such as obeying the laws of that place. Different nations have different requirements for citizenship, including voting rights and benefits like unemployment insurance. This concept of citizenship has become an important topic of discussion in academic fields such as political science, education and sociology. It is also a popular topic in the media and in public discussions.

Citizenship can mean something different to everyone, and it may change with time. For example, a child may grow up to believe that being a good citizen means participating in civic activities and voting for politicians who support their views. While this is one way to think about citizenship, it is not the only way to be a good citizen. Some people believe that good citizenship is defined by how much a person contributes to the community, while others see it as a set of values that guide a person’s behavior.

The term citizen comes from the Latin word civitas, meaning “people,” and it refers to someone who has been granted the legal right to live in a particular city-state or sovereign state. Citizenship is typically conferred at birth, although in some cases it can be acquired through a process called naturalization. In modern times, the notion of citizenship has become closely linked to a country’s cultural heritage and national identity.

In the earliest examples of the city-state, citizens would often be involved in political assemblies and were considered to have rights that were not available to non-citizens. Over time, these rights would expand and citizenship began to include more of an individual’s personal qualities. Citizenship is generally thought to have begun in the city-states of ancient Greece, and many scholars have traced its development throughout history.

In recent times, citizenship has been seen as a crucial part of the social contract. For example, in the United States, many believe that being a citizen means voting for elected officials and paying taxes to support the government’s functions and goals. This idea of citizenship has become so important that it is even included in curriculums at some schools.

Citizenship is an important subject to teach in school because it helps children develop a strong sense of their own identities and the value of freedom. It is also a great way to help kids understand the importance of respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs. This is an essential skill that all citizens need to have in order to be successful and happy.

Teaching children about citizenship is not an easy task because it requires a lot of dedication and patience. But it is a valuable lesson that will serve them well for the rest of their lives. Getting kids to think about citizenship will help them learn the value of respect and responsibility, and it will help them become active members of their communities.

The Origins and History of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

Human rights are a collection of freedoms and protections that all humans have, whether they live in the developed world or not. These include the right to life, the freedom of speech, the freedom to religion, and the right to a fair trial. Human rights are essential to all of us as a way to preserve our humanity, so we can live a life worthy of a human being. This article discusses the origins and history of human rights, how they are abused by some governments, and how to promote them.

A human rights abuse occurs when a government violates one or more of these fundamental freedoms, usually as a result of political, economic, social or cultural reasons. It can also happen when a government fails to protect its own citizens from human rights abuses by other countries or groups. Human rights abuses can be widespread, affecting people across a country or across the entire globe.

While the concept of human rights is largely a Western invention, many cultures and traditions around the world have ideals and systems to ensure justice and maintain community. These values can help people respect each other, but they can also be undermined by governments that use human rights violations to justify violent suppression of their own people.

Many of these ideals were shaped by the teachings of Confucius, who believed that all humans are equal in their basic dignity. This idea was later incorporated into the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was adopted by the United Nations in 1948 to provide a common understanding of everyone’s rights and form the foundation for a world of freedom, justice and peace.

The UDHR was drafted by representatives from various legal and cultural backgrounds who were brought together in a spirit of global solidarity to respond to the barbarity that had outraged the conscience of humankind during World War II. It was the first time that a global body recognized that every person possessed inherent, inalienable rights, regardless of their status in life, location or nationality.

Despite the fact that only 56 countries were members of the UN in 1947-8 when the UDHR was drafted, it is still considered to be an important landmark document, and it has been translated into more than 500 languages. While it is true that some people, such as criminals or heads of state, may need to have their rights limited in certain circumstances, this is only possible when the limits are necessary for a life of human dignity.

The UDHR is monitored by the Council of Europe’s European Court of Human Rights, which has 47 elected judges from different states that examine allegations of human rights violations made against member nations. In addition, the UN has a set of universally accepted human rights standards that all states must adhere to in order to avoid being condemned for violating these fundamental freedoms. These are known as the core international human rights treaties.

Immigrant Experiences in the United States

posted in: News | 0

A person who moves to a new country for the purpose of living and working there is considered an immigrant. The term can also be used to describe people who have done so to escape a dangerous or undesirable situation in their homeland, and people who have been granted special status such as refugees or asylum seekers.

The largest and most nationally representative survey of immigrants, conducted by KFF in partnership with the Los Angeles Times, captures the diverse experiences of those who live in the United States today. While the vast majority of respondents feel their lives are better here than in their countries of origin, many face financial hardships and face discrimination at work or when seeking health care.

Many Americans believe that immigrants take jobs from Americans and drive up welfare benefits, but the most widely cited fiscal estimates show that on average, immigrants contribute about $90 billion to the economy each year — while receiving only $5 billion in public assistance. They do this by increasing productivity, boosting capital formation, and raising demand for goods and services.

However, the perception that immigrants increase welfare costs may be based on the fact that some undocumented migrants do not pay taxes. This is an inaccurate and misleading assumption. Most undocumented people who are not working do not fit the traditional definition of a “worker,” as they do not have a job and do not earn enough money to pay taxes.

For a large share of people who are not employed or earning enough to pay taxes, the reason they left their home country was not to work but rather to escape unsafe conditions. This includes those who crossed the border to enter the U.S. from Central America, as well as those whose applications for asylum or refugee status are under consideration. The most common reason for migration is poverty, followed by political instability and gang violence.

Two-thirds of those who are working say they are overqualified for their jobs, particularly among college-educated black and Hispanic immigrants. One in three say they struggle to afford basic needs such as housing and food, with Hispanics more likely than others to report such challenges. Many also send remittances to their families in their countries of origin.

International migration is at the center of a range of political, economic, and social debates in many countries around the world. But a clear understanding of what it means to be an immigrant can help shape these conversations and guide policies that improve the quality of life for all residents.

To be a legal immigrant, someone must pass a civics test and oath of allegiance, acquire a naturalized citizenship, and be treated the same as citizens under the law. As such, they are considered members of the 1.5 generation – those who have moved to another country as children or teens and have at least one parent who has moved to that country at some point in their lives.

How Deportation Affects Families and Communities

posted in: News | 0

If you’re a noncitizen in the United States, the government may have the right to deport (or remove) you. If you’re facing deportation, getting legal advice is one of the best things you can do. This guide provides an overview of the deportation process, what you can expect when you’re placed in removal proceedings, and how to help protect yourself.

Deportation is the expulsion by executive agency of a person who’s presence in a country is deemed unlawful or detrimental. The term harks back to Roman law, where it describes banishment to foreign soil and the transport of criminals to penal settlements. Since then, the practice of deportation has shifted from punishing political criminals to the removal of people who’ve committed crimes that violate a state’s moral and ethical standards.

The current administration has pursued a far more expansive and punitive approach to deportation than any other in history. It has stopped people from seeking asylum at the border, separated families, and enforced an “everyone goes home” strategy that has targeted people with minor or even unresolved immigration cases. Deportation is now happening at a record rate, and it’s harming families and communities in a way that is unprecedented.

A growing body of research has examined the impact that deportation can have on individuals and their families. This policy brief reviews the research and identifies key lessons from it.

Thousands of families are struggling to cope with the anguish and steep financial decline that follow deportation. They are a visible reminder of the Trump administration’s deep hostility toward immigration and its call to deport millions.

To address these concerns, the administration should stop deporting people who have been here for years or who have no serious criminal record. Instead, the government should focus on enforcing the laws that actually work, while protecting immigrants’ rights and encouraging entrepreneurship. It should also rethink the 287(g) agreements it uses to train local police officers, which have been criticized for undermining community trust and promoting racial profiling.

Lastly, the administration should halt its efforts to deport people who are living in peace with their neighbors, as well as its efforts to exclude people from communities of color. It should also consider ways to support local initiatives that promote economic justice, civic participation, and mental health/healing for immigrant communities. These strategies are critical to a just and prosperous society.

Transitioning From Military to Civilian Life

posted in: News | 0

A civilian is a person who is not a member of the armed forces of any country. Usually, civilians work in occupations such as law enforcement, construction, education, health care and retail. A trained civilian, however, can be just as effective in combat as a soldier. The only difference is that a soldier is sworn to protect the state and is an official member of the military of a nation.

Civilians also have different roles in a nation’s government than military personnel. For example, some of them serve in the executive branch or legislature while others work with humanitarian agencies. In addition, many civilians are involved with the public through volunteerism and political participation.

Generally speaking, civilians are considered protected people under international humanitarian law (the customary laws of war and the treaties that implement them). They are not to be exposed to the dangers of military operations unless they are involved with certain categories of combatants.

The rules of the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols distinguish between protected civilians and those who are directly participating in hostilities. Direct participation is defined in the two protocols relating to international and non-international armed conflicts, as follows:

Civilians who take part in hostilities are not considered to be combatants, but they do lose their protection from direct attack for as long as they directly participate in the hostilities. They can regain their civilian status, once they cease to directly participate in the hostilities.

Direct participation in hostilities is defined more precisely in the ICRC’s guidelines, which provide that civilians who engage in such conduct lose their civilian status “unless and for as long as they are not members of organized armed groups belonging to a non-state party to an armed conflict.” The ICRC recognizes that states are reluctant to grant legal status to non-state armed groups in situations of armed conflict.

One of the most difficult aspects of transitioning from military life to civilian is breaking away from a familiar and supportive community. This can be especially true if you move to a new area where you don’t know anyone. To help ease this challenge, you can try to build a network of friends through your local VA office or other veterans’ organizations. This will give you a support group to turn to when the going gets tough and you feel isolated. Additionally, you should make sure that you plan ahead financially for the changes you are likely to experience. This will include budgeting for things like housing, education and healthcare costs. Then, you can focus on getting settled into your new civilian lifestyle. If you are not careful, financial changes can be a distraction from your goal of successfully reintegrating into civilian society. This is why it’s important to seek out financial assistance as you prepare to leave the military. This can be in the form of a re-enlistment bonus, VA benefits or other forms of financial aid. You can also ask for assistance from family and friends who have successfully made the transition from military to civilian life.

What is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

Citizenship is a relationship with, and responsibilities to, a country or community. It entails rights, such as voting or access to public services. It also has duties, such as obeying laws and paying taxes. Different nations, states or commonwealths may have different laws for citizens and different processes for granting citizenship. Citizenship can be formalised by a process called naturalisation, in which a person is granted citizenship by being formally recognized as such. Citizenship can also be informalised, in which a person is recognised as such by being treated as a good citizen – that is, being helpful, respecting others and obeying the law.

Citizenship can be taught as a subject in schools, and it is included as a component of other courses in the United Kingdom, including democracy, human rights and the British constitution and its relations with other countries. It is also an integral part of the National Citizen Service, which is a scheme run by charities to encourage young people to take responsibility for their local communities and develop leadership skills.

The term originated in ancient Greece, where it was associated with the small-scale organic community of the polis. Citizens were expected to fulfil a range of social obligations and civic duties, but they also enjoyed the benefits of property ownership and free access to municipal services. These were privileges that distinguished them from women, slaves and aliens, who did not enjoy the same status and rights as citizens.

In modern times, the concept of citizenship has evolved, and it now covers the relationship between an individual and a government, the state, nation or region to which they belong. It is often a contested issue, based on concerns about social cohesion and the need to integrate new arrivals. Some governments have adopted a restrictive approach to citizenship, with restrictions on immigration and rights for those already living in the country. Other governments have a more expansive view of the scope of citizenship, and promote civic engagement and active citizenship as key elements of national identity.

The debate on citizenship and integration is inherently complex, because it is impossible to separate the legal status from the broader issues of national identity and belonging. The current emphasis on tests and other restrictions for those applying for citizenship runs the risk of making it a mere instrumentality, rather than a vehicle for promoting social cohesion. It is also likely to narrow the space for a meaningful sense of belonging, and make it harder for those who do not have citizenship to participate in a meaningful way in society. This may not have been the intention of policymakers, but it is a result of their actions nonetheless. The legal status of citizenship will remain an important policy area, but it must be managed within the broader contexts of ‘Britishness’ and ‘citizenship’.

What Are Human Rights and How Do We Best Define Them?

posted in: News | 0

In the aftermath of multiple world wars and the horrors of the Holocaust, human rights emerged as an enduring commitment to prevent those darkest moments in history from ever happening again. But despite great progress — the abolition of slavery, women’s right to vote, the end of apartheid — these basic standards still have not been universally respected. What exactly are human rights, and how do we best defend them?

In principle, everyone has the same fundamental rights. These are often referred to as “natural” rights or “universal” rights, because they seem to be inalienable and intrinsic to the human condition. They are derived from the fact that people, as individuals, have a moral value that is unique to them: their own dignity as human beings. It is this value that makes it wrong for people to violate others. Most individuals, if they realize that they are violating someone else’s human rights, will seek to avoid doing so. They are also subject to the moral sanctions of their own consciences and the potential embarrassment that would result from publicly violating a fundamental human right. In addition, the majority of nations in the world now have legislation that obliges their citizens to respect the human rights of other citizens, even if they disagree with their views or actions.

This legal regime, based on international law and treaties, is the foundation of modern human rights. It lays out the basic principles that should be embodied in national and international law, as well as the basic standards of behavior that are expected of all persons. It is a system that provides a common standard of decency for the entire planet and a way to measure and monitor governments’ compliance with those standards.

The UDHR defines six categories of fundamental rights — life, liberty and security of person; the right to freedom of opinion and expression; the right to education; the right to work; the right to housing and food; the right to freedom of movement; and the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and welfare of the individual. Subsequent treaties have expanded this list to include the rights of women, children, racial and ethnic minorities, indigenous peoples, disabled persons and other groups.

Those who defend this political conception of human rights tend to be agnostic about the existence of universal natural moral rights, but they reject wholesale moral skepticism. They are usually inclined toward cognitivism, moral realism and intuitionism as the bases of morality. They believe that human rights can be understood and justified as the norms of a highly useful political practice, and that this practice can play certain important roles at both the national and international levels (for a discussion of these issues see Section 2.3.).

They argue that the main political role of human rights is to serve as an effective standard for international evaluations of government treatment of their citizens, as a basis for economic sanctions and military intervention, and as a guide for governments in choosing and implementing policies to improve human rights. They also believe that human rights can and do play other useful political roles, including providing a mechanism for evaluating the morality of foreign policies and for monitoring compliance with international laws and treaties.

The Immigrant Experience in America

posted in: News | 0

Immigration involves moving to a new country and establishing residency there. It can be voluntary or involuntary, temporary or permanent. In 2019, the United States had 23.2 million immigrants, or about 14 percent of the population. About half of those were naturalized citizens, and the other half were unauthorized immigrants.

Some people have a negative view of migrants and believe that they are a burden on economies in which they live, while others see them as an important source of economic growth. But the truth is that, at a national level, the impact of migration depends on many individual factors and is complex.

Migrants move for a variety of reasons, from wanting to pursue educational opportunities or business opportunities to escaping war and persecution. They come from countries of all sizes and types, and their experiences vary widely.

Depending on their origin and the nature of their migration, some immigrants face a harder time settling into their communities than others. For example, a refugee who leaves home because of a war may have to let go of a lot very quickly, often without the opportunity to prepare for it or say goodbye to loved ones. It’s also difficult for a migrant who enters the country illegally to get access to education, jobs and services.

Even for those who become citizens, the path to success is far from guaranteed. For example, researchers have found that those who are more successful in their first jobs tend to have higher levels of English proficiency and longer tenures in the United States than those who are less successful. But those who take part in civic engagement are also more likely to have better job outcomes than those who don’t (Chiswick and Miller 2009).

As a whole, immigrants contribute significantly to the American economy. They are consumers, workers and entrepreneurs. They generate billions in business revenue. And they pay tens of billions in taxes, including state and local taxes. But, as the Pew Research Center’s recent report “Now That I’m Here” finds, it takes a long time for most immigrant-led households to become fully integrated into U.S. society and reach the point where their members can climb the socioeconomic ladder, develop social connections and be civically engaged.

We need to have bigger, more nuanced discussions about the immigrant experience in America. Discussions that attend to the specific contexts that so often get swallowed up by a label that alternately paints migrants as a problem (overwhelming our borders, sucking up governmental resources, taking American jobs) or as model success stories. We need to hear from the people who are at the heart of this story. Their voices can help us understand how to achieve the true promise of America’s democracy. To that end, this month, we asked a nationally representative sample of foreign-born adults whether or not they were “fully integrated” in American life. We then conducted focus groups and interviews in New York City, Los Angeles, Miami and Sioux Falls, SD.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

Deportation is the removal, or forced return to a home country, of an individual by immigration authorities after a hearing. This process is overseen by the Department of Homeland Security and its law enforcement division, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). It can start when someone enters the United States without permission or overstays their visa, or when they are found to have committed certain crimes, including aggravated felonies.

If the government decides to pursue deportation, it must notify the individual and schedule a removal hearing. The proceedings are a lengthy process and can result in the permanent loss of one’s ability to live, work, or visit the U.S. Individuals who are arrested on criminal charges or who pose a threat to public safety may be placed in expedited removal proceedings, meaning they can be removed from the country without a judge’s review if they are within 100 miles of the U.S. border and have been in the country for two weeks or less. In these cases, individuals don’t have the right to a lawyer provided at government expense and must represent themselves.

The decision to remove a person from the country can be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals. In addition, a person can ask for a stay of deportation or removal, which will allow them to remain in the country until their case is decided by a judge. People who have legal rights to remain in the country, such as lawful permanent residents or holders of visas such as F-1 student visas and K-1 fiance(e) visas, can file a request for relief from removal.

Immigration Judges hear the cases of non-citizens and determine how the case should proceed. The first hearing is a master calendar hearing where the judge verifies the facts of the case from the Notice to Appear and assesses whether the respondent has any basis on which they can claim eligibility for relief from removal.

It can take anywhere from 3-6 months to get a hearing for non-detained individuals and shorter time periods for those who are being held in custody. The length of time can be affected by a number of factors, such as the location of the court and how many immigration judges are at each facility. The current administration has pressured immigration judges to complete cases more quickly, which means that continuances – requests to delay the case – are less likely to be granted.

Ultimately, it’s the duty of a government to make sure that the harms it inflicts through deportation are proportionate to the cause it pursues. This involves a two-part evaluation—first, establishing that the deportation is a necessary means of accomplishing the state’s purpose and, second, evaluating how well the actual implementation of the deportation measures inflicts those harms.

In our view, the best way to do this is by ensuring that deportation enforcement always operates in a context of fundamental human rights – because that’s the only way to ensure that the harms inflicted are not excessive.

Transitioning From Military to Civilian Life

posted in: News | 0

A civilian is someone who is not a member of the military or any other belligerent group. Civilians are also those who are not a part of a government or a religious organization. A civilian can be found in any number of jobs including the law enforcement and medical fields. Civilians are generally paid hourly or on salary and are not guaranteed a job for life.

The transition from military to civilian life can be difficult for many service members. Leaving behind the close-knit community of other service members and friends can be challenging, especially when you may find that your new neighbors and coworkers cannot relate to your experiences in the military. You must work to build new relationships with people who will understand your unique perspective and can connect with you on a deeper level.

One of the biggest differences between military and civilian life is communication style. The way that you communicate with your friends, family and coworkers is going to change dramatically when you make the switch. It is important to find ways to connect with your loved ones that work for you and be patient during this process. Trying to force your old communication methods on civilians will only lead to frustration for both parties.

Civilians also must be aware that the laws that they follow are different than those of the military. In some cases, they will need to follow military laws in certain situations while in others, the civilians will be subject to a set of rules and guidelines that are specific to the location where they are. They will not be subject to military court-martial unless they commit certain offenses that are considered part of the criminal code, such as sexual misconduct or drug trafficking.

Although civilians can be a part of the belligerent group, they must not engage in combat operations or take part in planning or organizing the hostilities. Under the laws of war, civilians who take part in hostilities lose their civilian status and become a prisoner of war. This is also true for civilians who work for a non-state armed group in a situation of armed conflict, although there are some exceptions.

The Meaning of Citizenship – A Policy Primer

posted in: News | 0

Citizenship is a legal status that confers the right to live in a state and to claim benefits, voting rights and access to public services. It can be granted by birth or naturalisation and is usually a precondition for employment. It can also have social and cultural dimensions, providing a sense of belonging to a community and a sense of responsibility to the state. But the definition of citizenship varies between nations and can be shaped by political culture, values and beliefs. In this policy primer we explore the meaning of citizenship, its relations to ideals of cohesion and integration and how it is shaped by the law.

There is an enduring debate over what citizenship means. It is often framed by the question: Is citizenship an end point, a reward for being integrated, or is it part of the process of constructing a cohesive society? If it is the latter, then it would suggest that citizenship should be widely available. But if it is the former, then restricting access would undermine its value.

In the United Kingdom citizenship policy is a particularly fascinating example of this debate as it involves both the legal concept of citizenship and broader questions about belonging and Britishness. The current government has reframed the debate by making settlement and citizenship acquisition more difficult (by breaking the link between length of stay and the right to settle) and by introducing tests to promote citizenship. In doing so it is creating an increasingly narrow space for a sense of belonging without formal citizenship and sharpening the distinction between citizens and non-citizens.

This move has been prompted by the Bradford disturbances of 2001 which led to a new emphasis on community cohesion and a sense of belonging in the UK. The Cantle Report, and later the Building Cohesive Communities document commissioned by Home Office highlighted the importance of English language acquisition and an oath of national allegiance for migrants. These ideas were then taken up by the Life in the UK Advisory Group and incorporated into the government’s policy on naturalisation and citizenship.

The aims of this policy are ambiguous and the relationship to ideals of cohesion, integration and equality is unclear. There are many ideas being brought to bear on citizenship acquisition processes, and these inevitably bring competing priorities and pressures. This policy primer argues that it is important to understand the nature of these competing ideas and how they affect the policy process. This will help to inform the development of policies that have a positive impact on society and avoid those which are detrimental.

Understanding the Concept of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

Human rights are a set of fundamental principles that define everyone’s basic dignity. They are universal, inalienable, indivisible and interdependent; they include political, civil, economic, social and cultural rights. Those who violate them should be held accountable for their actions.

The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted in 1948 to provide a common understanding of what everyone is entitled to under the law. It outlines the core tenets of human rights and the responsibility of states to protect their citizens from abuse, oppression, injustice and genocide.

It was the first time that governments had agreed on a common list of core human rights. It is still the most widely recognized international treaty addressing the core concepts of human rights. The Declaration also established a unique procedure, the Universal Periodic Review, which involves each country being reviewed by other UN member states every four years.

While the Declaration and other international treaties have helped to make major advances in the protection of human rights, it is important to recognize that there are continuing challenges. In many countries, the human rights situation continues to deteriorate. Millions are affected by poverty, conflict and natural disasters that impede their right to adequate food, housing, health care and education. People in some countries are subjected to indiscriminate attacks, the destruction of vital infrastructure and forced displacement by militias, armed groups and security forces. Governments fail to respond adequately to the needs of people fleeing from violence and persecution.

A key question for human rights scholars is how to explain the core idea of human rights. Advocates of a moral conception of human rights often argue against wholesale moral skepticism while maintaining that there are sound normative justifications for the content, normativity and role of human rights.

Some human rights philosophers, such as Alan Gewirth, have argued that human rights are grounded in the values of individual autonomy and agency. This view of human rights is problematic for several reasons. For one, it is difficult to show how a theory of human rights that is grounded in normative agency and autonomy can provide the kind of robustness and coherence that is needed for the effective protection of human rights.

A second problem with this approach is that it fails to account for the fact that human rights are not just something that we can ascribe to the divine or to any other metaphysical realm. They are also a product of contemporary social arrangements. As such, they are susceptible to all the same controversies about their content and legitimacy that we encounter with other social norms and principles. It is therefore important to find a form of justification that provides both a rationale for the existence of human rights and a way to link them with the other moral norms that are deemed essential to human flourishing. This is the challenge that faces all advocates of a political conception of human rights.

The Importance of Immigration

posted in: News | 0

Immigration is one of the world’s oldest and most widely practiced forms of political and economic migration. Historically, it has had immense social and economic benefits for states. But it also brings challenges, particularly for the immigrants themselves. Learning a new language, mastering a complex culture, and coping with everyday life in a strange place can be daunting. And the memory of family and friends left behind can fuel feelings of homesickness.

Whether they’re legally authorized or not, immigrants are part of America’s population and often play a vital role in the economy. Across the country, immigrant communities are a major source of high-tech workers and construction professionals, for example. And they are especially concentrated in some key occupations: Forty-four percent of medical scientists and 42 percent of computer software developers are foreign born, according to the George W. Bush Institute.

The word “immigrant” has many definitions, but in general it refers to a person who lives in a country other than the one where he or she was born. The term can apply to anyone who has moved from a home country for any reason, including those who travel for work, study or retirement. It can include those who have become citizens of a different nation, those who are married to a citizen or have children who are naturalized, as well as those who are undocumented.

Around the globe, an estimated 3.4 percent of the population is an international migrant. They live in countries other than the ones where they were born, and about three-quarters of them move between low-income nations. And the number of migrants has been rising in recent decades, though it has slowed down in some regions.

In the United States, about 800,000 people settle here each year through a variety of legal channels: 480,000 to reunite with spouses, parents and children; 140,000 to fill jobs that the government has determined can’t be filled by Americans; 55,000 to enter through the diversity lottery; and 85,000 to receive asylum because they have been persecuted or fear persecution in their homelands. But many more live in the country without documents.

Like all citizens, immigrants have the same basic rights, including freedom of speech and religion, the right to privacy, and equal treatment under the law. They pay taxes that fund government actions, from improving schools to building roads and modernizing water systems, and are less likely than the general population to use welfare services. Many are business owners, and their purchasing power helps keep local economies competitive. Moreover, in a dynamic process known as “comparative advantage,” immigrants boost economic growth by driving productivity gains and raising the wages of complementary workers. They also help revitalize cities and towns that might otherwise lose their residents, and they play a critical role in the development of many far-flung rural communities. As a result, immigration has been a major driver of the nation’s economic and demographic change over the past century.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

Deportation is the formal removal of a non-citizen from a country. The process is often complicated and lengthy. It is typically triggered by an immigration violation such as entering the country illegally, committing a crime in the United States, or remaining in the United States beyond the period of time allowed by law.

Countries have different policies and laws regarding the deportation of their citizens. Some have specific grounds for deportation such as a criminal conviction, while others may have more generalized reasons such as “public safety” or “national security.” In the United States, there are two ways to get deported:

The first way is by being placed in “removal proceedings.” This is when ICE formally accuses you of having removed from the country illegally, or of violating the terms of your visa or other status. The government must then prove these allegations with evidence. If the judge finds that you are removable, you will be ordered to leave the United States (or a particular country) at ICE’s expense. This can be done through a charter flight or by arranging for you to depart with the assistance of commercial airlines.

There are several ways to avoid deportation, including hiring a Chicago immigration attorney and fighting your case in court. In addition, a successful appeal can lead to your case being reopened and the deportation order being reversed. Finally, you can request a pardon or cancellation of your deportation from the President or federal courts.

People who are subject to deportation may face serious and long-lasting consequences for themselves, their families, communities, and the countries from which they come. Many of these individuals are long-settled in the US and have developed a strong sense of identity as American citizens. In addition, as Brock argues, they have formed relationships with others in the community that are significant to their wellbeing and their sense of purpose. Uprooting these individuals and forcing them back into hostile environments can lead to severed family ties, poverty, and mental health issues.

In addition, the return of deported individuals to their home countries can trigger violence and persecution, particularly against women, children, and people with disabilities. Deported individuals can also be subject to gang violence, and instabilities in the country’s political, social, and economic systems can lead to violent retaliation against those who have been deported.

Throughout his presidency, President Trump has shown himself to be hostile toward immigrants and refugees. His policy of separating families at the border, his attacks on Muslim communities, and his calls to build a wall in environmentally sensitive areas have enraged advocates of immigration reform and fueled anti-immigrant sentiments. As a result, many fear that the Trump administration will continue its push to remove millions of people from the country.

The Definition of a Civilian

posted in: News | 0

A civilian is a person who does not belong to an armed force or engage in hostilities. Civilians are a group of people that are subject to certain rules and regulations under international humanitarian law. In addition, they are protected from the dangers of military operations, especially during armed conflict. This is the definition of civilian in general, but there are also other specific categories of civilians that are entitled to enhanced protection under international law.

In the military, it was often difficult to make time to take care of yourself. Your focus was on your team and the mission at hand, so things like getting enough sleep, maintaining a healthy diet, and taking care of your skin were not as important. When you transition into civilian life, it is normal to want to splurge on some of these areas that were rarely given attention in the military. Some examples include spending more money on beauty products and grooming items, as well as getting more frequent haircuts and makeup.

There are also many responsibilities that come with being a civilian. You may be required to attend classes or workshops on topics that are not related to your career. You might be expected to dress according to a particular standard or to be on-time for work. Additionally, if you are a civilian working in a military-run location, you may be subject to additional rules and codes of conduct that are specifically tailored to the environment.

If you are a civilian, it is not as easy to get called up for active duty or to be promoted. This is because civilians are not subject to the same military laws as military members. They cannot be summoned for court-martial or sent to jail for military crimes, such as sexual misconduct. The only exception to this is if they are on military property and committing a crime that goes against the civilian code of conduct.

Some countries have a separate category of civilians who are allowed to serve in the armed forces, while others do not. This distinction makes it possible for civilians to have a more direct role in policymaking and decision making. This is an area where civilians have been highly valuable in the military, because they are able to bring a fresh perspective to issues that are complex and controversial. Their careers have usually been in fields that prepare them for balancing extremely diverse interests, and they are skilled at understanding the interplay of power, both financial and social, that makes up any organization or society. They know how to organize and resource institutions, and they understand the importance of building relationships that can help them achieve their goals. Civilians can also contribute to a sense of fairness in the context of military operations, by ensuring that all sides are treated equally and fairly. This can make a significant difference in the outcome of an operation. Having a more balanced view of what is at stake can also prevent unjustified attacks on civilians.

Understanding the Concept of Citizen

posted in: News | 0

Citizenship is a complex concept, but in general it refers to a person’s relationship with the state. In a formal sense it is a legal status which, in rich liberal democracies, brings with it the right to vote and access to welfare or health services. It is also a social bond, expressing a commitment to a society. For some, this is rooted in a shared cultural heritage or the need to protect common interests such as economic security and national identity. For others, it is about the obligation to participate in public life. For the ancient Greeks, a person’s private and public lives were inextricably connected, so that to not participate was to be “either beast or god.” This is not the same as the modern western conception which separates the two worlds. The political dimension of citizenship has a long history in the West, and for much of this time the most popular definition has been one which defines it as a legal status through which an identical set of rights is accorded to all members of the polity. This is known as the universalist or unitary model and it became progressively dominant in post-war liberal democracies.

However, the success of welfare states in promoting social cohesion and the growth of pluralist societies challenge this model’s underlying assumptions. It is now questioned whether the notion of a public sphere can really be insulated from private/social/economic life and if so, how does this impact on conceptions of citizen?

Differences between conceptions of citizenship centre around four disagreements: over the precise definition of each element (legal, political and identity); over their relative importance; over the causal and/or conceptual relations between them; and over appropriate normative standards. This entry’s first section examines the three dimensions of citizenship and sees how they are instantiated in very different ways within the two dominant models: the republican and the liberal.

The second section focuses on debates about the relation between citizenship and ideals of social integration, cohesion and equality. It concludes that if these ideals are to be sustainable then citizenship must be seen as a valuable status, associated not only with civil and political rights but also with the fulfilment of social and cultural rights.

The entry’s third section considers the challenges that globalisation poses to citizenship theory. It concludes that for citizenship to be a source of solidarity it must be linked not only with the state but also with a wider civic and social network of organisations and individuals. As a result, there has been a rise in policy initiatives aimed at encouraging participation in public life, including statutory programmes to promote citizenship education. This has been accompanied by an increase in formal processes for acquiring citizenship, often based on tests whose aims include promoting the idea of civic participation. This has generated new discussions about how to define these concepts and to what extent they are related to each other.

Understanding the Nature of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

Many people are aware of basic human rights – their right to food, a safe home and the ability to earn money. They also know that all humans have the right to freedom of speech and of religion. However, many people are not fully aware of what human rights actually mean. They are not always clear about the nature of those rights, their limitations and how to protect them. This article seeks to clarify those misconceptions and give readers a better understanding of the nature of human rights, their history and their current status.

Human rights are a set of basic principles that bind all members of the human family together. They are based on the recognition that every individual, as a member of society and as a human being, has certain inherent dignity and value that must be respected. Human rights help to ensure that everyone is treated equally, regardless of who they are, where they live or what they do.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted in 1948, in response to the barbarity that had outraged humankind during World War II, and to prevent those bleak moments from happening again. It outlined that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights, and that those rights cannot be taken away except under specific circumstances – such as when they break a law or commit a crime.

It also recognised that rights can only be guaranteed by a system of international rules and laws, with the help of an international body to monitor their compliance. This body, the United Nations, is responsible for promoting and protecting human rights.

Throughout the centuries, philosophers and other thinkers have debated the meaning and significance of human rights. Many have been influenced by ancient Greek and Roman thinking, in particular the philosophy of Stoicism, which held that a person’s behaviour should be judged according to the “laws of nature”.

More recently, philosopher John Rawls proposed a political conception of human rights, based on an examination of the main roles they play in some political sphere, such as international relations or national politics. He called these the “justifying generic functions of rights.”

While he acknowledged that human rights are not necessarily universally applicable, his theory suggested that governments and other duty-bearers would be most likely to respect them. He also argued that those who fail to meet their obligations should be held accountable by the courts or other appropriate bodies.

In the years since the UDHR was established, there has been great progress in the recognition and protection of human rights, but the battle is far from over. It is important that individuals, groups and organisations continue to raise awareness about human rights issues. They can do this through campaigning and by supporting organisations that promote and protect human rights. They can also use their influence to hold governments and other duty-bearers accountable for their adherence to human rights standards.

Working and Non-Working Immigrants in the United States

posted in: News | 0

Immigration has long been a vital part of the American experience and a key to its success. Today, 14 percent of the nation’s residents are foreign-born, including about 7.3 million who live in the United States legally and 2.8 million who do not.

Immigrants come to the United States for a variety of reasons, from seeking opportunity and a better life for themselves and their families to fleeing poor or dangerous conditions in their country of origin. Despite the fact that most immigrants say they have been better off here than in their countries of origin, many still face significant challenges in their new home. In addition to financial concerns, many immigrants say they are subjected to discrimination on the job or in their communities. They also face a lack of access to public benefits such as health care and social services.

For most immigrants, working is the primary way they earn a living. Most cite a desire to provide for themselves and their family as the main motivation for moving to the United States. This desire is what drives them to work in many difficult and sometimes physically demanding jobs, including some that they feel they are overqualified for. They are disproportionately employed in industries like construction, sales, and health care.

Nearly half of working immigrants have a bachelor’s degree or higher. Three in four are self-employed, and most have jobs in construction, manufacturing or healthcare. In contrast, about two-thirds of the nonworking immigrant population consists of students and people who are retired or homemakers.

The vast majority of immigrants, both legal and unauthorized, live in metropolitan areas. New York, Los Angeles and Miami are home to the largest numbers of immigrants in the nation. Approximately 20 states have larger proportions of foreign-born residents than the national average.

While the largest metro areas are the most common settlement locations for immigrants, their numbers do not tell the whole story. Many states, such as Hawaii and Texas, have higher shares of immigrants than the national average. They are often located in historic immigrant gateways and have large communities of immigrants that span across generations.

Almost three in four immigrants say they would choose to move to the United States again if given the chance. This figure is consistent across ages, education levels, incomes and races/ethnicities.

The vast majority of immigrants, both legal and undocumented, report speaking English well or very well. Most, however, have limited family connections in the United States and are reliant on wage-based employment to support their families. As a result, first- and 1.5-generation immigrants may have to focus on finding stable, secure, and dignified work and have little time or space to consider pursuing their passions in the arts or other professional fields unless they are able to do so with a green card or some other form of legal status. Some may decide to do so later in their careers when they have established themselves and their children are older.

What is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

A citizen is a person who, whether by birth, the nationality of one or both parents, or naturalization, has full rights and responsibilities as part of a nation or political community. A citizen also has the right to vote in elections and to participate in public life. Citizenship is a privilege that requires the willingness to work for the good of your country. To be a good citizen, you should help people who cannot help themselves and always respect others’ property. It is important to take part in civic activities and make sure you vote in every election. You should also get to know your local government and pay attention to what they are doing in your neighborhood.

In recent times, there have been many debates over the nature of citizenship and its place in a democratic society. These debates are typically framed in terms of the relationship between the state, citizenship and rights. The first debate concerns the question of whether citizenship can be conceived as a status entitling its holders to an identical set of civil, political and social rights. This is known as the universalist model of citizenship, and it became dominant in post-World War II liberal democracies.

An alternative to the universalist model is the idea that citizenship may be defined by a particular social class, religion, culture or other characteristic. This is often called the pluralist model of citizenship and, in contrast to the universalist model, it recognises that citizens of different social groups are entitled to equal recognition (Kymlicka, 1992).

Another point of debate is the extent to which the private/private sphere and the public/political sphere should be considered separate or interconnected. This issue is crucial to the debate over citizenship because it has shaped conceptions of citizenship since Aristotle, and it continues to shape the theory of democracy in general and political philosophy in particular.

A third debate centres on the role of globalisation in citizenship theory. The premise of much scholarship is that citizenship’s necessary context is the sovereign, territorial state. This is contested, however, by those who argue that citizenship can be exercised in a range of’sites’ below and above the nation-state, such as the family, the workplace or the church.

When asked to identify traits of a good citizen, most Americans agreed that voting in elections is very important, and most agreed that paying taxes and obeying the law are very important. But there were sizable partisan differences on several other items, including knowing the Pledge of Allegiance, volunteering to help others and showing the flag. These data suggest that mainstream definitions of citizenship do not resonate with many young adults. They are more likely to talk about a justice-oriented vision of citizenship that emphasizes participation in civic activity that promotes a just and fair society. They also focus on personal empowerment and civic opportunities. This is a new form of citizenship that is not yet fully established in the United States, but it is a promising way forward.

The Importance of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

human rights

As human beings we have a natural desire to respect and preserve our own dignity as individuals. Human rights are created to help us do that. They are needed because no government – or group of people – has a perfect record on human rights all the time, and even ‘established democracies’ can sometimes fall short on this front.

In addition to the moral sanctions of their own conscience or that of others, most governments – and all states – are obliged by international treaties to respect the basic human rights of their citizens. This includes a duty to protect them from violations and to investigate complaints of human rights abuses by individuals or groups. There are now more than seventy human rights treaties, in place at both global and regional levels.

These treaties form a legal framework that gives effect to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). They are an important tool for the protection of people’s rights, but they can only do so much. The real work of defending human rights is the responsibility of governments and society as a whole.

The fundamental principles of human rights are universality, equality and non-discrimination. All living humans – or at least all individuals who are able to meet the criteria for human dignity – have these rights. That means that nobody should be discriminated against on the basis of their gender, age, political affiliation, religion or occupation.

All people also have the right to life, liberty and security. That includes the right to have a home, food, clothing and medical treatment. It also includes the right to be free from slavery, torture and forced labour.

These rights, together with the right to education, are considered essential for a person’s well-being and development. They are also essential to a person’s ability to enjoy all other human rights.

There are two types of human rights violations – those committed by people and those committed by governments. In the latter case, governments are either committing the violation or failing to act to prevent it. For example, the United States failed to protect black Americans from lynchings in the nineteenth century and so was complicit in the violations.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights lays down fundamental rights that all people are entitled to enjoy. It is the basis for a number of other international legal instruments.

There are many organisations, both “professional” NGOs and spontaneous grass roots movements, that are engaged in human rights work. Most will be glad to have new members and will be happy to provide training and support to anyone wanting to take action to defend human rights. It is worth bearing in mind that policy change – whether at national or international level – happens as a result of a build-up of pressure on issues, often by many different people and organisations working together. For this reason it is often more effective for young people starting out in the field of human rights to work at local or regional level, where there are opportunities for building a network and forming partnerships with other organisations.

The Importance of Immigration

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

For millions of people around the world, leaving home for a new country is a major step in life. Some people move for work, others to reunite with family members or pursue a dream. Still others leave their countries to escape persecution or poverty. All of these migrations create far-reaching changes in the places they call home.

Immigration benefits all Americans in many ways. It fills our labor force, and increases GDP and average wages. It fuels innovation and entrepreneurship by adding workers with skills that employers would otherwise have trouble finding in the native-born population.

It helps bolster the national birth rate, which has fallen to historic lows and can lead to a decline in labor force participation and reduced demand for housing and other goods, and it brings young workers to replace baby boomers entering retirement. It also adds energy and dynamism to our economy by providing a new source of demand for the services of government and private businesses, including schools, hospitals and transportation systems.

Immigrants are less likely than native-born citizens to use welfare, and they contribute a larger share of their income to taxes, helping fund government actions like building roads, improving schools, modernizing water systems, and running courthouses. They are also more likely to start companies, and they bring new ideas and perspectives into the workforce and culture.

As a result, immigrants have helped save and revitalize many urban areas that were losing population; made possible the growth of cities such as Las Vegas and Orlando that had never been more than small towns; and resuscitated far-flung rural communities. It is no wonder that immigrants have become the face of America’s changing and diverse society.

Moreover, immigrants have a deep sense of loyalty to their adopted homes and are very active in civic life. In fact, more than a quarter of all voters are immigrants or children of immigrants, and their influence on American politics is significant.

If you are looking for a new job, it is important to apply for a wide variety of positions. Different jobs, companies and hiring leaders have their own nuances and priorities when it comes to the type of candidates they want. It may take some time to find a position that is the “right fit,” but it’s worth it. The more applications you make, the better your chances of a successful outcome. By applying to several jobs, you increase the number of opportunities and improve your chances of getting noticed by employers. It is also a good idea to rent your accommodation on a month-to-month basis instead of signing a long-term lease, which will reduce upfront costs and allow you to easily change your location. This way, you will be able to test out the different parts of the USA before making a final decision on where to settle. This will be the beginning of a new adventure in your life, and you’ll have a chance to explore the country on your terms.

What Is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the expulsion of a person from a country. In practice, it occurs in a variety of ways: For example, someone who is caught illegally entering or re-entering the United States may be ordered to leave. The government might also order the removal of someone who has been convicted of crimes like homicide, trafficking in drugs or other controlled substances, or domestic violence. In addition, a foreign national who has participated in activities that threaten U.S. national security might be removed, as well as those who have been found to be gang members.

Many of these deportations have serious consequences for their victims, including their children. Almost six million children in the United States live with at least one parent who has been deported or is in removal proceedings. Deportations have significant emotional, developmental, and economic repercussions for these families, as well as their communities and the country as a whole.

The harms inflicted by deportation can vary considerably, depending on how long the person has been settled and on her health and the social, political, and economic circumstances of her destination country. Moreover, a careful assessment must be made of whether the state’s deportation-induced harms are proportionate to its aims.

As a practical matter, it is not easy to prove that the benefits of deportation outweigh the harms that a person suffers simply by virtue of being sent back to her home country. This is because the state’s aims are not always clear and because the means used for deportation can have a range of negative effects, from human rights violations to economic and demographic declines in her home country.

For example, deportations can contribute to the rise of transnational criminal organizations such as MS-13 in Central America and to the resurgence of the Gambia’s once-powerful dictatorship as its citizens are forced to return. Moreover, deportations can strain local health-care and public-service systems.

Deportations are often complicated by nonresponse or bureaucratic hurdles erected by the origin country. For example, if the United States requests the help of an embassy in verifying identification and issuing travel documents as part of a removal, the embassy can refuse to cooperate or erect cumbersome bureaucratic obstacles to make it difficult for the government to get the information it needs.

If you are facing deportation, you should seek legal services to determine what your options are. In some cases, you may be able to leave the country at your own expense (voluntary departure). You can find legal services through the government or through nonprofit organizations. In other cases, a judge might allow you to appeal the decision. If you do not appeal, the deportation will take place. Deportations are typically carried out by ICE Air Operations. People from Mexico are flown to border cities, while those from Central American countries are flown directly to their home countries. Read more about how the deportation process works.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is a person who is not a member of the military. People who are civils serve their country in a variety of ways. Some work in the law, some work in education, and some are doctors. Civilians are not armed with weapons but have many duties that they must perform. They must obey laws, pay taxes, and do their jobs. If they do not do their jobs, they may be punished. A civilian may also be a student in college or university.

The distinction between combatant and civilian is a central question in international humanitarian law, including the three Geneva Conventions and the two Additional Protocols. Humanitarian law requires that civilians be protected against attack unless and for so long as they do not directly participate in hostilities. Civilians who do directly participate in hostilities lose this protection and become combatants (GC IV Arts. 45.1, 51.3; APII Art. 13-3).

It is not uncommon for a civilian to be referred to as a “civi” by a member of the military. This is usually done because it is a way to show respect and courtesy. It is also a way to let the person know that they are not a member of the military and are therefore not a threat to the civilians who are working to protect the United States.

Civilians also work in the armed forces to teach new recruits the rules of engagement and the basics of warfare. They are a vital part of the training process and often work closely with members of the armed forces. This allows the armed forces to concentrate on learning new skills and tactics and helps ensure that new recruits are prepared for battle once they enter the battlefield.

There are many reasons why a person would choose to become a civilian. It could be the need to take care of a family, or it might be that they have been injured in the armed forces and cannot continue to serve. Whatever the reason, it is important that people understand their rights and know how to go about getting a civilian status.

A person who is a civilian can file for benefits that help with the transition from military to civilian life. There are various options that they can look into, such as financial aid and scholarships. They can also contact their employers for information on tuition assistance programs. In addition, there are government agencies that can provide support to a civilian. In some cases, the government will even reimburse the cost of school. This can be a huge benefit for many families and individuals who are struggling financially. Depending on the situation, it might be in the best interest of the individual to hire an attorney to help with the case. This will help them get the resources they need and ensure that they are protected throughout the process. It might even save them money in the long run.

The Concept of Citizenship

posted in: News | 0

citizen

Citizenship is the legal status of a person, often associated with rights and obligations, within a nation, state or commonwealth. It can also indicate a social relationship of loyalty and reciprocity, as described by terms such as “belonging” or “shared cultural heritage.” Different nations define citizenship in different ways. For example, some allow citizens to vote in elections, while others require them to pay taxes.

Although the concept of citizenship is generally seen as a Western phenomenon, there has recently been an upsurge of philosophical interest in the subject. In particular, the relation between citizenship and the political is a topic of concern to scholars from diverse disciplines, including philosophy, history, sociology, and law.

In the classical and liberal traditions, the concept of citizenship is understood as a legal status that allows individuals to engage in politics on equal terms with others. This is the basis for the modern notion of a constitutional democracy in which all citizens are considered to be equal participants in the political process, even though they may not share all the same opinions about what is politically desirable.

From the 17th century onwards, other ideas of citizenship have developed, mainly in reaction to the absolutist monarchies that had become dominant in Europe and elsewhere. For example, the term citizen came to be used as a label for members of the middle class in urban societies. In the medieval period, titles like burgher (in Italian or German) or grand burgher were used to signify membership of a mercantile class and thereby privileges and protection from feudal overlords.

The modern understanding of citizenship has come to include both the idea that citizens have political rights and the idea that they have responsibilities to their community. In the latter case, the concept is sometimes referred to as the “rule of law” or the idea that citizens have duties to obey laws enacted by the government and that it is the duty of citizens to help enforce these laws.

It is widely accepted that the responsibilities of citizens are more important than their political rights, but this is an area where there are considerable differences in the interpretations of what constitutes these duties. For example, some countries recognize all adults as citizens who have a right to vote in elections and the duty to participate in civic activities; other countries consider only those born within the territory of the country to be citizens; and still others limit citizenship to those who can prove their parents were citizens at the time of birth.

In contrast, other political theories of citizenship have emphasized the role of an individual’s personal experience in shaping his or her sense of belonging and in defining what it means to be a citizen. This perspective has been most clearly articulated by the republican position, which asserts that citizenship is a matter of an individual’s participation in politics rather than a legal status based on inherited qualities such as race or religion.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the expulsion of a noncitizen from a country or region, typically based on their violation of a nation’s laws. The practice is overseen by immigration law enforcement agencies, most commonly the Department of Homeland Security and its agency, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Deportation can be a harsh punishment for breaking specific rules or laws that have little to do with crime. It can also have a profound impact on families, communities, and nations where those who are deported return.

There are many ways to end up in removal proceedings, but all cases begin with ICE formally accusing the person of being removable. The reasons vary from being in the country without legal documents to having a felony conviction that renders a person inadmissible to remain in the United States.

When a person is placed in removal proceedings, they have a chance to defend themselves against the allegations through immigration court hearings. During these hearings, the immigration judge verifies the facts on their Notice to Appear and determines whether they are eligible for any relief from deportation, such as a cancellation of removal or asylum.

The process for removal can be incredibly lengthy. It depends on a number of factors, such as the respondent’s detention status, the location of their case, and how quickly they can find a lawyer to represent them. Additionally, the current administration is pressuring immigration judges to complete cases as fast as possible so continuances to pursue pending benefits are less likely.

Once the judge has made a determination on their case, the respondent can be ordered to leave the country, or they may choose to depart voluntarily. ICE runs regular flights to Mexico, Central America, and other countries for those who decide to leave on their own. The process isn’t without its complications, though. For example, people who are removed can face difficulties at the border when trying to reenter the United States or even in their home countries.

Those who are deported to their home countries often return to chaotic and dangerous situations. They may suffer from violence or abuse, especially if they are women or children. Some may be subjected to torture, rape, or murder. Researchers at the Global Migration Project have created a database with numerous reports from migrant shelters, aid groups, law offices, and mortuaries that document the harm deportees have faced upon returning home.

For these reasons, the practice of deportation has drawn scrutiny, especially in recent years with heightened immigration workplace raids and terminations of Temporary Protected Status for Salvadorans and Hondurans. The impacts of these actions go far beyond the individuals who are being removed from the country. Their deportation can affect spouses, children, and parents who are US citizens, as well as community members and business owners who depend on them for their labor and support. These ripple effects are what makes the policy controversial. Deportation is an essential part of our nation’s immigration system, but it needs to be handled carefully and fairly.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is a member of the population who does not belong to any armed force or take part in hostilities. Civilians are protected by the laws of war and international humanitarian law, such as the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols. The term can also be used to describe non-military members of the armed forces, including police personnel and military chaplains, who are not combatants and therefore not entitled to prisoner-of-war status. It can also refer to any person who is not a political leader or other high-ranking official.

A military person who has transitioned into the civilian life is referred to as a “civilian.” The change can be challenging for some veterans, especially when re-integrating with friends and family. It’s important for veterans to remember that their experiences in the military were unique and may not make sense to people who haven’t served.

Civilian is also a legal term that is defined in the Code of Criminal Procedure of the United States. The Code defines a “civilian” as any person who is not a member of the armed forces or an officer. This includes enlisted personnel, family members of military personnel, and the general public. The term is also used in the military to refer to a person who does not hold a rank, such as an Administrative Specialist or clerk.

Those who have transitioned into civilian life must understand that they are subject to different rules and regulations. This can include different employment and housing opportunities, as well as differing social standards. It’s important for veterans to take the time to learn about these differences so they can avoid making mistakes that could land them in trouble with authorities or employers.

It’s also important for veterans to be patient when trying to communicate with their civilian peers and family. Military forms of address can be difficult for civilians to understand and can lead to frustration. For example, addressing someone by their rank is unacceptable in the civilian world and can cause other employees to feel uncomfortable.

The civilianization of armed conflict continues to be an issue of concern in the field of humanitarian protection. The increasing involvement of organized armed groups and the blurring of the distinction between combatants and civilians have led to calls for further clarification of the laws of war. In this regard, it has been argued that the ICRC’s current guidelines fail to distinguish between civilians who participate directly in hostilities for a limited duration and those who do so on a continuous basis. This further aggravates the confusion and inconsistencies that have pervaded this area of law since its earliest formulation.

What is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

Citizenship is the legal recognition of belonging to a particular nation, state or commonwealth. It brings with it rights and responsibilities such as voting, welfare, education, etc. Citizenship is primarily a matter of law but it can also indicate a sense of membership, loyalty and responsibility and of a shared cultural heritage or history. It can therefore be a powerful motivating force in people’s lives and can help shape their identity. Citizenship is also often defined at a subnational level, for example as citizenship of an individual canton within Switzerland or of the Aland region in Finland (see municipal and regional citizenship).

As a political concept, the notion of citizen was developed by the Greek philosopher Aristotle. Aristotle believed that a person’s public and private life were interconnected, and that to be a citizen was to take an active part in society. This idea was reflected in ancient Greek legislation which made it an obligation for citizens to participate in the running of the community. In the modern world, the notion of citizenship has come to be closely associated with the right to a wide range of civil and social rights, which are conferred by the state. This is a broad conception of citizenship which has become increasingly important, and which is reflected in policies on immigration and integration as well as in the debates over ‘naturalisation’.

In recent times, the idea of citizenship has been given further momentum by a number of politicians who have emphasized the relation between citizenship and ideals of civic engagement or ‘active’ citizenry. The Labour government in the UK based much of its citizenship policy on this theme, and introduced major changes to processes for acquiring formal citizenship through naturalisation. This was in an attempt to raise the status of citizenship and make it more meaningful than a mere bureaucratic process. In practice, however, this has led to an instrumentalisation of citizenship, which risks turning it into a ‘tick box’ exercise in a wider debate on migration and integration.

It is interesting to note that there has been a decline in applications for British citizenship from those who have moved to the country as migrant workers since EU Enlargement, even though these groups are the most likely to enjoy full citizenship rights. This may be because, as they are already citizens of the EU, they have the most liberal rights to live and work in the country, and thus less reason to acquire formal citizenship. Citizenship is, in short, a highly complex concept, and it is hard to give a definitive definition of it. The concept varies from nation to nation, and the definition of who is a citizen has changed over time as a result of political upheavals and reforms. However, there is a general consensus that citizenship is a vital concept in any democratic nation and is central to the operation of a democracy. It is essential for a healthy democracy that citizens are actively engaged in the affairs of their country and that they are treated fairly.

Human Rights at the International Level

posted in: News | 0

human rights

One of the central ideas in human rights is that every individual possesses an inherent dignity that requires protection from being violated or diminished by other individuals or by society as a whole. As a consequence, people have the right to freedom of thought and expression; the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; and the right to a fair trial and privacy in their personal affairs. Many governments have also agreed to protect these fundamental rights at the international level by ratifying, or becoming legally bound by, human rights instruments and treaties.

In the 19th and 20th centuries, a number of major issues emerged that required international attention and action: such as slavery, serfdom, harsh working conditions and child labour. These issues provided the context for the first human rights agreements, which aimed to establish objective standards of behaviour for states, as well as imposing certain duties upon them towards individuals. These agreements can be either binding or non-binding, or a combination of both.

The most widely accepted of these agreements is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which was drafted in 1948, following World War II. Eleanor Roosevelt led a team of brilliant international experts in the complex negotiations that produced this landmark document. Its drafting reflected a deep belief that, regardless of civilizational or cultural differences, there is one human nature and condition – the inalienable rights that everyone possess – and that these are a matter for global concern.

Many regions of the world have established their own systems for protecting human rights, which operate alongside those of the UN. These include regional human rights commissions, ombudsman offices, human rights councils and committees, parliamentary committees and other mechanisms. In addition, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights is expected to become an integral part of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

While these international norms are of fundamental importance, the reality is that many countries are not yet able to fully implement them. For example, in post-conflict situations, the institutions responsible for implementing human rights are often severely weakened by the violence and distrust that have been prevalent during the conflict. As a result, it is important for those who work on human rights to find ways to promote and facilitate the re-establishment of these essential institutions, and also to understand the constraints that may be in place.

The best way to prevent human rights violations is to raise awareness and demonstrate that such abuses are unacceptable. The most effective way of doing this is by identifying specific articles in the UDHR and other international documents that have been violated; by claiming those rights; and by reporting your experiences to relevant organisations and officials. As these international norms are ultimately subject to cultural interpretation, it is crucial that external agents that assist in the restoration of human rights in post-conflict societies be mindful of finding local terms with which to express them, so as not to create mistrust or perceptions of intrusion into internal affairs.

The Myths About Immigration Debunked

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

Immigration is a vital component of the economy, yet it’s also one of the most controversial issues in politics. Many myths surround the topic, including the idea that immigrants steal jobs from Americans, collect an excessive amount of government benefits and are generally a drain on the economy. These myths must be debunked in order to create a more hospitable environment for immigrants, who are a critical part of the American society.

Immigrants make a positive contribution to their host countries through remittances, investments and business creation. These efforts help to maintain and improve the living standards of their families, communities and nations of origin. These contributions also support foreign policy goals, including economic development and poverty alleviation.

Many immigrants are highly skilled and contribute to a wide range of industries. They pay billions in taxes, fill low-wage jobs that keep domestic industry competitive and revitalize struggling communities. They are also less likely to need public assistance than comparable low income natives. This helps to reduce the strain on public programs and overall tax burden.

The United States has a higher population of immigrants than any other country in the world, making it an extremely diverse nation. This diversity is a great asset that promotes a culture of tolerance and understanding of different cultures. As a result, America is home to some of the most unique foods, music and art in the world. It is no wonder that people from all over the globe are drawn to the nation to live, work and play.

Despite the positive impacts of immigration, many states still have restrictive policies that limit their ability to attract and retain immigrants. Some of these laws are based on fears about cultural differences and the alleged negative effects of immigration on American culture. These misunderstandings are unfortunate, as they limit the opportunity for America to benefit from the talent and hard work of its immigrant population.

For example, in California, 39 percent of respondents to a Field Poll agreed that illegal immigrants are “taking jobs away from Californians.” However, according to a study conducted by the Institute of Labor Studies in 1984, high-skilled immigrants increase employment opportunities for Americans in their fields and do not compete with American workers in language or culture-dependent occupations. In fact, the highest job growth in America in the 1980s came from new hires of all types, including those with non-English speaking backgrounds.

In addition, a number of research studies from the Rand Corporation and University of Maryland, as well as the Council of Economic Advisors and the Urban Institute, show that immigration is beneficial for the United States economy in general. It increases competition in domestic markets, lowers the cost of wages and raises productivity in the economy as a whole. Moreover, it lowers the average age of American retirees, thus reducing the burden on taxpayers. As the baby boomers continue to move into retirement, this is an important consideration.

What Is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the removal, or expulsion, from a country by government authorities of an alien who has been deemed to have no right to stay. The word derives from Latin, where it originally meant banishment to a foreign country, usually an island. In the modern era, deportation is the process of expelling noncitizens from the United States for a variety of reasons including criminal activity, violations of immigration law, and national security concerns. Once deported, they can’t return to the United States for several years or forever – even if they have family here. Deportation has a profound impact on the lives of individuals and families, especially when children are affected. This article examines the current definition of deportation, the process of deportation, and the ramifications of being deported.

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) defines deportation as an order from a federal court to return a person to their country of origin. A judge can issue such an order if the individual is found to be inadmissible or removable under the INA, or if they have committed a crime that renders them ineligible to remain in the United States.

Noncitizens can become deportable for a variety of reasons. Some of the most common reasons include illegal entry or re-entry, crimes involving moral turpitude, and false claims to U.S. citizenship. Additionally, the government can deport a noncitizen if they have been convicted of certain criminal activities including homicide, domestic violence, drug trafficking, and crimes against public safety.

When the government initiates removal proceedings, an immigrant must appear before an immigration judge at an Immigration Court in order to be able to argue his or her case. Immigrants may be detained during the proceedings or released on bond if they meet certain requirements. In either situation, an experienced immigration attorney can help defend the person against being removed from the country.

During the hearing, a judge will evaluate whether an immigrant poses a security and safety risk to the community and determine if they should be granted a bond or released on their own recognizance. The judge will also schedule a date for an order of removal to be issued, which is generally within two or four months. During this time, the person is required to report periodically to a DHS officer at a pre-designated location or face being re-arrested and deported.

After a decision is made by the Immigration Judge, an individual can choose to appeal the ruling or accept it as final. In order to appeal, the individual must submit a request to the Board of Immigration Appeals by the deadline set by the immigration judge. Filing an appeal generally stays the deportation order so long as it is filed in time.

Once the appeals process is complete, an Immigration Judge will reopen the removal proceeding and make a new decision. The timing for the person’s physical deportation will depend on the country of their origin and any factors that may be considered such as whether they have any relatives there, if they have maintained good moral character throughout the proceedings, or if they can prove that their deportation would cause extreme hardship to their lawful permanent resident or U.S. citizen spouse, parent, or child.

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Being a Civilian

posted in: News | 0

A civilian is an individual who is not a member of an armed force or a person engaged in hostilities. Civilians are often employed by the military in maintenance, administrative or support positions like building trades, cooks and storekeepers.

In general, to be a civilian means to live a peaceful life away from the rigors of war or battle. There are a number of advantages to being a civilian, including the ability to work in a variety of industries and the freedom to enjoy recreational activities without being concerned about conflict with an enemy or the threat of war. In addition, civilians are more likely to be employed and to have higher wages than those in the military.

However, being a civilian has its drawbacks as well. For example, civilians are not guaranteed a job and may be laid off when a company closes. They also must follow strict working and presentation standards and talk to other people according to specific rules. They are also not guaranteed a safe place to live if they happen to be caught in the middle of an armed conflict or natural disaster.

Many veterans struggle to adjust to civilian life after returning from service. It’s important for transitioning soldiers to remember that their rank doesn’t matter in the civilian world and to be patient with others who may not understand their experiences. They should strive to be humble, ask questions and make an effort to become a part of the civilian culture.

It is also important for civilians to be aware of the impact that their actions can have on those in the military. Civilians should avoid protesting at military bases and should not publicly display their patriotism or support of the armed forces, as these actions can be perceived by soldiers as disrespectful. It is also important for civilians to avoid wearing uniforms that could be viewed as military attire, as this can also cause confusion among members of the armed forces.

One of the most difficult parts of being a civilian is the loss of structure and discipline that comes with military life. A service member must be on time for work and cannot afford to skip or be late, because he or she will be in trouble with superiors. There are no excuses for being late or not meeting high working or presentation standards, and a service member can be easily punished for these things.

Although a soldier’s role is to protect civilians, it can be hard to distinguish between a terrorist and a civilian. This is especially true if the terrorist is acting in concert with an organized armed group that is a party to an armed conflict. In such cases, it is sometimes necessary to target civilians who are directly participating in hostilities and do not have a protected status under international law. However, such targeting must be proportionate to the military advantage expected from the attack and taken in full consideration of the precautions that must be taken in attacks on civilians.

What is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

A citizen is a person who has the rights and responsibilities of a member of a nation. Citizenship is a legal status granted by a state that entitles a person to vote, participate in government and other civic activities, and claim certain benefits such as welfare payments or employment assistance. Citizenship also provides the opportunity to enjoy a shared cultural heritage and national identity. Citizenship is a central concept in political science and is often linked to the idea of social cohesion, which has been an important driver of changes to citizenship policy in Europe.

The definition of citizenship varies from country to country. In general, it is considered to imply loyalty to a nation. This may be expressed by a commitment to defend the nation, pay taxes, obey laws and serve the country in civil roles such as policing, volunteering, caring for the elderly or sick, serving in the military or providing disaster relief. Citizenship can be a form of recognition by a nation that an individual has contributed to its success and stability.

In recent years, many governments have been redefining the meaning of citizenship, with emphasis on active participation and community engagement. In the UK, for example, there has been a shift away from the legal concept of citizenship towards ideas of ‘belonging’, ‘values’ and’shared cultural heritage’. This has been driven in part by the growing polarisation of society and by the need to support cohesion and integration within the nation.

However, it is not always clear how these ideas relate to the legal status of citizenship, which can still be thought of as a mark of belonging and recognition by the state. This has led to controversy over the extent to which citizenship is a political status that is subject to the whims of voters or an intrinsic good of a nation.

One of the biggest challenges is determining how to measure a person’s ‘good citizenship’. There is a broad range of opinions on the question, and the answers are frequently highly subjective. For example, a poll conducted by the Pew Research Center in 2013 asked people to rank 11 “good citizenship traits,” such as voting, paying taxes, helping others with compassion, displaying the flag and following politics closely. Voting ranked first, with 74% of respondents saying it was very important. Other top traits included volunteering, taking steps to reduce global climate change and respecting private property.

The survey also included a personality assessment, using well-known Big Five traits (extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness and emotionality) as well as the new trait of honesty-humility. A different set of questions was used by a team at the University of Toronto in a 2015 study of the personality characteristics of Canadians who view themselves as good citizens. They found that a person who was self-congratulatory or proud was significantly less likely to be a good citizen than someone who acted in an honest and humble manner. Moreover, they found that narcissism was correlated with lower levels of civic participation and involvement in community affairs.

What Are Human Rights?

posted in: News | 0

Human rights are principles and laws that protect all of us. These laws are not based on religion, culture or nation but on universal values. They are a foundation for peaceful co-existence and the basis for resolving conflicts.

The concept of human rights is relatively new, emerging after multiple World Wars, the founding of the United Nations and the adoption of its Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. It replaced the older phrase natural rights, which had fallen out of favor with the rise of legal positivism, a theory that all law should be founded on rationality and not morals.

This Declaration asserts that everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. It also says that no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. It further states that people should have the right to freedom of movement and of association with others, including the right to form trade unions.

It says that all individuals have the right to a fair and public hearing when they are accused of a crime, as well as the right to access the courts and to a lawyer to defend them. It also stipulates that a person charged with a crime must be presumed innocent until proven guilty. It also prohibits racially discriminatory laws and practices, and it says that all persons have the right to privacy, family and correspondence.

People have a right to work and should be paid fairly for their labor. They have a right to food and clothing, as well as a safe, healthy environment in which to live. They have the right to medical care when necessary, and to education that is relevant to their job.

They have the right to a private life and to marry, as well as the right to a home and to raise children. They also have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and expression. They have the right to a free press and the right to express themselves freely without fear of reprisals, intimidation or imprisonment.

Unfortunately, human rights violations still occur on a large scale. We see it every day on television and in the news, with famine, wars and violence. We have a long way to go in creating a global community of respect and tolerance, and it will be up to each and every one of us to take action in our own communities to support and protect these rights. The first step is to recognize that these rights exist and respect them. If everyone did that, we would be closer to a world where all of these rights are guaranteed to each and every one of us. – Article 28

Immigrants and the American Economy

posted in: News | 0

As a nation of immigrants, America has long been a place of diversity and openness to new ideas. In fact, almost one in seven people living in the United States has at least one immigrant parent. Immigrants are an important part of the American economy, contributing as workers, entrepreneurs, and taxpayers. In addition, they provide social and cultural contributions that benefit all Americans.

There is a broad range of jobs available to immigrants, including construction, food service, and health care. Many immigrants also hold professional degrees and are in demand by employers. The American economy depends on a large number of immigrant workers, and immigrants are often more productive than native-born employees.

In the United States, immigration is defined as the international movement of people into a country or region where they do not normally live or possess nationality, in order to settle there as permanent residents. Although the word is often used to refer to refugees fleeing persecution, most immigrants are seeking work or economic opportunities. Some of these migrants are legally privileged, such as family members who are sponsored by their new country of residence. Others are unskilled laborers or people without formal qualifications for specific professions.

Many of the first wave of immigrants from Europe came to the United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, as part of a larger Age of Mass Migration. However, popular opposition to this immigration led to laws in the 1920s that sharply restricted immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe.

As the population grew in the years after World War II, the number of immigrants increased rapidly. In 1970, the percentage of the population that was foreign born reached about 5 percent. Immigration continued to rise in the decades after that, driven by a surge in legal and illegal migration from Latin America, the dissolution of colonial regimes across Asia, and political and military intervention in several regions.

Contemporary immigrants tend to assimilate into American society at about the same pace as previous waves of immigrants did. Their children are on track for upward mobility as well, as evidenced by the high rates of college attendance and graduation among immigrant families. They make up a significant share of the workforce in certain industries, helping to cushion the effects of labor shortages and increasing the rate at which new businesses are started. They also help support the aging population of native-born Americans, reducing the burden on Social Security and Medicare trust funds.

As a result of the high level of immigration, the United States is considered to have a relatively fast-growing economy. This is in contrast to most other advanced countries, which are experiencing slow or negative economic growth. There is a general belief in economic history that a rising rate of immigration stimulates the economy by stimulating consumer spending. This, in turn, encourages manufacturers to hire more workers, which creates more jobs and raises wages. As a result, consumers benefit from a higher standard of living and a wider choice of goods.

What Happens If You Are Deported?

posted in: News | 0

Getting deported from the United States means being sent back to your home country. It can be a frightening process for everyone involved. If you are facing deportation, it is important to speak with an experienced immigration attorney. There are several ways that someone can be removed from the country, including criminal convictions and violating immigration laws.

The government deports many people each year. The vast majority of deportations are done because the government believes they have committed a crime or violated their visa or other immigration status. Depending on your circumstances, you may be able to avoid deportation by showing that you have a good moral character or that you would suffer extreme hardship for a lawful permanent resident or U.S. citizen spouse, child or parent if you were forced to leave the country.

The Deportation Process

In order to be deported, the government must formally accuse you of being removable. The person who files the accusation is called the “petitioner,” and in some cases it can be the USCIS. The petitioner must have a valid reason for wanting to deport you, and it must be based on the facts of your case. The petitioner must also show that you are not a flight risk or a security threat. It is the government’s burden to prove that you are removable by clear and convincing evidence.

You will be detained during the removal proceedings, which can last for a few months or more. Typically you will be kept at an Immigration Detention Center or contracted prison. During these proceedings, you may request a Bond Redetermination Hearing to determine if you are eligible for bond. The judge will hear from the defense and ICE and make a decision on whether you can post bond or not. If you are not granted bond, the judge will schedule an Evidentiary Hearing to decide what happens next.

Once the judge makes a ruling, it is mailed to you and you have 30 days to file an appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals or the Federal Courts. Filing a notice of appeal generally stays the order of deportation until it is resolved.

It can take years to resolve the matter of deportation if you are placed in removal proceedings, and sometimes it is not possible to avoid being deported from the country. If you are deported, you will be barred from returning to the United States for a set amount of time (usually five or ten years) depending on your situation and the grounds for your removal. The process of removing you from the country can be complicated and time-consuming, but with the help of an experienced lawyer, there are often avenues to stay in the country. If you are facing deportation, we encourage you to contact our office immediately for a consultation. We can provide you with the information and advice you need to prepare for the worst. We are here to help you every step of the way.

Transitioning From Military to Civilian Life

posted in: News | 0

Despite the efforts of many civilians around the world, it has become increasingly difficult to protect civilians from the effects of conflict. The number of armed conflicts is growing, with increasing consequences for civilians’ livelihoods, housing, governance and food and water security. In these circumstances, finding better ways to protect civilians must remain a top priority.

Civilian

A civilian is a person who does not serve in the military, whether enlisted or commissioned and has received zero military weapons training. The term is a generalization that covers a wide range of people, from the private who owns a gun and is legally allowed to fire it without restriction to those who have extensive military weapons training and have a specific job in the field such as urban sweeps, snipers, or machine-gun crews.

For military veterans, the transition to civilian life can feel like a huge leap in terms of rules, expectations, and culture. It is important to remember that everyone has been there once before, and it will take time to adjust to the new norms. It is also important to reach out to resources that help manage finances, find jobs, and support educational endeavors.

One of the biggest differences between civilian and military life is that there are fewer strict rules for how to carry yourself in the workplace. While military life requires you to be on time, live up to presentation and work standards, speak to others in a particular tone of voice and respond to commands with specific rules, these things are not followed as strictly in the civilian workforce. This can cause some stress and frustration when adjusting to the civilian life.

It is also important to remember that in the civilian sector, rank is irrelevant. Using military forms of address such as sir or ma’am, or addressing co-workers by their rank can make civilian colleagues uncomfortable and is considered offensive in most places. Depending on the workplace culture and geographic location, civilians often prefer to be addressed by first name.

When it comes to career advancement, civilians are typically given the opportunity for more promotions and salary increases than military personnel receive. The amount of time a veteran has been in the workforce is also an advantage, as it gives them the option to seek positions that may be more challenging or rewarding.

When preparing for the civilian workforce, it is recommended that soldiers attend the Soldier for Life – Transition Assistance Program (SFL-TAP). The program assists transitioning soldiers, family members, Army retirees and Department of Army civilians with their career goals. For more information, visit SFL-TAP.

What Does it Mean to Be a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

Citizenship is a legal status that grants rights and obligations in relation to a national or state government. As a social concept, citizenship relates to a person’s subjective feelings of identity and community relations of responsibility and reciprocity. Citizenship is also associated with political participation and engagement, civic participation and engagement, and a sense of belonging to a community or nation.

People may be considered citizens by virtue of being born in a country or by a process of naturalization. Citizenship can be gained or lost through actions such as voting, protesting and other forms of political activism. A lack of citizen participation and commitment to democracy can be a cause for concern as it undermines the legitimacy of democratic governments.

A good citizen has a moral obligation to respect the rights of others, and takes care not to infringe upon them. A good citizen also respects property and is careful not to waste resources or harm the environment. In addition, a good citizen is helpful to those in need and willing to work with the rest of the community to resolve problems. A good citizen is also able to adapt to changing circumstances and make quick decisions in matters that require immediate attention. Finally, a good citizen is aware of the laws of the land and obeys them, because he or she knows that those laws were promulgated with his or her welfare in mind.

According to a recent survey by Pew Research Center, around three-quarters of Americans consider it very important for a person to vote in elections as part of being a good citizen. This includes both Democrat and Republican voters. Similar majorities consider it very important to pay the taxes owed, serve jury duty when called and respect the opinions of others. In contrast, Republicans were more likely than Democrats to consider displaying the American flag and always following the law to be very important parts of being a good citizen.

A person who is a good citizen is a patriot, meaning that he or she loves his or her country and wants it to be the best it can be. A patriot also protects his or her fellow citizens, and is ready to make sacrifices for the country if necessary. A good citizen also respects the country’s heritage and history, and works to preserve it.

A person who is a good citizen also values the country’s culture and traditions, and encourages others to do the same. He or she is also conscious of the nation’s ecological footprint, and makes an effort to conserve natural resources by reducing waste and recycling materials. This reduces the amount of waste that goes into landfills, helps to prevent toxic substances from entering rivers and oceans, and cuts down on the need for virgin materials to be extracted from the earth. Being a good citizen also involves contributing to the country’s economy by working hard and supporting local businesses.

Do Human Rights Really Exist?

posted in: News | 0

Human rights are a set of principles that supposedly embody the morally rightful demands of individuals on each other and their governments. They are derived from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly on Dec 10, 1948 in the aftermath of World War II. The UDHR is one of the earliest times that people from diverse legal and cultural backgrounds came together to distill and assert general principles for peaceful living on this planet.

But do human rights really exist? Or are they simply the norms of a highly useful political practice that humans have constructed or evolved? To answer this question, it is helpful to distinguish between two ways of thinking about human rights.

The first way involves seeing human rights as grounded in some sort of independently existing moral reality. In this view, moral reasons are independent of human construction and can be used by anyone willing to commit to open-minded inquiry to establish the basis for demands that are morally valid. This approach has considerable appeal for some people.

However, many people find that the moral grounds that underlie the human rights movement are not persuasive to them or do not resonate with their own experiences. They may not be convinced that a particular moral claim is justified because they are not aware of the conditions under which it could be proved or because their own life experiences do not support its validity.

The second way of viewing human rights is to see them as the norms of a highly useful political tool that can be employed in a variety of ways to protect urgent human interests and advance important policy goals at both national and international levels. This is a more practical and empirical way of looking at human rights. It has considerable support among some people, including governments.

For example, it is common for governments to make human rights a central feature of their foreign policies in order to attract investments and promote good governance. Countries with high human rights standards also tend to have stronger economies. Human rights have been a central theme in some of the most popular international treaties in recent decades, including those on civil and political rights, social and economic rights, cultural and minority rights.

Nevertheless, some people are still skeptical of the value and importance of human rights. They are concerned that these demands threaten to undermine national sovereignty or lead to the imposition of external values and standards. In addition, they are concerned that the human rights movement is too focused on specific groups such as women, minorities or indigenous peoples.

Other people, however, believe that human rights have made a substantial difference in their lives. Whether or not they agree with human rights, most people want their governments to respect them and ensure that those rights are not violated. Human rights treaties set forth minimum standards that States must adhere to, and violations of these treaties can be subjected to legally sanctioned international scrutiny and enforcement. The UK’s Human Rights Act of 1998 makes it easier for people to bring cases in the UK courts and tribunals for breaches of these obligations. Previously, such challenges were generally brought before the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

The Importance of Immigration

posted in: News | 0

Since the dawn of humanity, people have been on the move. Often, they leave their homes in search of work and opportunities, to be with family or to pursue education. Others seek to escape conflict, persecution or large-scale human rights violations. And still others leave because of climate change or natural disasters. Regardless of the motivation, immigration is one of the world’s most significant events, and its consequences are felt everywhere.

The United States has the world’s largest immigrant population, with more than 13.6 million foreign born residents. This includes those who are legally authorized to live and work in the country, such as beneficiaries of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Temporary Protected Status, and those who entered without passing through immigration (unauthorized entry). This diverse group also includes those who overstayed their visas and those who have yet to become legal residents or citizens.

While the debate around immigration is intense and the issue gets highly politicized, it’s worth remembering that immigrants are a vital part of our economy and communities. For example, they bolster our national birth rate—which has dropped to historically low levels—and increase the demand for housing and other goods. They contribute billions in taxes annually and, unlike some stereotypes, they do not drain public treasuries.

Immigrants also play a role in expanding economic opportunity and building wealth in their new countries. In a 1990 American Immigration Institute survey of prominent economists, four out of five said that immigration had a positive impact on the economy. Immigrants expand total output, raise the supply of workers, and promote capital formation through high savings rates. And while some may be concentrated in occupations with lower wages, such as service sector jobs, more than a third of adult immigrants hold at least a bachelor’s degree.

Despite these clear economic benefits, the debate about immigration is too often dominated by concerns about border security and humanitarian issues—which are important and deserve attention. As a result, the issue is often skewed and mischaracterized by those who oppose it. In fact, immigrants are a source of our strength and the key to our future prosperity.

While most of the nation’s immigrants reside in the largest metropolitan areas, there are counties all over the country that disproportionately benefit from these life-changing migrants. These “immigration hotspots” are located in every region of the country, from dynamic innovation centers in Silicon Valley to legacy cities in the Northeast. The interactive below illustrates the geographic distribution of America’s foreign-born population and the local economic benefits that come with it. Click on the dots to learn more about each location.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

Deportation is the expulsion of a person from a territory. It can be carried out by a government, military force, or private citizens. It can also be a result of political turmoil or natural disasters.

In the United States, immigration officials use deportation to remove people from the country if they are not citizens. Deportation is a complex process that involves several steps. In the beginning, the government will send the noncitizen a notice called a “Notice to Appear.” Then an immigration judge will hold a hearing known as the master calendar hearing. At this hearing, the judge will decide if they have the legal right to remain in the country.

A noncitizen can be removed if they do not have a valid visa, have committed certain criminal offenses, or violated immigration law. They can also be removed if they have a history of domestic violence or other serious crimes that could affect their community or nation’s security.

The government must follow strict rules when removing someone from the country. The noncitizen must be given a fair trial with the opportunity to present evidence. This is true whether the case is at the beginning of the removal process or in the middle. If the judge finds that the noncitizen does not have a right to remain, they will order that they be deported.

Many people face deportation because of mistakes made during the application for a visa or because of activities that go against immigration law. Some immigrants’ family members have even been deported because of their own actions. Others, like Alfredo Ramos, who was deported to Mexico, have died because of the dangerous, turbulent environments they returned to (Stillman, 2018).

Local efforts should focus on supporting mental health/healing and building community for those affected by deportation and their families. Programmatic efforts should also be intentional with supporting economic empowerment and fostering hope.

The Trump administration is accelerating the deportation of millions of noncitizens by scapegoating them as violent criminals and ignoring their actual criminal histories. Those who are deported face the risk of returning to countries where they may be at risk for kidnapping, torture, rape, and murder.

In addition to increasing deportations, the federal government has reinterpreted immigration law and implemented policies that make it easier for ICE to remove people from the country. Many of these new policies are affecting people who have lived here for decades, had no prior convictions, and were working in the economy to support their children.

It is important for all Americans to understand how the deportation process works and to be aware of how it has changed under the current presidential administration. These changes have not been based on facts or due to a rigorous legal process, but rather on the president’s misguided beliefs about who belongs in our country and how the government should treat its immigrant population. The result has been devastating to many American families and a massive waste of public resources.

Transitioning From Military to Civilian Life

posted in: News | 0

A civilian is someone who is not on active duty with a military, naval, police, or fire fighting organization. Civilians are not armed or trained to serve in the military and instead rely on their education, work experience, and skills to earn a living. Civilians tend to have a wider range of career experiences than military personnel and are therefore better equipped to understand the broad and complex issues involved in national security policymaking.

When a person transitions from the military to civilian life it can be difficult to find a new sense of community. The crew that a person served with in the military are often their family, and they are used to spending time together talking about their day, and sharing stories about what they have seen and done. It can be hard to find this type of connection in civilian life, and may be one reason why some people choose not to return to civilian life after their service is complete.

Another aspect of civilian life that can be a major challenge is the fact that people do not have a guarantee of employment as they do in the military. Those who have chosen careers in the civilian world will need to be aware of the fact that they will not receive as much financial support from their employer and may need to make other decisions about their finances. This is especially true if the person is looking for a job that offers health insurance and retirement benefits.

It is important for those who are thinking about returning to civilian life to take the time to research what is available to them in terms of employment opportunities and career paths. It is possible to continue a military-type of career and move into a different industry that will offer a more flexible schedule or allow the individual to pursue other interests. In the end, this can be a far more rewarding experience than simply leaving the workforce completely and trying to enjoy the freedom of civilian life.

One final thing to consider is the way in which people who choose to become civilians treat themselves. While the military certainly places a high value on physical fitness and the way in which an individual presents himself or herself, this is not always the case when a person moves into civilian life. It is easy for a civilian to let themselves go, and this can be problematic. A person who is a civilian may have a more carefree lifestyle and also a greater opportunity to spend money on personal care items.

It is worth noting that the word civilian dates back hundreds of years and was originally used to refer to someone who was not a member of a military organization. Today, the word has come to mean anyone who is not on active duty with a particular group or organization, and this definition continues to be accurate. The word has been used in a number of different ways throughout history, and its meaning is constantly evolving as people continue to use it in their daily lives.

What Does it Mean to Be a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

A citizen is a person who, by virtue of birth in the territory of a state or naturalization, enjoys full rights and responsibilities as a member of a nation or political community. Citizenship can be acquired by place of birth, through the nationality of one or both parents, or by ‘naturalization’ (acquiring citizenship through official procedures). Citizenship also gives an individual certain privileges in social, economic and cultural areas such as voting, access to welfare benefits and rights to own property.

A good citizen is an active participant in the life of his or her country. This participation includes voting in elections, paying taxes and obeying the law. It also includes participating in local government, volunteering, playing an active role in the community and staying informed about political developments. A good citizen also demonstrates love and devotion to his or her country.

In a recent survey, nearly three-quarters of Americans said that voting is an important part of being a citizen. Other items that topped the list included being a good parent, displaying the American flag and helping to reduce the effects of climate change. Interestingly, while most Democrats and Republicans agreed on most of these items, there were sizable partisan differences on some.

Being kind to others is another way to be a good citizen. Practicing kindness not only benefits the person you are treating, but it also influences and inspires others to do the same. This creates a chain reaction of goodness that can make a significant difference in the world.

Another way to be a good citizen is to help out when possible, whether it’s volunteering at the local soup kitchen or giving money to a homeless person. This helps to build self-esteem and gives you a sense of pride in your community.

One of the most important duties of a citizen is to defend his or her country when needed. This responsibility is usually fulfilled by members of the military, but activists have also played an important role in bringing about change.

It’s also a good citizen to recycle and avoid waste, both in terms of materials and energy. Recycling conserves the earth’s resources and can reduce pollution of rivers, lakes and oceans. It can also save on waste disposal costs. Buying from locally owned businesses and artisans also stimulates the economy and creates a sense of community connection and ownership.

Finally, it’s a good citizen to protect his or her privacy and not spread gossip or infringe on other people’s private lives. This can help prevent a number of problems, including domestic violence, identity theft and terrorism.

The Philosophy of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

Human rights are fundamental principles which aim to protect people’s dignity and well-being. The idea behind them is that no one should be treated less favourably than others because of their race, colour, sex, disability, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, birth or other status. Human rights are recognised almost universally by all civilised governments and most major religions. It is widely accepted that state power must be limited in order to protect those basic rights.

Despite their widespread acceptance and popularity, human rights have been contested for a variety of reasons. Some philosophers have argued that the concept of human rights is merely a set of social conventions which are not necessarily true for all cultures, and so should not be taken as a matter of moral truth. This is known as cultural relativism.

Others have defended human rights by arguing that they are justified as moral norms arising from natural law. John Locke, for example, argued that the state should be bound by a fundamental constitution that guarantees the rights to life, liberty and property. Similarly, Thomas Aquinas argued that natural law provides the foundation for moral principles of right and wrong action that can be used to justify overthrowing oppressive governments and creating new ones.

The philosopher John Rawls developed a different approach to the philosophy of human rights. He argued that the best way to understand human rights is to identify the main role they play in some political sphere, and that this sphere should be international relations (see his work The Law of Peoples). He also argued that the defining characteristics of human rights are universal freedoms and equality.

Many human rights treaties are built on this philosophical framework. They set out fundamental principles for civil, cultural, economic and political life. It is important to remember that human rights are indivisible, meaning that no right can be viewed in isolation from the others; enjoyment of one is dependent on the enjoyment of the other. A right to due process of law, for instance, is inseparable from the right to privacy.

It is also worth noting that human rights are a global phenomenon. Almost all countries have human rights treaties and are part of regional and international bodies that monitor human rights. Moreover, civil society is responsible for preventing human rights violations by companies and institutions, while all individuals have a duty to respect the rights of others.

If you think your human rights are being violated, it is important to act. There are a number of ways you can do this, including speaking out publicly and writing to government representatives and heads of state, as well as informing local organisations engaged in human rights activism. The United Nations has an excellent website which can help you get started.

Immigrants and American Public Opinion

posted in: News | 0

Many Americans believe that immigrants enrich our country’s culture and economy. They are a vital part of our nation’s communities and make essential contributions to the workforce. They also face a number of challenges, including high levels of workplace and other discrimination and difficulty making ends meet. Despite these obstacles, most immigrants say they are satisfied with their lives in the United States and that the people in their neighborhoods are welcoming to them.

There are several different definitions of the term “immigrant.” The most widely used is to describe someone who has moved from one country to another for the purpose of establishing a permanent new residence. However, some studies use more general terms such as migrant, foreign-born or non-national to refer to people who have changed their place of residence without settling permanently. These definitions may be useful for comparison purposes but do not capture the full range of human migration.

Most immigrants come to the United States for economic reasons rather than out of a need for protection or refuge from persecution. But a large share of immigrants are migrants who have a well-founded fear of persecution or death if they return home. In such cases, they are often granted asylum.

The United States is home to more than 27 million immigrants, about a third of all international migrants. This figure includes those with legal and undocumented status.

Immigrants are disproportionately concentrated in the largest cities in the country, with most living in New York, Los Angeles and Miami. They are also highly represented in a variety of industries, with two-fifths working in agriculture and forestry and a quarter in manufacturing and construction. Immigrants are also disproportionately found in the health care and social assistance industries, where they account for more than 4 million of the nation’s workers.

Many surveys include questions on attitudes toward immigration and ask respondents to identify whether they are in favor of, opposed to or neutral about it. However, a significant amount of public opinion research on immigration has not clearly defined its terms, leaving respondents to answer questions based on their own implicit definitions. For example, some surveys use the term to refer to anyone who has emigrated to the UK “to live” (Ipsos MORI) or to those who have settled in the UK (British Social Attitudes).

The immigration debate has been driven by a number of historical trends and political pressures. The peaks in immigration that occurred during the late 1800s and early 1900s were driven by a mix of factors, including religious and political persecution, crop failures, and the expansion of the American West. These events led to a series of restrictive immigration laws that included the 1917 Immigration Act, which established a national-origins quota system with strong preferences for immigrants from Northern and Western Europe. Eventually, these restrictions started to decline and were replaced by a new philosophy that emphasized family unity. These changes shifted the focus of immigration policy to a more balanced approach.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

Deportation is the expulsion of a non-citizen by an executive agency of a sovereign state. It is a form of punishment or banishment from a country where the government feels the presence of that person is unlawful or detrimental. The word derives from the Latin “deportare,” which meant to banish or exile someone from the country of his or her citizenship. Historically, deportation was often used to remove political enemies, criminals or those convicted of serious crimes from their homelands.

In the modern immigration context, the government initiates removal proceedings for non-citizens when they are found to be in the United States illegally and fail to meet their legal obligations. This includes those who have been convicted of crimes such as aggravated felonies, drug offenses, domestic violence, sex offenders and national security threats. Non-citizens placed in removal proceedings are also subject to a variety of other violations including failure to appear at hearings, lying during interviews and more.

During removal proceedings, the Department of Homeland Security will serve the non-citizen with a Notice to Appear (NTA). The NTA informs the individual of the alleged grounds for deportation and that they have the right to an attorney at government expense. Individuals will then be scheduled for a master calendar hearing, which is the first opportunity to have their case heard before an Immigration Judge.

At the individual hearing, the immigration judge reviews evidence and hears testimony from witnesses in support of their application for relief. The judge will then issue a decision on the case and either approve or deny the request for relief. If the judge does not approve the case, he or she will order the person removed from the United States.

If a non-citizen’s deportation is ordered, they may appeal the judge’s decision by filing a written appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals before the time limit set by the judge expires. The non-citizen can also seek to have the deportation reversed in a court of appeals, but this is very difficult and the process can take years.

When a person is ordered deported, they are typically escorted to a commercial airline flight to their home country. It is not uncommon for individuals to return to countries that are hostile or unstable, where they will face severe harms such as torture, abuse, gang violence, death and more. Researchers have developed a database that records cases where individuals who have been deported have returned to their homes and suffered a variety of harms (Stillman, 2018).

The process of deportation has many ripple effects. Besides the direct impact of deportation on individuals, it can have profound implications for families, communities and societies. It is for this reason that the United States must carefully weigh its immigration policies and avoid deportation to dangerous countries. In the current climate of political pressure and limited resources, the deportation process can become increasingly complex. As a result, it becomes more challenging for origin states to comply with readmission agreements and may create further problems for the individuals they are seeking to deport.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

A civilian is a person who has not served in a country’s uniformed military services. Civilian is also a term that refers to the non-military portions of a country’s government, and to the non-military sectors of business, industry, and culture.

Civilians have important roles to play in the prevention and mitigation of harm. They have the ability to positively influence conflict-affected populations, and can help bring about greater understanding of the importance of avoiding civilian harm and of protecting and respecting civilians in all situations.

However, a civilian’s status as a civilian does not necessarily guarantee protection from attack or treatment as a prisoner of war (POW). The distinction between a civilian and a combatant is an extremely complex one, and there are many circumstances where the identity of a person is unclear. The most common such cases are where members of armed groups take part directly in hostilities, which is allowed by the law of armed conflict for certain purposes (API Arts 45.1 and 51.3).

Although this does not make them combatants, such individuals do lose their civilian status for the duration of direct participation, and can thus be subject to attacks by the state. The issue of defining the civilian status of armed group members in this way is not easily resolved, and it is essential that the international community works to resolve it.

In the policymaking context, civilians are more than just the people who do not wear military uniforms: they comprise a broad professional group that provides expertise that complements and guides that of professional military advice. Civilian experts may be more diffuse than, and not systematically commissioned as, those of the military, but they are no less real.

At a more pragmatic level, civilians may be distinguished from military personnel by the fact that they do not share the same values and attitudes towards violence and conflict that characterize members of the military. The sensitivity that civilians bring to the issue of the protection of civilians, and their close connections to civilian communities, should be considered when addressing the issues of conflict-affected populations.

For some, reintegrating into civilian life after a career in the military can be challenging. It is easy to feel like you are starting from scratch, especially when it comes to your finances. After paying taxes and benefits, your take-home pay will likely be significantly less than what you received in the military. Fortunately, there are a number of resources available that can help you navigate your transition back into civilian life.

What is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

Citizenship is the legal status that entitles a person to live in a country and not be denied access or deported. In wealthy liberal democracies, it also entitles them to rights such as voting, welfare or education. Citizenship is often associated with ideals such as integration, cohesion and equality. However, the nature of citizenship is complex. The term is a social construct, and it is the product of a range of different cultural, political and economic forces that act upon it. It is therefore a key issue for both policy makers and academics.

The concept of citizen has been subject to numerous debates. In some cases it has been seen as a means to social control, while in others it has been seen as a vehicle for individual rewards and benefits. It is also used as a tool to foster a sense of belonging and community.

Ultimately, the definition of a citizen is a political one and it is in the hands of politicians and states to determine what type of citizenship they will offer. For example, some countries have historically restricted entitlement to citizenship on the basis of ethnicity, sex, land ownership status or whether a person was free (not a slave). This was to ensure that the nation remained pure and that people were committed to its values. Such exclusions have largely been replaced by requirements that a person demonstrate a positive attitude to the state and its values through their behaviour.

This has been combined with a growing emphasis on civic participation. This is a way to make citizens active participants in society rather than passive recipients of services. The recent British debate on citizenship has been framed within the context of this approach. It has been accompanied by a growing number of tests and other restrictions on gaining formal citizenship, such as the requirement to take part in the National Citizen Service.

These changes have been driven by concerns about integration and the impact of migrants. However, the extent to which these restrictions actually promote these ideals is unclear. There is evidence that they may be having the opposite effect and increasing marginalisation of those who do not qualify for citizenship, e.g. EEA nationals.

What is also clear is that the current debate about citizenship in Britain sits within a much wider debate about Britishness and the notion of national identity. It is also taking place at a time of ‘super-diversity’, where individuals move between countries for very different reasons and with very different lengths of stay.

The challenge is to understand how these different ideas are influencing the development of citizenship and how they interact with each other. This will require a much more holistic and nuanced understanding of the role of law in society than has been the case to date. In particular, the question is whether a policy of citizenship as an individual reward, with a wide range of rights and privileges attached to it, is going to be effective in building cohesive societies.

The Human Rights Movement

posted in: News | 0

Across the world, governments and individuals have recognised that there are certain minimum requirements for human dignity. These basic beliefs – that people deserve to live with some level of physical, mental and spiritual security, and that all people should be treated fairly and with respect – are so widely accepted that they have become known as human rights.

These rights are inalienable, indivisible and interdependent; they are universal, irrespective of where a person lives or comes from; and they are not subject to derogation by any circumstance of fact or by any circumstance of time. Human rights are not just a Western creation; they have roots in all cultures and traditions and are the result of universal human needs and a search for justice.

The traumatic events of the Second World War sparked a major shift in global thinking about human rights, and led to the development of international laws, organisations and institutions to protect and promote them. Governments worldwide made a concerted effort to foster peace and prevent the horrors of war from ever occurring again, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was created to set out the basic rights that all human beings can expect to have simply because they are humans.

Since the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted, governments have incorporated its principles into their national laws. Individuals can file complaints about violations of their human rights with local courts or with international bodies such as the United Nations. Some countries have even established commissions to investigate allegations of violations, although these do not have any enforcement power.

One of the key challenges facing the human rights movement is how to win broad political support for its ideas. The most effective way to achieve this is to make sure that the ideas of human rights appeal to people with all kinds of political views, from center-right to center-left.

It is also necessary to clarify what the human rights movement means by describing how it differs from other types of rights. While all rights are important, the human rights movement is distinct in that it is based on the belief that human beings need certain legal protections to ensure their well-being, and that these needs must be taken into account when making decisions about the use of state power.

Another distinguishing feature of human rights is that they are not limited to political or civil rights but also include economic, social and cultural rights. This is because it has been argued that the fulfilment of one type of right will often, but not necessarily, depend on the fulfilment of other rights. For example, a person’s ability to enjoy their rights to health will depend on the availability of food, clean water and shelter, and on their access to education and healthcare. This is why many people argue that all of these rights should be protected and respected by the state, and that they should not be subject to derogation.

Immigrants in the United States

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

Immigration is the movement of people from one country to another for a number of reasons. The term immigrant can be applied to both those who are legally privileged to move from their country of origin (legal immigrants) and those who do not have the legal right to do so, including refugees. The term can also be used to describe the descendants of those who are immigrants.

The United States has a long history of migration. Its relatively open frontier in the 18th and 19th centuries beckoned settlers seeking economic betterment and a new life. The influx of migrants contributed to the development of many American communities, industries and political institutions.

Contemporary immigration is driven by the same forces that have influenced the nation throughout its history. Its impact, however, is more complex because of differences in the ways in which it occurs today compared to the past. For example, while many Americans still hold the view that recent waves of immigrants have failed to assimilate, the research indicates that most children of contemporary immigrants are on track for upward mobility.

In addition, immigrants have become a significant source of labour for the agricultural, manufacturing and service sectors in the United States. The most common occupations for immigrants are professionals, managers and technicians. In addition, the educational profile of today’s immigrants has become bimodal. Many have college degrees and many are able to speak multiple languages. However, those with less education tend to gravitate to unskilled jobs in the construction industry and nursing homes for the elderly.

The demographic composition of the immigrant population has shifted considerably since the mid-1960s. The 1965 immigration act transformed the system for selecting legal immigrants by abolishing national quotas and granting priority to those who had family already living in the United States, those needed for employment, and refugees. As a result, the major countries of origin for immigrant flows have shifted from Europe to Latin America and Asia.

Moreover, the composition of the immigrant population has changed significantly in the last couple of decades as the economy has moved away from traditional heavy manufacturing to services and high tech industries. While California and New York remain the most popular destinations for immigrants, they are no longer alone. Other regions are now attracting immigrants, particularly small towns in the Midwest and Southeast. The influx of immigrants into these regions has been driven by the need for labour in agriculture, food processing and many other industrial jobs that are not traditionally a magnet for native born workers. In the long run, these immigrants are a positive for the American economy and society. They are not the “enemy” of jobs, but rather a powerful economic force that creates and sustains jobs by spending their incomes on goods and services and paying taxes. This stimulates demand, increases the productivity of American businesses and helps to create more jobs. Despite the myths about immigrants that pervade popular thinking, these facts are not widely known.

The Importance of Giving Noncitizens a Chance to Be Heard in Deportation Proceedings

posted in: News | 0

deportation

The government deports people who are not citizens of the country in which they live if it believes they do not have the legal right to be there. Deportation is often a terrible experience for the person who is removed and their family members who remain behind. It can also have a significant economic impact. A new study finds that deportation can lower household incomes by about half.

In some cases, the government will ask noncitizens to leave voluntarily without going through the deportation process. This is often the best option for those who are in the country illegally and who do not have any strong defenses to deportation. However, the government must still give these individuals a chance to be heard in deportation proceedings.

Immigration officials may begin the process of deportation by sending a notice to an individual known as a Notice to Appear or NTA. This notice will provide the person with a date of their first hearing before an immigration judge. At this initial hearing, the judge will advise the noncitizen of their official charges and give them a chance to have an attorney present with them.

At the next hearing, called an Individual Hearing, the judge will review evidence and hear testimony from witnesses before making a decision on whether to order the person deported. This is the most important hearing and is similar to a trial. This is when the noncitizen has the chance to defend themselves against the deportation charges by presenting evidence and arguments with the help of their lawyer.

During the hearing, the judge will also discuss any relief available to the immigrant and what burden of proof is required for this type of relief. Typically, the burden is clear and convincing evidence. However, the judge has broad discretion to grant relief to an immigrant based on evidence presented at the Individual Hearing.

If the judge grants relief, the NTA will be dismissed and the immigrant will be allowed to legally re-enter the United States in the future. If the judge denies relief, they will be ordered to be deported.

Historically, deportation was a punishment for crimes such as murder, adultery, robbery, and forgery. It was often accompanied by confiscation of property and removal to penal settlements in foreign countries. The ICTY’s Stakic Appeals Chamber has held that the term deportation, when used in international law, means the forced displacement of persons across state borders or de jure border lines, and that it is therefore a war crime (ICC Statute of Rome, Art. 49).

Deportation can be a devastating experience for people who have lived and worked in the United States for years. It can also break up families, especially if the deportee has U.S. citizen children. Local communities can support those affected by deportation with programs focusing on mental health/healing, community building, and collective political action. Those who have been deported can be barred from returning to the United States for several years or indefinitely.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is anyone who is not a member of the military. Civilians are important to the functioning of society, and they must be protected from harm in armed conflict. Civilians are often displaced, exploited, and subject to violence in situations of conflict. Finding better ways to protect civilians has never been more pressing.

In the United States, a civilian is someone who does not belong to any branch of the armed forces (Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, or Coast Guard). Members of the armed forces are called soldiers.

The term “civilian” is a broad one that includes many people with diverse backgrounds, views and responsibilities, including those who work in the field of conflict and humanitarian protection. As a group, civilians are active in shaping conflict environments and experiences of safety and protection.

They also act as agents for protection, often through unarmed practices that are not part of peacekeeping and other externally provided support. They are critical to the implementation of national and international peacebuilding efforts and can have a direct impact on how and by whom conflict-affected populations receive aid and protection.

It can be challenging to transition back to a civilian life after a long period of time away from family and friends. Finding a new social network and building strong connections with civilians can make the transition easier. It can also be difficult to adjust to civilian lifestyles such as balancing home and career commitments, living up to presentation standards, and being on time for work.

Civilians are also concerned about how military operations impact them and their communities. They often want to know about the objectives and rationale behind war plans, and they want to be engaged with decision-making. Civilians bring a wide range of skills and experiences that can be useful in developing, implementing, and evaluating military policies and operations. They are particularly well suited to positions that require a deep understanding of how societies and public institutions function, as they spend their careers learning about a variety of areas such as law, management, and human resources.

In the 20 years since the Security Council added the protection of civilians in armed conflict to its agenda, protecting them has remained a top priority. Despite progress, civilians continue to suffer the most from conflict. In 2018, they accounted for the majority of fatalities across the world; and, as climate change and other environmental challenges continue to intensify, their vulnerability will increase further. Finding better ways to protect civilians is vital for sustainable peace. The international community must redouble its efforts to ensure that all parties uphold their obligations under international humanitarian law. This must include ensuring that civilians have access to impartial and independent humanitarian assistance and information. It must also involve finding more effective ways to strengthen civilian oversight and accountability in armed conflict situations. The ICRC is committed to continuing its work in this area. The ICRC has initiated a process of research and expert reflection on three key questions: Who can be considered a civilian for the purpose of conducting hostilities? What conduct amounts to direct participation in hostilities, and thus suspends a person’s protection against direct attack?

What Does it Mean to Be a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

A citizen is a person who has full rights and responsibilities as a member of a nation or political community. Citizenship is usually granted by birth, but it can also be acquired through naturalization or as a result of marriage to a citizen. Citizenship is more than a legal status, it can also convey a sense of belonging and loyalty to one’s community. Good citizenship is often characterized by acts of service and by a desire to contribute to the common good.

People are considered to be good citizens when they obey the laws, vote in elections, pay taxes, and participate in their local community. They are often willing to help others in need and they try to keep up with political developments. Good citizenship also includes showing respect for others and the environment. Citizens are concerned about things like preventing pollution and keeping public spaces clean, and they often volunteer their time to help those in need.

Throughout history, the concept of citizenship has changed. In some places, citizenship has been a matter of law and rights, but in other countries it has been more about a subjective feeling of belonging to a community. For example, during the Middle Ages, citizenship was related to membership in a particular town or city. This is why people were given titles such as burgher and grand burgher, which meant they belonged to a certain social class.

Today, citizenship is more often seen as a right, rather than a duty. Many nations have a minimum age requirement for citizens, and they may also require a knowledge of the country’s history and government. Some require an oath of allegiance and loyalty to the country. Often, these obligations are based on an individual’s place of birth or the nationality of one or both parents.

A recent study by the Pew Research Center examined what it takes to be a good citizen. The researchers gave a questionnaire to 371 Canadian voters, asking questions about their willingness to vote in elections, pay taxes, and obey the law. They also asked about their personality traits, using a well-known assessment called HEXACO. They found that the personality characteristics of honesty-humility, emotionality, extraversion, and conscientiousness were all positively correlated with good citizenship. The trait of narcissism, on the other hand, was negatively correlated with good citizenship.

When asked what behaviors are at the heart of being a good citizen, nearly seven out of ten US adults said that voting is very important. However, only a small percentage of them actually do so. Other behaviors that Americans reported as very important for being a good citizen included displaying the American flag, knowing the Pledge of Allegiance, and protesting when government actions are considered to be wrong. However, a majority of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents saw protesting as very important for being a good citizen, while a smaller majority of Democrats did the same. In addition, more Democrats than Republicans believed that it was important to show respect for other cultures.

The Concept of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

human rights

As a concept, human rights have been around for thousands of years. The idea is that every human being has certain inalienable rights, which are fundamental to their dignity as humans. It is these rights that are defended and promoted by activists, NGOs and governments worldwide.

In the 19th and 20th centuries, human rights began to take on a more formalized role in international law, with governments signing treaties to uphold them. These human rights agreements, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), are based on a commitment to protect the basic liberties of individuals. The key principle is that no one should be deprived of their basic human rights by their government, which has a moral and legal obligation to do so.

While the concept of human rights has been around for a long time, the specifics of what counts as a right are not always clear. As such, there are still many issues on which people disagree. Often, these disagreements reflect a tension between two competing claims about what is important to the human condition: the claim that all humans are created equal and therefore have some intrinsic value; and the claim that rights can only be enforceable through the political process (known as the “full belly thesis”).

Historically, philosophers have attempted to bridge this gap by asserting that both of these ideas are true, but that we need to balance them. The best way to do this, according to some, is to limit human rights to a set of essential standards that are universally applicable and which provide an adequate basis for enforceable protections. This list of standards includes things like freedom of religion, freedom of expression, and the right to a life worth living.

However, if we want human rights to be viable and effective in practice, they must be more than mere abstractions, and need to be grounded in real world values and needs. This is what John Rawls tried to do in his book, The Law of Peoples (1999). Rawls argued that we can understand and justify the concept of human rights by looking at the ways they function within some sphere of politics.

These include the sphere of international relations and, more specifically, national politics. Rawls also argued that the main roles of human rights are to protect and promote fundamental standards, and they must be universal in application.

Moreover, human rights must be anchored in some moral and natural order, because without them we would not have the justification to sign up to them. For example, a person’s right to life is rooted in natural law and the belief that they are born free and equal in dignity. This is why these rights are universal.

Other scholars, like Cranston, have argued that human rights should be limited to only very important goods and protections, which are then justified by a series of tests (known as the “Cranston test”) to ensure that they are universally applicable.

Immigrants Across the Globe

posted in: News | 0

Across the globe, people are making one of the most difficult decisions of their lives: to leave the country where they grew up, often for good. They do so for a wide range of reasons: poverty, lack of opportunities for work, conflict, natural disasters, discrimination or persecution, climate change, family reunification, retirement and even, in some cases, simply the desire to experience something new.

The term “immigrant” is often used indiscriminately to describe anyone who moves to another country, but it’s important to distinguish between different types of migrants. A person who relocates to a different country for permanent residency is considered an immigrant. However, people who travel to another country for short periods of time or move between countries regularly for work purposes—including tourists, business travelers and seasonal workers—are not immigrants in the traditional sense of the word.

Depending on the country of origin, legal immigrant status is determined through the immigration process or by family connections to existing citizens. Some immigrants are granted asylum or refugee status in a country, which allows them to live and work legally. Others come into a country through a visa, such as those for seasonal or religious work or as students. Still others are undocumented or unauthorized, and are therefore not recognized as having any rights at all.

As debates about immigration heat up, many Americans hold misconceptions that need to be corrected. For example, a popular belief is that immigrants are criminals who steal jobs from native-born Americans and drain local economies. In fact, most undocumented immigrants pay property, sales and payroll taxes, including Social Security, and contribute to their communities in other ways. They also spend their money on American products and services, which helps the economy grow.

Many first-generation immigrants struggle with psychological trauma or adverse health effects from their experiences on the journey to the United States. They may also endure hardships in their new home, such as racism and discrimination, economic instability or limited social support. In addition, they may face the challenge of learning a new language and adapting to a different culture.

For decades, the American Dream has been an attractive destination for people from around the world who want a better life for themselves and their children. But the country’s immigration system has a long history of ups and downs, with dramatic consequences both intended and unintended.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

Deportation is the removal of a non-citizen from the country where they are living, often to their home country. A person may be removed if they have been found to have violated the law or if they are deemed to pose a threat to public safety and national security. Generally, an individual must be given a hearing before they can be deported. During this hearing, they will have an opportunity to present witnesses and evidence in their favor. If the judge decides that they do not have a strong case, they may be ordered to leave the United States.

In the past, deportation was a harsh punishment inflicted upon people who committed serious crimes such as murder, poisoning, forgery, and embezzlement. They were often sent to remote islands where they were exiled for life. In modern times, a number of countries have a policy of deporting certain individuals who do not have citizenship or a visa. The goal is to deport them away from societies that may not be as welcoming to those from other nations.

The process of deportation starts with a hearing before an immigration judge. During this hearing, the judge will advise you of the official charges against you and ask if you want to admit or deny those charges. Depending on your situation, the judge will then schedule an Individual or Merits Hearing. The Individual or Merits Hearing is where you will have the opportunity to present testimony, evidence, and arguments in your defense against deportation.

During this hearing, the judge will review the facts of your case and hear all sides of the argument. During this time, you will have the chance to hire an attorney who can help you fight for your case. Having an experienced lawyer on your side will increase your chances of a positive outcome in your case.

If the judge decides that you will be deported, they will enter a removal order at this point. You will be informed of this decision and will have the opportunity to appeal the ruling if necessary.

One way that the government can deport someone is through administrative removal, which does not involve a hearing with a judge. This is done if the individual was previously removed and then reentered the country illegally or has been convicted of an aggravated felony.

The deportation system intersects with the criminal legal system through information-sharing programs such as Secure Communities. These programs allow local and state law enforcement agencies to send fingerprints of people who are arrested to ICE for a match with immigration databases. If ICE finds probable cause that the noncitizen is deportable, they will issue a request known as a detainer asking the LEA to hold the person until their deportation or relief hearing.

Brock argues that deporting long-settled irregular migrants ‘effectively amounts to banishment, and counts as a violation of Article 5 of the UDHR, which stipulates that no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.’ As a result, he concludes that a case can be made for why the harm of uprooting them is substantial enough to overcome their strong pro tanto claims to remain in this country.

The Role of Civilians in the Military

posted in: News | 0

A person following the pursuits of civil life, especially one not active in the military or a police force. Civilians are distinguished from combatants in situations of international armed conflict and non-international armed conflict, although the distinction may be difficult to make. In such cases, civilians retain the special protections afforded by the main international humanitarian conventions on the conduct of hostilities and their treatment in captivity.

Civilians also play an important role in the United States’ system of civilian control of the armed forces. This concept, rooted in Articles I and II of the Constitution of the United States, ensures that the President’s authority to launch military actions is strictly limited by the Congress’ War Powers Clause and the President’s authority as commander-in-chief.

This concept of civilian control, in turn, ensures that the military will not be used as an instrument of foreign policy without the express consent of a civilian leader. In addition, it promotes the principle that military commanders must be allowed to disagree with civilian policy guidance that is deemed unwise in their professional judgment.

There is no question that civilians have a lot to offer the military. They bring a wealth of experience in managing complex projects, working with teams from diverse backgrounds and balancing competing interests. They often have extensive experience in dealing with public opinion and navigating political issues that can impact the effectiveness of defense and national security policies.

Despite these valuable contributions, however, many military veterans are uncomfortable with civilians taking leadership positions in the military. This is largely due to the difference between the civilian and military worldviews and career paths.

Civilians tend to have careers in fields such as business, law, government and public administration. They have spent their lives learning how to work within highly-regulated institutions, manage people and resources, and balance multiple competing priorities. They have a unique perspective on the relationship between national security and society and how military policies can positively impact that relationship.

It is true that many senior military officials do not have civilian careers before entering public service, but this should not diminish the value they add. In fact, civilians can be more valuable to the military than their counterparts in other government sectors because of their experience in the full range of societal and public policy issues that a defense or national security official must address.

Civilians have a lot to teach the military about balancing extremely diverse interests and navigating political considerations. They can help to ensure that the defense or national security community does not lose sight of its mission, or the importance of ensuring that the safety of civilians caught up in conflicts is protected. This is precisely what the military needs from civilians. And it is why the broader civil and private sector should embrace the talents that civilians can bring to these roles.

Becoming a Good Citizen

posted in: News | 0

Citizenship is the relationship between an individual and a state to which he or she owes allegiance and claims protection. A person who has citizenship in a state may have rights and duties that are not granted or extended to noncitizens, such as the right to vote and hold office, and the duty to contribute to the defense of the country by military service. Citizenship is a status in which an individual is free to live within the political boundaries set by his or her state. The word citizen is often preferred over subjects, slaves, or nationals because it implies that a person has been baptized in the state’s political community.

There is a lot that goes into being a good citizen, but the basic foundation of it comes down to believing in justice, truth, and equality, and then choosing to act in ways that exemplify these beliefs. A good citizen is also someone who respects others, helps those who are not in a position to help themselves, and cares about the environment. In addition, a good citizen is someone who votes in elections and participates in the government by serving in the military or working for the government.

A citizen should also know his or her rights and be able to speak up for them when necessary. For example, a good citizen should be able to stand up for his or her freedom of speech and the right to protest. A good citizen should also be aware of the impact that his or her choices have on the community, which is why it is important to buy local and support local businesses and artisans. This is not only a great way to support the economy, but it also creates a sense of community pride and connection.

One of the most difficult aspects of being a good citizen is acknowledging that there are other people who deserve the same rights and freedoms as you do. This can be difficult for some people, especially when it comes to race and religion. However, it is vital to remember that every human being has the same fundamental rights, no matter what those rights may be.

Ultimately, it is up to each individual to decide what being a good citizen means for himself or herself. It takes a lot of selflessness and love for your country and its people to be a good citizen, but it is still something that can be achieved with small steps. By taking the time to make sure you are voting in all elections, supporting local business and artisans, and being conscious of the impact your choices have on the environment, you can be a better citizen each and every day.

Philosophy of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

Human rights are fundamental freedoms and dignity that every person is entitled to. They include the right to food, shelter, education, health and freedom from torture or inhuman and degrading treatment. The fulfilment of these rights is essential to a person’s human dignity. Human rights are universal and inalienable, indivisible and interrelated, and must be respected by all countries. They are the rights of all persons, irrespective of their status in society, gender, race, ethnicity, religion, political or other opinion, age, social or cultural origin, disability, property or birth. These are the core principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1948, in response to the barbarities committed during World War II.

The Declaration proclaimed that the human rights of all people are universal and indivisible, and must be respected by all states. It established the foundation for a world based on freedom, justice and peace.

Since the Universal Declaration was first enshrined in international law, many philosophies and theories have been put forward to try and explain how these fundamental rights became a central part of the world’s legal system. The study of these philosophies and theories is called the philosophy of human rights.

Some philosophers believe that human rights are an expression of natural moral law, stemming from a variety of different philosophical or religious traditions. This idea provides a foundation for the philosophical justification of human rights, and it is a major source of the debate over them. The strong claims often made on behalf of human rights (such as their universality and inalienability) have provoked skepticism and countering philosophical defenses.

Other philosophers, such as John Rawls, argue that human rights can be best understood in terms of their role within some political sphere. These roles could, for example, be international relations or national politics. Rawls’ political conception of human rights has been influential in recent philosophical and legal discussion, and it provides a way of understanding the content, normativity and roles of human rights.

Many human rights defenders, who often work at great personal risk, have a moral and ethical commitment to the universality of human rights. The improvement of one right facilitates the advancement of the others and the deprivation of one adversely affects the fulfilment of the others. They must therefore strive for the progressive realisation of all human rights.

The most practical way of establishing the existence of human rights is through their legal enactment in both domestic and international law. This approach is also the most effective way of guaranteeing their implementation, because it imposes a legal obligation on governments to respect and protect human rights. For this reason, some human rights advocates have sought to establish the existence of human rights in other ways. One popular alternative to legal enactment is by arguing that they are inherent in human nature, a claim that is closely linked to the doctrines of ancient Greece and Rome.

Immigrants’ Views on Immigration

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

Immigration is the movement of people from one place to another in order to live and work, often in a new country. In the United States, immigrants make enormous contributions as workers, business owners, taxpayers, and neighbors. They are essential to America’s economy and the heart of its communities, and they bring a wealth of knowledge, skills, and values from their home countries. Immigrants also contribute to the culture of our nation, enriching us all with an abundance of vibrant and diverse traditions.

In their own words, most immigrants say that moving to the United States has provided them with greater opportunities and improved their quality of life. They cite economic and educational opportunities, as well as a better future for their children, as key reasons for making the move. A smaller share cites escaping harsh economic and unsafe conditions in their countries of origin.

Immigrants are an important part of the American community, and the vast majority say that their neighbors welcome them. However, a significant share believe that some residents in their state do not welcome them. In addition, a significant number of immigrants face discrimination and unfair treatment on the job, in their communities, and while seeking health care. Moreover, the fear of deportation is a major concern for many, especially among those who are likely undocumented.

Most immigrants say they are happy living in the United States, with three-fourths saying they would choose to move here again if they could. This sentiment is strong across ages, educational attainment, income, and race and ethnicity. Three in four cite their own standard of living, as well as that of their children, as being better than it was in their country of birth.

When asked about their biggest challenges and concerns, most immigrants mention financial stability and paying bills. They also worry about a lack of English-language skills and the cost of housing. Other worries include the impact of political and social instability in their country of origin, family issues back home, and safety concerns. Lastly, some feel uncomfortable with the amount of media attention on immigration-related topics.

The Process of Deportation

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the process of returning a foreign national to their country of origin. Individuals may be deported for a variety of reasons including being found to have committed criminal acts, a lack of proper documentation, or having violated immigration law. Deportation can have severe consequences for families and communities. For example, the deportation of undocumented immigrants could lead to increased costs for education, health care, and housing. In addition, deportation can result in strained familial relationships.

The process of deportation can be lengthy and complex. An individual who is in removal proceedings will have several hearings before being deported. The first hearing is a Master Calendar Hearing where the government will present their case against the individual. The individual will then have an Evidentiary Hearing where they can defend themselves by presenting witnesses and evidence to counter the government’s claims.

A person can be deported for violating immigration law, such as entering the United States without authorization or committing a crime that is considered to be of “moral turpitude.” Other reasons include being convicted of a serious crime or being in the country illegally for extended periods of time. Once the individual is in removal proceedings, they will receive a notice to appear from the Department of Homeland Security. This is where they will be told what the government’s claim against them is and how much time they have to prepare a defense.

During removal proceedings, individuals can ask to have a bond hearing. If they are granted bond, a family member can post the amount of money to have them released from custody. During this hearing, the immigration judge will assess the risk of the individual and determine if they are eligible for bond. During this hearing, the noncitizen can also request relief from removal and argue that they should be allowed to stay in the United States.

After the judge has made a decision, they will issue an order to remove the individual from the United States. This will be sent to the ICE office that is responsible for processing the deportation. Once the ICE office processes the order, they will then transport the individual back to their home country. Most people who are removed from the United States are deported to countries in Latin America. However, they can be deported to other places as well.

In a recent article, Brock argues that it is important to consider the harms that are caused by deportation before considering whether it is legitimate state action. She writes that deporting long-settled irregular migrants threatens to split up mixed-status families, and it is unduly disrespectful of the localized nature of making life plans – an essential human need.

The vast majority of deportations are ordered by immigration judges, who must weigh the risks and benefits of a removal order. When the judge does decide to deport an individual, it must be based on clear and convincing evidence. If an individual is denied relief from removal, they can appeal the decision to a federal circuit court and, ultimately, the Supreme Court.

What is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is a person who is not a member of an armed force. Civilians include those who live in cities or towns and those who work at jobs such as teaching, nursing and police work. They can also be those who have retired from military service and now have a job in the private sector such as an accountant or lawyer. Civilians may also be those who have taken part in a national liberation movement during an armed conflict. International humanitarian law outlines the distinction between combatants and civilians but it is not always clear cut in internal armed conflicts or war zones.

Getting back into the civilian world can be a challenge for many people returning from military service. The transition can be difficult especially when a person leaves behind their military crew who become their family. While it is not possible to replicate this group in the civilian world it is important for someone making the switch to try and connect with those around them through friends, coworkers and veteran groups to have a community they can depend on.

One major difference between military life and civilian life is housing. In the military most soldiers are provided with their living allowance or BAH to cover the cost of their home. This allows for soldiers to live in a military base or barracks if they have dependents or in the town of their assignment if they do not. In the civilian world most jobs do not provide this benefit. This can make settling into civilian life more difficult and can lead to financial stress.

The term civilian is also used to refer to areas where it is illegal to attack the military because they are a civilian target. This includes hospitals, schools and other places that have a large number of civilians gathered. This is because of the legal protection under international humanitarian law to protect civilians in times of war.

A civilian can be anyone not on active duty with a military, naval, police or fire fighting organization. In the case of a war or armed conflict this can mean those in cities and towns as well as those that work in the private sector at jobs such as nursing, police or accounting. This does not include those who have retired from the military or those who have taken part in a national freedom struggle during an armed conflict such as a civil war or the Algerian war of independence.

In practice, however, the distinction between civilians and combatants is less clear in internal armed conflicts or in situations of terrorism than it is in international armed conflict or conventional war. This is reflected in the two Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions of 1977 on the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (API Arts 45.1 and 51.3), which confirm that civilians do not lose their protection against attack unless they take direct part in hostilities.

What Is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

A citizen is a person who is a legal member of a nation state and enjoys some privileges, rights and duties that come with that status. Citizenship is usually conferred at birth or through a process called naturalization. In most states, citizens have voting rights and access to social services like welfare and unemployment benefits. In the broadest sense, a citizen is someone who contributes to society through voluntary activities and works to improve the quality of life for all its members.

The word “citizen” comes from the Latin root citizen, meaning “a subject of a sovereign.” It is an ancient concept that has undergone many changes throughout history as nations developed and changed the rules for citizenship. Some people have a stronger relationship with their country than others and may feel a deeper connection to its history and culture. For some, a sense of patriotism is an important characteristic of a citizen and they are willing to make sacrifices for the sake of their homeland.

Other people are less invested in their country and may just live there as a means of survival. They have a different relationship with citizenship and may only see it as something that gives them certain privileges, rights and duties. Some states have different ways of defining what a citizen is, with some being more restrictive than others. For example, some countries only allow citizens to vote and participate in government. Others only give citizens the right to work within a specific profession or industry.

Some people consider themselves to be good citizens because they pay their taxes, obey the law and are not violent. Some also donate to charity and take care of their family, home and community. They also try to keep up with the latest news and events in their local area. In addition, they do what they can to protect the environment and are not wasteful of resources.

In a recent survey by the Pew Research Center, more than three-quarters of Americans said that voting in elections is very important to being a good citizen. Around seven-in-ten say it is very important to always follow the law and pay their taxes, as well. Republicans and Democrats were more divided on other traits and behaviors associated with good citizenship. For example, Republicans were more likely to say that knowing the Pledge of Allegiance and displaying the American flag are very important to being a good citizen than Democrats.

It is also very important for citizens to vote in every election, not just those for national leaders. Voting is a way for citizens to influence the direction of their country, and it can even help them get their favorite candidate elected. When a citizen votes, they should think about the issues and what kind of future they want to see for their country. They should be aware of what is going on in their state and county, so they can choose who represents them and the interests they share with their neighbors.

The Importance of Human Rights in Peacebuilding

posted in: News | 0

human rights

Human rights are the fundamental freedoms and entitlements that everyone is born with – simply because they are human. They cannot be negotiated, earned or bought. They are universal, indivisible and interdependent. They are inherent in the dignity of every person and are guaranteed by the international treaties that govern human rights. Human rights are not privileges that can be taken away at someone else’s whim, but rather they are the basic minimum requirements for living a fulfilling life and protecting us against those who would harm or oppress others.

While much progress has been made in advancing human rights, there remains a great deal of work to be done, particularly in addressing the human rights concerns of people living in conflict zones. Many of these people have been traumatized by the violent and repressive behavior of their governments or by the atrocities committed by their warring neighbors, and they need help healing psychological wounds. In addition, the institutions that are charged with observing human rights must be rebuilt from their often weakened or compromised state and must be trusted to function again.

For all these reasons, a strong human rights community is vital to the success of peacebuilding. Amongst the most important of these are international organizations, such as Amnesty International, which gathers and analyzes data on violations and provides a forum for dialogue between those who would uphold the human rights standards of their respective countries and those who would violate them.

Amnesty’s global network of activists, supporters and staff is committed to using our collective power in order to achieve justice for all. Our work to protect the human rights of individuals and communities is informed by our long history of research and our deep concern for the many people around the world whose lives have been destroyed by wars, dictatorships and other human rights abuses.

Human Rights Watch was founded in 1978 as a private, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending and promoting the universal values embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Our global community of activists is committed to bringing an end to the abuses that undermine human dignity and foster fear and hatred between people, as well as fostering reconciliation and hope for the future.

The word “human rights” refers to a set of principles that all people are entitled to, simply because they are human. These rights are enforceable by the principle of morality, and most people, if shown that their actions violate another’s personal dignity, will try to refrain from such conduct. They are also enforceable by law, in most countries of the world, through legislation that obliges their government to respect basic human rights.

In fact, the majority of human rights abuses are committed by governments against their own people. This is why the human rights movement relies so heavily on international pressure, and on the fact that most governments are aware that, if they wish to be accepted as responsible members of the global community, they must respect human rights.

Immigrants and the United States

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

As workers, business owners, taxpayers and neighbors, immigrants play a vital role in the U.S. economy and culture. They provide billions in annual tax revenue and fill critical jobs in construction, farming and other services that support the nation’s infrastructure and operations. Immigrants also contribute to the social fabric of their communities, often serving as school teachers, healthcare providers and social workers.

Most immigrants cite better opportunities for themselves and their children as the main reason they came to the United States. Others mention more personal reasons such as escaping unsafe or violent conditions in their home countries or wanting to be closer to family members who live here.

The vast majority of Americans say they are glad the United States allows immigration. Two-thirds say immigrants strengthen the country because of their hard work and talents; only a quarter think they burden it. Views differ, however, by political affiliation: among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents, 88% say immigrants strengthen the nation; among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents, 41% say they burden it.

About a third of all adults living in the United States are immigrants, and almost four in ten are either Hispanic or Asian. The majority of immigrants are men, and most are younger than the median age for all Americans. Most immigrant households are low-income, and a large share of immigrant families receive public benefits such as Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). These benefits may help immigrants make ends meet while they establish themselves in their new homes. However, the long-term fiscal impact of these benefits is not well understood.

When asked about their biggest challenges, many immigrants mentioned concerns relating to making ends meet. When compared to the general public, immigrants are more likely to report financial worries, particularly about paying bills and the economy. They are also more likely to worry about their children’s safety, employment situation and education, as well as the overall quality of life in the United States.

Immigrants are highly skilled on average, with the majority having a college degree or more education compared to only about a third of native born Americans. Immigrants tend to be concentrated on both ends of the educational spectrum; those with the most advanced degrees are in professional fields such as engineering and computer science, while those with less education often work in physically demanding or lower paid professions such as agriculture, forestry and fisheries and in health care and social service industries.

Immigrants are also a highly mobile population, and many are able to move easily across the country as job opportunities arise. Despite these strengths, there are significant barriers for the large number of immigrants who live in poverty or have limited English proficiency. As a result, some immigrants experience high levels of workplace and other discrimination, difficulties in making ends meet, confusion about U.S. laws and policies, as well as fear of deportation. These challenges are more pronounced for some groups of immigrants than for others, including those living in lower-income households, Black and Hispanic immigrants, and those with limited English proficiency.

Family Separation and Deportation in the United States

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the removal, or expelling, of a noncitizen from a country, often for violating immigration laws. The United States, along with many other countries around the world, has a long history of deportation. In general, the government only seeks to deport people who have committed serious criminal offenses or engaged in fraud to enter or remain in the country.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) handles the deportation process. If ICE decides to deport someone, that person must first be arrested, attend a hearing, and receive a removal order. Those who are ordered removed may have the opportunity to leave the country on their own, called voluntary departure. The person may also appeal a ruling or request to return to the United States after a period of time.

Under President Trump’s more aggressive immigration enforcement policies, the deportation machinery is running overdrive. In his first week in office, he announced the hiring of 10,000 new interior enforcement officers and threatened to take away federal funding from localities that limit law enforcement cooperation with ICE.

The United States has a long history of uprooting families by its deportation practices. Hundreds of thousands of children have had to live without one or more of their parents over the years. This has profound physical, emotional, and developmental repercussions for those children, most of them U.S. citizen children.

Family separation is a significant consequence of deportation, especially for the more than 16.7 million children in the United States who share a home with a parent who is undocumented. Many of these children are themselves at risk of deportation, and the threat of deportation exacerbates stressors for all members of the household.

In the past, the US had a more targeted approach to immigration enforcement. However, President Trump’s sweeping Executive Orders have put the deportation machine into overdrive and expanded the government’s priorities to include anyone deemed inadmissible at a port of entry or who had been ordered removed by an immigration judge in the past. The vague wording of these priority categories, coupled with the fact that noncitizens in removal proceedings can be deported for a wide range of crimes and misdemeanors, makes it even harder to avoid deportation.

Immigration lawyers can help people facing deportation. If you are in deportation proceedings, it’s important to get legal advice quickly. The sooner a lawyer becomes involved, the more likely it is that a client’s case can be resolved with an outcome favorable to them.

Generally, those who are ordered deported must be removed from the United States by air at US government expense. But some can be returned to the United States after a period of years, depending on whether they are eligible for an exception under the deportation statute. Deportations can be carried out in a variety of ways, including by commercial flight or private charter. Deportation appeals can be filed with the Board of Immigration Appeals and, in some cases, with a federal circuit court or the Supreme Court.

Do Immigrants Strengthen the Country?

posted in: News | 0

Despite being at the center of much political debate, more than two-thirds of Americans (66%) say that immigrants strengthen the country because of their hard work and talents. However, opinions vary greatly by political affiliation. While a majority of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents believe that, Republicans and Republican-leaning independents are more likely to believe that immigrant families take away jobs, housing and health care resources.

According to the latest census estimates, there are 45 million immigrants living in the United States – almost 14% of the population. This represents a dramatic shift from the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when only 9.6 million foreign-born residents lived in the US. This change is due largely to the expansion of family reunification rules, which allowed millions of immigrant families to reunite and move to the US.

More people than ever are choosing to leave their home countries in search of a better life and opportunities for themselves and their families. They are seeking economic prosperity, a good education system, religious freedoms and the chance to reunify with loved ones. In some cases, these people are escaping from conflict and war, hunger, climate change or natural disasters. In other cases, they may be looking for a new start after failing in their home country.

As a result of these trends, some countries are experiencing an increase in their immigrant populations while others are seeing a decline. The US has the largest immigrant population in the world, but it’s not the only country where foreign-born residents make up a significant portion of the population.

The top five countries of origin for immigrants to the US are Mexico, India, China (excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan), Philippines and Vietnam. These five countries have been the main source of immigration to the US since 1965, when a national original quota system that favored northern and western Europe was replaced by a system that prioritized highly skilled workers and those with family living in the US.

Living in a different country can be a lot of fun, but it can also be challenging. There are many things to get used to, from a different language to new food and customs. Having a strong support network of friends and family in the new country can help ease the transition.

Another thing to consider when deciding whether to move to a different country is the job market. Depending on the industry, it can be difficult or even impossible to find work in a different country. If you’re planning to look for employment in a new country, try your best to be patient and focus on finding opportunities that will allow you to use your skills and experience from your previous career. Additionally, try to learn the local language. It will be easier to connect with people if you can communicate in their language. The more languages you know, the more options you’ll have when it comes to finding a job abroad.

How Deportation Affects Families

posted in: News | 0

Over the past three decades, changes in US immigration policies and procedures have resulted in a massive increase in deportations. These changes have shifted away from post-World War II-era policies that prioritized family reunification. Deportation is the formal process of removing noncitizens from the United States. If you are an immigrant facing deportation, or you know someone who is, it’s important to get legal advice immediately.

Most deportations begin with ICE putting the noncitizen into “removal proceedings.” A removal case is a court proceeding in which ICE formally accuses the person of being removable (either because they lack documentation, have committed a crime that makes them inadmissible, or violated their visa or other status).

If the judge finds that the noncitizen is deportable, she orders the government to remove them from the country. Deportation requires the government to meet a high burden of proof in order to prove that the noncitizen is deportable. The most common crimes that lead to deportation include unauthorized immigration-related activities, certain types of violent and serious misdemeanor crimes, or multiple convictions of offenses that are considered morally turpitude.

In deciding whether to deport someone, immigration judges use their discretion to weigh the public safety interests of the community against the individual’s history. But this discretion is being eroded by the Trump administration’s crackdown on immigration arrests and deportations. The administration claims it is targeting “violent criminals,” but it is also sweeping up unauthorized immigrants and legal residents who have been convicted of sometimes minor or old offenses.

Once removed from the United States, the impact of deportation can be felt by individuals and families for generations. Families are separated, lives are turned upside down, and communities lose their cultural and economic strength.

Deportation can have devastating psychological, physical, and developmental consequences for children. In addition to the loss of parents and other caretakers, deportations can leave children with an ever-present sense of fear of being arrested or subjected to immigration enforcement actions.

Local efforts are critical for addressing the negative effects of deportation. Schools, places of worship, and community organizations must foster supportive social networks and create a sense of belonging among families affected by deportation. Programmatic efforts should focus on supporting mental health/healing, building community, and collective political action.

Currently, most origin countries do not publicly oppose deportations to the United States as a matter of principle. They often do, however, resist readmission of deported individuals by erecting bureaucratic hurdles that make it difficult for them to respond quickly or at all. This dynamic is a reminder of how a deportation system based on flawed presumptions of deservingness can perpetuate a cycle of racial and economic disparity. Ultimately, deportation is a tool of power politics. As a result, return rates to many origin countries are very low.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

A civilian is an individual who is not a member of any military, police force or other armed force. This term is generally defined by international humanitarian law, though a number of different definitions are in use. Civilians may be individuals who have voluntarily chosen to be part of a conflict, or they could be individuals who are displaced by a conflict and may not have chosen to participate in it either professionally or officially. In a more broad sense, civilians can also refer to individuals who have not participated in military service and who are therefore protected from attack by the law of war.

The question of what makes someone a civilian is not an easy one. A person’s status as a civilian depends on a variety of factors, including the laws of the country where they live and the specifics of their role in life. In the modern context of a globalized world, this includes things like the type and level of education a person has had and the skills they have acquired. In the case of military personnel, it might also include a number of factors like their rank and their years of active duty.

Civilians may be employed by government agencies, businesses or private organizations and they can earn an hourly wage or a salary. They can be involved in a number of different professions, from politics and journalism to teaching and health care. In some cases, people have become civilians due to a change in their nationality or the way their family’s citizenship is structured. The term can also be used in a political context, with politicians and journalists who have chosen to distance themselves from the military or other armed forces being considered civilians.

Those who choose to leave the military for civilian life face many challenges, and it is important that they take the time to build relationships with new friends and find a community that they feel comfortable in. They should also make sure that they understand what benefits they are entitled to, such as healthcare, housing allowance and pensions. This is because civilian life can often be more unstable than a career in the military, as there are no guarantees of employment or benefits for any length of time.

The world is facing growing challenges to the protection of civilians from the impacts of war and other types of armed conflict. These include the need to reduce displacement and provide access to essential services, as well as promote accountability through support for truth, justice and reconciliation commissions or hybrid courts. It is also important to consider the ways that civilians can be protected, both from the impacts of conflict and from its causes, and to develop strategies that are responsive to local needs and conditions. This will require a mix of civilian and military expertise, which is why the defense and diplomatic communities need to work together more closely.

Teaching Children About Being a Good Citizen

posted in: News | 0

A citizen is a person who is legally entitled to the protection and benefits of a country or region in which they live. A good citizen shows allegiance to his or her community by voting, participating in civic activities and initiatives that benefit society, and following the rules set by local, state and national governments. Good citizens are willing to sacrifice for the benefit of others and respect other people regardless of their differences.

A good citizen cares about the environment and practices eco-friendly habits to minimize his or her carbon footprint. They also support local businesses and artisans to help the economy, which fosters a sense of community connection. They respect private property and do not damage or destroy it in any way. A good citizen supports their military and police forces and believes in a common purpose with their country.

The definition of citizen varies depending on the individual, but most often it includes a willingness to vote and participate in civic activities. A good citizen also contributes to the well being of his or her community, nation and the world. They pay taxes, obey laws and contribute to the development of the country by volunteering. They work for the government, take part in politics and protect the country from threats through armed service.

One of the most important traits a good citizen has is integrity, which means being honest and treating other people fairly. Citizenship is more than merely voting and participating in civic activities; it is a moral duty to uphold the rights of all people, regardless of their race, religion or political beliefs. Citizens must be willing to sacrifice for the greater good of their country, even if it means taking a stand against popular opinion.

In the digital age, it is becoming more and more important to teach children about the importance of being a good citizen. This includes being mindful of what they say online and keeping their personal information private. Having open discussions and stressing the importance of truth and respect are also key aspects of citizenship.

When teaching about good citizenship, it is helpful to have students identify other individuals who exemplify the characteristics of a good citizen. Using a chart like the Handout: Historical Good Citizen, students can fill in information about other citizens that demonstrate the values of honesty, fairness and equality. They can then use this chart to describe a person in their own life that exhibits the same traits. Alternatively, they can add this information to their own chart in the classroom or in their Good Citizen Book.

Understanding the Concept of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

human rights

Human rights are principles of conduct that people can reasonably expect governments and other entities to respect. They cover a broad range of topics, including civil and political rights, economic and social justice, the environment, health care, education, and privacy. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, drafted in 1948, is one widely accepted statement of these standards. The UDHR was a result of a highly collaborative process that involved representatives from around the world, each representing their own cultural, religious and political contexts. The UDHR has since become the international standard for human rights, a document that is widely used in law and in daily life.

It is important to understand the differences between the various concepts of human rights. Different definitions allow for different interpretations of when and how rights apply. These interpretations then inform policy decisions, legal actions, and other efforts to protect human rights.

The concept of human rights has gained prominence throughout the world as a result of growing public awareness and concern about social and economic inequalities. Many of the most well-known and recognizable organizations in the world focus on promoting, protecting, and researching human rights. These are often professional, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that have the financial resources to produce and disseminate information to a wide audience. They are also often able to provide information subsidies for news organizations seeking to report on human rights issues credibly.

In addition, the Internet and new media provide opportunities for smaller, grassroots groups to raise human rights concerns. While these groups can reach a wider audience than ever before, they do not always have the same level of expertise and objectivity as professional NGOs. The resulting confusion can confuse as much as it enlightens when it comes to understanding and identifying human rights issues.

One way to understand human rights is to consider their origins and purposes. Some scholars have argued that they are norms of actual human moralities, reflecting certain core values and standards that can be reasonably expected of humans. Such views are consistent with the notion that human rights should be applied equally to all people, regardless of their social standing or fortune.

Others have argued that human rights are simply norms of national or international law. Such views see human rights as a collection of practices that have been developed over time to satisfy important human needs and interests. Such needs include the need for stability, prosperity, and peace. The idea of human rights has become particularly salient in the international arena, where it has served to provide a set of standards for evaluating how countries treat their citizens and specifying when military or economic intervention is appropriate.

A final, and somewhat controversial, approach to the concept of human rights is to view them as a useful political tool. In this view, human rights are not grounded in some independently existing moral reality but rather serve to promote and protect urgent national and international political interests.

Immigrants in America

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

The United States is one of the world’s most diverse nations and many immigrants come from all over the globe to live here. As a result of this, people that move to the USA report that there is little or no culture shock when they arrive. This is mainly due to the fact that the vast majority of Americans are ethnically diverse and most can speak at least some English, if not fluently.

In addition, the quality of life in America is usually high and people are provided with a good standard of living. They have access to good food, clean water, healthcare and more. However, it is important to note that these standards can differ between states.

Immigrants are a key part of the American population and have played a fundamental role in shaping and reshaping the nation’s economic, social, and political fabric over centuries. They have been a driving force in the country’s major transformations during four peak periods of immigration: westward expansion and transition to an agricultural economy at the turn of the 19th century, urbanization and industrialization in the late 1800s, the rise of manufacturing at the end of the 20th century, and most recently the growth of the service sector and the emergence of Silicon Valley.

Today, the foreign-born share of the population has declined from its peak of 14.8 percent in 1890 and is close to historic lows compared with other developed countries. The decline reflects both the aging of native-born populations and restrictive laws that restricted permanent immigration to a limited number of countries and regions in 1860s and 1920s.

As the country faces a growing shortage of skilled workers, the need to fill many jobs remains a significant factor in immigration flows. In addition, global crises like the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan, and a mix of authoritarian government and collapsing economies in Mexico and other Latin American countries have fueled recent unauthorized migration to the United States.

Many of these new arrivals are asylum seekers, not migrants, who travel to another country for work and do not intend to stay permanently. Their well-founded fear of persecution in their home countries often allows them to quickly gain legal status in the United States. Asylum cases can be filed defensively in immigration court or affirmatively with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The top source countries of asylum seekers have shifted from Mexico and China to El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. Regardless of the reason, all immigrants contribute mightily to the U.S. economy, paying billions in annual taxes and filling low-wage jobs that keep domestic industry competitive. Social scientists find that on balance, they provide far more in benefits than they cost in public services. (January 6, 1992).

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the process of sending a noncitizen back to his or her home country after he or she has violated the United States’ laws on immigration or criminal activity. Deportation is a powerful tool in the hands of the government and can lead to severe penalties including fines, jail time, and the removal of family members.

The process of deportation begins when a noncitizen is found to have violated immigration or criminal laws, or is deemed to pose a threat to the public safety. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will then place the noncitizen in deportation proceedings, where he or she will have an opportunity to present a defense to his or her case with the help of a specialized immigration attorney.

Deportation can be ordered on a number of different grounds, but the most common is illegal entry or re-entry into the United States, whether it is entering without a valid visa or overstaying a visa. Other grounds include crimes of a “moral character,” such as domestic violence, or criminal activities that threaten public safety and national security, such as drug trafficking or the sale of prohibited substances.

Once a judge has ruled that someone should be removed from the country, he or she will issue a “removal order.” The person will then need to leave the country before the expiration date on the removal order. It is possible to appeal an removal order, but the appeals process can be difficult.

In addition to being a significant penalty, deportation can have devastating psychological and economic consequences for family members left behind. The anguish can be compounded by steep financial decline and a loss of access to the health-care system. For many, the loss of a loved one leads to feelings of deep despair and worthlessness.

When an immigrant is deported, it can also affect a country’s foreign policy and national security. In the 1990s, for example, deportations of Central Americans helped fuel the rise of MS-13, a gang that posed an increased threat to regional stability. More recently, a high volume of planned returns during the COVID-19 pandemic could put pressure on a fragile democratic government in Gambia, which has struggled to move on from decades of dictatorship.

Generally, origin states do not protest the deportation of their citizens openly, but they do have tools at their disposal to make readmission difficult or impossible. Often, these tools involve nonresponse or bureaucratic obstacles, which can be in the form of refusing to cooperate with readmission requests or imposing a high bar for verifying identity or issuing travel documents. The result is a complex and opaque process that often results in the removal of people who might otherwise be able to return. The opacity can also contribute to a lack of trust between the two countries, further slowing down the readmission process. However, even when readmission is possible, it can take years to complete. Ultimately, no country wants to be seen as a source of deportations.

What is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

The word civilian is derived from the Latin verb “civilis” meaning “of the people.” A citizen is someone who is not a member of an army or armed force and therefore does not take part in war. Civilians are generally not treated as combatants and are therefore protected by the laws of war and international humanitarian law. This includes the 1949 Geneva Conventions and the 1977 Additional Protocols. These treaties describe the rights and protections that are guaranteed to civilians during armed conflict, regardless of whether it is an internal (civil war) or international (war) armed conflict.

Civilian is also used to refer to the population of a country or region who are not members of the military forces fighting against an armed insurrection. The population of civilians is typically a large group, and if the country or region are not at peace, the number of civilians in the area may be very high. A country’s constitution or other legal document may define the definition of civilian and set the number of citizens in the population.

While some countries have constitutional provisions defining the population of civilians, most do not. Instead, they rely on the definition of civilians in international humanitarian law, which was originally defined in 1949 by the Fourth Geneva Convention and has been reinforced by the Additional Protocols. International humanitarian law defines civilians as persons who do not belong to definite categories of persons, such as members of the armed forces or other belligerent parties, and excludes from civilians anyone who takes direct part in hostilities (API Arts. 45.1, 51.3). Some practice adds the condition that civilians who directly participate in hostilities lose their protection from attack and become liable to be attacked as combatants under their own law, even though the notion of direct participation in hostilities is not clear from the treaty text itself.

In addition to protecting the general civilian population, humanitarian law guarantees certain privileges for civilians in particular circumstances such as those in occupied territories and during evacuations and internment (API Arts. 48-56). It also requires that the Parties to an armed conflict endeavour to conclude local agreements for the removal from besieged or encircled areas of wounded and sick civilians, ministers of all religions, and medical personnel and equipment; and that civilian hospitals organized to give care to them should be respected and protected (API Arts. 13-18).

In the context of a policy-relevant civil-military relationship, a civilian is often a person who has experience and expertise that complements and guides professional military advice. This experience and expertise can be in the form of a political or management career, which prepares a person to understand the ways that society and public institutions are organized and resourced, or it may come from an academic discipline such as social science or law. In either case, the civilian’s insights into the nature of power in a specific political context can be invaluable to the military and the broader society.

The Concept of Citizenship

posted in: News | 0

citizen

Citizenship is the status of an individual within a society that gives them rights and responsibilities, and offers them protection. It is usually associated with the right to vote, to take part in politics and public administration, to receive education, health services and social care, to own land and to live within a certain territory (either a country or a community of nations). A citizen also has access to employment opportunities, to public facilities and to protection by the state in case of crime. A society with a strong civic identity is likely to have citizens who are highly committed and engaged in the political life of their community.

Differences between conceptions of citizenship centre on four disagreements: over the precise definition of each of the three dimensions (legal, political and identity); over their relative importance; over the causal and conceptual relations between them; and over appropriate normative standards. Throughout the history of political philosophy, different models of citizenship have been advanced, and have been found to be compatible with one another only to an extent. In particular, two models are dominant today: the republican and the liberal model.

The republican model of citizenship, with its roots in ancient Greek democracy, Republican Rome, the city-states of Italy and the French workers’ councils, envisages a civic identity which is central to an individual’s sense of self; and a strong civic identity can itself motivate him or her to engage actively in politics. By contrast, the liberal model of citizenship, with its roots in the 17th century and the writings of Locke, Rousseau and Kant, assumes that the private sphere of an individual’s life will leave him or her little time or inclination to engage in politics; thus he or she will entrust his or her participation in a constitutional democracy to representatives.

Both models are widely accepted and, in their different ways, have shaped contemporary constitutional democracies. However, the premise on which they are based has come under increasing scrutiny. As a result, the concept of a sovereign, territorial state as the necessary context in which citizenship can thrive is being challenged by those who argue that it is possible for citizenship to be exercised in a multiplicity of sites below and above the nation-state and who claim that the notion of the right to live anywhere in the world is compatible with the idea of the democratic nation-state.

Furthermore, recent discussions in the fields of disability rights and animal rights challenge a basic assumption on which many theories of citizenship have been built: the idea that discourse is an important medium through which law acts as a means of satisfying social wants, needs and expectations. This challenge is a fundamental one for the development of any theory of citizenship. A theory of citizenship must be capable of incorporating these new challenges and making the transition to a more diverse and multi-cultural society a reality. This is not an easy task, but it is essential if citizenship is to fulfil its vital political role in the modern world.

A Human Rights Framework Can Appeal to People With a Broad Political View

posted in: News | 0

human rights

A human rights framework can appeal to people with a wide range of political views. This is important because a strongly egalitarian political program will have better future prospects for acceptance and realization if it can win support from the broad political center. This will require that it avoid appearing to be a narrowly leftist programme, and that its standards and values are seen as universal. It will also be easier for a human rights framework to evolve and improve in the long run if it draws on the expertise and experiences of a diversity of states from around the world.

One crucial element in the human rights discourse is the notion that all individuals are born equal as human beings and that all human rights – including the right to food, health, education and freedom from torture or inhuman treatment – are fundamental and inalienable. The UDHR, along with its two Optional Protocols and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, establishes this basic principle as a legal standard. The Declaration explains that human rights are universal, indivisible and interrelated and that each individual’s enjoyment of one right depends on the enjoyment of all other rights.

Some philosophers have argued that human rights derive from natural law, an idea that gained currency in the seventeenth century with John Locke’s claim that all people are “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, among them Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Human rights reformulated this concept and asserted that those natural rights are inherent to every person and that they cannot be lost through bad conduct or voluntarily given up.

Human rights advocates are also likely to agree that it is immoral for governments to deny their citizens human rights. However, they may differ over whether a violation of one right constitutes a violation of all human rights. Certainly, some people will experience violations of all human rights at some point in their lives. But there are also situations in which a single right is violated, for example when a racialized employee with a disability alleges that they were harassed at work.

Many harmful traditional practices, such as slavery, female genital mutilation and the death penalty, are widely condemned by the international community as violations of human rights. These practices are sometimes defended by people who argue that they are based on culture or tradition. Harmful traditional practices are a reminder that the protection of human rights relies on education and efforts to promote sensitivity, and that human rights are not a rigid and predetermined set of rules.

Other human rights philosophers have argued that, regardless of their origin, all human rights are fundamentally inalienable, and that the right to food, health, education and the right to freedom from torture or inhuman treatment are necessary for a life worth living. These are often the core human rights affirmed in international treaties, although some, such as the right to freedom of expression, have not been included in all treaties.

What Does it Mean to Be an Immigrant?

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

Immigration is a hot topic in politics and public discourse around the world, and people have strong opinions on how it should be handled. Regardless of whether one is in favor or against immigration, it’s important to understand what it means to be an immigrant.

A person who has moved to a new country for any reason is an immigrant. That includes anyone who has taken citizenship of their new country, served in its military or married a native. It also includes those who live in the country as permanent residents or citizens. The term “immigrant” encompasses a wide range of experiences and legal statuses, so a clear definition is critical for the proper discussion of this issue.

The United States has a long history of welcoming newcomers, and the nation is built in large part by immigrants and their descendants. But the experience of being an immigrant is often challenging and complicated. The most common reasons given by respondents in our survey for moving to the United States include work and educational opportunities, a better life overall, and a more prosperous future for their children. Other reasons cited are joining family members or escaping unsafe and/or violent conditions.

Immigrants have a significant impact on the economy, both as workers and consumers. In fact, they are responsible for driving much of the recent growth in the U.S. economy, including high-tech industries and many jobs that require specialized education or training. Many of these jobs also pay better salaries than traditional American jobs, which is helping to reduce inequality in the country.

As a group, immigrants are more likely to be employed than non-immigrants. About a third of working immigrants are self-employed or own a small business. These owners and entrepreneurs are also more likely to be in highly skilled fields, such as engineering, software development, health care, financial services and professional sales. However, it is important to note that the vast majority of working immigrants do not own their businesses or have a bachelor’s degree.

Almost all immigrants report that their lives have improved since they moved to the United States, although the vast majority still say they face challenges. These struggles include workplace discrimination and difficulties making ends meet. The most pronounced challenges are experienced by lower-income households, Black and Hispanic immigrants, and those with limited English proficiency.

Most of the immigrants in the United States live in 20 major metropolitan areas, mainly in New York, Los Angeles and Miami. About two-thirds of the nation’s unauthorized immigrants are in these three cities, as well. The number of unauthorized immigrants has been decreasing in these metro areas over the past decade, but it is increasing in other parts of the country. Unauthorized immigrants are largely from Central America and make up the bulk of those caught trying to cross the border at the southern U.S. border, with most of them claiming asylum. This is an especially difficult situation for the parents of these kids, because they cannot return to their homes.

How Deportation Affects Communities

posted in: News | 0

Deportation is the expulsion of a foreign national from a country where he or she is currently living. This is a legal process governed by the United States immigration laws and can occur for a variety of reasons including criminal convictions, failure to maintain citizenship status, or other serious violations of the law. Deportation can have devastating consequences for the individuals who are removed and their families. In addition, it can also have broader social and economic effects for entire communities.

Deported people and their family members often struggle to survive without the support systems they have built in the United States. Many face the threat of poverty, isolation, abuse, and even death once they are removed from their homes. These challenges are often exacerbated for people with children who may be left behind. According to the Society for Community Research and Action, there are multiple ways that communities respond to deportation and its threats. This policy brief reviews the existing empirical literature on the impacts of deportation and highlights examples of these responses.

How long it takes to get deported depends on whether or not you are detained and which Immigration Court you attend. Those who are detained are often on expedited dockets and have their cases heard more quickly.

If you are not detained, your case might not be heard as quickly because the current administration is urging Immigration Judges to complete cases as soon as possible. It might take 3-6 months for your first hearing, called a master calendar hearing, to happen. At this hearing, you and the government will discuss whether the charges against you in your Notice to Appear are true and if you have any eligibility for relief from removal.

The judge will then make a decision at the end of the hearing or at a later time. If the judge decides that you should be deported, he or she will issue an order of removal. This can be appealed, but only for a limited amount of time after the judge issues the order of removal.

If you are able to prove that there is an error in the judge’s decision, you can apply for readmission into the country or request a review of the ruling by the Board of Immigration Appeals. You can also file an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, which is located in San Francisco. It is also possible to leave the United States voluntarily and without an order of removal, a procedure known as voluntary departure. This is an option that you can explore with a nonprofit legal organization. Depending on your situation, it might be better to try and find legal help before you are ordered deported. This can save you the cost and anxiety of having to appeal your decision. You can also contact a migrant services provider to see if they can help. They can help you find a legal team and provide information on local resources for support while you are in deportation proceedings or after you have been removed.

Transitioning From the Military to a Civilian Life

posted in: News | 0

A civilian is a person who does not serve in the military or police forces. It is a broad term that encompasses a wide range of people. Those who work in political offices are civilians, and those who serve in the armed forces are not. The term also applies to those who are not employed in the security or defense sector. Civilians have a diverse range of backgrounds and views, and lumping them together for analytical purposes is problematic. Nonetheless, they make up the majority of the population.

The primary definition of civilian is someone who does not serve in the military. However, the word has been used in other ways. It can refer to a person who does not live in an urban area, for example. It can also refer to a person who does not have a particular job or career, such as a stay-at-home mom. Civilians are often referred to as “non-military,” which can be misleading. People in civilian positions have many responsibilities and obligations, just like those in the military do.

When it comes to military situations, international humanitarian law defines civilians as those who are not members of the armed forces. It also states that they must not be exposed to direct attacks. International humanitarian law only recently accorded specific protection to civilians. Prior to 1949, most of the main international conventions did not define civilians or provide protection for them.

It is illegal to attack civilian areas, including schools and hospitals. This is to ensure the safety of civilians who are caught up in the conflict. It is also important to protect people who are helping civilians in a warzone, such as medical workers and chaplains.

This is one of the biggest challenges of transitioning from the military to civilian life. You need to find a community that can connect with your experiences and offer support. You should try to find people who share similar interests and are in a similar stage of life as you. This can help you adjust to the transition.

Another challenge is financial. You may be used to having a certain lifestyle that comes with the military, such as free housing and healthcare. It is essential to budget for these changes. It is also important to be frugal to avoid overspending. It is helpful to plan a budget and stick to it. It is also a good idea to have a emergency fund in case of unforeseen expenses. In the military, you have a crew that is your family. It can be difficult to leave this family behind when you become a civilian. Try to connect with other military families in your community to build a new support system. This will help you with your transition and prevent feelings of isolation. This is especially important for those who are struggling to find employment in their civilian careers. It can also be helpful for those who are dealing with PTSD.

What Is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

A citizen is a member of a political community (polity). Citizenship confers rights and duties on a person which are not available to non-citizens, while those rights and duties depend upon the laws of the polity. Citizenship is an abstract concept, and the precise meaning of the term has varied over time and across cultures. It is usually contrasted with the related concepts of subject and nationality. The terms citizen and subjects refer to people who owe allegiance to a sovereign state, while the term nationals describes those who share the same ancestry and are entitled to the protection of that state.

There are several ways that a person can become a citizen. Some countries grant citizenship by birth or parentage; others confer it through a process called naturalization. In some cases, citizens must meet certain requirements in order to retain their status; for example, many countries require their citizens to participate in political activities and defend the state in war. Citizenship may also be restricted or withdrawn by the state.

The idea of citizenship is central to the philosophy of democracy and of the modern nation-state. It is an ideal which has long inspired philosophers, artists and writers. It has a complex relationship with ideas of identity and belonging, and it is often linked to notions of loyalty and responsibility that are expressed in words like ‘belonging’ and’shared values’. Citizenship is also used as a metaphor for membership of a community of people, which can be either a geographic or an ideological grouping.

Historically, the concept of citizenship evolved along with the development of city-states and the development of law. In ancient Greece, citizens were those who participated in the polis, the political assembly of the city-state. In the early modern period, political upheavals and reforms led to a more egalitarian concept of citizenship. Citizen is an important word in the context of legal theory because it refers to a person who has the right to live where he or she wants, and to be protected by the law of that place.

In the United States, a person acquires citizenship through a process known as naturalization. To qualify for naturalization, a person must have been in the United States or its territories or aboard a U.S. vessel for a specified period of time, usually five years. Some states have special provisions for military service members, or for those who obtain citizenship through marriage.

In the United Kingdom, debate on citizenship is taking place within a wider debate about Britishness and ‘national identity’. This has been accompanied by changes to the processes of acquiring formal citizenship, with the introduction of tests which ostensibly promote citizenship and a sense of belonging. However, these changes are sometimes criticised for making citizenship acquisition more difficult, especially for certain groups of migrants. The relationship between citizenship and the broader issues of cohesion, integration and equality remains unclear.

What Are Human Rights and Why Do They Matter?

posted in: News | 0

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted in 1948 and sets out 30 rights that belong to all people. Seven decades on, the UDHR continues to be the basis of all international human rights law. However, there is still debate about what exactly human rights are and why they matter.

Some argue that human rights exist independently of their legal enactment, that they are innate or inalienable. Others point to the fact that human rights are reflected in all the world’s major religions and that most nations have signed and ratified many of the human rights treaties and conventions. In addition, there is a growing awareness that certain groups of people, such as women, minorities, the poor, the elderly and the incarcerated, are subject to systematic discrimination, abuse or neglect that is not justified by legitimate government interests. This has led to the widespread acceptance of the notion that some groups of people have special rights that require special protection.

The origins of human rights can be traced back to twin observations. The first was the recognition that human beings everywhere need a wide range of values or capabilities to live their lives to the fullest and the second was the realization that these requirements are often frustrated by social as well as natural forces, resulting in exploitation, oppression, persecution and deprivation.

In the aftermath of the Second World War, there was a renewed global concern about these issues. The Holocaust, and other examples of the systematic denial of humanity to groups such as Jews, communists or Slavs, shocked much of the world and gave rise to the human rights movement.

A number of philosophers have tried to explain the nature and significance of human rights. Rawls (1999) proposes a ‘political conception of human rights’, which is the idea that we can understand human rights by considering how they function in some specific political sphere. For Rawls this sphere is international politics and the law and practice that surrounds it.

Other philosophers have taken a more theoretical approach to the issue of human rights. For example, Gewirth (2011) argues that it is possible to derive a list of human rights from a few hard-to-dispute facts and a principle of consistency. He believes that we can do this because all countries have a similar set of political institutions – courts, legislatures, executives, militaries, police, prisons and public schools – and these have characteristic problems and abuses.

There is a continuing challenge to decide which norms count as human rights and to expand the lists. Many political movements would like to have their main concerns categorized as human rights so that they can get greater visibility and support at the international level. For example, feminists argue that standard lists of human rights fail to take adequately into account the different forms of violence against women. They also point out that most violations of women’s human rights are not committed by police or other government agents but by husbands, boyfriends or relatives.

Immigrants and America

posted in: News | 0

Across the globe, every day people make one of the hardest decisions imaginable: to leave their homes, often forever. They move to find better opportunities, safer lives or a new place to call home. Some go as far as the next village or city, but many go further still – to another country. This is called immigration and is a fundamental feature of our globalized world.

The vast majority of immigrants come to their new countries legally, through a rigorous vetting process that includes extensive background checks and in-person interviews. They become lawful residents and, in time, citizens. But current law confines millions of people to a life in the shadows, without rights to be fully economically engaged or to receive vital social protections. This treatment inflicts harm on unauthorized immigrants and their families, and it undermines the economic and social contributions of the entire population.

In the United States, immigration is a major contributor to the country’s economy and culture. Each year, nearly 1 million people move to the United States for work or to join family members. Most of these people are legal permanent residents, but some are not — including migrants who entered the country without a visa and those granted temporary protected status or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).

While public opinion surveys show that the general public is generally supportive of immigration, there is considerable variation in views about specific types of migration. A recent briefing by the Migration Observatory found that those who want to see immigration reduced tend to focus on asylum seekers, low-skilled workers, or extended family members who have legal status.

Immigrants make a significant contribution to the economy, increasing both the size of the labor force and the potential productivity of businesses. They are also an important source of innovation, with research finding that a 1 percentage point increase in the share of college graduates with at least a bachelor’s degree boosts patents per capita by 9 percent to 18 percent.

Although the country has a long tradition of welcoming immigrants, public policy is not always well-adapted to changing circumstances. In particular, the nation faces a pressing need to address its rapidly growing population of unauthorized immigrants.

A government advisory panel will publish its final report this fall, which will examine how the public and private sector can better support a vibrant immigrant community and foster integration that strengthens America’s economic and civic fabric. The panel is tasked with summarizing what is known about the relationship between immigrant integration and the economy, and making recommendations for future policies that can help ensure a successful path forward. The panel is part of a larger National Academies project that will publish a comprehensive report on the impacts of immigration. More information about both is available here.

What Happens If You Are Deported?

posted in: News | 0

Unless your status is lawful permanent resident or a US citizen, you can be deported (removed from the United States) for certain types of criminal activities and national security and law enforcement issues. Your status is determined by the type of visa you have, your country of origin and your immigration history.

If you are placed in removal proceedings, you will receive a Notice to Appear, which contains an instruction to appear before an immigration judge. You may be in detention while you wait to appear before the judge.

The Judge will review the evidence, listen to your testimony and that of any witnesses and make a decision whether to order you removed from the country. If you are ordered removed, you will have a chance to appeal the Judge’s decision.

People who are removed from the United States are sent to their country of origin or another country specified by USCIS. The receiving country must agree to accept them and issue travel documents before the deportation is carried out. If the receiving country does not agree to accept them, or if the judge orders them deported for other reasons, they will remain in detention until they are freed to leave the United States.

Generally, to justify deporting someone who has been a long-term legal resident of the United States, a government agency must show that the person is not a “bona fide” or lawfully present immigrant and that their removal would be in the public interest. The immigration court’s judge will also evaluate the person’s level of involvement in a crime and any potential negative impact on community safety.

Brock writes that “over time, as people become fully integrated into ways of life, uprooting them will often cause considerable and unwarranted hardship and harm to the persons with whom they have built significant relationships.” He goes on to say that a ‘rule of law that requires states to respect and uphold human rights must recognize that this is not just a matter of fairness and good sense but a fundamental element of our shared humanity’ (Ibid).

In addition to their own loss, families of deported individuals face immense economic, emotional, and developmental challenges. Across the country, millions of children—including US citizens—live in homes with deported parents and other family members. They face the anguish of a loved one being taken away and the steep decline in household incomes that results.

Local efforts can support the wellbeing of deported and their family members, including through mental health/healing, community-building, and political engagement programs. These efforts can be enhanced by fostering supportive communities and a place of belonging, and in particular, by ending 287(g) agreements that force local police departments to act as immigration agents. This allows people to be more comfortable seeking help from their communities when they are facing deportation, and reduces the fear of being contacted by local law enforcement officials. Read our policy brief on the impact of deportations on communities here.

The Civilian Workforce at the Department of Defense

posted in: News | 0

A civilian is a person who does not belong to the military, police or other emergency services. In the context of armed conflict this includes people living in areas of hostilities as well as those who are not participating directly in military operations but may be at risk because they are civilians or because they are members of organized resistance movements. International humanitarian law has only recently accorded specific protection to civilians, with special guarantees for the most vulnerable groups of persons, in particular women, children, the elderly and sick.

Civilians are an important part of the fabric of a society, as they are essential for its functioning and to the delivery of its services. The United Nations and other global institutions have developed policies and practical skills to protect civilians from the risks and effects of armed conflict, including the destruction of their homes and infrastructure, displacement, loss of livelihoods and access to education and health care.

In the United States, the civilian workforce is essential to supporting the Department of Defense and its missions worldwide. Civilian employees bring a broad range of experience to the DOD, and their careers span a variety of fields. Many come from fields that prepare them for public service—careers in the social sciences, law and management. This range of backgrounds helps ensure that the civilian workforce understands how societies and their public institutions should be structured and resourced to best serve the nation.

As a matter of policy, the DOD aims to provide a high-quality civilian workforce that is culturally diverse and reflective of the nation we serve. DOD also strives to support civilian veterans and their families in a way that promotes their professional development and helps them transition successfully to the next phase of their lives.

Getting back into the civilian world can be a tough transition for those who have been away from friends and family for a long period of time. It can also be a challenge to adjust to the different communication styles that come with civilian life. It is important to be patient and work through these differences, as it will help to cut down on frustration.

In the US, DOD is committed to the principle of transparency in reporting on civilian casualties resulting from military operations. It is important to recognize that while civilians are not combatants, they can be affected by the conduct of armed conflict, and as such deserve a full accounting of the consequences of their participation in war. The United States should mandate monthly, publicly releasable estimates of civilian casualties resulting from military operations, as well as damage to civilian infrastructure. This would help to bolster the confidence of civilians in the ability of governments to conduct military operations with due regard for the protection of civilians. This is a critical step toward achieving the goal of the UN Secretary-General’s plan to end impunity for war crimes. This would also be a good step toward building a culture of accountability in the international community.

What Is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

A citizen is a person who has full rights and responsibilities as a member of a nation or political community. Citizenship usually signifies a bond that goes beyond basic kinship ties and unites people of different genetic backgrounds as equal members of a group or society. It also usually entails a commitment to abide by the laws of the country and to participate in its government, although participation may vary from token acts of obedience to active involvement in politics.

In modern society, citizenship is a social status granted to individuals who have acquired membership through either birth or naturalization. This social status is based on a constitutionally protected fundamental right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. A constitutionally defined democratic citizenship includes the right to vote and serve in elected offices, as well as other protections. Citizenship is a central concept in many societies around the world.

While some scholars suggest that a citizen’s fundamental right to life, liberty and the pursuit is essentially independent of any other condition or obligation, others argue that the principle can only work if citizens are held accountable for their actions by their governments and are free from interference from other countries, individuals or organizations. The concept of citizenship has evolved over time and continues to change within each society as a result of changing conditions and shifting ideas about how a democracy should function.

A good citizen is one who contributes to the betterment of the society. He or she obeys the law and pays taxes diligently. A good citizen is always ready to help those in need and respects the lives, rights and property of other citizens. He or she treats people with kindness and empathy and is a good listener. A good citizen keeps track of what is happening in the country as a whole and in his or her local communities and tries to influence the direction of the country through voting.

Some studies have associated good citizenship with civic norms and citizen learning, highlighting the formative nature of this concept. Others have focused on the role of citizenship in broader contexts, such as contemporary global problems. The debate on citizenship has implications for the future of global governance.

According to the survey, most Americans believe that it’s very important to be a good citizen to care about other people and to treat them with respect. Almost all of the respondents also agreed that it’s very important to be willing to help when needed and to obey the law. In addition, more than three-quarters of the respondents said that voting in elections is very important to being a good citizen and nearly seven-in-ten said the same thing about paying taxes.

Other behaviors were viewed as important to being a good citizen by smaller shares of the public. For example, 36% of those surveyed believed that it was very important to display the American flag. The results from the poll also showed that Democrats and Republicans differed on how important some of these traits were to being a good citizen, with sizable partisan differences for some items.

What Are Human Rights?

posted in: News | 0

People have a right to life and liberty. They also have other rights, which allow them to express their views, to get an education and to enjoy property. These rights are called human rights and they are based on the fact that every person is equal in their humanity. Human rights are not just something to be talked about; they are a reality that we live with, and they can be used as tools to overcome injustice.

The idea of human rights grew from earlier tradition and documents, but it was the cataclysmic experiences of World War II that propelled them onto the international stage. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was a powerful expression of the hopes, aspirations and protections to which all people are entitled.

This document outlines 30 articles that cover civil and political, economic and social and cultural rights. It shows that human rights are interdependent and indivisible: taking away one right has an impact on the others. All of these rights are essential to our dignity as human beings and they can not be taken away.

It is important for the human rights movement to be a broad-based one and to have the support of people with a variety of political views. It would be difficult for this to happen if the human rights movement is seen as a leftist political program. For that reason, it is best to pursue a strongly egalitarian political program partially within and mostly beyond the human rights framework.

Some critics of the human rights concept argue that human rights are not universal and do not apply to everyone. They argue that standards and values are relative to the culture from which they arise, and so what is a human right in one society may not be a human right in another. This view is often expressed as cultural relativism.

These arguments can be countered by showing that human rights are a universal and basic set of principles that are common to all cultures, societies and historical contexts. Human rights are also shaped by practicalities and constraints that give them their unity, coherence and limits. Griffin describes these as a “second ground” of human rights. They include making the boundaries of rights clear by avoiding “too many complicated bends,” enlarging them slightly to give them safety margins and consulting facts about human nature.

This approach makes it more likely that the principles of human rights will become accepted and enforced by governments. It has resulted in great progress, even though it sometimes seems like a drop in the ocean – the abolition of slavery, women’s voting rights, the banning of the death penalty and the collapse of apartheid, to name just some examples. Every day, people around the world stand up for their human rights and challenge those in power who would violate them. These protests, like drops of water on a rock, wear down the forces of oppression and move us closer to the ideals outlined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The Myths and Facts About Immigration

posted in: News | 0

Immigration is the process of moving to a new country or region in order to live and work there. It may also involve obtaining citizenship, and it can be either legal or illegal. International migration is a natural part of the world’s economy, and people have been migrating since early times for a variety of reasons. Some people move in search of better economic opportunities, while others flee conflict, persecution or climate disasters. Still others move to reunite with family members or pursue higher education. Whatever the reason, immigrants face many challenges when they make a difficult transition to a new society.

In recent years, immigration has become a central issue in political and public discussions around the globe. Some countries have embraced open-door policies, while others have instituted restrictive measures. In the United States, public opinion on immigration has been volatile. In general, Americans are more positive about legal immigration than they are about illegal immigration.

Some people define immigration as anyone who moves from one country to another, regardless of their purpose or motive. However, most definitions include some form of official status, such as citizenship or a visa. People who are living or working legally in a country that is not their own are often called immigrants, but the term is also used to describe people who have gained access to a country or region through humanitarian channels, such as refugees or asylum seekers.

There are a number of myths about immigrants that are pervasive in American culture and must be refuted. One of the most common is that immigrants steal jobs from native-born workers or otherwise represent a drain on the economy. This is not true, according to studies by the Rand Corporation and other research organizations. In fact, immigrant workers contribute to the American economy by increasing productivity and demand for goods and services, promoting capital formation, paying taxes and raising the average wages of all workers.

It is also important to remember that immigrant families are a source of social stability and strength in the United States. The children of immigrants tend to have higher incomes than the children of native-born Americans, and they are more likely to finish high school and attend college. They are also more likely to be employed and be engaged in the community.

The vast majority of immigrants have a positive impact on the American economy and are highly assimilated, despite their initial struggles. They are the source of innovation and entrepreneurship in America and contribute to the social and cultural fabric of the nation.

Throughout history, the United States has been a magnet for people from all over the world who seek to improve their lives. Many of them have made a remarkable contribution to American life, from the industrial revolution to the growth of cities such as New York and Los Angeles. Immigrants have built the foundation of America, and their contributions will continue to shape the future of our global economy.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

In Anglo-American law, deportation is the expulsion by an executive agency of a noncitizen whose presence in a country is deemed unlawful or detrimental. In practice, the term has often had a broader meaning: it can include exile, banishment, and the transportation of criminals to penal settlements. The United States has a history of deporting people from across the globe for a variety of reasons, but the term has come to be particularly associated with mass removals of noncitizens from the country. Deportation is a powerful tool of state power, and it can have devastating consequences for those who are removed.

A person can be removed from the United States for a variety of reasons, including entering or re-entering the country without proper documentation, engaging in public charge activity, committing crimes of moral turpitude, or being convicted of certain crimes related to drug trafficking. Most people are placed into removal proceedings because Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) formally accuses them of violating the terms of their status or visa.

Those placed into removal proceedings can be taken into custody and immediately sent back to their country of origin, or they may remain free in the United States while their case is processed. The process starts when ICE serves the noncitizen with a notice to appear, which includes information about the charges against them and the date of their individual hearing.

Noncitizens with a case are then contacted by an immigration judge and asked to present their evidence in support of their case. The immigration judge then decides whether to deport the person or not. If the judge determines that a noncitizen should be removed, the case is sent back to ICE to continue the removal process.

The immigration legal system and the criminal justice system often intersect through information-sharing programs like Secure Communities. These programs require local and state law-enforcement agencies to share fingerprints with ICE and to check them against immigration databases. If the fingerprints match, ICE can issue a “detainer” asking that the LEA hold the person for longer than they normally would, which allows them time to take them into custody and begin removal proceedings. However, many LEAs do not honor ICE’s detainer requests.

As of 2018, there were approximately 11 million individuals in the United States with an order of removal. Of those, 6.1 million American citizen children live in households with a family member who is vulnerable to being deported. Deportation carries significant costs, both for families and for the economy. In fact, the Marshall Project and Center for Migration Studies found that household incomes drop by nearly half after a family member is deported. These economic losses are compounded by the emotional trauma that can occur when a family is split apart by deportation. The United States deports tens of thousands of families every year, and the number is rising. Deportations are not only a form of family separation, they also send poor migrants back to their home countries, where they are more likely to face poverty and violence.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

A civilian is someone who is not a member of the military, police or any other kind of belligerent group. Civilians may work in government, the private sector or nonprofit organizations and are not involved in active duty with any of the armed forces. The word can also refer to people who live in a certain community, especially a city or state. Civilians are sometimes distinguished from citizens, a term that encompasses all residents of a country.

Civilians are often seen as the backbone of any democracy. They are people who make up the majority of the population and who run businesses, organizations, schools, hospitals and more. Many of them have specialized skills and training that are useful in the civilian workforce, as well as unique experiences that can help them succeed. Civilians are valuable members of society who contribute to the economy and provide much-needed security services.

The transition from military to civilian life is a significant one for most service members. It takes time to adjust to new responsibilities, people and cultures. Luckily, there are many veteran resources available that can help with everything from managing finances to finding jobs and pursuing education. During military service, many members have been offered financial support in housing, healthcare and even tuition costs. It is important to be aware of these benefits and take advantage of them during the transition process to civilian life.

Another big difference is the shift from a strict culture to a more flexible one. Civilian life has less rigid rules and expectations regarding things like timeliness, tone of voice and responses to commands. While some of these changes are necessary and can improve efficiency, they can be difficult for some service members to adapt to at first. It is important to find a community that will support you in your journey, and be patient as you find others who can relate to your experiences.

The civilian world is full of different opportunities and experiences, but it can be overwhelming at times. Be patient as you learn to navigate this new phase in your life, and don’t forget to take care of yourself. Your health and mental stability are just as important as your physical capabilities, so remember to prioritize them. It will take time to fully connect with a new community, but the more you persevere and remain positive, the easier it will become. In time, you may find that civilian life is more rewarding than your military experience ever was. It all depends on your individual mindset and preferences. Remember to always listen to your heart and do what is best for you.

What is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

Citizenship is the societal status of someone who is a member of a community of individuals sharing common rules and responsibilities. This status is usually conferred by law, though it can also be created through social practice. Citizenship is a fundamental concept in political science and a central issue in many social movements, such as civil rights, immigration and human rights.

In modern times, the concept of citizenship has become very complex. As the world has become more globalized, many different definitions and interpretations have emerged. For example, the term is sometimes used to describe a person’s legal status in one country, while in other cases it refers to his or her membership in a national community of individuals based on their shared history and culture. In either case, a person’s citizenship is determined by the laws of the country in which he or she lives.

To be considered a citizen, a person must fulfill several requirements set forth by the government. In the United States, for example, the path to citizenship requires passing a civics test and knowing about the history and culture of the nation. In addition, the individual must speak English fluently and be able to read and write at an intermediate level. He or she must also take a loyalty oath to support the Constitution and form of government of the United States. Other citizenship tests require an understanding of U.S. history and culture as well as knowledge of the Constitution and laws of the United States. In some countries, citizenship is also based on a person’s religious affiliation.

Being a good citizen means that a person obeys the laws of his or her nation, pays taxes in a timely manner and participates in community activities. This includes voting, serving on a jury and volunteering. Good citizenship also involves respecting the property of others and not littering or vandalizing. It is also important to be well informed about the political situation of your nation and to keep up to date on news and current events.

People should treat all citizens with the same level of respect. They should care for the environment and make an effort to recycle and reuse items to reduce waste. This will help to conserve resources and save money on landfill fees as well as the cost of raw materials. Being a good citizen also means that you must be kind and thoughtful toward others and do what you can to help those who cannot help themselves.

Generally speaking, good citizenship is defined by how much the individual cares for his or her country and its people. The good citizen obeys the law of his or her country, respects other people and their property, cares for the land, river, pond, mountain or plants and does what is required to protect the natural resources of the nation. Good citizenship also includes participating in community services, voting, paying taxes, and being a virtuous role model for children.

What Are Human Rights?

posted in: News | 0

human rights

Human rights are a set of principles that people around the world are entitled to enjoy, and that governments are obliged to protect. This includes protecting people from violence, discrimination and other abuses of power. It also means ensuring that people can exercise their freedoms, and that they have access to the resources they need for an adequate standard of living.

This is not an easy task, however. Human rights violations are common, and many of them happen on a large scale. For example, despite the Universal Declaration of Human Rights being adopted in 1948, slavery is still prevalent globally and the number of victims of female genital mutilation continues to rise. It can also be difficult to find common ground on some issues, especially when people have differing political views.

A number of approaches are taken to identifying what constitutes a human right, but each has its limitations. One approach is to rely on religious beliefs. The idea of divinely ordained rights can be found in religions from Christianity to Islam, and this may provide a basis for persuading some individuals that human rights are something they should support. But the problem with this is that it excludes millions of people who do not believe in the sort of god that prescribes human rights. This is why a more practical approach is needed, which involves legal enactment rather than religious doctrines.

Another approach is to take a strictly political view of human rights. This is the approach that underlies most of the international treaties governing human rights, and it has its strengths, but again there are problems with this. It assumes that people will accept as human rights those things that are endorsed by the majority of international diplomats, and that this will settle matters for them. In a diverse global society, this can be problematic.

Other approaches to human rights try to identify those things that people are intrinsically entitled to. This can be a useful starting point, but it is important to remember that many different things are intrinsically connected and that no single right can be viewed in isolation from the rest. This is particularly true of those rights that cannot be restricted – such as the right to life, the right to liberty and the prohibition against torture.

It is important to become familiar with the legal frameworks in your own country that protect human rights, and to support those laws. It is also a good idea to stay informed of proposed policy changes or reforms that could impact these rights, and to write to your elected representatives about your concerns. Similarly, to work with organisations that actively campaign for these issues, whether they label themselves human rights NGOs or not.

Immigrants and the United States

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

Most people in the world will have to leave their homes, villages, towns, or cities at some point in their lives. For some, this will be a temporary move while they seek work or study in another part of the world. Others will need to escape conflict, economic hardship, or human rights abuses. Still, others are compelled to leave by environmental factors such as climate change or natural disasters. Together, these factors create a world in which millions of people are constantly on the move.

For most, the decision to migrate is not easy. The prospect of leaving their families, communities, and countries behind is frightening. But for many migrants, it is the only way to provide food and shelter for themselves and their children.

Immigration shapes the United States in profound ways, from demographics and economy to culture and politics. Over the centuries, four major peak periods of migration have driven fundamental transformations in the country: westward expansion and shift to agricultural production in the 19th century, emergence of cities and the industrial economy after 1900, and the rise of services and knowledge-based economies since 1970.

Today, immigrants make up more than a quarter of the nation’s population. In addition, they provide two-fifths of the nation’s health care and social assistance workers. They also contribute significantly to the economy as business owners, professionals, and laborers in agriculture, manufacturing, construction, and services. One in seven Americans has at least one immigrant parent.

Many immigrants are highly educated in their home countries and bring skills to America that can help them find good jobs, such as engineering, computer science, nursing, and law. However, a significant number of migrants are not college-educated. In some cases, financial need propels them to get jobs that require little or no training and pay very low wages. They do so in the hope that they will be able to earn enough money to support their families back home.

While the United States has a long tradition of welcoming skilled and hardworking immigrants, the political debate over immigration has become contentious in recent years. Much of the public perception about immigrants is based on misconceptions and stereotypes, such as those depicted in popular movies and TV shows that portray illegal or undocumented immigrants as dangerous criminals.

To better understand the complex issues surrounding immigration, students need to learn about the different types of migrants and the challenges they face. Use the articles in this section to start a class discussion and give students an opportunity to share their personal experiences with immigration.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the process of removing a non-citizen from the United States, typically to their home country. The government can deport a person for many reasons, including immigration violations, crimes of moral turpitude, and serious felonies. It can also deport a person because they are at risk of persecution or death in their home country. People who are deported cannot return to the United States for several years or at all, if they ever do. For many immigrants, especially those who have children in the United States, being deported can be a terrifying prospect.

In the past, most people facing deportation in the U.S. were given a chance to go before an immigration judge and make their case for why they should stay. But in 1996, Congress revoked that right for tens of thousands of individuals by expanding forms of “summary removal,” which allow life-or-death decisions to be made without the benefit of a hearing or judicial oversight. In 2013, more than eighty per cent of all deportations were conducted without a hearing.

Most deportations are based on immigration violations, but some can be based on criminal convictions and other factors. Immigrants who have committed aggravated felonies or crimes of moral turpitude are at particular risk of being deported. Other deportable offenses include fraud, embezzlement, domestic violence, and crimes involving drugs or firearms.

There are two types of deportation: expedited removal and regular removal. Under expedited removal, an immigration official can order your removal without a judge’s approval. Then, the process of arranging your return to your home country speeds up. Regular removal involves a series of steps overseen by an immigration judge, including an initial Master Calendar Hearing where the judge advises you of the official charges against you and your right to counsel.

After the Master Calendar Hearing, you will be scheduled for an Individual Hearing (sometimes called a merits hearing or a trial). At this hearing, you can present testimony and evidence to prove why you should be allowed to remain in the United States. If the judge finds that you should be removed from the country, they will enter a removal order. If they don’t, they may grant you relief or reopen your case for reconsideration.

If you lose your hearing, you can still appeal the decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals. The appeals process can take several months or more.

Once an immigration judge enters a removal order, it can be very difficult to reverse the decision. It is important to work with a skilled immigration attorney who knows how to challenge the government’s case and raise your chances of staying in the United States. A knowledgeable lawyer can help you navigate the complex and oftentimes confusing deportation process, allowing you to keep your family together and stay in the United States for many more years. Contact us today to speak with a compassionate and experienced attorney about your case. We will discuss your options for legal relief and fight to protect you against being deported!

Transitioning Between Military and Civilian Life

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is a person who is not a member of the armed forces. Civilians are employed in many different fields, such as law enforcement, health care, education, business and finance, and the arts. The majority of civilians work in the United States government, with approximately 2 million people working within the 15 executive departments or independent agencies. The most prominent federal departments include the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Agriculture.

Often, military personnel transitioning into civilian life will feel as though they are being pulled in several different directions. This is a normal feeling and the disconnects between military lifestyle and civilian society will take time to work out. From friends to family, the relationships will all need to be reestablished and new bonds formed.

In the pre-trial brief in the Tadic case at ICTY in 1996, the Prosecutor argued that common Article 3 of the 1949 Geneva Conventions on the Treatment of Civilians covers all non-combatants and that it is customary international law. The Defence, in its response to the Prosecutor’s brief, argued that the term civilian is not easily delineated and that the concept is not clear cut when it comes to groups that are not under the control of a central authority (as was the case with the alleged Bosnian armed group).

It is important to remember that there will be differences between your military life and the civilian world. The expectations of strict schedules, tone of voice and responses to commands, and a general level of professionalism are not typically found in civilian life.

The ICRC guidelines on the distinction between civilian and combatant imply that a person who takes part directly in hostilities loses his or her civilian status and therefore loses protection against attack under international humanitarian law (see the Bagilishema judgment of 7 June 2001, p. 104). However, state practice in non-international armed conflict has never reflected this view and it is not reconcilable with the principle of distinction which is generally recognized as customary international law.

Moreover, the ICRC holds that members of militias or volunteer corps which are a part of the armed forces of a party to an armed conflict cannot claim civilian status and neither can persons placed hors de combat. This view is consistent with the overall humanitarian purpose of the laws of war and reflects state reluctance to recognize or grant legal status to non-state armed groups.

Despite the challenges, there are many reasons to make the civilian workforce a vital part of the nation’s national security policy. Bringing in civilian expertise, experience and perspectives can help ensure the proper development of policy for the benefit of the entire country. This is especially true when it comes to areas like counterterrorism and homeland security, which must incorporate the needs and concerns of all Americans. The vast range of backgrounds that civilians can bring to these critical policymaking positions is one of the reasons why their contributions are so valuable.

What is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

A citizen is a person who is a member of a country or community with full rights and responsibilities. Citizenship is generally determined by birth, the nationality of one or both parents, or naturalization. Different countries have their own traditions and approaches to citizenship, which often vary according to their history, culture, or ideologies. In the United States, for example, a citizen is someone who lives and abides by its laws, and is able to vote and hold public office.

Citizenship is an idea with many facets that are subject to debate and discussion in fields such as politics, sociology, anthropology, education, philosophy, and history. The concept has also been a major topic in the field of law, as it affects the rights and duties of people and organizations, as well as their obligations and responsibilities.

While the definition of a citizen varies, it typically includes such factors as the ability to vote, hold government offices, and receive social welfare benefits, among others. In addition, a citizen is expected to respect the rights of other citizens and the property of the state. A citizen is usually well-mannered and courteous, willing to help those who are less fortunate than themselves. A good citizen is a productive member of society and contributes to the growth of the nation.

The term “citizenship” has a rich tradition in the world’s cultures, with the most prominent examples being the European city-states and ancient Greece. Some thinkers, however, have argued that the notion of citizenship is relatively new in human history and that it has evolved from prehistoric hunter-gatherer societies.

Regardless of its origin, the concept of citizenship is now a global phenomenon. As such, the practice of citizenship has influenced international relations, and it is widely accepted that a state must protect its citizens from external threats and internal strife.

One of the most important things that a citizen can do is to vote in elections. While it may be tempting to only vote in big national or local elections, it’s necessary to be active in every election you can because it is the best way to have a direct impact on your government and its policies.

A good citizen should care for land, mountain, river, pond, plants and forest just like he/she do care for his/her own home. He/she pay all required tax on time & don’t support any form of corruption. He/she is not afraid to speak out his/her opinion if he/she feel that it will improve the life of other citizens or the country in general.

A citizen should also be generous in sharing his/her resources and talents with the society he/she belongs to. He/she is willing to help the needy without seeking anything in return. A good citizen is also humble and willing to take advice from other people. He/she also understands that the rules are promulgated with everyone’s welfare in mind. In short, a good citizen should be able to put himself/herself in the shoes of other citizens and make decisions accordingly.

What Are Human Rights?

posted in: News | 0

human rights

Human rights are the standards that deserve universal protection in order for every person to live freely, equally and in dignity. They are based on the idea that all people have a basic moral worth and are entitled to certain minimum requirements for living with dignity, regardless of their status, ethnicity, religion or political affiliation. They are a set of moral norms that are shared by the vast majority of civilised nations and most major religions. These rights are recognised by almost all cultures in the world and by most civilised governments as a fundamental element of their culture.

The term ‘human rights’ has only been in wide use since the end of World War II and the adoption by the United Nations of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. It replaced the phrase ‘natural rights’, which had fallen out of favour with the rise of legal positivism in the 19th century and its rejection of the theory, long espoused by religious thinkers, that law must be moral to be legally valid.

John Locke, a British philosopher who wrote Two Treatises of Government, developed the concept of natural law by asserting that the right to life, liberty and property derives from one’s own nature rather than from their relationship to their government. He also turned Hobbes’ prescription on its head, saying that if a ruler goes against the rules of natural law, the people might justifiably overthrow the regime and establish a new one.

Most countries have ratified the major international human rights conventions and treaties, indicating their agreement with and voluntarily binding themselves to them. Some have also set up their own national systems for identifying and protecting human rights. These are usually based on the UN system but with more local influence, and they tend to focus on specific categories of rights, such as minority and group rights (e.g., women’s rights, racial and ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples) or labour rights (e.g., a decent wage and adequate working conditions).

The question of which norms are considered to be human rights is often a matter of controversy and debate. Some argue that the UDHR and its international treaties are authoritative guides to which rights are considered human rights, while others say that only if a particular problem is included on an official list of human rights can it be taken seriously as such.

Even if there were reliable ways of finding out what counts as a human right, it would still be difficult to agree on which problems should receive this status. This is because human rights are a moral construct, and the questions of what is right or wrong can be resolved only through open-minded and serious moral inquiry. These moral enquiries must take true premises into account about current institutions, problems and resources. Only then can we reach rational agreement on which standards humans may justifiably expect of each other and of their governments.

Immigrants and the United States

posted in: News | 0

Immigrants are people who live in a country other than the one in which they were born. They are the source of much political, economic and cultural debate in many countries. In the United States, immigration has contributed to its growth and vitality, and it continues to shape the country demographically, economically and socially.

Whether legal or not, immigrants add to the economy by purchasing goods and services and by paying taxes. They also contribute to the culture of a country through their family and social connections, and they create a diversity that enriches the nation. In addition, they help to bolster the national birth rate, which is currently low and can contribute to reduced labor force participation, a lower demand for certain industries (such as housing), and weaker consumer spending.

International migration has been central to the development of modern societies, and it is a critical factor in most current discussions of globalization and integration. Although migration has been a part of human history for centuries, it is only recently that it has become the focus of so much public attention.

In the modern sense of the word, immigration refers to the movement of people across borders for the purpose of settling in a new place. The 44.9 million immigrants living in the United States today comprise about one-sixth of the world’s international migrants. They come from more than a hundred different countries, and they speak an enormous variety of languages.

Although the country has had its ups and downs in terms of its attitude toward immigration, the U.S. continues to be a magnet for migrants from around the world. The 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act allows immigrants to settle in the United States through three primary streams: family-based (re)unification, employment-based (green card) pathways and humanitarian protection, such as refugees and those admitted under a lottery program known as the Diversity Visa.

Traditionally, the majority of immigrants have been from Europe, Canada or other North American countries. But since 2007, the number of unauthorized immigrants has grown, and its composition has shifted. The share of unauthorized immigrants from Mexico has dropped significantly, while those from Asian countries such as India and China have increased, and the numbers of asylum seekers have grown, especially from El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras.

Because the influx of migrants has had such a profound impact on the United States, it is important to understand what they do and why they do it. While there are many myths about the effects of immigrants on their host communities, most Americans have a positive view of immigration and understand its importance to the nation. However, a significant portion of the public remains skeptical about the impact of immigrants and is concerned that the federal government has given itself too much power to turn people back at the border. This has contributed to a legacy of cruel and inhumane treatment of people trying to seek refuge from violence or poverty.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation, also known as removal, is the process of sending a non-citizen back to his or her country of origin. This can occur for a number of reasons. Often people are removed because they violated immigration law or committed a crime such as fraud, embezzlement, rape, murder, certain drug offenses and more. In addition, certain misdemeanors such as drunk driving and domestic violence can result in deportation as well.

For immigrants, deportation can be a life-altering event and is often accompanied by severe financial and emotional hardships. It can also lead to separation from family and friends. In some cases, it can even mean death.

Throughout the United States, as well as around the world, millions of people have been or are in danger of being deported. Unlike criminals, who may be sentenced to prison or a fine, most people are not tracked or kept accountable after being deported and the fate of many is unknown. For this reason, it is important that everyone understand what deportation means.

In most cases, immigration authorities will not deport someone without first putting them through a lengthy removal or deportation proceeding. During removal proceedings, an Immigration Judge will listen to evidence and testimony from witnesses and decide whether or not you should be deported. The Immigration Judge can order your deportation, but you have a right to appeal the judge’s decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Alternatively, the judge can reopen your case for a hearing if there has been an error in the law or you have new facts that could impact your deportability.

Before a person is deported, they will receive what is called a Notice to Appear. This document will list the alleged grounds for deportation and tell you when and where to appear before an Immigration Judge. It is important that you attend your hearing date or you will be automatically deported. During the hearing, you will have an opportunity to present evidence and arguments about why you should remain in the United States.

The most common reason for deportation is that a person did not have legal status in the United States to begin with, whether they entered illegally or overstayed their visa. Other common reasons include being convicted of a crime such as rape or murder, having a serious mental illness, and engaging in activity that harms national security or public safety.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is someone who is not serving in the military. Civilians can be found all over the world and they work in many different fields. They often make a lot of money and have great benefits, including health insurance and retirement. The civilian life can be very fulfilling, but it is also a big change from the military life. There are many resources for civilians that can help them transition to a new life.

ci*vil*ian (si vl’in) a person who is not on active duty with a military, naval, police, or fire fighting organization: Thousands of civilians had been killed or injured in the war.

A civilian can be paid either hourly or a salary, depending on the job and industry. Most civilians do not have housing provided for them, so they must pay for that on their own. Most civilians can also get excellent health insurance and other benefits, which are very helpful for people with families. Civilians can find jobs in almost every field, from retail to government. There are even civilians who work in the military, though they are not on active duty. The most common jobs for civilians include sales, education, business, and health care.

Civilian lives are not as well documented as the military life, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t interesting. There are many perks to the civilian life, including the freedom to travel and live in different parts of the world. There are many different branches of the civilian service, each with their own traditions and cultures. There are also plenty of opportunities for people to become leaders in their chosen fields.

It’s no secret that the military and civilian worlds are very different. Transitioning from the military to a civilian life can be difficult, especially when it comes to the difference in schedules and expectations. Rigid schedules, tone of voice, and responses to commands are all things that must be changed when a soldier transitions into civilian life. It’s important to remember that these differences are normal and will improve with time.

When it comes to the definition of a civilian in international law, there are two main conditions that must be met. The first is that the individual must not be a member of an armed force or of a militia, or of an organized group of armed force or volunteers. The second condition is that the person must not directly participate in hostilities, although this may sometimes be difficult to determine, especially if the individual holds a position of leadership or authority within an armed force, for example a general officer. In the case of direct participation, the Chamber will examine whether it is possible to distinguish the individual’s role from his or her overall function within the armed force. This is in line with the customary interpretation of common Article 3 of the 1949 Geneva Conventions. ICTY, Tadic case, Prosecutor’s Pre-Trial Brief, 1996.

What Is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

A citizen is a person who is a member of a community. In the modern world, citizenship is usually tied to a government and includes the right to vote, participate in political activities, and access public services. A citizen is also someone who obeys laws and carries out other responsibilities.

Citizenship has a long history and has changed greatly over time. In the past, it was often linked to kinship or ethnicity. Today, people can become citizens of a country by marrying into it, serving in the military, or completing a naturalization process. Citizenship can also be acquired by a country through war or as a result of other events, such as the birth of a child or winning a lottery.

The purpose of the law is to set standards, maintain order, resolve disputes, and protect liberties and rights. There are many branches of law, including contract, family, criminal, and property laws. Each branch has a different focus, but they all share some basic principles. For example, contract law regulates agreements to exchange goods or services for money or anything else of value and criminal law punishes crimes. Property law defines people’s rights and responsibilities toward tangible property, such as land or buildings, and intangible property such as stocks and bank accounts.

Some scholars think that the concept of citizenship arose with the city-states of ancient Greece, or polis. Unlike hunter-gatherer bands, the Greeks saw their own lives as entwined with the life of their community. They believed that to be fully human was to be an active participant in the polis. Aristotle taught that a person should be concerned not only with their own welfare but with the welfare of others.

Other scholars believe that citizenship developed along with other human institutions, such as religion or economic systems. In other words, it was a consequence of the development of civilizations and industrial societies. In the modern world, most nations define citizenship through their constitutions and treaties. Depending on the definition, citizens may be granted rights and responsibilities that vary from one state to the next.

The earliest laws were written to address common problems and prevent violence. Over time, these rules evolved into a legal system that has many purposes, such as keeping the peace, maintaining order, and resolving disputes. The law can also help preserve individuals’ freedoms and promote social justice. For example, some countries’ laws prohibit discrimination based on race or religion and protect minorities from majorities. In addition, the law can regulate business and provide financial assistance to those who need it. It can even encourage or discourage the establishment of certain industries. For example, some countries have banned the production of tobacco because it causes health problems, while other countries have promoted the growth of biotechnology because it can benefit society.

Understanding Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

human rights

Human rights are basic freedoms – like the right to live, to choose where one lives, to love and to work – that people need in order to be happy and fulfilled. They are universal, inalienable and interdependent. They apply to all irrespective of their race, gender, language or religion, and they cannot be taken away from anyone. Human rights are not just a matter of opinion or politics: they are a moral and legal duty of all governments.

There are many ways of interpreting and understanding human rights. One view is that they are a way of identifying fundamental moral principles that all societies share, and thus providing the basis for international law and cooperation. This view aims to provide an objective foundation for human rights, so that they are not simply seen as a political issue to be argued over by competing nations or interests. It also aims to ensure that the international community acts to protect human rights where they are violated, and that governments take their responsibilities seriously.

Another approach to human rights is that they are norms of international law, created by legislative enactment, judicial decisions or custom that have been turned into treaty obligations at the global level. The idea behind this is that, when a government signs up to international agreements on human rights, it is not only obliged to respect those rights in its own territory but also has a responsibility to help other countries do the same.

A third view is that human rights are a set of standards that are universal and inalienable, regardless of whether they are recognised or not. This view suggests that the Universal Declaration is a statement of the most important of these standards, and that all states have a responsibility to uphold them, even if they do not agree with all the provisions. This is a very challenging view, and one that many people do not accept.

For some, the concept of human rights can seem like a very abstract and “otherworldly” concept, and it may feel impossible to make progress on these issues in the real world. However, policy change – whether at national or international level – often comes about as the result of a series of pressures from a range of sources. Young people starting out on human rights activism can make a big difference by applying the same approaches as seasoned activists.

It is important to remember that human rights are about more than just laws and institutions – they are about attitudes and values. To truly achieve human rights, everyone needs to know what they are and be able to identify them when they see them being violated. So, learn about your own rights, and talk to your friends and family about them. Support organisations that fight for your rights, and avoid consuming products that are made by slave labourers (or at least boycott those that do). This is the only way to make a difference!

The Facts About Immigrants

posted in: News | 0

Immigration is the process of moving to a new country with the intention of permanently settling there. People immigrate to improve their economic opportunities, living conditions, and quality of life. Each country has its own rules and regulations that govern how people can legally immigrate. It is also common for individuals to immigrate illegally, which can be dangerous and have negative consequences.

The number of immigrants in the United States has risen rapidly since 1970. Today, immigrants comprise nearly 14 percent of the population, and their children make up about a third of all Americans. Immigration is a crucial part of our economy, and it can have positive or negative effects on local communities.

Many people have misconceptions about immigrants, such as the belief that they depress wages and take jobs from Americans. This is why it is important to educate the public about the facts regarding immigration. This article will highlight some of the most important facts about immigrants, including their contributions to the economy and how they are different from native-born citizens.

Most immigrants are employed, and about half work full time. They are concentrated at both ends of the education spectrum, with about a third having a college degree or more and about a fourth having less than a high school diploma. About half of working immigrants are self-employed or the owners of small businesses.

When asked to name the biggest concerns facing them and their families, about three-quarters of immigrants named financial issues. These included paying bills and making ends meet, compared with other concerns such as health and medical issues, safety, and school and workplace concerns. Several in ten immigrants cited escaping unsafe conditions as a major reason for coming to the United States.

Immigrants are an essential part of the economy, and their contributions have been growing over time. The number of immigrants is not linked to the unemployment rate, and there is no evidence that immigrants depress average wages or compete directly with American workers for jobs. Immigration has also boosted GDP growth by adding workers and raising productivity. Immigrants mainly supplement American workers in industries and sectors where there are bottlenecks or shortages that would otherwise slow growth.

It is important to understand the realities of the immigrant experience, and this report does so through a broad range of data and research. It aims to foster bigger, more nuanced conversations about the American dream of immigration that pay attention to the unique situations of migrants who come from all over the world and have a wide range of backgrounds and circumstances. It also focuses on understanding the paths that open or close for migrants, with a particular eye toward how they are affected by societal and governmental support. These conversations can lead to better policy that is more reflective of the reality of how migrants actually live and their needs. Ultimately, the goal is to help all Americans realize that immigrant stories deserve to be told in all their complexity and glory.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the removal or expulsion of a person from a country. In the United States, it is the process of removing someone who does not have citizenship in the United States from the country. Deportation can be the result of criminal activity, immigration violations or civil infractions.

In the US, a deportation order can be issued by an immigration judge or an immigration agency, such as ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement). Deportation can also be the result of a criminal conviction. Criminal convictions can include a wide range of crimes, including homicide, drugs, burglary, weapons charges and many others.

The process of deportation is complex and can take many months or even years. It usually begins when a person is arrested by ICE and referred to a deportation or removal proceeding. The person will be detained, and ICE will decide whether to release the person on bond or whether to detain them in an immigration detention center or another contracted prison facility. A person who is detained has the right to appeal the decision to a Federal Immigration Court, which will review the case and determine whether or not the government meets its burden of proving that the person is removable.

When someone is deported, they are sent back to their country of origin. In some cases, a person who is deported can return to the United States in the future through a process known as cancellation of removal or adjustment of status. However, in other cases, the individual may be subject to deportation permanently because of a crime or other grounds.

The most common reasons for deportation are illegal entry or re-entry, committing a crime of “moral turpitude” or engaging in smuggling activities. In the case of illegal entry or re-entry, the government has to prove that the person entered or attempted to enter the United States without proper documentation and that they did not go through a port of entry.

Other grounds for deportation include committing a crime of moral turpitude, such as domestic violence or robbery, participating in smuggling activities or threatening national security. The government also has the power to deport people who have been convicted of certain types of crimes, such as murder or drug trafficking offenses, or who have engaged in fraud or money laundering activities.

The consequences of deportation can be severe, especially for children. A Marshall Project analysis with the Center for Migration Studies found that about 6.1 million American citizen children live in households with at least one undocumented family member who could be vulnerable to deportation. The loss of these parents has significant physical, emotional, and developmental repercussions for these families, as well as for the entire community. In addition, the impending threat of deportation has already caused many children to suffer from psychological and emotional problems. Deportations are a human rights violation that undermine the basic dignity of all people. Moreover, they often cause lasting harms to communities and nations.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is a person who is not a member of an armed force or an organized military group. Civilians are protected by the laws of war and are entitled to certain privileges that distinguish them from combatants. However, it is difficult to define what a civilian is exactly. The term is a broad one, and the distinction between a civilian and a fighter can be blurry at times.

Civilian life is a lot different from the military, and it takes time to adjust to civilian relationships. People are not as familiar with the etiquette of military ranks, and veterans must work hard to avoid slipping into old habits that can make them appear rude or insensitive to civilians.

There are many benefits to being a civilian, including earning more money per month than in the military and getting paid on an hourly basis. Civilian jobs also offer better job security and more vacation days. Civilians can also enjoy more freedom in their daily lives and have more flexibility with their schedules.

While there are many advantages to being a civilian, it is not without its challenges. The most obvious difference is that civilians are not commissioned officers in the military, and they must contend with the higher expectations of their peers when it comes to leadership skills, performance, and discipline. Military-related offenses such as fraud, theft of government property, sexual misconduct, drug and alcohol abuse, insubordination, desertion, and AWOL are not tolerated by civilian employers.

The challenge facing civilian authority in the midst of an armed conflict is to determine the ideal balance between control and preventing a backlash from the military world. Too much control over the military could make them too weak to defend the country, and too little control could result in a coup from within the ranks.

During a conflict, it is common for members of the armed forces or of an organized armed group to take up a civilian occupation for a limited duration of ongoing hostilities. These individuals are considered civilians and are not obligated to comply with the laws of war during that period, but they must return to their normal duties once the hostilities have concluded.

It is difficult to classify those who directly participate in hostilities as civilians, because they often have a regular full- or part-time civilian job (“farmer by day, fighter by night”). However, according to international law, they must be treated as civilians during their direct participation, and therefore must not face attack.

Civilian protection is not only a matter of protecting civilians from violence and addressing their material needs, but it is also about supporting communities to protect themselves through unarmed practices. Conflict-affected civilians and their communities are active agents in their own protection and shape the context in which external assistance is provided. The international community must ensure that the concept of civilian is properly understood and applied, and that the protection of civilians is not undermined.

What Is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

A citizen is an individual who participates in a society and contributes to its welfare. Citizenship is a complex concept and it differs from one person to another. It can also be defined differently depending on a society’s core cultural values. For example, the Native American culture defines being a good citizen through tribal core cultural values that are applied at the nation or community level.

In modern societies, citizenship is usually understood as a legal status that grants rights and obligations to individuals who are bound by the laws of their nation or community. Generally, the liberal model of citizenship is based on the ideas of the European Enlightenment that emphasized individual freedoms and human dignity. It is also rooted in Roman law and early-modern reflections on it. This liberal model of citizenship, which emerged from the 17th century onwards, is based on the idea that political liberty is important as a means to protect individual freedoms from interference by other individuals and from the authorities themselves. It is also a necessary prerequisite for social integration.

Most people believe that to be a good citizen, it is important to obey the laws and pay taxes. It is also believed that citizens should vote in elections and support their local community. This is called being a civic citizen and is one of the main ideas behind civic education programs that are taught in schools.

However, there are some problems with this idea of a good citizen. For example, if someone has a low socioeconomic status, they may not be able to afford to participate in local elections or even have the ability to read the ballot. Moreover, they may not be aware of the issues that are being discussed in the elections or how their votes will impact the country.

Some scholars have proposed a new conception of citizenship that acknowledges the differences between different groups in society and takes into account their different needs and perspectives. They call this a “citizenship of all” and suggest that the traditional distinction between public and private life should be replaced by the notion of a common community that is based on a fundamental equality.

This approach to citizenry is largely based on the idea that people should participate in their local communities through things like volunteering, supporting other people who are less fortunate than them, and supporting causes that are important to them. Consequently, this model is sometimes referred to as ‘active citizenship’ and it is becoming more popular in some countries where it has been introduced into the school curriculum. Nonetheless, most surveys find that the majority of respondents think that participating in national elections is very important to being a good citizen. They also tend to believe that it is important to follow the news and to be knowledgeable about current political issues in the country. It is also believed that it is important for citizens to be aware of what their government is doing and to protest when they feel that the government has done something wrong.

The Human Rights Framework

posted in: News | 0

human rights

A human rights framework provides a way for political leaders and governments to develop and sustain democratic institutions. It also serves as a counterweight against the natural human tendency toward tyranny. Wherever political leaders or governments cut away at the individual strands that hold this web of rights and obligations together, it undermines the overall democratic edifice and allows human rights abuses to escalate.

When the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted in 1948, it proclaimed a range of fundamental rights to which all people are entitled, regardless of their country or culture. These rights are not just morally or legally important; they are essential to human dignity. They are the foundation upon which international law and human rights treaties have been built.

There are many ways to interpret human rights, but there is a consensus that the fundamental concept is that all people have certain intrinsic worth or value as humans and are worthy of respect. Human rights also protect people from the actions of others and provide a set of guiding principles against which to judge the conduct of individuals, communities, countries, and multinational corporations.

Most importantly, the idea of human rights has broad popular support. This broad popular support is vital for human rights to be realized and sustained. Ideally, it should appeal to people with a wide range of political views – from the center-left to the center-right. If the human rights framework is dominated by a strongly egalitarian political program, it will not appeal to enough people and may lose support.

The concept of human rights emerged from two observations: the observation that every person requires diverse values or capabilities for well-being, and the observation that these requirements are often painfully frustrated by social and natural forces, resulting in exploitation, oppression, or persecution. These twin observations gave rise to both the human rights movement and the national and international legal processes that are associated with it.

The first question about human rights is what makes them legitimate. The answer to this question has varied over time. The majority view today is that they are grounded in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and derived from an empirical analysis of human nature, society, and politics. In the end, they are a collection of hard-to-dispute facts and a set of practical guidelines for how to act on those facts.

Griffin explains that “practicalities” shape human rights by prescribing “a clear definition of rights that avoids too many complicated bends,” enlarging them a bit to provide safety margins, and consulting the facts about human nature and the human condition (see “Fundamental Groundings” in this issue).

The next question is how to ensure that human rights are respected and protected. One way is to promote and implement human rights treaties, which have the force of law when ratified by states. Another is to encourage the development of local human rights advocacy and defenders. Finally, there is a need for more consistent, principled, and ambitious action by all states to promote and protect human rights.

The Importance of Immigration

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

In a world where nations compete to attract the best and brightest, immigration is an important economic and social policy. Immigrants add to the nation’s economy, but they also enrich their communities, contribute to its cultural fabric and help their children become more assimilated. They face a wide range of challenges and experiences, from finding jobs and housing to navigating a culture that is sometimes ambivalent or hostile to their presence.

The term “immigrant” encompasses all foreign-born individuals who have not yet naturalized as citizens of the host country. These include both legal immigrants and undocumented migrants. The number of immigrants has varied over the years, and some countries are more welcoming to foreign-born residents than others.

There are many different reasons people migrate, but the most common is to escape poverty and seek a better life. In addition, some may be fleeing persecution or a threat of violence in their home countries.

The United States has a long history of immigration, and today about 14 percent of Americans are foreign-born. The nation has benefitted from the energy and ingenuity that newcomers bring, even if there have been times when immigration was restricted.

From the mid-19th century through the early decades of the 20th century, the era of mass migration was marked by sweeping demographic changes that profoundly shaped American society.

Most of these demographic changes were driven by the demand for labor. The economy grew rapidly during this period, and it required large numbers of workers to keep it going. In addition, a new wave of immigrants brought in much needed skills and a desire to live a freer, more prosperous life.

While these economic benefits are clear, immigration still faces widespread opposition. Many of the same forces that made assimilation difficult for earlier waves of immigrants have resurfaced in this era. These factors include demographic change, rapid economic growth and the existence of ethnocentrism-beliefs that value members of one’s own community more than outsiders.

When immigration fuels the economy, it raises the incomes of immigrants and natives alike. This increase is referred to as the immigration surplus. It raises the return on capital and lowers the wages of competing laborers, but only a small share of this extra income goes to the workers themselves (Keely 1979).

Those who are not benefiting from the economic gains of immigration have strong motives for opposing it. This includes political leaders, talk-show and radio pundits, and social movement organisations such as public interest organisations and unauthorized militia groups that patrol the U.S.-Mexico border, such as the Minutemen. This opposition is not only motivated by economic concerns but by an underlying belief that outsiders are a threat to traditional cultural arrangements and social stability. Despite the evidence of economic and social benefits, immigration remains a controversial issue because it challenges established values and creates new inequalities. In the end, however, economic forces are likely to prevail over cultural ones. In the future, the United States will have to find a way to manage and control immigration in order to maintain its role as a global leader.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

Deportation is the expulsion of a non-citizen from a country by order of a government. The process is often complicated and lengthy. It changes the lives of not only the person being deported, but their family and community as well. Deportation breaks up families, and it is a difficult and stressful experience for everyone involved.

People are deported on a variety of grounds. They may be in removal proceedings because Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) formally accused them of being removable or they violated the terms of their visa, visa extension or other status. People who are in removal proceedings are usually placed into deportation detention while they wait for their hearing date.

The first step in a deportation case is the Master Calendar Hearing. At this hearing, the immigration judge advises you of the official charges against you and you have an opportunity to tell your side of the story. The judge will also decide if you are eligible for relief from removal or deportation.

It is important to be at every Master Calendar Hearing. If you do not attend all the hearings, your lawyer may not have the chance to present any evidence that might prevent your deportation.

In some cases, the ICE attorney will argue that you should be removed and the judge will agree. However, in some cases the judge might not agree with the ICE attorney’s arguments and will not enter an order of removal.

If the judge decides that you should be removed, he or she will set a date for your departure. If you believe that your removal would cause extreme hardship to your family members who are citizens of the United States or lawful permanent residents, ask your attorney to apply for voluntary departure. You must show that you have enough money to buy your ticket home and that you can prove that you are not a threat to the safety of your country of origin.

Alternatively, you can get your deportation case expedited and avoid the need for a Master Calendar hearing. This is usually done for people who have committed serious crimes. It is important to note that this type of deportation does not protect you from criminal convictions in the future.

Another way to be deported is to be convicted of certain crimes in federal court. Then, the judge can simply order you to be removed in what is called a judicial removal proceeding. If you have a criminal record, it is important to talk to your attorney about your options. A skilled and experienced lawyer can help you avoid deportation and stay with your loved ones.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is someone who has not been enlisted into the military or any other armed force. This definition also applies to a person who is not a member of any political party or organization that advocates war. A civilian is also a person who does not work in any profession that involves military training and service, such as lawyers, doctors, engineers, teachers, and police officers. The term civilian can be used in the context of civil-military relations to describe individuals who serve at the policymaking level, most notably members of the National Security Council and the Office of the President with their relevant committees.

The distinction between combatants and civilians can be less straightforward during an internal armed conflict. Nevertheless, international humanitarian law establishes that civilians must be protected from the dangers of military operations “unless and until they have taken a direct part in hostilities” (Additional Protocol II).

This protection does not exclude the presence within the civilian population of persons who are not combatants; however, these individuals should be accorded enhanced protection in order to ensure their safety and allow them to return to peaceful life as soon as possible (API Art. 50).

Although it may not always be easy, it is important for a military veteran to make a smooth transition into civilian life. This includes adjusting to relationships with friends and family who remained on the home front, as well as dealing with financial changes that are often associated with civilian living. While it is necessary to find a new routine, veterans should not forget that they have unique skills and knowledge that can help them adapt to the civilian world.

In the workplace, it is important for a military veteran who has recently transitioned into civilian life to avoid using military forms of address, such as sir and ma’am, Mr. and Mrs., or by rank. These types of terms are considered inappropriate in the civilian sector and can make others uncomfortable. This is especially true in jobs with large numbers of civilians who are accustomed to addressing their coworkers with first names.

Despite the fact that most people consider the military to be an all-civilian endeavor, it is not uncommon for individuals who serve at the highest levels of the Pentagon to question or disagree with civilian policy guidance that they deem unwise in their professional judgment. The example of James Mattis, President Trump’s first Secretary of Defense and a retired four-star Marine Corps general, is illustrative of this phenomenon. However, it is difficult to argue with the experience and vision that a senior military officer has acquired over time through countless meeting rooms and practice fields. It would be unreasonable to expect such an individual to revert to a neophyte politician just months after retiring from the military.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the removal from a country by government authorities of a non-citizen who is found to have committed a criminal offense, violated immigration laws, or otherwise lacks legal status to be in the country. The process is complex, both legally and socially. Deportation has a deep impact on families, communities, and the nation as a whole.

Deported individuals are removed from the country, either voluntarily or involuntarily. Generally, a person who is deported is not allowed to return to the United States for 10 years or more. However, some people who have been deported can apply to reenter the country sooner, as long as they have not committed any serious crimes and have met certain other requirements.

The term deportation is a Latin word meaning “to banish,” and it has had many historical connotations, including the transportation of criminals to penal settlements in foreign countries. In Roman law, deportation was a punishment for political crimes, and it also applied to those who committed adultery, murder, poisoning, forgery, or other serious criminal offenses. Deportation is the act by an executive agency of a nation state that expels a foreign national from its territory, either voluntarily or involuntarily. In modern times, the term deportation most commonly refers to the expulsion of a non-citizen from the United States for violating its laws or lacking legal status.

Immigration attorneys can help individuals in deportation proceedings defend themselves against the government’s claim that they should be removed. They can help clients prove that they have not been convicted of a criminal offense (or that their crime was not serious enough to warrant deportation), and that they have good moral character. They can also show that their removal would cause extreme hardship to a lawful permanent resident or U.S. citizen spouse, parent, or child.

A deportation or removal proceeding typically starts when a DHS official serves an individual with a Notice to Appear (NTA). This document will list the date of their first hearing, which is also known as a master calendar hearing. Individuals should bring their attorney with them to this hearing, which will be held before an immigration judge in an immigration court.

The deportation process can move rapidly, particularly in cases where an individual is attempting to cross the border illegally. Under a 1996 system called expedited removal, low-level DHS officials can order deportation without the involvement of an immigration judge if they believe that the individual is inadmissible and poses a threat to national security or public safety.

In other types of removal proceedings, the non-citizen will be given a chance to present evidence and arguments before an Immigration Judge. A specialized lawyer can make sure that the deportation process is conducted fairly and in accordance with the law. It is also possible to appeal a deportation order or to have the case reopened if there is a mistake of law in the original decision or new information arises that could change the outcome of the case.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

A civilian is a person who is not an active member of any military, police, or fire fighting organization. The term is also used to refer to someone who follows the pursuits of civil life rather than a religious or clerical career.

Civilians do many different jobs for the federal government, including working as teachers, bankers, engineers, doctors, and police officers. They are paid hourly or salary and receive tax advantages. Civilian workers do not receive pay for housing or food like members of the armed forces, but they may be eligible for health and dental benefits.

One of the most common struggles that service members face after transitioning back into civilian life is finding a sense of community. Military crews become like a family, and it can be difficult to leave that crew behind when returning to civilian life. For this reason, it is important for service members to network as much as possible and reach out to veteran resources that help manage finances, find jobs, and provide support during the transition back into civilian life.

While the civilian lifestyle is not without its challenges, it offers many more opportunities for personal growth. The flexibility of being able to take advantage of educational programs at a local university or college is a huge benefit that can make civilian life seem more appealing than it once was.

The freedom that civilians enjoy is often not taken for granted. In some countries, such as Syria, civilians are subject to oppressive governmental regimes that can lead to a loss of life and liberty. Civilians are also at risk of being caught in the crossfire between two belligerent sides in an armed conflict, and they can lose protection under international law.

Under international humanitarian law, a civilian is a person who does not belong to any regular armed force that is taking part in hostilities. However, it is not always easy to distinguish between combatants and civilians, especially in the context of internal armed conflicts where a clear distinction may be impossible to make. Civilians who take direct part in hostilities are deprived of civilian status and are entitled to the protection provided under international humanitarian law, but they are not exempt from prosecution for violations of domestic and international law that they commit during a conflict.

It is crucial for a civilian to understand their rights and seek legal assistance if they are wrongfully accused of violating military or civilian law. Whether fighting to avoid a court martial on their record or trying to fight unfair penalties and jail time, a skilled lawyer can help them resolve the situation in their favor. The sooner a civilian enlists legal assistance, the faster they can return to their lives and start rebuilding their future. Civilian is an important word in the military vocabulary, but it can be confusing for those who are not familiar with its definition. Learn more about this common military term by reading the following article.

What is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

Citizenship is a legal status that allows you to vote, work and live in a country. It can be acquired in various ways, including being born in a country, having citizen parents, marriage to a citizen or naturalization (applying for citizenship). A good citizen has the rights and responsibilities that come with this status. Some of these responsibilities include obeying the law, paying taxes and helping others in need. A good citizen also tries to influence the direction of the government by voting, and acts according to the prevailing principles of fairness, justice and morality.

A person who loves his or her country is considered a good citizen. This love is expressed in patriotism, which is the devotion to a nation and its people. It also includes the desire for the best of the country and a willingness to sacrifice for its sake.

In modern times, the concept of citizenship has evolved from being a mere legal status to an important part of one’s identity. This change has been brought about by the decline of monarchy and the rise of the constitutional state. Citizenship is now a fundamental element of a democracy and an integral component of human freedoms.

The concept of citizenship has become an essential topic of debate among scholars and policymakers. A variety of models have been developed to define citizenship and its role in a democratic society. These models vary in their approach to the meaning of citizenship, the rights and responsibilities that come with it, and how it is applied.

While the definition of a citizen differs from country to country, most surveys share certain common variables. For example, most surveys include variables related to the importance of being a citizen and the extent to which a person follows the laws of his or her country. They may also include questions about political participation, civic culture and the level of knowledge a person has about his or her nation’s history.

Those who wish to be good citizens must know about their nation’s history and current policies. They should keep track of local and national news and participate in their nation’s political life by voting. Moreover, they should read books that teach them how to analyze issues logically and critically. They should also make sure that they do not have any trips of six months or more outside their nation during the three- or five-year wait for citizenship.

Being a good citizen is not as hard as it may seem. All you need is a bit of selflessness and love for your country. This way, you will be able to be the kind of citizen that your country deserves.

The Political Concept of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

Human rights are the universal principles that everyone on the planet is entitled to enjoy in a world of genuine peace and justice. The most comprehensive statement of them was approved, almost unanimously, by the nations of the world in 1948: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The UDHR opened by stating that “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” It then proceeded to list 30 articles summarizing the things to which all persons are entitled, simply because they are human beings. The UDHR is the most widely translated human rights document in history. It is the basis for all UN treaties, and is the core of human rights discourse around the globe.

It is not, however, the only way of thinking about human rights. A different approach is to view human rights as political concepts rather than a kind of independently existing moral reality. This view sees human rights as serving various political functions, including setting international standards for evaluating the treatment of people by their governments and specifying when it is permissible to use economic sanctions or military force to protect urgent human needs.

For some, such political concepts of human rights are a more pragmatically helpful approach than a belief that they embody the most fundamental moral norms of humanity. It leaves legal and policy matters open for democratic decision-making at the national and local levels, and avoids excessively lofty aspirations or demanding ideals. Henry Shue, for example, has argued that human rights concern the “lower limits on tolerable human conduct” (Shue 1996).

The practicality of a political concept of human rights is further strengthened by the fact that it does not require any religion or creed to support it. Theological beliefs can, of course, provide support for human rights, but this is not required for their enshrinement as international law. This is a crucial consideration in a world of very diverse religious beliefs, where billions do not believe in the sort of god that would prescribe or sanction human rights. It is much harder to persuade them to change their theological views than it is to get them to ratify the legal enactment of human rights at both the national and international levels.

Whether human rights are understood as politically practical or as morally fundamental, they remain the key to a world in which all individuals can live with dignity and freedom. It is important to recognize the challenges that lie ahead and to continue to work together, at the regional and global level, towards their universal application. In this context, reprisals against human rights defenders must be addressed, including the abuse of accreditation and security procedures to prevent civil society organizations from interacting with the UN system, and the labeling of people as terrorists or criminals in their attempts to persuade their governments to address their grievances. These practices contribute to the lack of trust in the international system and undermine human rights progress.

Immigrants and America

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

About 44.9 million immigrants —people who were born in another country —lived in the United States as of 2019. This represents about 14 percent of the population. Since the end of World War II, immigrant numbers have increased steadily.

Immigrants have strengthened cities and towns that were losing population; played key roles in reviving cities such as Los Angeles, Miami and New York that were struggling economically; and helped revitalize far-flung rural communities and halt their decline. In addition, many of the people who were born abroad have gone on to become leaders in their fields and have made a profound impact on the economy, including driving technological advancements in the areas of health care, finance, energy and food science.

The nation is better off because of the openness to immigration that has been part of its culture and history. It enriches the culture, expands economic opportunity and enhances America’s role in the world. It also brings the benefits of a diverse, multicultural society and provides the energy and ingenuity that has built our nation.

While some people may have negative views of immigration, most Americans recognize the positive contributions that immigrants make to our society. A recent PNAE/KFF survey found that 70 percent of the public thinks that the U.S. would be even more successful if it allowed more immigrant admissions.

Some people are concerned that immigrants take jobs away from U.S.-born workers or impose fiscal burdens on the government, but these concerns are misplaced. The majority of immigrants pay more in taxes than they consume in government benefits. Additionally, there is a growing recognition that immigrant entrepreneurs drive innovation in the United States and contribute to economic growth.

Many immigrants face challenges as they integrate into American life. Some of these include navigating the legal system, learning English and dealing with culture shock and discrimination. However, the vast majority of immigrants report feeling successful in their lives and achieving the American dream.

Most immigrants work hard and provide a strong foundation for the future for their children. In 2017, 92 percent of children with foreign-born parents were living in families where at least one adult was employed full time and working at least 1,000 hours per year on average. Almost all of these families are in the middle or upper-middle income brackets.

Immigrants also make significant financial contributions to their countries of origin through remittance payments and other investments. These transfers help individuals meet their basic needs and are a critical source of funding during disasters. They also boost productivity in the home country by bringing knowledge, skills and capital to improve industry and create jobs.

The ability to move across borders has transformed the global economy, making it possible for workers to move where they are most needed. This has given rise to a new kind of competition, with firms seeking the best talent wherever it is available. In this new global marketplace, all businesses need to adapt if they want to thrive.

How to Avoid Deportation

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the process by which the federal government removes a noncitizen from the United States. The Department of Homeland Security, through Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), can formally remove a person from the country for a variety of reasons, including serious crimes and violations of immigration law. If you’re facing deportation, you should consult with a qualified immigration attorney to determine your options and defenses.

The deportation process is complex, and many people who find themselves in removal proceedings have no idea how to fight it. They may believe they’re going to be automatically sent back to their home country, even if they have lived here most or all of their lives and have deep roots in the community. Deportation can be devastating, both emotionally and financially, and can break up families. This article will help people understand the deportation process so they can protect their rights and seek relief from deportation.

How to Avoid Deportation

The first step in the deportation process is when ICE formally accuses the noncitizen of being removable. This can occur in various ways, such as when a noncitizen applies for a benefit and the government denies their request or when they’re arrested and police check for an immigration hold.

After a noncitizen is formally accused of being deportable, they must attend one or more hearings before an immigration judge. During these hearings, the judge can decide whether to order removal or grant relief from removal. The person can also be offered the option of leaving voluntarily without a removal order.

During these hearings, the government must prove that they have grounds to deport the person. This is done through evidence presented in the form of a case summary and through testimony by a government representative. The noncitizen has the opportunity to present their own evidence and testimony to the judge as well.

In the past, deportation was often referred to as exile or banishment, and in fact, this is what it originally meant. It was a way to punish political criminals by transporting them from the country for a certain period of time or indefinitely, usually to a penal settlement abroad.

Deportation is now generally considered a harsh punishment that breaks up families, destroys communities, and takes people away from their loved ones. It can leave behind children who are then left without parents, spouses and partners, and other family members. It can also deprive immigrants of their career and education opportunities, and it can cause significant hardship to people’s lives and their families. However, despite the negative effects of deportation, there are ways to protect your rights and fight deportation. The most important thing is to be prepared and get the right legal advice as soon as possible. Contact us today for a consultation with one of our attorneys. We can help you understand your options for relief from deportation and fight to protect your rights and your family. We offer free initial consultations and we only charge if you win your case.

What is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is a person not associated with the military or any other armed force. The term may refer to people who are not soldiers, sailors, airmen or police officers, or it may describe citizens who are not involved in armed conflict with a belligerent state or with an armed rebel group. Civilians may also be those who work for government agencies, in education, or in business. Civilians are sometimes referred to as the “ordinary population.”

Transitioning back into civilian life can be difficult for veterans and their families. It takes time to adjust to the different communication styles and the responsibilities of civilian relationships. Some things that are natural in military life can be frustrating for civilians, such as saluting or referring to people by rank. It is important to understand this difference and be patient as you adjust to your new friends and coworkers.

When you have questions or concerns about the way a civilian is treating you, it is important to speak up. This will help you avoid conflicts and keep your rights protected. If you need assistance, you can find many resources that will help you manage finances, find a job, and continue your education. There are also programs that will assist you with your transition into a civilian career.

The primary definition of a civilian in international humanitarian law is someone not associated with the armed forces or any other armed force. However, a person may lose civilian status if they participate directly in hostilities in an armed conflict. This loss of protection is only for the period of direct participation in hostilities and does not constitute a war crime.

It is a complex and nuanced issue that has been debated since the first world war. One reason for this is the ambiguity between the definition of combatant and non-combatant, as well as the differences between domestic and international armed conflicts. Another reason is that the principle of civilian immunity from attack has not been as strong as it could have been because it would require a military establishment to accept such a principle without sacrificing the ability to control its own military.

The principle of civilian immunity has been strengthened over the years because of increased awareness that it is an important part of ensuring that the military maintains the necessary level of autonomy. This autonomy is essential to a nation’s security and to the ability of a military force to act as a catalyst for social change when it is called upon to do so. However, there is a danger that the civilian authority will take on too much or too little control over the military, and this can lead to serious problems on the battlefield. This is why the concept of civilian authority needs to be carefully reviewed, ensuring that it does not interfere with the proper operation of military institutions. The ideal balance is to have a civilian body that will oversee and guide the military services, but that will not run them or set their goals or budgets.

What Does it Mean to Be a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

A citizen is a member of a political community. Citizens have a range of rights and responsibilities and are expected to follow certain principles that guide their behavior. Citizenship also entails a shared sense of identity and purpose. The question of what citizenship means is one that has been debated since ancient times. Some scholars have argued that the modern notion of citizenship should be more inclusive, allowing people who do not fit the traditional definition to become citizens. Others have argued that the concept should be more narrow and focused on individuals who live within a specific territorial state.

Some scholars have argued that a fundamental characteristic of citizenship is the recognition of the right to freedom. This is often referred to as the moral and rational basis of citizenship. Citizenship is an important part of our society and it is vital to have a good understanding of this concept.

Being a citizen requires many different characteristics including the moral obligation to respect the rights of others, the ability to defer to the decisions of other people, and the willingness to take quick action in emergencies. It is also necessary to be able to adapt to new situations and make adjustments accordingly.

In addition to these traits, being a citizen is also characterized by an active involvement in the life of the community and an awareness of the need for social justice. Being a citizen also includes the willingness to help others and to share resources. Finally, being a citizen is the willingness to obey the laws of the land and recognize that these laws were promulgated with the citizens’ welfare in mind.

It is important for citizens to keep up with what is going on in their country both nationally and internationally. This can be done by reading newspapers, watching TV or movies and speaking with friends and neighbors about what is happening in their country. It is also helpful for citizens to vote and participate in public deliberation.

Most theories of citizenship, whether liberal or republican, rely on an ideal picture of the citizen as actively involved in the political life of the community. This includes voting in elections, canvassing and demonstrating against government decisions or policies. This picture of the citizen is problematic because it assumes a degree of discursive and rationality that not all people possess. For example, a person with deep cognitive disabilities does not have the capacity to be a fully active citizen.

The Future of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

human rights

The horrors of World War II brought to global consciousness the idea that human rights need to be universally respected. In 1948 the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, a set of 30 rights that belong to everyone. Seven decades later, those 30 rights are still the foundation of international law.

A central belief in human rights is that people have natural or God-given rights that must be recognized by society and governments. These rights are inalienable, meaning that they cannot be taken away from people. It is also believed that all people, regardless of their status in the society or the quality of their government, are born with certain fundamental human rights, including the right to life, liberty and security.

Human rights also posit that there are limits to the power of the state, and that the state must protect the individual’s freedoms. In order to be valid, these principles must be rooted in a morally just and rational system of laws that ensures the respect and dignity of all people.

These basic beliefs have given rise to an international human rights regime, and to a number of regional and national human rights bodies. These institutions are not perfect, but they are an important step in preventing genocide and other human tragedies.

While most people in the world recognize these values, they do not all agree on what human rights are. There are different views of what rights are fundamental, as well as differing opinions about how those rights should be interpreted and applied.

For example, many human rights activists believe that the standard lists of human rights do not adequately take into account the particular risks and dangers that women face. Because of the widespread discrimination against women in many societies, it is believed that they must be protected from harm and violations of their rights. This has led to the expansion of lists of human rights that address issues like violence against women, reproductive choice, and trafficking in women for sex work.

It is important for the future of human rights that a strong and viable movement emerges that has widespread political support. This will require that the human rights framework appeal to people with a broad range of political viewpoints, from center-left to center-right. In order to have the best chance of achieving this goal, it is essential that those who advocate for human rights adopt a philosophical outlook that reflects a form of realism.

Realism is a view that states and other actors should seek to treat people in the most humane manner possible. This view is incompatible with relativism, which states that the morally just and rational principles of human rights do not apply in all circumstances and situations. Realism also rejects the idea that any cultural practice or religion should be excluded from the human rights debate. Moreover, it is a view that supports the notion that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is not just a 20th-century Western creation, but rather an ongoing effort to promote peace and justice in a changing world.

The Importance of Immigration

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

Immigration is the international movement of people to a country where they are not natives and do not possess citizenship in order to settle as permanent residents or naturalized citizens. National statistical agencies generally use the term “immigrant” to refer to those who are foreign born, although some also use the terms “international migrant,” “foreign-born population,” or “migrants.”

Historically, many Americans have been immigrants or children of immigrants, and they continue to shape our culture. Today, 14 percent of the United States population consists of migrants, including those with American citizenship. In cities and towns across the country, immigrants are helping to build and sustain vibrant communities.

Immigrants contribute to the economy, filling job gaps and bolstering businesses. They are the backbone of the food industry, and they bring a wealth of knowledge and ingenuity to industries like technology and health care. In addition, many immigrants are building the next generation of American leaders and innovators in fields like education and science.

People move to other countries for a variety of reasons, from economic ones to political and societal concerns. Those who migrate seek better jobs and higher wages in their new home, or they might flee wars or other conflicts that have left their homes in turmoil. The desire to be close to family members or loved ones is another driving force for migration.

There are many challenges that migrants face, such as integrating into society and overcoming language barriers. Approximately half of the people who live in the United States are non-English proficient, according to Pew Research, and it takes time for them to learn the language. In the meantime, they often feel isolated from their neighbors and co-workers.

Many states are addressing these challenges by expanding educational and employment opportunities for immigrant students, creating community-based organizations to help them navigate the social service system, and implementing policies that allow local communities to hire more immigrants. These efforts are essential to the success of a country that was built, in part, by immigrants.

As for achieving the American dream, most immigrants do not think that they will reach it unless they work hard and remain self-sufficient. In a recent Pew Research Center survey, eight in 10 immigrants said it is important to work and stay off welfare, reflecting a longstanding and highly prized American value.

As a result, despite the adversity of this pandemic, most immigrants are determined to persevere and remain hopeful that they will one day achieve their American dream. Nevertheless, as the political climate changes and their communities are threatened by federal enforcement actions, immigrants, including those with American citizenship, are increasingly struggling to feel at home in a country they once wholeheartedly embraced. This is a time when the nation needs to rethink its approach to immigration.

Understanding the Process of Deportation

posted in: News | 0

Deportation is the act of sending a person, usually a foreigner, back to their home country. The process is governed by immigration laws and can take many forms. It can happen as part of a mass deportation program like Operation Streamline, during removal proceedings when ICE accuses someone of violating immigration law, if they are apprehended at the border or inside the country, as the result of a criminal conviction, or even after an asylum claim is denied. Throughout history, the term deportation has had a broad meaning that has included banishment, exile, and transportation of criminals to penal settlements abroad.

When a person is deported, they are sent back to their home country, usually to a place they do not remember or have never visited. This can impact not only the person deported, but their spouse, children, parents, and other family members. For this reason, it is important for immigrants to be familiar with the process and understand how it works.

In the United States, deportation is a legal process that happens through a series of hearings in front of an immigration judge. These cases are called removal proceedings. The first hearing is the bond redetermination hearing, which allows noncitizens to see if they have a chance at avoiding deportation by posting bond with a loved one.

If an immigration judge decides the person is removable, the next step in the process is for ICE to file a notice of intent to deport. During this process, the government will outline all the reasons it believes the person should be removed from the United States. The noncitizen will then have an individual hearing that is the equivalent of a trial, where they can present counterarguments to why they should not be deported. This is where having an experienced and knowledgeable immigration attorney is crucial.

During these hearings, the government must prove that the noncitizen is deportable through clear and unequivocal evidence. The noncitizen must also demonstrate that if they are deported, it will cause extreme hardship to their family members who are U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents.

The final step in the deportation process is for an immigration judge to order that person deported. The person who is deported can appeal the order and even win a stay of removal in an immigration court appeals court, but these stays are rare.

Deportation is a complex and often terrifying process that can have an enormous impact on families, communities, and the economy. The best way to avoid being deported is to make sure you and your family follow all the rules and laws of this country. For more information on how to protect your rights, contact an experienced and dedicated immigration lawyer today. These examples have been automatically selected from a number of online sources. They may contain sensitive content.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

A civilian is a person who does not belong to any military, police, fire fighting or other emergency service organization. Civilians have jobs that pay them a living. They have mortgages, cars, insurance, and bills to pay. They work with other people in a job, have a boss and need to show initiative if they want to get ahead.

There is no such thing as a purely civilian society; all societies have some kind of military component, even if it’s only a small part of the total population. People can be both civilian and military at the same time, but it’s not very common for them to be fully one or the other.

People in the military have an attitudinal divide between their civilian and military life. The more societal influences are present in the military, the smaller that divide is likely to be.

Military personnel need to understand the culture and values of civilians. They need to be able to communicate effectively with their civilian colleagues and friends. They also need to understand the nuances of civilian politics and business practices. This will help them in their roles as leaders and leaders-in-training.

There are different definitions of a civilian, but the most common is that a civilian is someone who does not take direct part in hostilities or act as a combatant. This is based on international humanitarian law. According to the ICRC, “civilians are not members of the armed forces and do not become combatants when they openly bear arms and respect the laws and customs of war.” The ICTY’s pre-trial brief in the Tadic case notes that common Article 3 of the 1949 Geneva Conventions provides an authoritative definition of civilians.

Civilians in military policymaking are important because they provide valuable perspective from outside the military and national security communities on how the nation’s defense enterprises should be organized, resourced and managed. Careers that prepare people for these positions tend to be in the areas of social science, law and management. This means that these people have spent their entire professional lives learning how to balance extremely diverse interests and public relations. They are skilled at identifying and building relationships with all kinds of stakeholders, from the highest levels of government to local communities.

Those who are military minded need to understand that they cannot just walk away from the military after years of active duty. They must take time to adjust to the responsibilities and expectations of civilian life. This is difficult, but it’s essential for the health and well being of a service member. It’s a necessary step in their career advancement and for the future of our nation. The sooner they accept and understand this, the more successful they will be in their transition back to civilian life. It will also make the process less stressful for their families. The more that they can get their family members and friends to support this, the better for all of them.

The Concept of Citizenship

posted in: News | 0

Citizenship is a broad concept that encompasses all of the rights and responsibilities that are associated with membership in a specific political community. It is therefore a fundamental aspect of human existence and an important topic for study.

The concept of good citizenship has become a focus for research in the social sciences. While a definition of good citizenship is not widely accepted, there are some key elements that can be identified. These include obedience to the law, love for one’s country and patriotism, a commitment to service and giving back to the community, and tolerance.

Many of these characteristics can be taught to children in school and at home. Children can learn from the actions and words of famous Americans such as Benjamin Franklin, who worked all his life for the benefit of other people, even when he was not receiving any remuneration. Students can also learn from the actions of local and national heroes, such as firefighters and police officers. In addition, schools can teach children to respect and protect the environment and their own bodies.

In contemporary democratic and republican theory, there is a strong emphasis on active citizenship. This includes participation in the political process, such as voting in elections, canvassing for political parties, participating in public deliberation, or demonstrating against government decisions or policies. This notion of citizenship assumes the capacity for rational agency, and it is based on an ideal of the citizen as a free person capable of exercising informed judgment.

While this vision of the citizen is widely accepted, it is not without its limitations. Many individuals cannot participate in these activities due to a physical or cognitive disability, and they are thus not fully functioning citizens. This gap in the understanding of the concept of citizenship has fueled a debate over whether these people can be considered members of the citizenry.

A further limitation in this approach is the tendency to view good citizenship as a set of values that can be imposed from above. This is reflected in the idea that “political culture” can determine what kind of citizenry a society has. This view is in contrast to the idea that good citizenship is formed through the process of individual civic education and experience, a concept that has been the subject of much recent research (see Ichilov et al., 2007).

The academic discussion on the concept of good citizenship is ongoing. The present systematic review has mapped the academic discussion to date. It has a number of limitations, including its reliance on English-language literature and the fact that it excludes studies of broader social or political issues. However, it has made a valuable contribution to the mapping of the academic discussion of this concept. The future of good citizenship will depend on how this debate unfolds.

The Concept of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

The concept of human rights has become one of the cornerstones of international law. It is a body of international legal principles that defines a set of minimum standards of human dignity and equality, and states’ responsibilities to realise them. It is a principle that is embraced by nearly all nations and civilised governments and by the major religions.

The underlying assumption is that all people have certain basic needs, and that these need to be met for humans to live with the respect and dignity they deserve. This is a view that has been shaped by the experiences of two world wars, and by the suffering that was caused by their terrible atrocities. This understanding has led to a large body of international law, and to the development of institutions such as the United Nations that promote and protect human rights globally.

Human rights are indivisible: they include all the civil, political, economic, social and cultural freedoms that are inherent to the dignity of all people. This is why they are referred to as universal and inalienable: people cannot voluntarily give them up, and they can no more be taken away from them than they can their citizenship or the air they breathe. In particular circumstances, it is possible to derogate from certain rights – for example to take away freedom of movement in times of national emergency – but even this can be justified by reference to the fact that fundamental freedoms are indivisible.

Although the notion of human rights has been shaped by a number of different events, it is most clearly articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). It was written in 1946 by representatives from a wide range of countries and their various religious, political and cultural contexts. This inclusive approach, combined with the principles of universality and inalienability that define the concept, has given it a remarkably broad base of support.

Another important factor in the widespread acceptance of human rights has been their practical utility. They are a very reliable way of finding out what demands can be justifiably made by individuals of each other and of their governments, and of providing a framework for the resolution of conflicts between them. When people are polled in many countries, big majorities of the population give affirmative answers when asked whether they believe in human rights.

Nevertheless, it is worth remembering that, whatever their merits as practical tools, there are limits to their usefulness. For most of the history of human rights, they have been a source of conflict, as they have clashed with other traditions of morality and politics. For this reason, there is a very real risk that human rights could eventually run into the same sorts of resistance that have been encountered by other ideas about how to live together in peace and prosperity. This is a danger that must be addressed by identifying and articulating the wider implications of the idea of human rights.

The Importance of Immigration

posted in: News | 0

Since ancient times, people have moved from one place to another in search of opportunity or a better life. Today, international migration plays a central role in political and policy debates across the globe. In the United States, immigrants make up nearly a third of the population. They work in many professions and contribute to the economy. Many also start businesses, helping to fuel America’s innovation and entrepreneurship. In addition, many immigrants have made significant contributions to the country’s culture and heritage.

Immigration is the international movement of people into a country other than that of their birth, regardless of whether they have taken on citizenship in their new home or not. International migrants are often referred to as “foreigners,” but the term immigrant is more accurate because it implies a permanent move into a foreign country.

During the early modern era, the American colonies grew as a result of immigration from Europe and Africa. As the nation evolved into a constitutional democracy, the government established policies to control and limit immigration. In the ensuing centuries, immigration boomed and tailed depending on economic, social, and political factors.

In the mid-20th century, international migration increased dramatically following World War II and as many former colonial powers opened their borders to citizens of Asia and Africa. As a result, the main countries of origin for migrants to the United States shifted from Europe to Latin America and Asia. In 1965, Congress passed a law that transformed the basis for selecting immigrants by abolishing national quotas in favor of a system that prioritized those with family members living in the United States, those needed to fill specific job vacancies, and refugees.

Today, the number of authorized immigrants stands at 11.2 million. About a quarter are naturalized U.S. citizens, and more than half are lawful permanent residents. Most immigrants come from Mexico (25%), followed by China, India, the Philippines, and El Salvador. The share of asylum seekers is smaller.

Many migrants experience serious challenges in their efforts to enjoy their human rights and fully participate in society, particularly if they are women or minorities. They may face discrimination in housing, education, employment, and health care. They can suffer from the effects of climate change, conflict, and natural disasters. They can also be exposed to dangerous working conditions.

For those who seek to understand the history of immigration in the United States, there is a wealth of information available through public records, family histories, and archival and manuscript collections. These resources provide insight into the many reasons that people choose to leave their homes and seek out a different one, and the challenges they face along the way. They can help inform the future decisions we make about immigration.

How Does Deportation Work?

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the official expulsion by an authority of a foreigner from the country to which they belong. Traditionally, it is a criminal punishment that results in a prison sentence or even death but has more recently been applied to non-criminals who are deemed to be a threat to the state, and the government also expels immigrants when they violate immigration law. The process is complicated and a matter of both state and federal law. This is why the American Immigration Council produces a wide range of resources for attorneys to help them understand how it works, and what it can mean for their clients.

Our immigration laws allow us to bring in people who are vital contributors to our economy. We rely on them as workers, consumers and taxpayers. However, a misstep or crime can put an immigrant at risk of being thrown out of the country and separated from their families, and deportation is often used as a tool for political gain. The Trump administration has ramped up immigration arrests inside the United States, while scapegoating millions of unauthorized immigrants for violent or old crimes and painting them as a danger to society. This crackdown has led to a surge in deportations and sparked international outrage over the way people’s lives are being destroyed by the Trump administration’s policies.

ICE’s Removal Data Tools

TRAC’s ICE removal data tools contain individual records for every recorded deportation made by ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) division. This includes deportations that were ordered by an immigration judge and those that resulted from an apprehension at a port of entry by Customs and Border Protection and a subsequent transfer to ICE for removal proceedings. The ERO tools also record voluntary departures and returns.

Status at Latest Entry into the U.S. The ERO data tools contain a record of the category that ICE placed the individual into when they most recently entered the United States. This could be a legal permanent resident, an undocumented immigrant, a person seeking asylum, a visa waiver program participant, or a parolee. It could also be present without admission, or an apprehension by federal, state or local law enforcement officers in cooperation with ICE.

ICE records whether the individual was removed under expedited or regular deportation procedures. ICE also records whether the removal was carried out under a reinstatement of a previous order and/or a discretionary grant of executive relief. TRAC is pursuing FOIA litigation against ICE to request a more complete breakdown of the information in these tools. This broader information is available in our More Complete Historical Data tool. TRAC will update these tools as they become more comprehensive. Please check back regularly for new data. You can also subscribe to receive a monthly email with the latest data. You can change your subscription preferences in our Settings page. TRAC’s ICE removal data tools are powered by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is someone who is not a member of the military. The word can also refer to a person who does not take part in the fighting or support the war effort. Civilians may be harmed by war, especially in non-international armed conflicts and in international armed conflicts where it is difficult to distinguish combatants from the civilian population. The concept of civilian is central to international humanitarian law, which aims to limit the effects of armed conflict on people.

It is important to note that the civilian definition under international humanitarian law differs from the civilian definition in criminal law. A civilian under criminal law is someone who has not committed a crime against humanity, while the civilian under international humanitarian law is a person who has not taken part in the armed conflict and has not been designated as a combatant.

Civilians are at risk of suffering from indiscriminate and foreseeable harm in armed conflict, due to the failure of state and non-state parties to take all feasible precautions in the conduct of hostilities. Such harm is often unavoidable, but it is possible to limit its impact on civilians through better implementation of the laws of war and more effective protection by NGOs and other organizations.

The meaning of civilian as a non-military person is relatively new, dating back only to the early 19th century. Before that, the term referred to the code of law that governed non-military life.

Despite the differences between military and civilian life, many veterans find transitioning to civilian life very challenging. Among the most difficult changes are financial issues, such as the loss of government assistance in housing, education and healthcare. To minimize these difficulties, it is important for a servicemember to carefully plan his or her budget and be frugal in the early stages of civilian life.

Another major difference between civilian and military life is that the former involves a strong sense of community, while the latter has an “every man for himself” mentality. This can make civilians feel lonely, particularly if they live far from their families or other servicemembers. To combat this problem, servicemembers should try to build a network of civilian friends and acquaintances before leaving the military.

Military life requires a high level of responsibility and accountability, and the need to live up to strict working and presentation standards. In contrast, civilian work is less demanding and provides greater flexibility in schedules. However, it is important to remember that civilian jobs also have their own expectations and requirements. It is vital to research and apply for the right position, in order to maximize your career potential. In addition, servicemembers who are interested in pursuing an advanced degree should consider applying for military tuition assistance or taking advantage of civilian employer-sponsored educational programs. In addition to these programs, there are numerous online resources for military members who are making the transition to civilian life. These websites can provide information about specific education programs, such as the steps that must be taken and the guidelines that must be followed in order to participate.

The Future of Citizenship

posted in: News | 0

citizen

The word citizen appears to have a rather straightforward meaning: an individual legally attached to the state and entitled to certain privileges or rights, he fulfils obligations in return (Habermas 2001b). The question is not how this notion of citizenship has evolved throughout the centuries but whether it is able to play its intended role of generating social solidarity.

Contemporary constitutional democracies are divided into two dominant models, both of which rest on a conception of the state as the primary institution in which political life takes place. The liberal model, which dominates the western world, understands citizenship primarily as a legal status that confers rights and privileges on individuals. It does not see the citizen as the primary political actor: on the contrary, his private activities leave him little time and inclination to engage in politics. Instead, he entrusts law-making to representatives, and views himself as the object of public policies rather than as an active participant in their formulation.

A second model is based on the understanding of the state as an historical community of citizens sharing common values and ethno-cultural traits. This idea is still largely present in the world’s less developed countries. Moreover, it seems to have influenced the way in which some states, particularly post-communist ones, have extended voting rights to nonresident citizens. Though such extensions can be explained by pragmatic considerations, they should nonetheless cause concern for normative theorists.

Despite these differences, conceptions of citizenship tend to share certain dimensions: the political dimension involves rights and obligations vis-à-vis the state; it requires knowledge of the political system and the development of democratic attitudes and skills. The economic dimension concerns the ability to live at a level of subsistence and is linked to the development of social skills, job training and education. Finally, the cultural dimension involves a sense of shared identity and the consciousness of a common heritage.

A fourth dimension of citizenship, the moral one, is concerned with a sense of responsibility towards one’s society. This aspect should be cultivated through civic education and participation in associations, mass media and the neighbourhood.

The debate on the future of citizenship focuses on how to reconcile these four dimensions. Some theorists argue that it is important to recognise that there are multiple spaces of citizenship and that it is therefore necessary to create distinct spheres of citizenship commensurate with the capacities of each individual. Others, however, fear that such a policy would allow citizens to retreat into particular enclaves and not participate in the political life of their society at all.

What Are Human Rights?

posted in: News | 0

A human right is a principle or set of rights that define the fundamental dignity and worth of every person. It is a concept that is universal, inalienable and indivisible; it is interrelated and all rights are interdependent; and it encompasses civil and political, economic, social and cultural rights. People who promote human rights argue that all persons are born with the same inherent dignity and are equal as human beings, regardless of their gender, race, religion, ethnic origin, age, language, education, work, disability, property or birth status. Human rights protect people against discrimination based on those criteria.

In 1948 the United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). It is an international treaty enshrining 30 fundamental freedoms and rights for all members of the human family, regardless of where they live. The UDHR grew out of the experience of World War II, the Holocaust and the grinding poverty of many parts of the world. It was drafted by representatives of different countries, reflecting their diverse religious, political and cultural contexts. It replaced earlier international agreements that did not address the fundamental causes of human suffering or offered only limited protections to individual victims.

One important reason why human rights have become more widely accepted is that they are rooted in the natural law, which states that every person has certain basic moral and legal entitlements. Another reason is that enshrining them in legal and international treaties makes it much harder for governments to deny them. In addition, the fact that human rights are rooted in the natural law means that they can be used to hold governments accountable for their actions and to encourage a culture of respect and tolerance.

However, if human rights are to be more than just an instrument for holding governments accountable and encouraging a culture of respect they must also have a core philosophical value. For this reason, some people think that human rights are rooted in religious and ethical traditions. Others argue that they are rooted in political conceptions of justice and the innate dignity of the human person.

A theological interpretation of human rights may offer them a metaphysical status that is secure in a highly diverse world. However, this would be very hard to achieve in practice. It would be very difficult to persuade billions of people that they have a spiritual obligation to respect human rights and to bring their societies into harmony with them. For that reason, a human rights movement will only have greater prospects for acceptance and realization if it can appeal to a wide range of political views, from the center-left to the center-right.

The Nation of Immigrants

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

Whether you consider yourself a “nation of immigrants” or not, the United States is a country built in part by people who came from other countries. Immigrants are essential to our economy, providing valuable workforce skills and bringing new ideas to the table. They have fueled the country’s technological and construction booms, and they are overrepresented in certain occupations. Forty-four percent of medical scientists, for example, are foreign born, as are 42 percent of computer software developers. Immigrants also grease the wheels of our legal system by making up a significant portion of the population of attorneys and judges.

Generally speaking, an international migrant is someone who moves from one country to another, whether permanently or for a short time. Some migrants are driven to leave their home country by the threat of violence, extreme poverty, political instability, gang violence or natural disasters. The majority of migrants, however, are children, women or men who choose to move for economic reasons.

Many immigrants come to the United States to work, to reunite with family or because they want their children to be able to access educational opportunities that are not available in their home countries. They are seeking a more prosperous and safer future for themselves, their families and their children.

The United States is a nation of immigrants, but its legal system is not always a good fit for everyone who wants to immigrate. That’s why it is important to be a good candidate for immigration, and to know what your options are for becoming a citizen of the United States.

Immigration is a complex subject, and the legal process varies widely from country to country. In general, most international migrants are classified as refugees or asylum seekers if they apply for protection at a border, while those who come to live as permanent residents are called economic migrants. Both types of migrants face a series of obstacles, but both can benefit from the opportunity that is offered to them by a more open and welcoming society.

The United States has a long history of open borders and the welcoming of immigrants. Today, about 14 percent of its population is foreign born, and most of these people are naturalized U.S. citizens or have at least one parent who is a naturalized citizen. This makes it the perfect place to be an international migrant, if you’re a skilled worker and have a strong desire for a better life for yourself and your family. Those who come here are a vital source of the country’s innovation and prosperity, so let’s celebrate this legacy and encourage newcomers to continue their contributions to our society and economy. After all, America was built by immigrants, and we can only succeed when we’re a nation of migrants, too.

The Impact of Deportation

posted in: News | 0

deportation

In the United States, deportation is a process of removing noncitizens from the country, usually to their place of origin. Deportation is often associated with criminal convictions, but can also be based on a variety of other grounds including inadmissibility and violations of immigration law. Deportation can have significant impacts on families and communities, including economic and psychological stress. Deportation also impacts children and can impede the ability of parents to care for them.

The impact of deportation can be long-lasting, affecting the lives of family members, friends and neighbors for generations. In addition, research shows that the removal of one family member can have ripple effects across a community, creating an atmosphere of fear and distrust that can lead to strained relationships and social disengagement (Ginwright, 2021).

Deportation has been practiced throughout history. In ancient times, it was used as a punishment for crimes of a moral character, such as adultery, poisoning, theft or dishonesty. It was also used to punish political offenders and to remove people who were considered to be a danger to the state or public safety. In modern times, the United States has used deportation to expel many thousands of people.

Deported people are sent back to their country of origin, often to places that are unable to absorb them or have difficulty providing basic services. While many governments accept returnees, others do not, sometimes for reasons that are political or economic. In recent years, deportations have increased, and the Trump administration has broadened their targets to include more undocumented individuals with no serious criminal records.

Typically, a person who is placed into deportation proceedings will have one or more hearings before an immigration judge. The timing of the hearings can depend on a variety of factors including whether the individual is detained, how long it takes for USCIS to process an application for cancellation of removal and how many immigration judges are available.

If a judge orders that you be deported, there are several ways to challenge the decision. For example, you may be able to request that an appeals court review the case. Your lawyer can help you file an appeal and explain the options available to you.

If you are a person in deportation proceedings, it is important to get legal advice as soon as possible. An experienced immigration attorney can help you understand your options, plan a strategy and protect your rights. In most cases, it is not feasible to cancel or prevent deportation, but an attorney can help you find a way to stay in the country with your loved ones.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is someone who is not a member of the armed forces. Typically, civilians serve in the non-military parts of the government and are involved in the decision making processes of defense and national security policy.

There are a variety of ways to be a civilian. Some people work for the government as a civil servant, such as a police officer or teacher. In the United States, these positions are usually known as “federal civilians.” Others work for private companies on a contract basis that provide services to the government. These are known as “state civil employees.”

Civilians can also be found in the civilian workforce of a country or region. This includes people who work for both the government and private employers, as well as those who are unemployed but available for employment. Civilian unemployment can be a useful indicator of the health and strength of a economy or nation.

Transitioning back into civilian life can be difficult. Taking on new roles and friendships can take time, especially when dealing with long distance relationships with family members. It is important to be patient and understanding when trying to forge these relationships, as not everyone will understand what you have been through.

One of the most significant differences between military and civilian life is discipline. As a service member, it is expected that you will follow a rigid lifestyle and routine. You must be on time to your job, meet certain presentation and conversation standards, and obey the commands of your superiors at all times. If you do not, you can be punished in a variety of ways, including incarceration.

For military personnel, living on a base is like its own town or city. Many of the resources that you need are right there at your disposal, and it is common for you to be able to go to entertainment grounds or places to shop within 30 minutes or less. This type of convenience is not available to most civilians.

While the Peelian principle is generally regarded as a legal standard, it has been interpreted in a number of ways since its earliest formulations. It has shaped how the world views its relationship with military power. People who spend their entire careers studying and practicing how societies and public institutions should be organized have a distinct advantage in the political arena, as they know how to balance incredibly diverse interests. They are a valuable resource to the nations that rely on them for their security and economic growth.

What Does it Mean to Be a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

A citizen is a person who has been officially recognised by a country as an individual who lives there and who has rights, such as the right to vote in elections, access to welfare benefits, education and health care. Citizenship is acquired either by birth or, in some states, through ‘naturalisation’. Citizenship has long been central to discussions of modern politics, law and society, involving the study of political theory, sociology, history, philosophy and cultural studies. Disagreements about citizenship centre around four areas: over the precise definition of each element (legal, political and identity); over their relative importance; over the causal and/or conceptual relations between them; and over appropriate normative standards.

In early 2018, a Pew Research Center survey found that most Americans believed it was very important to be a good citizen and included such traits as voting in every election, paying taxes, always following the law and volunteering to help others. Other responsibilities of citizenship include learning about government and politics and protesting when government actions are wrong.

Another important trait of a good citizen is patriotism, which is love for one’s country and devotion to it. Patriotism is a powerful force that pushes people to protect their nation from harm and to strive for its greatest potential. In order to be a true patriot, one must love their country enough to do anything for it, even if that means making personal sacrifices.

To be a good citizen, you must also be productive and contribute to the economic well-being of your nation. This includes providing the workforce with skills necessary to be successful in today’s world, such as technical skills, legal skills, medical skills and so on. Taking advantage of educational opportunities is a key aspect of being a productive citizen and can help you achieve your career goals as well as make an impact on the country’s economy.

The more you learn, the better citizen you will become. This can be done through reading books and articles on politics and current events, watching documentaries, listening to podcasts and engaging in online debates. This will teach you about the various views of different politicians and allow you to make up your own mind about what you believe is best for your country.

You should be a good steward of the environment. This means recycling as much as possible and reducing your energy usage. By reusing and recycling, you are helping to keep waste materials out of landfills, rivers, lakes and oceans and saving money for your country by not needing to purchase raw material from other countries. Being a good steward of the environment also helps your country’s natural resources last longer and reduces the need for foreign oil. Lastly, a good citizen respects other people’s property and is polite. This shows that you are a considerate and helpful person who is willing to put others before yourself. This will help build a positive community and a strong democracy.

The Importance of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

Many people know that they have basic rights just by being born – such as the right to food and a safe place to live. But human rights are much more than that. They are about the dignity we all deserve to receive from society, whether that comes from our governments or from our work environment. When we don’t get this dignity we need to stand up and speak out about it – which is why human rights are so important.

Unlike property rights (which can be taken away by someone else), human rights are intrinsic to our nature as humans. They are the things we can never lose simply by being alive. We have a duty to protect these rights from those who would harm or violate them.

However, we can limit our enjoyment of certain rights in some circumstances. For example, if we commit a crime and are found guilty, we might be deprived of our liberty. This is because human rights are not absolute. Instead, they are subject to a number of limitations, called ‘derogations’.

These derogations can be used to protect the safety of others or prevent the outbreak of a serious public emergency. However, they must be based on genuine and urgent needs and are not arbitrary. They must also be proportionate and necessary to the threat to the individual’s life, liberty or property.

The concept of human rights evolved over time and became increasingly accepted internationally in the nineteenth century, with the abolition of slavery and widespread access to education being major advances. By the end of World War II the horrific atrocities that had occurred led to an international consensus on the importance of human rights, culminating in the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948.

In the twentieth and 21st centuries, further treaties and conventions have been created to expand the list of rights and clarify their meanings. Some of these new rights are extremely specific and impose particular obligations on states, while others are intended to empower individuals by affirming their value as human beings.

The fundamental idea behind the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is that all human beings are born equal and have a right to life, liberty and security of person. They also have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right is essential because it is the basis of personal autonomy, or the ability to decide what to do, believe and think for yourself.

Despite the importance of these ideas, it is important to note that not every question of social justice or wise governance can be considered a human rights issue. In fact, it is often difficult to determine which norms should be included in the human rights framework. Many political movements would like to see their main concerns categorized as human rights, because this would allow them to seek recognition and support at the international level. But the human rights movement cannot thrive if it becomes perceived as mostly a leftist program.

The Importance of Immigrants in the USA

posted in: News | 0

One in seven people living in the United States is an immigrant, and one in eight has at least one parent who was an immigrant. As workers, business owners, taxpayers, and neighbors, immigrants make extensive contributions that benefit society. This is a country built, in part, by immigrants and continues to be fueled by the energy and innovation they bring.

Often, the term “immigrant” is used in casual conversation to refer to any foreign-born person, but this is misleading because many individuals who are considered immigrants have different legal standings and statuses. They may enter a new country for tourism, business, or education, but intend to return to their home countries, or they might have a green card that allows them to live and work in the country permanently. Those who do not have these types of cards are typically referred to as nonimmigrants.

The USA is a vast, dynamic nation that provides many opportunities for those who want to live here. It’s a place where people from all over the world come together to create a vibrant cultural landscape, offering an array of cuisines and musical styles that can be enjoyed by everyone. It’s also a great place to find work, with companies from all around the world headquartered in the USA and a large number of top universities that offer excellent educational opportunities.

In addition, the USA is a great place for anyone who enjoys outdoor activities. The country’s massive size means there is a lot of room to explore, with more than 200,000 square miles of National Parks and protected areas to hike and ride through. There are also plenty of cities with diverse offerings to suit any taste, from historic buildings and monuments to hip bars and nightclubs.

It’s important to note that the majority of immigrants who live in the United States are legal residents and citizens, and that they are a vital component of the nation’s economy. They work at higher rates than natives in most industries, and they fill gaps in the labor force where shortages or bottlenecks might otherwise slow growth. They also help support the aging population of native-born residents, contributing to Social Security and Medicare trust funds.

Moreover, the United States is a meritocracy, and the country is filled with stories of immigrants who came to the USA with little or no money but succeeded in their professions thanks to their hard work and perseverance. The United States is a country that welcomes talent and hardworking people from all over the world, and it offers them limitless professional opportunity.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the formal removal of a non-citizen from the United States to their country of origin. The government can remove people if they have violated immigration laws, including entering the country without permission or overstaying their visa. They can also be removed for criminal convictions, especially those involving moral turpitude. Deportation can have severe consequences for a person and their family.

The government may attempt to deport an individual through expedited removal, a process where they don’t need to see an immigration judge or go through the regular hearing process. However, this process is not always available to those who need it the most.

Regular removal proceedings, or deportation proceedings, are a series of steps overseen by an immigration judge that can – and often do – result in an order to deport the person. A deportation order can bar a person from returning to the United States for several years or forever, even if they have family members who live here. It is important to work with a qualified, experienced immigration attorney to protect your rights during these proceedings.

During the normal deportation proceedings, an immigration judge will review evidence and hear arguments from both the person seeking to be deported and their lawyer. The judge will decide whether to deny or grant the request and issue a deportation order. A negative decision can be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals and, if necessary, to federal court.

If an immigration judge orders someone deported, they must be physically removed from the United States, unless they agree to depart voluntarily. People who are removed from the United States are usually sent back to their countries via ICE flights. People from Mexico are often flown to a border city and then bussed across the border, while those from Central American countries are flown directly to their home nations.

People who have been ordered deported can still apply to return to the United States, but it is a very difficult and lengthy process. An experienced immigration attorney can help a person understand their options and work to get them back into the country on a path towards citizenship.

A person’s attorney can argue that the government has not met their burden of proof in proving that they should be deported. They can provide evidence like affidavits from witnesses who can attest that the person is of good character. They can also present a case that a deportation would cause extreme hardship for a lawful permanent resident or U.S. citizen spouse, parent or child.

Deportation changes the lives of millions of individuals, and can be a devastating blow to families. The skilled attorneys at Scott D. Pollock & Associates, P.C. have extensive experience defending people against deportation, including in expedited and regular removal proceedings. To learn more about how we can help, contact us today to schedule a free consultation with a lawyer. We are committed to ensuring our clients’ rights are protected throughout the entire process.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is a person who does not serve in any military force. Civilians are often employed in police, fire and rescue services, emergency management, and other government agencies that deal with public safety and welfare. They are also found in a variety of private businesses. A growing number of civilians are also serving in law enforcement roles such as crime scene investigators, mental health consultants and data analysts, helping to free up sworn officers for other duties.

The term civilian is used in international humanitarian law (IHL) to refer to a person who is not a member of an armed force or other entity fighting in hostilities, whether internal or international. This concept of a civilian is central to the laws of war and has been established by IHL treaties, the law of armed conflict and customary international law. The ICRC disseminates this concept of civilian through its delegated experts around the world who train armed forces in IHL and teach them that, under IHL, civilians must be protected from direct attack “unless and for so long as they do not participate directly in hostilities.”

One of the main differences between military life and civilian life is camaraderie. The military is a close knit community and members are like family to each other. This is not the case in the civilian world, where it’s a much more individualistic culture. In addition, a civilian’s finances are far more complicated than in the military. Civilians have to budget for housing, food and other expenses. Most do not have the same financial benefits, such as housing allowance and medical insurance, provided by the military.

Another difference is education. While the military may offer a wide range of educational opportunities, these are not as easily available in the civilian sector. Civilians have to pay for their own educational pursuits, although some have access to tuition assistance through their employer.

Changing from military life to civilian is a challenge. The most significant adjustment is in relationships with friends and family. Transitioning back to the daily routine of work and home can be difficult as well. It’s important to be patient with yourself as you adjust and learn how to communicate your needs to others.

The Concept of Citizenship

posted in: News | 0

citizen

Citizenship is a concept that lies at the heart of contemporary debates on multiculturalism, integration and equality. Despite its many different definitions, conceptions of citizenship are usually grounded in the idea that it presupposes membership in a sovereign, territorial state and the existence of a bounded political community that furnishes a shared source of identity. For the last century this has been a common theme in most theories of citizenship and, arguably, it has remained the central assumption underpinning most policy initiatives in this field.

The first section of this entry examines the main dimensions of citizenship – legal, political and identity – and shows how they are instantiated in very different ways within two dominant models: the republican and the liberal. It also considers the feminist critique of the private/public distinction, which is central to both models. This is important because it raises fundamental questions about the relation between personal life and politics, and about how laws and policies structure personal circumstances (e.g. abortion law, child-care policies and allocation of welfare benefits).

In the final section we consider the implications of social and cultural pluralism to conceptions of citizenship. The challenge that this poses is to determine how, if at all, to reconcile the demands of pluralism with the need for the state to maintain social cohesion and integration. In particular, the question arises of whether or not concepts of citizenship should recognize, rather than transcend, difference, and, if so, what are the implications for citizenship’s purported role in strengthening social cohesion? This challenge has brought to the forefront the debates about how to understand citizenship in a post-national context. It has also brought to light a number of debates about how best to construct processes of formal citizenship acquisition, including the introduction of various tests. While these measures ostensibly aim to promote citizenship and sense of belonging, they have also made it more difficult for those seeking citizenship, particularly migrants. As a result, they have been criticized as undermining the fundamental principles of citizenship. They are often seen as contradicting the principle of equality, and as reducing citizenship to mere entitlement to rights. Moreover, they have been criticised for failing to take into account the complex and diverse nature of communities and their relationship to the state. This criticism has a particular resonance in the UK where the coalition government has pledged to make settlement (and thus formal citizenship) more difficult by changing the requirement for migrants to undertake ‘active citizenship’. These changes are likely to have a significant impact on the number of people who gain citizenship, and therefore may affect the way that they engage with their local communities. In addition they may lead to a reduction in the numbers of migrant families who qualify for British citizenship. This will be an important test of the extent to which these measures can achieve their aims.

Philosophical Perspectives on Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

human rights

In general, human rights refer to a broad set of values or capabilities that are thought to enhance the agency and protect the interests of individuals. They are generally asserted to be universal in character and equally claimed by all individuals, present and future (see the Georgetown University Human Rights Law Research Guide in the Other Internet Resources section below).

One important philosophical approach to human rights is to regard them as an objective fact about the nature of humans that can be discovered through open-minded and serious moral and political inquiry. This approach reflects the belief that just as there are reliable ways to discover how the physical world works or what makes buildings sturdy, so too are there reliable ways to find out what moral reasons may be given for certain demands of others and on governments.

This view has been a key source of support for human rights ideas in recent decades, particularly in countries that once regarded them as a Western imperial invention or where the UDHR was viewed as a threat to national sovereignty. It has been a key driver in the growth of international organizations such as the United Nations and the World Trade Organization, and in the spread of human rights treaties, many of which have been ratified by over three quarters of all countries.

Other philosophers have tried to explain human rights in terms of their practical political roles. These “political conceptions” of human rights see them as norms for highly useful political practices that are developed and evolved by humans. Some of these roles involve the creation and enforcement of laws that are designed to protect urgent human interests and to facilitate interstate cooperation and surveillance. Other roles include setting standards for the evaluation of government behaviour by international bodies and specifying when economic sanctions or military intervention may be appropriate.

A related view of human rights is to treat them as a set of rights that are universal, inalienable, indivisible and interdependent – a set of fundamental rights that can never be abridged or taken away by a government or any other force. This approach was first articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations in 1948. It marked a historic moment in human history, providing the world with a globally agreed document that recognised all people as being born free and equal in dignity and rights, regardless of their sex, colour, creed or religion.

In some cases, the UDHR was supplemented by more specialized treaties addressing specific issues such as discrimination against women or minorities and the need for states to respect the rights of indigenous peoples in their territories. These specialized treaties allow for international norms to be created for groups that are deemed to have unique problems and needs such as the need for assistance and care during pregnancy and childbirth in the case of women, or the need for housing and access to food in the case of indigenous populations.

The Importance of Immigration

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

Immigration is the movement of people to a country where they are not citizens in order to settle as residents or become naturalized citizens. It may be the result of economic opportunities (such as those provided by the United States) or other reasons – such as political or religious freedom, safety from war or natural disasters, and availability of medical care. Some migrants are accompanied by family members; others travel alone. Some people are forced to leave their home countries because of violence, poverty, environmental degradation, gangs or other dangers.

Immigrants are a vital part of America’s economy and culture. They have brought in new ideas and approaches to business, science and the arts. Many have been instrumental in expanding our knowledge of the world’s cultures and preserving their own traditions. And they make up an increasingly large percentage of our population, giving them a greater stake in the society that is now their homeland.

The American dream of opportunity is alive and well for immigrants, and they want to give back to their adopted nation. This is reflected in their work ethic, civic involvement and commitment to their communities. Many are highly skilled and contribute significantly to their fields, as evidenced by the fact that the second generation of most contemporary immigrant groups meets or exceeds the schooling level of native-born Americans in some areas.

However, many immigrants still face significant hardships and societal barriers. They often have limited access to education, health care and social services. In addition, a large proportion of the immigrant population is without legal status, making it difficult to obtain the jobs and benefits they need to support their families and help them thrive in America.

A common perception is that most immigrants are stealing from the government or bringing crime into our neighborhoods, but the facts show otherwise. Immigrants are less likely to be involved in violent crimes than the native-born population and more likely to pay taxes, pay for insurance and participate in other social programs.

For those who are able to obtain legitimate employment, the rewards can be great. But many find themselves in an ongoing struggle with discrimination and lack of opportunity, especially when trying to start their own businesses. In addition, dishonest bosses and a lack of legal protections can lead to mistreatment and demoralization.

Despite these challenges, most immigrants are not thinking about leaving the United States. In fact, they are much more likely to view their children’s future in America as promising than the prospect of returning to their home country. The data for this study was collected in a national telephone survey of 1,002 immigrant adults conducted by Public Agenda from January 26-February 27, 2013.

The U.S. is one of the world’s largest economies and offers a robust job market that attracts millions of skilled workers. The survey was complemented by focus group interviews with immigrants and by in-depth interviews with experts in immigration policy, law and community outreach.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

Deportation is the process of expelling a person from a country. People can be deported for a variety of reasons, including if they have committed crimes or have violated immigration laws. Deportation can be a harsh punishment and can damage a person’s social and economic well-being.

The government can also deport people if they have been found to pose a risk to public safety or national security. This includes people who are believed to be members of gangs, those suspected of being human rights violators and those who have committed serious immigration violations.

If someone is deported, they will be removed from the United States and sent back to their country of origin. The process of deportation can take a long time and can have a significant impact on a person’s life.

A deportation order can affect a person’s ability to work, travel and interact with family members in the United States. It can also affect a person’s relationships with their community and their place of origin. This can have a negative impact on health and wellbeing, including mental illness.

It is difficult to know how many people are being deported. However, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has reported that in fiscal year 2022, 2,667 people were deported, mostly for criminal records and alleged immigration violations. This included 56 suspected or known gang members, and those who were considered to be a threat to the public safety.

The process of deportation involves being questioned by an immigration official, then the decision of whether or not you should be removed. If you are being deported through expedited removal or reinstatement of removal, you may not have a hearing in front of an immigration judge. This is mainly because there are only a few ways you can be removed and the immigration officials can make the decision without having to go before an immigration judge.

If you are not being deported through expedited removal or reinstatement, your case will go through regular removal proceedings. This can take 3-6 months. Whether or not your case is completed within this period depends on how detained you are and the pressure on Immigration Judges to complete cases quickly.

During these proceedings, an immigration judge will determine if there are any defenses to your case and if you qualify for any forms of relief from removal. You can apply for cancellation of removal or asylum, or you can file an application to adjust your status.

Qualitative research has explored how the experience of deportation impacts children and families. The findings suggest that deportation can generate a sense of rupture in a child’s relationship to their family and their home country. It can also create a sense of exclusion from their community and identity as American. These harms are especially acute for racial groups that the US immigration regime targets disproportionately, such as Latinos. In addition, deportation can contribute to the formation of harmful identities that are resistant to change and rooted in an exclusionary historical narrative.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

A civilian is a non military person. This word has been around for hundreds of years, but in the early 19th century it began to refer to people who did not belong to a particular group or society, like judges, lawyers, and professors. Later, it came to mean people who did not work in a military or police force, and in modern times it has come to mean someone who does not do something for the government.

Civilians are a vital part of our society and economy. They provide services, such as hospitals and schools, that keep our communities healthy and strong. They also play an important role in our democracy by voting and participating in political life. Civilians are a key to the peace and security of our world.

In international humanitarian law, the term civilian means any person who is not a member of an armed force. This definition has been codified in a number of treaties, including the Geneva Conventions and the 1977 Additional Protocol I to the 1949 Geneva Conventions. Similarly, the term protected person is used to describe persons who are considered to be civilians by virtue of their status under customary international humanitarian law. In the pre-trial brief in the Tadic case, the ICTY Prosecutor noted that the definition of civilian in Article 5 of the ICTY Statute (crimes against humanity) was consistent with the customary meaning of civilian under international humanitarian law.

The term civilian has a broad application, and it can include those who work in a wide range of occupations, from agriculture to nursing to construction. In general, civilians do not serve in the armed forces, although there are some exceptions, such as members of volunteer corps and militias that form part of a party to a conflict. The Appeals Chamber notes that the presence within a civilian population of members of resistance armed groups or former combatants who have laid down their arms does not deprive such a population of its civilian character.

Transitioning from military life into civilian life can be a challenge for service members and their families. Friendships that developed during military service may not always translate to the civilian life, and finding a community of like-minded people who understand your experiences can be difficult.

Financial changes can also be challenging for civilians who have been accustomed to military benefits and assistance. Budgeting and saving for healthcare, education, and housing can be overwhelming for a former servicemember who has never done this before. It is important to remember that civilian medical bills can be much higher than those for military members.

In addition, many civilians are displaced by conflict. This can have devastating effects on their lives and livelihoods, and has the potential to undermine human rights, exacerbate risks and the impacts of war on health, education, and critical infrastructure, and aggravate food insecurity and disease transmission. The safety of civilians is a top priority for the United Nations, which works to protect people in situations of armed conflict and crisis.

What is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

A citizen (plural: citizens) is a person who is a member of a community, state or nation. A person may become a citizen by birth, descent or naturalisation, or may acquire citizenship by marriage or civil partnership to a citizen. Citizenship is also a status that can be conferred by a government and is usually associated with rights, privileges and responsibilities. Different scholars have defined citizenship in a number of ways, with some defining it as a relationship to political society and others describing it as a concept that encompasses both legal and subjective elements of identity.

In modern Western societies, the concept of citizenship has emerged since the 18th century, during the American and French Revolutions. It originally referred to the possession, and protection, of certain freedoms from coercive power. These freedoms have evolved over time, and today, they refer to a wide range of social activities that are controlled or protected by the government.

A good citizen respects and obeys the law, pays their taxes and contributes to the economy of their country in some way. They are a positive force in their community and strive to make things better for everyone. A good citizen cares about the environment and takes steps to protect it. They help people who can’t help themselves.

They vote in national elections and participate in the democratic process. They are involved in their local community and look for ways to contribute to it, such as volunteering, fundraising or running a business. They take an interest in the history and culture of their country and support its sports teams.

Citizenship is an essential part of our lives. It enables us to enjoy the benefits of free healthcare, education and transport and to protect our property. We can vote, stand for office and join the armed forces, which is all made possible because of our citizenship.

To be a citizen of a country, you must be born in that country or have one parent who is a citizen. Some countries limit the number of generations that can claim citizenship through descent, and others have age limits for new citizens. If you are a foreign citizen, you can apply to become a citizen through naturalisation.

Different scholars have debated the nature of citizenship, and differences revolve around four disagreements: over the precise definition of each element (legal, political and identity); over their relative importance; over the causal and/or conceptual relations between them; and over appropriate normative standards. The debates have been influenced by distinct historical experiences, from Athenian democracy and Republican Rome to Italian city-states and workers’ councils. They have been conducted in two broad traditions, the republican and the liberal.

The Importance of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

human rights

Human rights are a set of legal and moral principles that every person has the right to live by, such as: equality, dignity, freedom, fair treatment and security. They are fundamental to the human condition and therefore inalienable; no one can give them up, lose them or have them taken away from them. People need protection of their fundamental human rights when they are violated, which is why we need international law to ensure that governments respect and protect these rights.

The roots of human rights go back to ancient times when many cultures and governments promoted the idea that some basic requirements are essential for our human dignity. The teachings of Confucianism, for example, emphasised treating others as we would like to be treated, which has helped to form the basis for many principles of the Universal Declaration. Throughout history, the development of these ideas has been assisted by many major advances in social progress such as the abolition of slavery and the extension of education.

In the early seventeenth century philosopher John Locke developed the theory that each individual has certain “natural” rights, which can only be denied or infringed by a tyrant. This, along with the growing acceptance that a state’s legitimacy depends on the respect it gives to these natural rights, provided a foundation for later human rights thinking.

However, in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries many countries tended to assert that they were free to do whatever they liked within their borders and that other countries and the international community had no right to interfere or even raise concerns when their rights were being violated. As a result, there were many major human rights violations.

Today, the concept of human rights is well established and supported by a large majority of nations and their populations. Many countries have national human rights institutions, and most have ratified the core human rights treaties that are overseen by bodies at the regional and international levels. Those who believe that their rights have been violated can make complaints directly to these oversight bodies.

Despite this widespread support, human rights violations remain a serious problem. The human rights norms that are upheld by the international system need to be championed by leaders, especially those in states that have a track record of violating human rights. This will help to re-establish the credibility of these norms, which are necessary for grounding attitudes of tolerance and mutual respect in civil society. They also need to help defuse exclusivist ideals that can fuel violent extremism. This will require an ongoing programme of education to debunk myths about the human rights system and to encourage a more inclusive approach to international relations.

The Importance of Immigration Reform

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

Every day, people across the world make one of the hardest decisions in their lives: to leave the place where they grew up for a new home. For many, this means a move to the next village or city; for others, it might be as far as the other side of the world. Still, for all of them, it is a profound change in their way of life.

The United States, which has always been a nation of immigrants, is today no exception to the rule. The country’s current immigration framework, largely constructed in the 1950s and 1960s, is struggling to keep pace with the nation’s needs for population growth, family reunification, and economic productivity.

In 2018, most of the nation’s 28 million legal and unauthorized immigrants lived in just 20 major metropolitan areas, with two-thirds of these living in California, Texas, and Florida. These top-tier immigrant-majority regions have higher average incomes and larger education levels than the rest of the nation. They also have higher rates of homeownership, with more than half of the immigrant population owning their homes.

There are many reasons why it’s important for America to continue to embrace its heritage of immigration. First and foremost, it’s a vital driver of our economy. Immigrants boost national productivity by filling low-wage jobs, increasing demand for goods and services, and spurring business investment and capital formation. As a result, they contribute far more to our tax coffers than the public services they use (CBO estimates show that they pay $90 billion in taxes each year and consume only $5 billion in welfare benefits).

Despite popular belief, there is no evidence that immigrants “drain” our government’s coffers. Indeed, social scientists have long found that higher rates of immigration tend to correlate with lower unemployment rates, as they increase overall productivity and drive up consumption, while boosting labor force participation and raising savings rates.

The country must find a balance between these important economic and social concerns. To do so, we must reform the immigration system to allow for more flexibility in where and when people immigrate to the United States. This can be done by allowing states to petition for additional visas, by establishing a regional employment-based visa program, or by giving localities the power to create their own visa programs that prioritize specific types of high-tech workers. Such initiatives would help alleviate the burden of a national immigration system that is not designed to meet the needs of an increasingly polarized nation. And they would reinforce the fact that our greatest strength is our diversity.

What Is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

deportation

In the United States, deportation is a process of legally removing a non-citizen from the country, often because they have violated immigration laws. This is done by the Department of Homeland Security, through the agency that investigates and brings removal actions against people, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

A person can be removed through a deportation procedure called “expedited removal” or “reinstatement of removal.” Both expedited procedures skip many steps of regular removal proceedings, including having an individual encountered by an immigration official, questioned, and being ordered to leave.

In normal removal proceedings, an individual will be given a chance to present their case and argue for relief from deportation before an immigration judge. A lawyer can help with this process. Immigration law includes a right to a fair hearing, and immigration judges are generally considered to be impartial.

The process of deportation can be lengthy, and a judge may not agree to remove someone immediately, even if they are found to have committed crimes or otherwise acted inadmissibly. The ICE director has discretion to “pause” the deportation process for certain groups of individuals, such as those with criminal records or community ties that could jeopardize public safety.

Brock, like many other scholars, argues that uprooting people who have settled into ways of life that are important to them or their families violates the moral limits on permissible state action and often causes harm that is disproportionate to the end being pursued. Her focus on harm is an auxiliary aspect of her larger argument that the purpose of deportation should be limited to people who pose a threat to national security.

A major problem with Brock’s argument, however, is that she does not provide a clear and systematic definition of what is meant by the term “harm” and how it might be measured in cases involving deportation. Rather, her concern with harm seems to be driven by a general human rights framework and the desire to establish a “harm threshold” that would limit the scope of the deportation state’s authority (see Brock 2020: 104-105).

For example, our survey participants reported that deportation caused significant economic hardship for their families remaining behind in the United States. Many were forced to lose their jobs, and others had difficulty paying rent/utilities, purchasing groceries, or providing day-care, among other things. Families were also separated, with 52% of those who were deported reporting being separated from their nuclear family members. This is especially troubling when children are involved. Families experiencing deportation are already stretched economically, socially, and emotionally, and the loss of a parent can have lasting negative effects on them. This can lead to depression, anxiety, and other mental health problems. In addition, children who are left behind face the prospect of moving from a two-parent household to a single-parent one. This can lead to a variety of educational and emotional problems, such as dropping out of school. These difficulties can have long-term effects, as the children are likely to be less well-educated and have more trouble getting a job later in life.

The Differences Between Military and Civilian Life

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is a person who is not a member of the military or a police force. Civilians typically work for the government, private businesses, and non-profit organizations. They may also serve as judges and other experts in the law that applies to situations outside of the military context. Civilians who work in defense and national security policymaking have backgrounds in fields like political science, social service, management, or law. They are able to apply their knowledge of complex societies and public institutions when making important decisions about the nation’s defense and security.

One of the most obvious differences between military and civilian life is the culture. In the military, there is a strong emphasis on being a part of something bigger than yourself, and that goes hand in hand with highlighting teamwork and camaraderie as core values. These traits are not as emphasized in the civilian world, where many people live on their own and do not have a brotherhood or sisterhood that they can fall back on for support.

Another big difference is the lifestyle. When you are in the military, you consistently must be on time for work (no “getting stuck in traffic” excuses) and live up to certain working and presentation standards. This is a very different environment from the more laid-back civilian lifestyle, and it can be a major adjustment for those who have spent much of their adult lives in the military.

Housing and living is another big difference. Civilians have the option to choose where they want to live, while military personnel are typically assigned a location and must move there on their own or with a spouse. They also get a base allowance or BAH for housing expenses, which can be a substantial amount of money. Civilians are often paid hourly or by salary.

The final difference is the laws that apply. Civilians are subject to laws that are designed to protect them from war crimes and other atrocities committed by armed forces in the course of fighting. However, there are many exceptions and grey areas to the rules that civilians must abide by. This is why it is crucial for civilians to be aware of the laws that apply to them, and to make sure they have a good attorney who can explain those laws in detail if necessary.

The differences between military and civilian life can seem intimidating, but they don’t have to be. With the right guidance and resources, veterans can make a smooth transition to civilian life and build new relationships while learning from their experiences. If you need assistance, there are veteran resources that can help you manage your finances, find a job, and provide ongoing education. If you are facing legal issues, it is important to have a knowledgeable military-friendly lawyer on your side. Contact an experienced military defense attorney today to learn more about your options. They can help you fight to preserve your career, avoid criminal charges, and protect your family’s interests.

What Does it Mean to Be a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

Citizenship is a social relationship of mutual dependence and reciprocity between people who share common values and interests. It enables them to work together to achieve their goals and dreams and to protect their shared interests. A good citizen is responsible, respectful and helpful and contributes to the community and country’s prosperity.

Citizens can have many responsibilities and duties, including paying taxes, obeying the law, volunteering for service opportunities and participating in political debates and elections. Citizenship can be a rewarding experience and a sense of belonging to a nation. It can also lead to career and life choices that have a positive impact on society.

There are many different traditions and approaches to citizenship, which vary according to countries, histories, societies and cultures. These differences result in different understandings of what it means to be a citizen. For example, some citizens believe that it is a moral duty to recognize the rights of others and take care not to infringe them. Others believe that a good citizen is well-rounded and understands the importance of making contributions to society in areas such as technical skills, legal knowledge, medical expertise and other professions.

One model of citizenship is based on the way that ancient Greeks lived, in small-scale organic communities known as polis (city). In this type of society, one’s public and private lives were not separated in the sense that they are today. Instead, the obligations of citizenship were deeply connected to everyday life and to an individual’s sense of self-worth. For the ancient Greeks, to fail to fulfil these obligations was not only unacceptable but to be something less than human.

As the polises of ancient Greece became part of larger empires, citizenship rights were extended to conquered peoples, which fundamentally changed the meaning of this concept. In the modern world, it has come to be seen as a legal status or as an occasional identity. In this context, discussions often focus on whether a citizen should be the primary political agent or if they should be a passive participant in politics, entrusting their role to representatives.

In the United States, there are multiple dimensions of citizenship, including the right to vote in local, state and national elections and the obligation to serve the nation in military and civilian roles. Other aspects of citizenship include promoting democratic attitudes and participatory skills, fostering a sense of cultural heritage and building a strong identity with the nation.

In a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center in early 2018, around three-quarters of Americans said that voting is very important to being a citizen and about seven-in-ten said it was very important to pay taxes, obey the laws and always be a good citizen. However, the survey showed that Democrats and Republicans and young and old adults differed in their beliefs about what is necessary for good citizenship. In addition, there are some who argue that government services should be delivered in a way that promotes citizen participation and civic engagement, while others maintain that the only acceptable form of civic engagement is protesting when the government does wrong.

What Are Human Rights?

posted in: News | 0

human rights

Human rights are a set of principles and standards that are recognized by international law. They are based on the idea that all humans are born free and equal in dignity and rights. These rights include the right to life, freedom, and security. They are guaranteed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international instruments. They are defended and promoted by government actors, international organisations such as the United Nations and the Council of Europe, NGOs, and other groups and individuals who work to protect people from discrimination, violence, and injustice.

The concept of human rights arose out of a combination of observations. One was the observation that people everywhere require the realization of diverse values or capabilities for their well-being, and that this requirement is often painfully frustrated by social as well as natural forces. This frustration often results in exploitation, oppression and persecution. The other observation was that there are many ways to treat people fairly, and that such treatment can be beneficial to everyone involved. These twin observations sparked the development of human rights concepts and practices.

A core value of human rights is the belief that there are some things that all humans can justifiably demand of each other and of their governments. These demands may be based on moral grounds, or they might be grounded in true premises about current institutions, problems and resources. It is argued that there are reliable ways to find out what these demands are, and that people can reach rational agreement on them by open-minded and serious inquiry.

It is also commonly held that human rights violations are a violation of the fundamental dignity and equality of all persons. They can occur through physical violence or non-violent means, and can be against any person, anywhere in the world. Violations can be against civil and political rights, such as the right to freedom of expression or the right to a fair trial; they can be against economic and social rights, such as the right to housing or the right to health care; and they can also be against children’s rights, women’s rights, or the right to be free from slavery, female genital mutilation or the death penalty.

A central principle of human rights is that they are inalienable, meaning that they can never be taken away from anyone, and that they cannot be denied on the basis of a distinction such as race, ethnicity, religion, language, disability, sexual orientation or any other attribute. This principle is reflected in the fact that human rights are indivisible, interdependent and interrelated: the enjoyment of one right depends on the enjoyment of others; and no right can be considered more important than any other. This concept of interdependence also applies to the concept that rights are mutually reinforcing; a violation of one right can lead to a violation of several other rights as well. Therefore, human rights must be applied on an individual and collective basis.

The Importance of Immigration

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

Since the earliest times, people have been on the move—to search for economic opportunity, to join family or seek higher education, to escape conflict and human rights abuses, and in many cases, to survive environmental challenges. When people migrate to a new country, they are called immigrants. The term “immigrant” applies to anyone living in a nation other than the one in which they were born or naturalized, regardless of whether they have taken citizenship in their new home, served in its military, married a native, or been granted any other status.

Immigrants have made innumerable contributions to the economy and society of the United States. Yet, they remain invisible in many settings and are frequently mischaracterized. For example, some believe that immigrants disproportionately take jobs from American workers or rely on government benefits, but these claims are false (see “Myths about Immigration”). The truth is that, while they may compete for certain positions in the labor market and may pay lower wages, overall they stimulate growth in the economy through increased productivity, capital formation, demand for goods and services, and tax contributions to the public treasury.

Some of the fastest-growing economies in the world today are those that depend on the talents, energy and drive of their immigrant populations. In the United States, immigrant entrepreneurs and employees in service occupations contribute more than $1.3 trillion to our national economy. In fact, immigrants are more likely to start businesses than other Americans. They are also essential front-line health, education and social service professionals. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for instance, immigrant health care and education workers risked their lives to ensure that the needs of local communities were met.

While it is true that the unauthorized population is concentrated in a few major metropolitan areas, most of these individuals reside in California, New York and other traditional destinations for newcomers. However, a growing number are moving to towns and cities in the Midwest and Southeast.

Among the reasons for this trend is that, as they settle, immigrants are seeking better opportunities in industries such as high technology and academia. They are also responding to the deteriorating conditions in their countries of origin, where poverty, civil unrest, gang violence and environmental degradation persist.

To help students explore the motivations of immigrants, assign them to research and analyze the stories of the ancestors of celebrities such as Stephen Colbert, Mario Batali, Kristi Yamaguchi and others. Have them record the motivating factors that they discover, comparing similar themes across people and time periods. Then ask them to write an explanation of why those factors would be the same, or not, for immigrants coming from different countries and time periods. You can then use these responses as the basis for a discussion about how we can best support the migrant population in our society. Alternatively, you can have students create their own profiles of immigrants from various countries and time periods and present them to the class.

What Happens When a Non-Citizen is Deported?

posted in: News | 0

deportation

A foreign citizen is deported when the government of a nation state expels him or her. This can happen for a variety of reasons. For example, an immigrant may be arrested and found guilty of a crime that makes him or her deportable. In addition, many people are removed from the United States because they do not have legal status here and haven’t applied for asylum or some other relief. Deportation is a serious matter that can have long-term consequences for families and the community as a whole.

Whether or not a non-citizen is deported depends on a number of factors, including how the person came to the attention of immigration authorities, the type of violation they committed, and whether or not they have any family members who are US citizens or legal residents. Fortunately, the law provides a way to avoid deportation in many cases. In some cases, deportation can even be reversed or stopped altogether if the person has family ties in the United States and has a good reason to remain here.

The most common way that a non-citizen ends up being deported is to first be placed into removal proceedings. This happens when ICE (the agency that enforces immigration laws) formally accuses him or her of being removable from the United States. The person then has a chance to defend himself or herself in court.

This process can be quick for cases that qualify for expedited removal (which is usually done at a port of entry or a border crossing) or for cases where an alien has been ordered deported in the past and has repeatedly violated his or her visa status. However, in most cases, the process can take months or years to reach a final decision through the courts.

Those who are removed from the country are often flown home by an ICE unit called “ICE Air Operations.” Those who are being deported to Mexico or Central America are usually taken directly to those countries while those going to other places are transported on regular flights to those locations.

If an illegal alien is determined to be deportable, he or she will have a master calendar hearing where he or she will discuss with the judge and the U.S. government attorney whether or not the charges against him or her are true and whether he or she has any realistic basis on which to claim eligibility for relief from removal.

The deportation of parents and other family members has major physical, emotional, developmental and economic consequences for the children in those families. A recent study surveyed over 16,740 parents and their children, finding that those children who were separated from a parent because of deportation were more likely to experience educational problems than were their siblings who did not face this challenge. This is especially true when the child is forced to transition from a two-parent household to a single-parent household, with limited or no supervision by another adult.

Is Military Life Better Than Civilian Life?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

When someone leaves military service and enters civilian life they are often faced with many different expectations and responsibilities that must be met. Some find a very difficult transition to the civilian world while others thrive. The difference can be attributed to a number of things such as a person’s mindset, career aspirations and the differences between military and civilian life.

Civilian is defined as a person who does not serve in the armed forces of a belligerent party to an armed conflict. According to international humanitarian law, civilians enjoy certain privileges during armed conflict. These privileges are outlined in the laws of war and human rights treaties. Civilians include those who are employed by non-belligerent parties to an armed conflict and also include those who are not engaged in hostilities, such as civilian NGOs or chaplains attached to the military of a neutral country.

The civilian workforce is a key pillar of the EU Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). Civilian crisis management includes preventive actions before conflict, supporting communities during and after a conflict and addressing the long-term effects of a conflict. It is essential that all actors involved in a conflict work together to protect civilians, especially women and children, as they undertake these tasks. This can be achieved through a combination of prevention, protection and recovery measures and through ensuring that the civilian voice is heard.

In the United States, civilian data is collected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The data used to determine unemployment rates and wages is based on an individual’s place of employment. Civilian employment does not include business owners, self-employed individuals or unpaid family workers. The data is also based on the individual’s location and if they have more than one job, they are counted only once.

Civilian employment numbers are important for calculating national and local unemployment rates. The data is also used to calculate wage and salary rates. In addition, it is an important factor in determining the size of the economy and the overall health of a nation’s workforce.

Whether or not civilian life is better than military life is a question that is up to each individual’s personal experience and preferences. Some former military members enjoyed their time in the Army, Air Force, Coast Guard, Marine Corps or Navy while others did not. The same can be said for civilians as some did not like their careers and eventually left them. There are many factors that influence a person’s decision to leave the military or civilian workforce. It can be as simple as a change in preferences or as complex as being court-martialed for misconduct. A general court-martial is the most severe punishment and carries the harshest penalties, including confinement, loss of pay and even the death penalty. Civilian appeals are handled through circuit courts and can go as high as the Supreme Court of the United States. In the military, commanding officers have the option of imposing non-judicial punishments.

What is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

A person who, by law of a state or nation, is granted the rights and responsibilities of citizenship. Most people in the world today are legal citizens of one or another national state. Citizenship confers certain privileges and obligations, but in general it also imposes a duty to participate in the political system. This is known as civic virtue, and it is thought to be essential for the smooth running of democracy. Citizenship can be inherited, and some states (especially in Europe) allow their citizens to claim descent from other nationalities through the principle of jus sanguinis. Citizenship can also be acquired through the exercise of naturalization, which involves being declared a citizen of a particular state by signing an application to that effect.

In the past, citizenship was defined as the right to take part in the government of a city-state or state, either directly or through freely chosen representatives. But the notion of citizenship has broadened considerably over time, and now most nations have some kind of citizen’s rights or citizens’ participation laws. These laws include requiring people to vote, and giving citizens a voice in the formulation of public policy. They also require that people be educated and informed enough to have an opinion about issues they are affected by.

Some theorists of the modern state view citizenship as a relatively recent phenomenon, dating back only a few hundred years. But others, such as the philosopher Giorgio Agamben, see a more fundamental relation between citizen and state, with an ancient origin in the concept of the besouled ‘animal’ that was the ancestor of modern biopolitics.

In everyday speech, the word citizen is often used to refer to a person who is a participant in society. It can be used to describe an active, engaged citizen – for example, someone who volunteers for charity work – or it can mean a person who has a professional interest in the operation of a city or country. The term can also be applied to a person who is a member of a club or other organisation. In law, a citizen is a party to an action that is brought against him or her by the police or by a private individual or corporation. A citizen may be called on to give evidence in court or produce documents such as a driver’s licence or passport. A citizen may also be asked to sign a document such as a contract or a lease. The word can also be used to refer to a judge’s charge to a jury, indicating which section of the law applies in a case. For further information on this topic, see Citizen: Law & Justice, and Law: Overview.

What Is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

A citizen is a person who, by place of birth, the nationality of one or both parents, or naturalization, has full rights and responsibilities as a member of a nation or political community. Citizenship can also refer to the adherence to a certain code of conduct or way of life that is associated with being a citizen, such as laws against criminal activity or civic obligations. The concept of citizenship has been shaped by social, economic and political changes in the modern world. Many people have been made citizens of multiple countries, which can be a source of confusion and conflict. Citizenship can be a legal status with rights and responsibilities or it may imply a more subjective feeling of belonging to ‘the nation’, which is often expressed in terms of loyalty and values.

The modern notion of citizenship is closely linked to the development of nation-states and, more generally, the idea of a ‘civil society’. The term ‘citizenship’ is most commonly used to describe membership of the state, although it can also be applied to subnational entities such as a city, region or a canton in Switzerland. In ancient Greece, citizenship was usually defined by being a member of the polis and included responsibilities as well as rights. Aristotle argued that a ‘citizen of the polis is a man who understands that his own destiny is linked to that of the community, and that it is therefore virtuous for him to take part in running the community’s affairs.’

A person who is a citizen of a country can be considered to be an integral part of the social fabric of that community and, if the individual meets certain criteria, can be elected as a representative or participate in a referendum. Many governments provide a range of benefits to their citizens, such as healthcare and education.

Other important functions of a nation include keeping the peace, maintaining order, resolving disputes and preserving liberties and rights. Some nations have used military force to expand their territory and control other territories (e.g. Britain during its colonial rule).

In addition, there are often social and cultural aspects to being a citizen that may not be explicitly stated in laws or formal documents. For example, a person may be seen as ‘a good citizen’ by virtue of being polite and respectful, participating in community events and volunteering.

The idea of a ‘good citizen’ is an important aspect of the concept of citizenship, which can influence policy in many ways. For instance, if citizenship is viewed as an end point (a reward that grants access to resources), restrictions will be placed on it; however, if citizenship is seen as a means towards community cohesion, the aim should be to encourage and facilitate as much participation as possible. In this context, a concept known as ‘active citizenship’ is being promoted by some governments. This is the principle that individuals should contribute to the community through economic participation, public and volunteer work.

The Importance of Human Rights in Education

posted in: News | 0

human rights

Human rights safeguard autonomy and freedom, along with the material conditions for a life of dignity – access to food, work, healthcare and other basic needs. They prevent oppressive and discriminatory behaviour by governments, and drive progress towards fairer, thriving societies. As legal rights, they provide a route for accountability and for change through national courts and international mechanisms. They also facilitate collective action, enabling communities to build narratives based on common values and on duties accepted by states.

Everyone is entitled to the fundamental human rights outlined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and they cannot be taken away from anyone voluntarily. They are universal and inalienable, meaning that every person possesses them at birth, regardless of where they live or what their social, cultural or religious background may be. They are also indivisible, meaning that each right is intrinsically linked to the others and no one can be fully enjoyed without the other.

The idea that people have inalienable human rights dates back to ancient times and can be found in many cultures and traditions around the world. Although the idea has been heavily influenced by Western culture, it is not a twentieth century invention. It is therefore important to remember that human rights are not just a matter of international law, they are also a moral imperative and should be viewed as a shared global responsibility by all.

Whether we are talking about the exploitation of children or the abuse of women, we must take action against all forms of violence and discrimination. We must also support the creation of an international legal framework and a system for monitoring and reporting on violations. And, in countries where there is no legal system, we must help build it.

It is vital that we work with governments and civil society to ensure that human rights are respected, protected and fulfilled by all people. Educators are a key group to engage with, and we must continue to provide effective materials and tools for them to use in their teaching and learning.

We must also promote and encourage dialogue amongst all sectors of society. Those who believe in human rights and respect them should seek out and nurture spaces for discussion, and we must work to overcome polarizations and create new alliances.

Lastly, we must remember that the most effective and powerful tool we have in our fight for human rights is our own consciences and actions. The vast majority of people, when shown that a certain act violates another’s dignity, will try to refrain from doing it. The same applies to governments, which, through their acceptance of international human rights treaties, have a legal obligation to respect all human rights.

Immigrants and the Job Market

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

Immigrants are a vital part of the United States economy and contribute to the quality of life for all Americans. They are a large segment of the workforce in many industries and provide valuable skills, such as computer programming, nursing, and architecture. They also bring rich cultural experiences and a diversity of perspectives that enrich our society. Immigrants are a driving force in our country’s history and continue to have a significant impact on its future.

In 2019 alone, nearly 44.9 million people in the United States were immigrants or had at least one immigrant parent. This figure includes both citizens and non-citizens, including those with Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) or Temporary Protected Status. It also includes individuals who have legal authorization to be in the country under immigration law but have not applied for citizenship, as well as those who entered the country without legal permission (unauthorized entry).

The U.S. is among the most robust job markets in the world, which makes it attractive to many potential migrants and those seeking a better quality of life. The dynamism of the labor market, coupled with the relative ease of getting a green card, is what draws most potential and recent immigrants to the United States.

However, the job market is not without its challenges for newcomers to America. The first step for finding a job is to determine your skills and qualifications. This can be done by evaluating your education, work experience, and language skills. This will help you narrow down your search for jobs and choose which industries to focus on.

In addition, it is important to be aware of the requirements and expectations of your desired industry in the United States. For example, you should know if you need an occupational license or certification in your area of expertise, as this will be essential to find a job.

It is also a good idea to network and build relationships with other professionals in your industry. This will make it easier for you to learn about job opportunities and increase your chances of landing a position. Additionally, it is important to stay up-to-date on the latest trends and changes in your field.

While immigration does have some costs, this should not be a reason to bar it. Instead, mechanisms can be developed to benefit from its economic contributions while making up for those workers adversely affected by trade. These policies will ensure that the benefits of immigration outweigh its costs, and that our country continues to be a welcoming place for people from around the world. Immigrants have made innumerable contributions to American business and society, but current laws confine millions to lives in the shadows without the rights to be fully economically engaged or access to foundational social protections. This is unfair to them and to the broader economy. We should reform our policies. The future of our nation is at stake. We need leadership that can move beyond politics and rhetoric, and toward a path that puts the economy and families first.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the process of removing someone from the United States. People can be removed for a variety of reasons, including criminal activity, overstaying their visa or being found to be in the country without proper authorization. People can also be removed because they are part of a group or class that has been targeted for deportation.

Deported individuals may return to their home countries or remain in the United States, depending on their circumstances. A deported individual must regain legal status in order to stay in the United States, and the immigration process usually requires many hearings before an individual can gain legal status again.

A deportation case starts when an individual comes to the attention of immigration officials. This might happen if an individual applies for an immigration benefit and is denied. It could also happen if a person is arrested and their fingerprints are checked against immigration databases. If the fingerprints match and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has probable cause to believe that the noncitizen is deportable, ICE will send the LEA a request for them to continue to hold the individual longer than they normally would by using a program called Secure Communities. Compliance with these requests is voluntary, and many LEAs refuse to honor them.

Once ICE has determined that an individual is subject to removal, they will schedule a hearing with an immigration judge. During this hearing, the individual will have the opportunity to argue why they should be allowed to stay in the United States or, in the alternative, why they should be sent back to their home country. The judge will issue a decision at the end of the hearing or later. If the decision is negative, an individual will be issued a deportation order.

Some individuals are placed in expedited removal proceedings instead of seeing an immigration judge. This occurs if they are at a port of entry or have been in the United States for more than two years without being granted legal status. These cases are typically heard by an immigration officer who will make a determination about whether an individual should be deported.

Individuals who are ordered removed from the United States must leave by a certain date. They can either travel to their home country before the expiration of their visa or be flown back to their home country by ICE Air Operations. Those who are unable to return to their home country can apply for discretionary relief by filing a request with the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Being deported can have a profound impact on people’s lives. Those who are removed often have to rebuild their lives from scratch in their native countries, sometimes with limited or no support from family members. Those who are left behind are often forced to live without the income they earned and may lose their access to health care and other services. Some are even relegated to the shadows of society where they become invisible to others.

Transitioning From Military to Civilian Life

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is someone who is not an active member of the military, police or a belligerent group. Civilians are protected under the Geneva Conventions and Protocols to them. Civilians can also be those who work for the government, in a nonmilitary job, such as a doctor or lawyer.

There are many differences between military life and civilian life. There are culture differences, housing and living arrangements, employment and career, education, laws, healthcare, and retirement that have to be navigated when making the transition. Civilians often find their new communities are different than the ones they left behind in the military and it can take time to find a comfortable fit. There can be frustrations and misunderstandings that arise in this process. Having good communication skills can help cut down on these frustrations.

It is important for both military members and those leaving the military to know what their rights are when it comes to discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and sexual assault. A civilian attorney can help you understand these rights and make sure that they are protected. They can also be a valuable resource in navigating the complex issues that may come up during this time.

One of the biggest struggles for veterans when they move to civilian life is finding a way to connect with people. In the military, you are part of a team that becomes a family and this close bond makes it hard to break away from that. It can be frustrating when you try to use the same communication style in civilian life and it does not translate well. However, it is important for all veterans to be patient and work through these issues with their friends and colleagues to avoid unnecessary frustration.

In the civilian world it is less common to address people with titles such as sir or ma’am or by their rank. This is because civilians do not have the same level of respect for ranks as those in the military. In some cases, using these forms of address can be seen as insulting. This is especially true in the workplace. Most civilians choose to address co-workers by first name only.

In the past civilians were used mostly in dispatch and clerical roles in law enforcement but today they are taking on more traditional law enforcement duties such as nonhazardous patrol or crime scene investigations, freeing up sworn officers for other tasks. Civilians are also proving to be valuable in new law enforcement roles such as victim advocates, mental health consultants and data analysts. This shows the importance of incorporating civilians into the law enforcement profession. Civilians are essential to the success of our country. They can provide an invaluable perspective that cannot be gained from a sworn officer or a law enforcement academy graduate. They can be the link to a successful and secure future for all Americans. It is important for all citizens to support the efforts of our country’s civilian workforce.

What Does it Mean to Be a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

Citizenship is a social status that gives individuals rights and responsibilities within a community. Depending on how citizenship is defined, it can mean a person is required to pay taxes, vote in elections, and obey the law. It can also be defined as a feeling of loyalty to one’s nation or community. The concept of citizenship is highly contested in the modern world, and there are many different viewpoints on what it means to be a citizen.

A good citizen tries to be involved in their community, and looks for ways they can help make it better. They often vote in local and state elections, as well as national ones. They read the news, and learn about current events. They can also be found volunteering to clean beaches, roads and parks, as well as helping neighbors. Being a good citizen goes beyond voting and volunteering; it includes contributing to the economic growth of a country. This is accomplished by developing technical, legal, and medical skills. It can also be achieved by studying the history and culture of a country, which makes people well-rounded.

In the past, scholars have discussed various theories of citizenship. Historically, the term has been viewed as a legal status granted by the state, and it was based on the notion that a person belongs to a nation and shares certain values and cultural heritage with other members of that nation. It also implies a mutual obligation to respect the law and the common interests of other citizens.

This theory of citizenship has been challenged in recent times, particularly by people who argue that citizenship is not limited to the territorial boundaries of the nation-state. These arguments challenge the idea that the state is the sole arbiter of who can be a member and that citizenship should include people who are not necessarily born to or related to a particular country.

When the Pew Research Center asked people what they thought constituted being a good citizen, 74 percent said that voting was very important. They also listed donating to charity and following political developments as important behaviors. However, when a list of more specific activities was included, only 44 percent said that getting the COVID-19 vaccine and 37 percent said that following international news were very important.

Researchers have also looked at how personality traits might affect citizenship behavior. They have found that people who are high in Machiavellianism tend to be more active in civic life. They are more likely to donate money and volunteer their time, and they are more willing to speak up against injustice. They are also more likely to be concerned about the environment and to value human rights. They have also found that people who are high in honesty-humility, extraversion, and agreeableness are more likely to be good citizens. The author concludes that the best way to be a good citizen is to educate yourself on the issues of the day and to get involved in the political process.

What Are Human Rights?

posted in: News | 0

human rights

Human rights are a set of principles and standards that protect people from abuse by governments and other powerful groups. These include the right to freedom, equality and dignity. Almost every culture in the world recognises these fundamental principles. It is generally recognised that people cannot lose these rights, but that in particular circumstances some – though not all – may be suspended or restricted, for example if a person is convicted of a crime.

In most cases, the protection of human rights depends on the existence of laws and other structures in place to prevent and punish violations. If a government does not respect and protect its citizens, people can call on international bodies such as the UN to intervene. The UN consists of a group of member states which are committed to protecting human rights and promoting peace, security and development.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a document that sets out basic human rights. Its creation was prompted by the horrors of WWII and it is intended to be a guide for governments and organisations dealing with human rights. By defining what constitutes a human right, it allows people to stand up against injustices.

People have a range of rights that are essential to their survival and well-being, including the right to life, freedom and security. Some of these rights are universal, while others apply to certain groups in society such as women, children, the disabled and LGBT individuals. By putting a focus on these groups, it is easier to identify when their rights are being violated and to make progress towards improving the situation.

Some people believe that human rights are innate and natural, arising from the very fact of being a person. These are called ‘natural rights’ and they have been described as a “core human need”. While this view provides an attractive basis for a belief in human rights, it is difficult to sustain on a practical level. Billions of people do not believe in a god that would prescribe rights for them, and persuading these individuals to accept a rights-supporting theological view is likely to be a very long and difficult task.

Other people believe that human rights are the result of historical experiences. These experiences include the oppression of Jewish populations in Europe, and the use of the death penalty in the USA during the wartime. By providing a history of human rights violations, this theory enables people to identify and remember past injustices and to press for action at a global level.

It is also important to note that human rights are indivisible and interdependent. A violation of one right inevitably leads to a breach of other rights. For example, if a person’s right to freedom of movement is denied, this will usually lead to the denial of their rights to health and education. For this reason, human rights are often interlinked and can only be fulfilled when all of them are in place.

Immigrants

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

The term immigrants describes people who move to a country other than their own and settle as permanent residents or naturalized citizens. The term also applies to people who travel to a foreign country to work, attend school, or take part in other activities, whether on a temporary basis such as a business trip or for the duration of a work visa.

The United States is a country of immigrants, and it has been for much of its history. Although there are lingering prejudices and fears, most Americans recognize that the presence of immigrants is a strength. Almost 13 percent of the population is foreign born, and the children of immigrants account for another 12 million of the total. In spite of their differences, the economic and social contributions made by these newcomers are considerable.

Immigration has always occurred at a variety of rates. During the era from 1880 through 1920 known as the Age of Mass Migration, the number of foreign-born persons rose rapidly in proportion to the overall population, peaking at about one million per year. After that, the numbers declined to below 10 million by 1970, before resuming an upward trend in recent decades.

Most immigration to the United States is legal. A large share of the population is admitted under the categories of family reunification, employment-based preferences, refugees, diversity, and asylees. A small portion is sponsored by a spouse or child of a citizen, and even more come as students or workers with temporary visas. As of late 2022, about four million people were on the waiting list for legal permanent residency.

Immigrants are a vital part of America’s workforce, making up a third or more of the labor force in some industries. They are particularly strong contributors to the agricultural sector and other seasonal jobs, and they provide a substantial share of the nursing, medical, and engineering workforce. They are also over-represented among college professors, mathematicians, engineers, computer scientists, and other professionals.

In addition, the children of immigrants are more likely to become citizens, thereby increasing the number of workers paying taxes and contributing to the economy. An intergenerational accounting that counts future tax payments by immigrant children shows that, on balance, immigration helps, rather than hurts, the American fiscal position (Lee and Miller 1998; Smith and Edmonston 1997).

Despite fears that immigrants resist learning English and refuse to join the mainstream of American society, there is a large body of academic research that concludes that, on average, they have assimiled to a very great extent. However, the process of assimilation has not been painless or automatic for many immigrants. They tend to live in ethnic enclaves, often continue to speak their native language, and gravitate to places of worship and events that provide cultural continuity with their homelands. These patterns may explain why so many immigrants feel that they do not fully belong to the United States. But, as the economic and political institutions of the country change, immigrant groups will continue to make an important contribution to the nation’s future.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the expulsion of an immigrant or other foreign national by a country. This can occur if the foreign national is found to have committed a crime or otherwise violated the terms of his or her visa or entry. In addition, some countries are hesitant to accept returnees due to political or security concerns. The term derives from the Spanish word “deportar,” meaning to “throw out” or “remove.”

The deportation process can be lengthy and complicated. Illegal aliens are generally subject to deportation if they cross the border without proper documentation or stay beyond their authorized period of time in the United States. However, non-citizens can also be subject to removal proceedings if they commit certain types of violations during an adjustment of status or naturalization process, engage in marriage fraud, or falsify documents to gain entry into the United States.

Most people who are deported are removed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). ICE arrests an individual and then sends the fingerprints of that person to federal immigration databases. If the records match, ICE can request that local law-enforcement agencies (LEAs) continue to hold the person for up to 48 hours before transferring them to ICE custody. The LEAs’ compliance with these requests, known as detainers, is voluntary.

Once an illegal alien is in ICE custody, they have the opportunity to contest their case in front of an immigration judge. This hearing is called a merits hearing, and it can take several hours or days to complete. During the merits hearing, an illegal alien can present evidence of their character and circumstances to prove they deserve relief from deportation. They can also submit affidavits from witnesses who can vouch for their good moral character and show that they would suffer extreme hardship (like loss of income or family members) if removed from the United States.

After a hearing, the judge decides whether to grant the illegal alien relief from deportation or not. If the judge rules against the individual, they will be issued a removal order. The individual then has 30 days to appeal the court’s decision.

For mixed-status families, the deportation of a spouse or parent can be especially devastating. Often these individuals are the primary caregivers for children in the household, which may be U.S. citizens, permanent residents or other dependants. When deported, these children often face the difficult choice of remaining in the United States or returning to their home country.

In a world where globalization is increasingly intertwined, the deportation of even one individual can have unforeseen consequences. Historically, deportation was used as a tool of empire to punish or drive out invading foreign populations and to establish control over land. Today, the global power dynamic is in play when the United States deports individuals back to their home countries, where they often face social and economic marginalization. This is particularly true for those sent back to China and other recalcitrant nations that refuse to accept their citizens.

Transitioning From the Military to the Civilian World

posted in: News | 0

civilian

People who are not members of the military, police or other belligerent group are called civilians. Often they live in the territories of a party to an armed conflict and are entitled to certain protections under international humanitarian law. Civilian is a broad term and includes many groups of people with diverse backgrounds, views and responsibilities.

Unlike soldiers, who are guaranteed a job for as long as they are active members of the military, civilians do not have this luxury and can lose their jobs with little or no notice. This makes it incredibly important to be prepared for the transition from a career in the military to the civilian world. Civilians should be aware of the differences in culture, language and expectations between the two.

One of the most important differences is that civilians are expected to maintain a healthy lifestyle outside of work. This means balancing bills, paying taxes, finding a home and maintaining a steady income. The military has a lot to offer to help maintain this balance, including health care, housing allowances and opportunities for education. Many civilians find that this is a huge adjustment and have to make adjustments in their daily lives.

The transition from military to civilian life can also be difficult in terms of relationships. Military members are surrounded by like-minded individuals and experience a sense of brotherhood or sisterhood that can be hard to replicate in the civilian world. This can lead to feelings of loneliness when returning to civilian life.

Another big difference is that civilians are expected to have a more flexible schedule and do not receive the same benefits as military personnel, such as free housing or healthcare. This can make it challenging to balance a family, career and social life. Depending on the field, civilians may also be expected to travel more frequently for their work than would be typical in the military.

As a result, civilians are often exposed to increased levels of harm caused by military actions. At PAX, we believe that protecting civilians is a legal, moral and military-strategic imperative. We strive to enable states and armed forces to better understand and mitigate civilian harm, from immediate casualties to damage to physical infrastructure, basic services and mental health. Our research and advocacy helps to ensure that these priorities are fully integrated into military planning and practice. For more information on our civilian harm research and advocacy, see our Civilian Harm in Practice project. These examples are automatically selected from various online sources and may not reflect the opinion of Merriam-Webster or its editors.

What Is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

A citizen is an individual whose rights are protected by the law and whose responsibilities to society are upheld. A citizen’s responsibilities may be a commitment to participate in politics, to pay taxes or even to defend the community from attack by foreign forces. In democratic societies a citizen’s active participation is often seen as an essential part of the public sphere (cf. the stakeholder principle).

The word ‘citizen’ was first recorded in English in the 17th Century as a legal status in place of the ancient Greek concept of politê, which also included civic duties such as military service and payment of tax. However, the modern understanding of citizenship was established in the 18th and 19th Centuries with the American and French Revolutions. It was at this time that the idea of the democratic public sphere began to develop, with the acknowledgement that different groups within society have equal political relevance and deserve equal respect. This is the foundation of citizenship as it is understood today.

Contemporary discussions of citizenship focus on two main models. One, exemplified by classical republican ideas of citizenship (Aristotle, Tacitus, Cicero, Machiavelli, Harrington and Rousseau), takes the view that it is civic self-rule that makes citizens free and laws legitimate. This is reflected in practices such as the rotation of office and in Aristotle’s characterization of the citizen as a person capable of ruling and being ruled in turn.

This model of citizenship has become more or less the dominant one in modern democracies. The other, which is exemplified by the ideas of liberalism, emphasises rights and responsibilities as fundamental to citizenship. This approach is supported by an analysis of how laws and rights are justified. The main argument is that if laws are to be considered as legitimate, they must be justified by a ‘general will’ which is shared by the whole democratic community. The idea is that the law functions to establish standards, maintain order, resolve disputes and protect liberties and rights.

While this approach has gained broad acceptance in the modern world, it is increasingly being challenged by a variety of political developments. These include the increasing fluidity of the relationships between individuals and polities in a globalised world, the contested nature of the notion of ‘citizenship’ as a legal status in the context of globalisation and arguments that the idea of the democratic public sphere needs to be expanded to include the inclusion of the rights of disabled people and animals.

As these debates continue, it is important that students learn about citizenship and understand how they can play a role in their democratic societies. This will enable them to make informed decisions and engage with the world around them. It will also help them develop the skills they need to tackle complex issues such as international relations, climate change and global poverty.

The Concept of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

human rights

The human rights movement has developed since World War II, especially after the United Nations was founded and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted in 1948. It was the first attempt to set out at a global level the fundamental freedoms and rights that everyone is entitled to have in order to live their lives with dignity and security.

What are the different ways of thinking about human rights? One way is that of viewing them as moral norms that have been established by humans and that are generally recognized and enforced. Another way is to see human rights as legal rights that are enshrined in international law. A third way is to view human rights as a kind of political practice that serves important political functions.

If human rights are viewed as moral norms then the most important way to determine whether they have been violated is to look at the actions of people and governments. This can include acts that are physical in nature such as murder, but also includes failures to act, like not prosecuting a criminal or not adequately protecting the environment. A person can be a victim of human rights violations whether they are a citizen of the country where the violation occurred or not. A government can be a violator of human rights regardless of the fact that it has enacted laws prohibiting such behavior.

There are many reasons why it might be appropriate to regard some rights as a human right, such as the fact that failing to protect them might have serious consequences for an individual or society. But the question remains as to how one identifies human rights and what standards or criteria should be used to determine which are really human rights.

Philosophers have debated the concept of human rights since it began to take hold in modern times, with the atrocities of World War II and the establishment of the United Nations. The term replaced the older phrase of natural rights, which had fallen out of favor with the rise of legal positivism in the 19th century and its rejection of the theory that law should be moral to count as a valid form of legal authority (see the entry on Philosophy of Law).

One approach to defining human rights is to start from the assumption that everyone has certain fundamental and inalienable rights simply because they are living creatures. The Greek dramatist Sophocles, for example, depicted the title character of his play Antigone as acting in accordance with the “laws of nature” when she buried her slain brother (see the entry on Philosophy of Ethics).

This approach to human rights is often referred to as a “natural rights” view. Others have rejected this approach and sought to identify human rights with other social practices that serve useful purposes. For example, the political theorist Rawls argued that a limited list of core human rights is necessary because only these can be regarded as legally protected and thus trigger permissible international intervention when they are violated.

The Importance of Immigrants

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

Immigrants, people who have moved to a country other than their own, are an important part of American life. They are a source of energy and innovation, and a vital component of our nation’s economy. In addition, they provide a vital link between our country and the countries from which they come.

While a number of myths are associated with immigrants, research and common sense show that they do not steal jobs from American workers or drain government treasuries. Rather, they create jobs by starting new businesses and spending their incomes on American goods and services. They also pay taxes, which help to sustain the economy.

As a result, immigration has been the engine of economic growth and an essential force for social stability throughout our history. It is no wonder, then, that more than 150 million people on the planet say they would like to move to the United States if they had the opportunity.

Although there are many reasons for the global movement of people, the most common is poverty. Poverty can lead to war, civil unrest, natural disasters, and political instability — all of which have a powerful effect on the international migration of people.

In addition, a growing middle class in many nations has made it possible for more of the population to afford the costs and inconveniences of moving from one place to another. This, in turn, has fueled an increase in the demand for international migration.

The United States is the most popular destination for international migrants, with 41 million residents who were born outside the country. More than half of these immigrants live in just 20 metropolitan areas, and the majority are unauthorized – meaning that they came to the United States without proper authorization. This group includes beneficiaries of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Temporary Protected Status.

Students will identify the common themes of the immigrant experience through a series of teacher-selected primary sources and their own research. These include oral histories, narratives, and the Library of Congress online collections.

For example, students may interview relatives or read memoirs about the challenges and rewards of emigrating to America from their homelands. Students will also learn about how the economic conditions of a new country influence its appeal to potential migrants. This information will be useful to the class as they develop proposals for future immigration policy. It will help them to understand that any changes must be based on solid investigation and analysis, not misguided assumptions about who we are as a nation. In order to do that, they will need accurate information about the economic benefits of immigrants and the costs of restrictive policies that restrict them. This will allow them to be fair and balanced in their considerations of immigration reform. This is especially important because current policies confine millions of immigrants to a shadowy existence and prevent them from fully contributing to the American economy and society.

What is Deportation?

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the legal removal of a foreigner from a country due to violation of immigration laws. In the United States, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) handles the deportation process. People can be subject to deportation if they are found to be in the country illegally, have committed certain criminal offenses, or pose a threat to public safety. People who are removed from the country are typically banned from returning for a specified period of time.

The deportation process can be difficult for families and individuals, especially children. One study showed that children whose parents were deported experienced a range of negative consequences, including emotional distress, academic problems, and negative perceptions of the world around them. Children who had undocumented parents in mixed-status households were particularly hard hit by deportation. In fact, they had significantly lower self-concept and perceptions of happiness than children whose parents were not deported.

In the past, the practice of deportation was used as a form of punishment for criminals who had committed crimes of moral turpitude or aggravated felonies. For example, a criminal might be sentenced to deportation after being convicted of murder, rape, fraud, or embezzlement. The convict would be sent to another part of the world and, in some cases, his or her property might be confiscated. This form of punishment was abolished in the 1850s after a series of protests about the inhuman conditions under which criminals were transported to colonial Australia and other parts of the world.

Deportation is a complex and controversial issue. In addition to the practical implications for families and communities, there are also broader political and social issues that surround the process. For example, deportations often send poor migrants back to former colonial territories. This can create tensions between destination and origin countries. Additionally, immigration policies sort individuals into desirables and undesirables, and the removal process expresses this dynamic in a visible way.

When someone is subject to deportation, he or she may be held in detention while the case is being handled by an immigration judge. This person will receive a Notice to Appear (NTA), which details the alleged grounds for deportation. The noncitizen will have a chance to argue against the grounds for deportation and request an individual hearing.

During the individual hearing, the immigration judge will review all the evidence and make a decision. If the judge rules that the noncitizen should be removed from the country, he or she will issue an order of removal. The individual will have a limited amount of time to appeal the ruling before it becomes final.

The individual can also request a review by the Board of Immigration Appeals and have his or her case heard through the federal courts. However, these appeals are complicated and the chances of winning are slim. Therefore, it is important to contact an experienced deportation attorney right away. An attorney can help you with the entire process and increase your chances of staying in the U.S.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is a person who does not belong to the military or serve in any armed force. Civilians do not work for the government but can be employed by a company or organization. Civilians have many advantages including good pay and benefits, such as health insurance and retirement. Civilians may also enjoy a different lifestyle than soldiers, with less stress and a more family-friendly schedule. Civilians may also be able to travel, which can be beneficial for their personal and professional growth.

A civilian may be employed by a business, government agency or nonprofit organization, such as a charity or educational institution. They may earn a salary based on their job title and responsibilities and are subject to the same laws as other employees in the private sector. In contrast, a soldier must abide by military rules and regulations while deployed overseas, which may limit their freedom of speech or movement.

In addition to earning a salary, a civilian may also receive health and dental coverage from their employer. Some employers may even offer life insurance policies for their employees. Civilians can choose to work full-time or part-time and often have a flexible schedule. Civilians may also have opportunities to pursue career advancement and training, which can lead to promotion or new positions.

People who are considered civilians are defined in international law and practice as persons who do not participate directly in hostilities. In a conflict between States, civils are protected by the customary laws of war and international humanitarian law. However, when a State is not in a position to protect its civilians, it must respect the principles of the Geneva Conventions.

For non-State armed groups, it is often difficult to determine who are civilians. The rules of customary law do not provide a clear definition, and the laws of war do not always apply to non-State armed groups. It is therefore necessary for States to clarify their positions in order to protect the civilian population and the principle of distinction.

While a civilian may not have the same privileges as soldiers, they must still abide by the rules of international law and respect the principles of the Geneva Conventions. In a conflict between a State and a non-State armed group, a civilian can be attacked only when they have participated directly in hostilities.

ICTY Pre-Trial Brief in the Case against Tadic, Prosecutor, 1996, at page 4.

Unlike soldiers, civilians do not get paid for every hour they work. This means that it is important for civilians to find employment that is consistent with their abilities and interests, and which provides stability. It is also important for civilians to have a strong network of support, especially during times of unemployment or re-entry into the workforce. This includes transition counselors and civilian career mentors, if possible. The latter can help with job-search strategies and interview coaching, as well as providing valuable networking contacts and career guidance. A good place to start looking for civilian jobs is through COOL programs and online databases.

The Concept of Citizenship

posted in: News | 0

citizen

Citizenship is a legal status granted to a person by a state who, in turn, shares in the responsibilities and rights of the political community of the nation to which they belong. It is often a key concept in the study of democratic theory and practice, of human rights and of globalisation and diversity. The notion of citizenship is often contested, however, and there are many different ideas about its nature.

The main theoretical models of citizenship relate to its role as the foundation and framework for political action. The liberal’republican’ model understands the citizen as a legal person whose freedoms are guaranteed by law. The universalist model, in contrast, argues that the existence of laws and their application to certain groups of people is a prerequisite for the moral and cultural pluralism of contemporary societies. A third view, based on Aristotle’s civitas model, considers citizens as political agents who share power with their representatives.

All these theories share the assumption that the law serves the public interest by establishing standards, maintaining order, resolving disputes and protecting liberties. This understanding is sometimes called the ‘rule of law’ and it is an important part of the ethos of contemporary democracies. However, a number of problems have arisen in the context of a growing skepticism about the link between law and social cohesion.

These challenges have led to a reappraisal of the concept and an emphasis on new forms of civic engagement. The recent controversy over citizenship tests and other procedures to promote the sense of belonging in Britain reflects this change in thinking. Such policies are intended to ensure that the benefits of citizenship and the ideals of cohesion and integration are realised. However, their instrumentalisation as a form of control is counterproductive and has damaged the very idea of citizenship which they are meant to promote.

There are also new ideas about the meaning and significance of citizenship which are developing in the context of globalisation and diversity. These are reflected in developments in the fields of disability rights and animal rights, for example. These challenge the basic premise of traditional theories of citizenship, which assume that discourses of rationality are a necessary prerequisite for its exercise (Carens 2000).

A further trend is towards a global vision of citizenship. This involves the assumption that globalisation has made borders irrelevant and that there is a need to develop common standards of behaviour and values in order to facilitate inter-state cooperation. It is also argued that the global community must work together to combat environmental degradation and other issues.

In this sense, a ‘global citizen’ is someone who understands the interconnectedness of nations and embraces diversity. They take the time to learn about other cultures and traditions as they recognise that they are all in this together. They are cosmopolitan, travel widely, and prefer experiences over possessions. They care about the world around them and believe that they have a responsibility to do what they can to make it a better place.

The Origins of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

human rights

The human rights movement is concerned with the dignity and autonomy of all people. It is based on the assumption that every individual, irrespective of his or her status in society, has the right to life and to liberty. It aims to promote and protect these rights in the context of a global society with common political institutions, such as laws, courts, governments, executive branches, militaries, bureaucracies, police forces and public schools. It also seeks to promote and protect the right of individuals to freedom of expression, religion, thought, assembly and association, and to free and fair elections.

The origins of human rights lie in the doctrines of ancient Greece and Rome, notably the Stoics, who held that human conduct should be brought into harmony with, and in accordance with, immutable natural laws. This view is reflected in Sophocles’ play Antigone, in which the title character defies King Creon’s order not to bury her brother and insists that she must follow her father’s instructions in accordance with natural law.

This philosophy underlies most international treaties and declarations concerning human rights. It is also a key component of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), a landmark international document that was produced during the aftermath of World War II. This document spelled out for the first time that everyone has rights which are universal, independent of their source in the practices, morality or laws of any particular nation or culture.

Some scholars have argued that this idea is unworkable because of the many differences in cultural practices and morals, which cannot be overcome by appeal to universalist principles alone. They have suggested that a more practical approach is needed. They have proposed that human rights be identified and recognised as such by a process of political negotiation, which allows for flexibility and compromise. This process has been a long and complex one, which has led to a number of different human rights conventions and agreements, including the United Nations Charter and the European Union’s Charter on Fundamental Rights.

Another argument is that there are certain rights which are so important and fundamental that they must be protected by all states, regardless of their current political systems. This approach is referred to as the “principal of equal treatment”. In principle, this means that all citizens should enjoy the same rights, including the right to life and the right to privacy.

A third argument for human rights concerns the role of the state. It asserts that a state has a responsibility to ensure the enjoyment of these rights by its citizens and that this obligation is binding. This involves a combination of laws, treaties, and goodwill – it requires a commitment to respect human rights, along with the willingness to abide by the international standards and treaties which have been established.

The protection of human rights has improved dramatically since the end of the 20th century, but more needs to be done. Accountability is a crucial element in this endeavour: if perpetrators of human rights violations are allowed to get away with their actions, they will not be deterred from committing them again in the future and others will be encouraged to do so.

The Economic Impact of Immigrants

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

Every day, people throughout the world make one of the most difficult decisions — to leave their homes in search of a better life. They flee from violence, war and hunger, or face discrimination based on their sexual orientation, race or religion. They leave family behind, seeking to give their children a future they could not provide for in their home countries.

While some people choose to settle in close-by villages, others travel far from home — often for the first time in their lives. They journey to a new country to live, work and raise their families — a place called America.

As the nation debates recovery and immigration reform, it is important to understand the impact that immigrants have on our economy and society. While some fear that immigration will cause native-born workers to lose their jobs, the reality is quite the opposite. The data show that immigrant employment is a key driver of the U.S. labor market and productivity growth. Immigrants also play a crucial role in supporting the nation’s aging population, and boosting Social Security and Medicare trust funds.

In addition, immigrants’ geographic mobility helps local economies respond to worker shortages and labor booms. As a result, immigrants have contributed to the growth of many regions and industries. In fact, immigrants have more than doubled the number of people in some key sectors, such as construction, food services and health care. They have also made major contributions to agriculture and energy.

Moreover, immigrant children are an economic asset to their parents’ communities and the nation as a whole. In addition to being a source of skilled labor, immigrant children are highly productive and contribute to the success of U.S. businesses through entrepreneurship and innovation.

The nation can turn the economic benefits of immigrants into even greater returns if we put millions of undocumented workers on a path to citizenship. By doing so, we will turn the economic contributions of these hardworking individuals into massive gains for our national economy and its workers.

Despite their diverse backgrounds, immigrant households are more likely to be entrepreneurs and have higher levels of educational attainment than the native-born population as a whole. As a result, they drive entrepreneurship and innovation and boost the productivity of the entire economy. Furthermore, the average household income of immigrants is higher than that of native-born families in the same socioeconomic bracket. This is because the earnings of immigrant households have increased faster than those of native-born families in recent years. This reflects an increase in the number of high-skilled workers and a more gradual decrease in wages for lower-skilled workers. In addition, immigrants are more likely to move to where the jobs are. This helps to alleviate bottlenecks in the economy by boosting demand for goods and services, resulting in faster economic growth. In contrast, a slowdown in the rate of population growth can hamper economic expansion by reducing demand for products and services, thus limiting growth and employment opportunities.

The Process of Deportation

posted in: News | 0

deportation

When a non-citizen is deported from the United States, it changes their lives. It takes them away from family members and a home they may have built up here for years. It may also make it difficult for them to return, even if they want to. There are many factors that go into whether someone can get back into the country after being deported. Each situation is different and is decided on a case-by-case basis by immigration officials.

The Process of Deportation

Before someone can be deported, they must first be placed into removal proceedings. These are a series of actions overseen by an immigration judge that can — and often do — result in the person being ordered to leave the United States. This can happen at the border, after being arrested inside the country, as a result of a denied asylum claim or other immigration-related matter and more.

To be placed into removal proceedings, the government must formally accuse the non-citizen of being removable. There are several reasons they could be inadmissible, including having no valid documentation, violating the terms of their status, committing certain criminal offenses and more. Once the person is placed into removal proceedings, they are detained at a federal immigration facility and their case is registered with an Immigration Court.

Throughout this process, they will have one or more hearings where the judge decides how their case will proceed. They will have the opportunity to present evidence in their favor such as affidavits from friends and family, and they can also argue that it would cause extreme hardship to their lawful permanent resident or U.S. citizen spouse, child or parent if they were deported back to their country of origin.

Once the judge finds that the deportation is appropriate, they will order that the individual be removed from the United States. Depending on where the individual is being sent, they may be released from custody and given a date to return to their home country. They may have to wait years before being able to reapply for a visa or green card and come back into the country.

The person will then be flown to their native country, either directly to their home country or through a stop in Mexico or Central America. ICE Air Operations handles these flights. The cost is covered by the government. Individuals being returned to Mexico will either walk or be bused to the border, while those being deported to Central American countries are flown direct to their respective cities.

In order to reenter the country, the individual must meet the following criteria: Have not committed any crimes (this includes misdemeanors) and have no felony convictions. Have a sponsor in their home country who will support them financially if they are deported and can provide proof of this financial support (like tax returns and pay stubs). Have ties to the community, such as a job and family, that are sufficient to prove good moral character and their intent to remain.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is a person who is not a member of the military, police, or any other belligerent organization. Civilians are a key part of the workforce, and statisticians use their employment data to measure a variety of economic data. There are several criterion that determine whether someone is considered part of the civilian workforce. Understanding these criteria can help you understand how important it is to keep looking for work if you want to remain in the civilian labor force.

There are many differences between life in the military and living as a civilian. One of the most significant differences is that in the military, you are surrounded by a community that feels like family. This camaraderie isn’t as pronounced in civilian life, and it can be difficult to adjust to. Although there are organizations and groups, the civilian world often operates in an “every man for himself” mentality.

Another big difference between military life and civilian life is the strict rules that you must follow. There are a lot of things that you must do, including adhering to rigid schedules, speaking in a specific tone of voice, and responding to commands quickly and accurately. In civilian life, there are fewer restrictions and a lot more leniency.

You don’t have to pass a physical fitness test to be a civilian, but you do have to meet the requirements of your employer. In some cases, this may include passing a drug screening and background check. If you are a military veteran who is seeking to transition into a civilian career, there are programs that can help you train and qualify for a new job.

In some situations, it can be unclear what the definition of a civilian is when it comes to international humanitarian law. This is especially true in internal armed conflicts, where the distinction between combatants and civilians can be less clear. The ICRC has been working to clarify three issues: who qualifies as a civilian; when a civilian loses protection against attack; and what conduct amounts to direct participation in hostilities.

It is also important to remember that when you leave the military, you will no longer be provided with housing and meals on base or post. Finding the right permanent housing can be a challenge, and it’s important to find out what your options are. Depending on your circumstances, you may be eligible for financial assistance when you move to a new city or state. Taking advantage of this assistance can make the transition much smoother. It’s also important to consider how much your budget will change when you go from military to civilian life. There are a lot of extra expenses that can add up. Having a solid savings plan can help you deal with these changes. A good defense lawyer can help you get the best results from your civilian case. A strong defense can help you avoid the harsh penalties or imprisonment that you might otherwise face in civilian court.

What Is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

A citizen is a person who is a member of a nation or state. They are legally entitled to take part in that country’s political institutions, and have a right to expect protection from the law. Citizenship is also a source of identity for individuals and groups, and it often provides the motivation for people to act in ways that improve their communities.

Different people have a variety of ideas about what good citizenship should look like. Some of these ideas are controversial, while others are more practical and realistic. For example, some people believe that a good citizen is someone who pays their taxes on time. This is important because the money from taxation goes to build roads and schools, pay the military, and other essential services.

Other people believe that a good citizen is someone that always follows the law. This is important because the people who follow the law are more likely to have a safe and healthy society. They are also less likely to get involved in illegal activities.

Another idea that people have about good citizenship is that a good citizen is someone that cares about their community. This means that they are willing to help out other citizens, as well as strangers. They also care about their environment and are careful not to harm it in any way. They recycle their waste and reuse materials to save energy and resources.

One of the most important things that a citizen can do is to vote. This is important because it allows them to have a say in who runs the government. It is also important because they can choose who represents them in local elections, which have a much larger impact on their lives than national elections do. People who want to be good citizens should try to vote in all elections that they are eligible for, not just the major ones.

Other ideas that people have about good citizenship are that it is a citizen’s moral duty to recognize the rights of other citizens and not to infringe upon them. They should also be willing to listen to other people’s views, because these might lead to solutions for problems that are being deliberated upon by the community.

Ultimately, differences in conceptions of citizenship centre around four disagreements: over the precise definition of each of the elements (legal, political and identity); over their relative importance; over the causal and/or conceptual relations between them; and over appropriate normative standards.

In the case of legal citizenship, these include laws, regulations, and responsibilities; over the rights and obligations they entail; and over how they differ from other types of identities. There are two main theories of legal citizenship: the republican model and the liberal model. The former draws on the works of authors such as Aristotle, Tacitus, Cicero and Machiavelli, as well as distinct historical experiences ranging from Athenian democracy and Republican Rome to Italian city-states and workers’ councils.

Understanding Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

human rights

The universal Declaration of Human Rights is the foundation of international legal standards that countries have agreed to follow and promote. It is an important guiding document for the work of a range of organisations – from individual volunteers, to large NGOs and government bodies. Its aim is to establish a standard that protects the basic dignity and freedom of every person on earth, regardless of where they live or what their background may be.

Most people are familiar with a few basic human rights – for example, the right to life, the right to be free from discrimination and to access education, healthcare and decent living conditions. It is important to understand that these are not privileges which can be taken away by those in power but are a basic part of being human.

However, few people know much more about the complexities and debates surrounding human rights, and many of them do not realise that their own actions can impact on these rights. This is one of the main reasons why educating people about their rights is so important.

People do not always act in accordance with their human rights, and when this happens it can lead to violations and oppression. The most common reason for this is ignorance. People cannot be expected to recognise their rights if they do not know about them, or if they only learn about them from books and the media.

This is why it is so important to teach people about their rights, and this can be done through a variety of methods, from schoolchildren to the UN. There is also a need to ensure that people can make complaints and have them settled, and this can be achieved through legislation and the establishment of institutions.

There are several different ways of thinking about human rights, but the most obvious is that they are norms of national and international law created by enactment, custom and judicial decisions. This approach has its limits, however. For instance, it is not sufficient to decide whether something is a human right simply because it is included on the list of human rights, as this can depend on the weight placed on international political processes by a country.

Another possible way of understanding human rights is that they are innate in the nature of humans, a view known as natural rights. This view dates back to ancient Greece and Rome, where doctrines of natural law were closely associated with ideas of human rights, as illustrated by the speech in Sophocles’ play Antigone in which the title character defends her refusal to bury her brother on the grounds that it goes against the laws of nature.

This is an attractive idea, but it is not without its critics. It is not, for example, consistent with the fact that all human beings are born equal, and it can only be supported by a very broad philosophical interpretation of what makes someone human.

The Concept of Citizenship

posted in: News | 0

citizen

Citizenship is an allegiance to and a relationship with the state and usually carries with it recognition of civil, political, and social rights that are not granted or acknowledged to non-citizens. It is typically associated with the right to a passport, the right to work within a country, and the right to return to one’s country of citizenship after leaving it for an extended period. Citizenship is also an important part of the public sphere, with citizens having various responsibilities such as obeying laws and serving on juries.

Different conceptions of citizenship differ from one another in many ways, but they tend to be based on two major models: the republican and the liberal. In the republican model, citizenship is a relationship of mutual obligation between the citizen and the government, with each having duties and rights that the other owes them. This model is often seen as a response to the problem of inequality and the need to build a society where everyone has a chance to become successful.

The liberal model of citizenship, on the other hand, is based on a more abstract and universalist concept that transcends the cultural differences of individuals and groups. The origins of the liberal model lie in the Roman Empire and early modern reflections on that law. The expansion of the empire caused citizenship to extend to conquered peoples, transforming its original meaning from a relationship of mutual obligation to a legal status that confers certain benefits on the person. The liberal conception of citizenship is often associated with the desire to create a democratic public sphere that encompasses different perspectives and that respects, rather than excludes, difference (Habermas 2001b).

Citizenship can be an overwhelming task for someone new to a country or city. However, becoming a good citizen begins with education and understanding the role of the public sphere in democracy. Learning about the history and the workings of our local, state, and national governments will help you to be a better citizen. In addition, you can get involved by getting registered to vote and participating in your government. Citizenship is a life-long journey, and we can all improve the quality of our lives by being more active participants in our community, state, and nation.

Human Rights and Young People

posted in: News | 0

human rights

The notion of human rights has become one of the most widely accepted principles in the world, endorsed almost universally by civilised governments and major religions. The basic idea is that people have certain minimum requirements for their dignity and it would be wrong to deny them these rights – and so it is important that they are protected by the rule of law, and that citizens can make legitimate claims for these rights to be enforced against governments who fail in their duty to uphold them.

The key values that are at the heart of human rights are those of human dignity and equality. It is this belief that underpins the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted 70 years ago this year. Its guiding principles are that all humans are born free and equal in dignity and worth, and that they are entitled to the highest standard of living necessary for their full development as human beings. That is why the UDHR lists 30 political, civil, economic, social and cultural rights which should be enjoyed by every person, regardless of race, ethnicity, gender, language, disability, religion or belief, sexual orientation or any other aspect of identity. These rights are inalienable and indivisible, and all of them are interdependent and interrelated; the enjoyment of any one of them depends on the enjoyment of other rights.

There are no absolute answers to the questions about how these rights should be balanced – but some of them are more clearly defined than others. For example, the right to freedom of speech can be limited to prevent it inciting hatred or promoting violence and there are no excuses for torture, which is always a violation of the human rights to life and liberty.

These issues have not always been settled by clear-cut arguments, as is the case for many other questions about human rights. This is an indication both of the fact that these are complex issues and also that human rights are not a’science’, but a developing area of moral thought.

For this reason, it is important that young people understand that human rights organisations – both professional NGOs and spontaneous grass roots movements – need their support. Many of them may not explicitly state that they are working on human rights but they will be, whether they realise it or not, defending the rights of those who are suffering and in need.

There have been great improvements in the protection of human rights since the UDHR was adopted – from the abolition of slavery and women’s suffrage, to the death penalty being abolished in most countries and the release of prisoners of conscience as a result of international pressure. However, the pace of change is sometimes slow and some people and governments still violate these rights. This is a serious matter, and outside intervention needs to be used to stop these violations taking place. The protection of human rights is a global responsibility.

The Nation of Immigrants

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

People around the world make one of the most difficult decisions — to leave their homes in search of a better life. Many leave to work or get an education, while others flee war, poverty, natural disasters or other threats at home. Some are escaping from human rights violations such as torture and discrimination on the basis of their religion, ethnicity or sexual orientation. These people are immigrants, and they are among the millions of people who move between countries each year.

In the United States, where 14 percent of the population is foreign-born, these people have become an integral part of the nation’s culture and economy. They are workers, business owners, taxpayers and neighbors, making significant contributions that benefit the entire country.

They bring new energy, ideas and creativity to a society that was built on the hard work of immigrants. They have made America what it is today and continue to shape its future.

Many Americans proudly proclaim that this is a “nation of immigrants” and can trace their ancestry to every corner of the globe. But they often forget the resistance that immigrant families encountered in previous generations — the riots where Italians were killed, the branding of Irish as criminals who could be taken away in paddy wagons, the anti-Semitism and racist denial of citizenship to Asian immigrants and the shameful internment of Japanese American citizens.

These experiences have shaped public opinion about immigration, and they have led to changes in how the nation treats its migrants. Today, fewer people feel that this country is a “nation of immigrants,” and more think it should be more restrictive on immigration from places with high levels of violence or economic decline.

Nevertheless, this country has long been a leader in immigration policy and continues to be an example to the rest of the world. It was the first to provide refugees with safe haven, and it has been among the most generous nations in giving citizenship to people from around the world.

As the globalization of the world continues, it will be essential that the United States maintain its leadership in immigration policies. In order to do that, we must understand the challenges and benefits of migration and how immigration affects different groups in our society. By doing so, we can create policies that reflect the realities of our nation’s past and future.

The Social Impact of Deportation

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation is the process of removing a non-citizen from the United States. Although often framed as an individual event, deportation has a wider social impact. Between 10-11 million undocumented immigrants currently live in the U.S, making up 17% of the labor force and sharing households with 6.7 million U.S citizen children (Warren and Kerwin 2017). In addition, the deportation of a loved one can have an impact on family stability and economic well-being.

Deportations can occur for a number of reasons, but the most common is that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) places a non-citizen into removal proceedings. ICE initiates these cases when it believes that the person is illegally in the United States or violated their status. People who enter the country without permission or overstay their permitted time under a visa waiver program are likely to be placed in removal proceedings, as are people who commit crimes or fail to inform ICE of changes to their address.

The person in removal proceedings will attend one or more hearings before an immigration judge. During these hearings, the person can present evidence and testify about their situation to the judge. The judge will then decide whether to order the person removed from the United States or grant relief. Relief can include asylum, cancellation of removal, withholding of removal, or Convention Against Torture relief.

In general, an individual will be deported if the judge orders them to return to their country of origin. However, the judge can issue a stay of removal or revoke a deportation order in the face of a credible fear of persecution. In some cases, the person may also be eligible for a waiver of removal or cancellation of removal and can apply for these forms of relief before a judge in immigration court.

The Trump administration has ramped up deportations and is targeting all unauthorized immigrants for removal, even those who have never been convicted of a crime or who have committed minor or old criminal offenses. In some cases, this crackdown has caused individuals to be put into expedited removal proceedings, meaning they are more likely to be deported due to a lack of time to fight their case in regular immigration court. The Trump administration has claimed that this approach is necessary because it focuses on violent criminals and gang members, but critics argue that these policies are not only unfair to families with long histories in the United States but also contribute to regional instability as they deport migrants back to countries that struggle to deal with violence and crime.

The Importance of Being a Civilian

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is anyone who is not part of the military or a belligerent group during a conflict. The term may also refer to the person’s clothes, as they are usually more modest than those of a combatant.

Civilian is a common word used in everyday life, but it is important to understand its meaning before using it in a sentence. Being a civilian can have many different implications, some of which are positive and others negative. It is important to understand these implications so that you can avoid making any mistakes when referring to a person’s status.

There are several benefits to being a civilian, including being free to participate in activities without the restrictions of military life. This freedom can include things like working, attending school, traveling, and spending time with family and friends. It can be a great way to enjoy life to the fullest, which is why so many people choose to become civilians after their military service has ended.

For those who are transitioning back into civilian life, it can be challenging at first. Some of the biggest changes are in responsibilities, living arrangements, and laws. It is important to take time to adjust to these differences, as it can be frustrating at times. In addition, it is important to learn how to communicate in a way that is more understandable by civilians.

The civilian population is a critical element in any conflict. The protection of civilians is both a moral imperative and an essential component of military success. Without this, hard-earned tactical and operational successes may turn into strategic failures. Civilian casualties, displacement, and destruction can also undermine long-term security and stability gains in a region.

Civilians also play a vital role in peacebuilding and post-conflict stabilization efforts. They are essential in building capacity to address the root causes of conflict, ensuring lasting peace and sustainable development.

Some of the most important aspects of being a civilian is being aware of your rights and knowing how to use them when necessary. This can help you protect yourself and your loved ones. Civilian rights can cover a wide variety of topics, from wrongful arrests to workplace discrimination. It is important to know how to defend yourself in order to ensure that you get the justice that you deserve.

Civilians are an important part of the workforce, and are often included in unemployment rate calculations, both nationally and locally. In order to calculate this figure, statisticians must make certain considerations. For example, a civilian who is currently searching for work will be counted in the unemployment rate, while a civilian who has already been hired will not be. Additionally, citizens of other countries might be excluded from the civilian workforce calculation if they are only temporarily in the country for business reasons. These adjustments are important in calculating accurate labor statistics.

The Different Conceptions of Citizenship

posted in: News | 0

citizen

When people discuss citizenship, they often have in mind a particular model of the relationship between a state and its citizens. This model reflects different historical experiences and differing political traditions. For example, the republican model was inspired by Aristotle and later authors like Tacitus, Cicero, Machiavelli and Harrington. It understands citizenry as a social status that is associated with specific political rights and duties. This model is widely prevalent in contemporary constitutional democracies.

The liberal model, on the other hand, was influenced by authors like Locke and Rousseau. This model focuses on the importance of individual liberty and the recognition that laws are promulgated with the welfare of citizens in mind. The liberal model also posits that good citizenship is the result of an active participation in the public sphere. This participation includes voting in elections, attending public deliberations and demonstrating against government policies. It also involves being familiar with the country’s history and culture.

Both models of citizenship have their strengths and weaknesses. They are often based on different assumptions about what it means to be a good citizen and how a citizen should behave. However, there are some basic characteristics that all good citizens have in common. For one, they are morally responsible and they respect the rights of others. They are also willing to adapt to changing circumstances and they can make quick decisions in urgent situations. In addition, they are able to listen to the views of others and recognize that they may have valuable perspectives on problems that need immediate attention.

There are many different conceptions of citizenship, but most of them have a shared goal: to make society better. For example, according to a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center, around three-quarters of Americans say that it is very important for citizens to vote in elections and pay taxes. A smaller share believe it is very important for citizens to volunteer, know the Pledge of Allegiance and follow what happens in their country’s government and politics.

One of the most important differences between the republican and liberal models is that they both depend on the capacity for rational agency as a prerequisite for citizenship. The extension of citizenship to groups that were previously excluded – such as women and the descendants of slaves – has not changed this basic understanding of citizenship. Similarly, the democratic process can only be legitimate when it enables a high level of solidarity, which in turn depends on basic standards of social justice being met.

While these distinctions between the various definitions of citizenship are important, they are not as stark as they might seem. In reality, most of the time, people think about what it means to be a good Citizen by asking themselves how they can contribute to making their communities and country better. This is why it is not unusual to see people wear “I Voted” stickers or talk about their participation in civic life – even when they have a very different definition of citizenship from the majority.

The Concept of Human Rights

posted in: News | 0

human rights

The term human rights is widely used to refer to a number of international treaties, conventions and agreements that promote and protect civil and political, economic, social and cultural freedoms. Some of these rights, such as the right to equality, are based on fundamental principles such as non-discrimination and the equal protection of the law. Others, such as the right to life, are based on a specific set of legal obligations that states have towards their citizens.

Some theorists have developed views of human rights that seek to explain their nature and justification. These are known as “political conceptions” and include the work of John Rawls and Charles Beitz.

One of the oldest Western philosophies of human rights is natural law, which asserts that every person has certain inalienable rights and that government should respect those rights. This view was formulated by John Locke and was the basis for the early constitutions of some countries.

Other theorists, such as Thomas Hobbes, have argued that people must submit to their ruler’s authority in exchange for being given some security of those basic rights. The concept of rights has been further elaborated by theologians, philosophers and others. For example, John Locke argued that people have certain natural rights that derive from their own nature and that the legitimacy of government rested on its respect for these natural rights. This reformulated idea of human rights became known as natural law theory and was reflected in the constitutions of some countries.

Nevertheless, it is difficult to argue that all human rights are universal, since many cultures have practices that are inconsistent with human rights. For example, slavery is still common in some parts of the world and female genital mutilation is defended by some as part of their culture, yet both are considered violations of women’s rights and have been outlawed. This type of argument is often called cultural relativism.

The human rights treaties have created international standards for civil and political rights, economic and social rights and culture. These standards are enforceable in the courts of the world’s states, and they are generally considered to be a binding international contract. However, these treaties do not provide any guarantee that all human rights are respected in practice. Ultimately, it is up to the individual countries, with support from international organizations such as the United Nations, to enforce their commitment to human rights in practice.

There are some important differences between the various human rights treaties and their provisions. The most significant difference is the scope of the protections they offer. For example, whereas the UDHR guarantees civil and political rights to all persons without distinction of race, religion, colour, language, sex, sexual orientation or disability, the other treaties focus on specific groups such as women or children. They also include a wide range of specific rights such as the right to education, the right to housing and the right to work. The enjoyment of most rights is indivisible, and the denial of one right invariably impedes the enjoyment of other rights.

Immigrants and the American Economy

posted in: News | 0

immigrants

Every day, people around the world face difficult decisions that may require them to leave their home country. Some will only move a few miles, others will go far away in search of opportunity and a better life. People who make the choice to migrate for a permanent change in their lives are called immigrants. They research their destination, learn the language and work hard to integrate into their new society. Many of them have to give up their family and friends as they make the difficult transition to a different way of life. They are not alone, however. In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of Central Americans seeking asylum in the United States. This increased demand for asylum has put pressure on the immigration system and has fueled anti-immigrant sentiment, with anti-immigrant attitudes reflected in political leaders and media commentators, social movement organisations that publish reports and policy briefs, and even unauthorised militia groups that patrol the U.S. border, such as the Minutemen.

Historically, the United States has been a nation of immigrants, with the doors wide open to almost anyone who wished to come. As modernisation spread throughout the Old World in the 18th and 19th centuries, the American frontier beckoned to those seeking land and prosperity. In the early 20th century, a backlash against immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe led to restrictive immigration laws that closed the door to most European immigration (Higham 1988; Jones 1992: Chapter 9).

Today, about one third of international migrants are from Asia and half are from Latin America. Most of these migrants are in search of work. On average, these people have less education than the native born population, but this does not necessarily mean that they are unskilled workers. Many immigrants are employed in the construction industry, as caregivers in nursing homes and hospitals, or in restaurants and hotels.

While immigrants are a vital component of the American economy, the perception persists that they drain government coffers, resulting in an overburdened welfare state. But the vast majority of immigration-related expenditures are spent on housing, food and clothing, not on public benefits or services. It is important to note that in the past, high levels of immigration have helped stimulate economic growth by raising labour supply and boosting consumer spending.

Immigrants also bolster our national birth rate, which has dropped to low levels among the native-born population. A low birth rate can lead to a loss of worker productivity and reduced economic growth. Immigrants help counter these effects, and provide vitality to local communities, where they are a key source of retail sales, restaurant customers, and homeowners.

In general, the term “immigrant” refers to those who intend to stay in a new country for a long period of time and gain legal status as citizens. In contrast, nonimmigrants are those who plan to stay in their new countries temporarily or for a short period of time, such as travelers, seasonal workers and students.

The Impacts of Deportation

posted in: News | 0

deportation

Deportation — or removal — affects the lives of millions of people across the country and around the world. It changes not only the individuals who are removed, but also their family and community members. Many of the people deported come back to their countries with a lack of resources, and are forced to live in situations that make them vulnerable to violence and other dangers. Deportation also disrupts the life of children whose parents are deported or separated from them.

The government starts the process of deportation by serving non-citizens with a notice called a “Notice to Appear.” It will list the reason why they are being targeted for removal, and tell them to appear at a hearing before an immigration judge. In the hearing, the judge will review all of the evidence presented and hear testimony from witnesses. If the judge decides that the person should be deported, they will issue an order to remove them from the United States.

Those who are not citizens have several options for how they can fight the deportation proceedings against them. They can choose to file a petition for asylum. They can also seek to have the case transferred to another court or the United States Supreme Court.

Some people are put in removal proceedings because they have violated the terms of their visa or immigration status. Others are deported because they have been convicted of a crime, including traffic violations and minor misdemeanors. Others can be placed in removal proceedings if they have entered the United States without a visa, or because of a mistake made during an adjustment of their status application. Finally, those who are deemed to pose a threat to flight safety can be subject to deportation.

A person who is deported has no legal right to return to the United States unless they have a spouse, child or parent who is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. For this reason, it is important to see a lawyer immediately if you are being targeted for removal.

The Society for Community Research & Action takes a strengths-based approach to research and action, but this brief focuses exclusively on the impacts of deportation and deportation risk. We are in the process of writing a larger brief on community and organizational responses to the risk of deportation. Ultimately, the goal of this research is to highlight and promote the ways in which communities organize to respond to the risk of deportation and to show the impact that organizing has on families who are facing removal. This is a crucial time for all of us to join together and support our communities who are being attacked by the government. Together, we can build a stronger future for everyone.

What Is a Civilian?

posted in: News | 0

civilian

A civilian is someone who is not a member of the armed forces. Civilians typically work for governments or private businesses. They have jobs that range from office workers to firefighters. Civilians also play a role in military affairs by providing support and advice to military leaders.

The term was first used in the 19th century and came from the Latin word civilis, which means people who live according to civilian law. The meaning of the word has changed over time as society has evolved. Today, it refers to someone who is not involved in the armed forces.

One of the biggest differences between military life and civilian is that there are more rules in the civilian world. In the military, many things are regulated such as schedules, tone of voice and responses to commands. This can cause frustration when transitioning into civilian life.

Another big difference is that civilians pay hourly or salary and not a monthly paycheck. This can make budgeting and planning a challenge. Lastly, civilians have to pay for their own health insurance which can be expensive. This is in contrast to the military where they have access to free or reduced cost health care.

In the military, soldiers are paid a salary and receive health care. Once civilians get their first job they may be surprised to learn that their pay is different than what they were used to in the military. This can be frustrating because they might not understand what it takes to pay the bills and meet other expenses.

For many veterans, a big change when returning to civilian life is their relationships. They have to re-establish bonds with friends and family that were a long distance away while they were deployed. They must also figure out how to fit back into the lives of those that stayed home. This can be a difficult process especially when it comes to adjusting to long distance relationships.

The distinction between combatant and civilian in international humanitarian law is a complex issue. In a landmark case, the Supreme Court of Israel ruled that a person who engages in direct participation in hostilities loses civilian status but does not become a combatant or entitled to prisoner-of-war status (see The Image Before the Weapon: A Critical History of the Distinction Between Combatant and Civilian, Cornell University Press, 2011).

In policymaking terms, “civilian” in civil-military relations connotes expertise that complements and guides that provided by professional military advice. This is the core of the principle that civilian control must supersede military authority in a democracy. It may not constitute a single profession like military officership, but it is real and relevant to the legitimate policymaking process of the defense enterprise.

What is a Citizen?

posted in: News | 0

citizen

A citizen is someone who has rights and responsibilities within society. They take part in the democratic process and are held accountable by their elected representatives. They contribute to their community and help those who are less fortunate than themselves. They obey the laws of their country and respect the property of others. They are active in their civic life and promote a sense of belonging. Different societies, cultures and histories have different conceptions of citizenship. The debate over citizenship usually centres on four disagreements: over the precise definition of each of its elements; over their relative importance; over the causal and conceptual relations between them; over appropriate normative standards.

Most people think of themselves as citizens of their country and would like to be seen as good citizens. However, the way one views citizenship varies according to their political beliefs and ideologies. Children tend to think of citizenship in apolitical terms, seeing their government as benevolent and protecting. However, the idea of citizenship becomes more political as they grow older and begin to have a say in what their government does.

In the modern democratic world, the concept of citizenship is most clearly defined in the law. Citizenship is a legal right granted by the state, which means that everyone has the opportunity to participate in the government of their country directly or through freely chosen representatives. However, some citizens are more interested in fulfilling their civic duties than others and would rather have a say in the running of their society through other channels.

Those who take the most pride in their citizenship are those who care about their community and look for ways to improve it. They might attend local events like festivals, community theatre or gallery openings. They might also volunteer to assist with local projects such as cleaning up parks or collecting food for the homeless. They are concerned about the environment and try to reduce waste by recycling as much as possible. They try to avoid the use of fossil fuels and support local farmers.

When asked about what they think it means to be a good citizen, most Americans give similar answers. Almost all of them believe that voting is very important to being a good citizen. They are also likely to report having a high level of trust in their government and in the media. Other common responses include being polite, being a good parent and neighbour, volunteering, paying taxes and following the news.

Despite the fact that many people believe they are good citizens, there are still problems in the country. Some of these are the result of the way that our society is structured and some are the result of the fact that not everyone feels that they have a voice in their own democracy. Regardless of these difficulties, citizens should continue to participate in elections and work to make their society better. They should also make sure to follow the Bible’s guidelines on how to engage in the public square and speak out on behalf of Christian principles.

What Are Human Rights?

posted in: News | 0

human rights

Human rights are the freedoms and protections to which all members of the Homo sapiens species are entitled simply by virtue of their humanity. They are inalienable and indivisible. They are enshrined in international treaties and in the Constitutions of many states. They are the basis for international law and are a source of moral guidance. They are a source of inspiration for those who seek to govern wisely and well, and for those who want to live free from oppressive forces.

The concept of human rights emerged in response to the calamities of World War II. Its importance arose because the atrocities of those times galvanised worldwide o